KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on October 25, 2009, 12:29:55 AM

Title: good big 12 north analysis
Post by: fatty fat fat on October 25, 2009, 12:29:55 AM

http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2009/10/24/big-12-north-wild-wild-race/

Title: Re: good big 12 north analysis
Post by: Bookcat on October 25, 2009, 12:42:27 AM

I can't stand writers putting Iowa State in the discussion tho. We have the tiebreaker plus a 1 game lead...so in essence...a two game lead over them...so when he says "the leaders"...thats inaccurate.

Title: Re: good big 12 north analysis
Post by: fatty fat fat on October 25, 2009, 12:58:42 AM

Quote from: Bookcat on October 25, 2009, 12:42:27 AM

I can't stand writers putting Iowa State in the discussion tho. We have the tiebreaker plus a 1 game lead...so in essence...a two game lead over them...so when he says "the leaders"...thats inaccurate.

ummm...look at their schedule. people still think we lose to ku/mu.

Title: Re: good big 12 north analysis
Post by: Bullfn33 on October 25, 2009, 01:38:00 AM

who woulda thunk Phil Steele could be underrating KSU when he predicted us to tie for second?  :eek:

Title: Re: good big 12 north analysis
Post by: kcchiefdav on October 25, 2009, 07:00:46 AM

Quote from: Bullfn33 on October 25, 2009, 01:38:00 AM

who woulda thunk Phil Steele could be underrating KSU when he predicted us to tie for second?  :eek:
[/quote

Turns out he should have picked the whole division to tie for 2nd.