KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: jmlynch1 on October 19, 2009, 08:53:19 PM

Title: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: jmlynch1 on October 19, 2009, 08:53:19 PM
NFM
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2009, 09:10:14 PM
Maybe use it to set up play action?  :dunno:

Especially on like 2nd and 2. 

^That's some real x's and o's right there.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: Bookcat on October 19, 2009, 09:11:44 PM
we're rushing for more ypg than Ostate right now.


take that Prince you dumb p.o.s.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2009, 09:12:11 PM
we're rushing for more ypg than Ostate right now.


take that Prince you dumb p.o.s.

prince recruited thomas
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: KCcat28 on October 19, 2009, 09:13:32 PM
we're rushing for more ypg than Ostate right now.


take that Prince you dumb p.o.s.

prince recruited thomas

Snyder is using him wisely... Prince would have found a way to ruin him...
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2009, 09:14:16 PM
we're rushing for more ypg than Ostate right now.


take that Prince you dumb p.o.s.

prince recruited thomas

Snyder is using him wisely... Prince would have found a way to ruin him...

:rolleyes:

we'll see if snyder does any better.  (you know, in wins and losses)
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 19, 2009, 09:20:01 PM
So remind me again how ku isn't K-State's super bowl.  I thought you guys had a game this week against Colorado, yet all you can do is talk about how much ku sucks.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: LimestoneOutcropping on October 19, 2009, 09:23:31 PM
So remind me again how ku isn't K-State's super bowl.  I thought you guys had a game this week against Colorado, yet all you can do is talk about how much ku sucks.

We don't have any CU trolls who have been begging for unearned validation on a KSU board.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: jmlynch1 on October 19, 2009, 09:23:51 PM
So remind me again how ku isn't K-State's super bowl.  I thought you guys had a game this week against Colorado, yet all you can do is talk about how much ku sucks.
You guys were just on TV. Did you see it? You lost. :frown:
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: dobbie4ksu on October 19, 2009, 09:25:08 PM
Yes BMW ku is our superbowl.... what an idiot seriously we see a weakness in a big 12 opponent so us fans make comments, so I guess any team we talk about they must be our superbowl... Your a Feckin IDIOT!
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 19, 2009, 09:28:14 PM
ku's ranked 22nd in the country in rushing defense. 
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: wes mantooth on October 19, 2009, 09:29:44 PM
"K-State is an extremely hot team right now.  ku is an afterthought."

-NY Times
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 19, 2009, 09:31:19 PM
ku is 5-1 and top 25. 
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: feralchat on October 19, 2009, 09:33:14 PM
That sqwawk rushing defense stat is indicative of how easy it is to throw the ball against them.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: dobbie4ksu on October 19, 2009, 09:34:14 PM
Yet CU had 147 yards rushing against your top 25 rushing D... hahaha DT is better than Rodney Stewart wanna argue with me some more? Shut your face
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: Pete on October 19, 2009, 09:34:37 PM
ku's ranked 22nd in the country in rushing defense. 

It will be a great barometer for both programs.    :sword:
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: jmlynch1 on October 19, 2009, 09:35:16 PM
That sqwawk rushing defense stat is indicative of how easy it is to throw the ball against them.
I see what you did there.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: sonofchadmay on October 19, 2009, 09:37:59 PM
we're rushing for more ypg than Ostate right now.


take that Prince you dumb p.o.s.

prince recruited thomas

Snyder is using him wisely... Prince would have found a way to ruin him...

:rolleyes:

we'll see if snyder does any better.  (you know, in wins and losses)

He's already matched Prince's 2008 conference win total.  Right Cool Breeze?  :confused: 
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: KCcat28 on October 19, 2009, 09:38:11 PM
Yeah ku sure showed everyone how good of a rushing D they have against one of the worst rushing O's in the big 12 this past saturday...  :lol:  :jerkoff:
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 19, 2009, 09:40:53 PM
Pretty easy to stack the box on Colorado when Cody Hawkins is the starting QB.  Surprising how LFBIQ this board actually is. 
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: catsdo on October 19, 2009, 09:41:22 PM
Too bad ku can't play Northern Colorado and Duke every Saturday.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 19, 2009, 09:42:09 PM
Too bad ku can't play Northern Colorado and Duke every Saturday.




Louisiana-Lafayette says hello.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: dobbie4ksu on October 19, 2009, 09:43:22 PM
Cody played how much of that game? It just proves Man-gina cannot coach worth a turd, uk couldn't finish the game and lost it themselves, it was thiers to win. and like I said earlier CU even with you stacking the box ran for over 140 yards
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: Bookcat on October 19, 2009, 09:44:10 PM
So remind me again how ku isn't K-State's super bowl.  I thought you guys had a game this week against Colorado, yet all you can do is talk about how much ku sucks.

just picking on the craptiest defense remaining on our schedule.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: ksu_FAN on October 19, 2009, 09:44:49 PM
Would've loved to see DT on the stretch zone with occasional traps and tosses behind tight trips.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 19, 2009, 09:45:12 PM
So remind me again how ku isn't K-State's super bowl.  I thought you guys had a game this week against Colorado, yet all you can do is talk about how much ku sucks.

just picking on the craptiest defense remaining on our schedule.



Don't you still play Colorado and Mizzou?  




PS.  ku is 9th in the country in sacks.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: catsdo on October 19, 2009, 09:45:30 PM
Too bad ku can't play Northern Colorado and Duke every Saturday.




Louisiana-Lafayette says hello.

No one thought K-State was going to be good this year.  They're at least improving, even according to you.  ku is showing that they don't deserved to be ranked.  
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: KCcat28 on October 19, 2009, 09:46:51 PM
So remind me again how ku isn't K-State's super bowl.  I thought you guys had a game this week against Colorado, yet all you can do is talk about how much ku sucks.

just picking on the craptiest defense remaining on our schedule.



Don't you still play Colorado and Mizzou?  




PS.  ku is 9th in the country in sacks.

Yeah that has really helped your defense so far in big 12 play...
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 19, 2009, 09:47:02 PM
Cody played how much of that game? It just proves Man-gina cannot coach worth a turd, uk couldn't finish the game and lost it themselves, it was thiers to win. and like I said earlier CU even with you stacking the box ran for over 140 yards



Wut?


 :confused:



Hansen started in place of Hawkins.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: Bookcat on October 19, 2009, 09:47:53 PM
Pretty easy to stack the box on Colorado when Cody Hawkins is the starting QB.  Surprising how LFBIQ this board actually is. 

ahha. Yes Tyler Hansen is such a threat in the air that there is no way you can ever put 8 guys in there. That second coming of Tim Tebow can just eat you up in the air or on the ground against ku's 22nd ranked rush defense. Just no way.
 

 :popcorn:
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: Bookcat on October 19, 2009, 09:50:44 PM
Too bad ku can't play Northern Colorado and Duke every Saturday.




Louisiana-Lafayette says hello.

Losing to them was really embarrassing for us. It didn't little to help A&M tho.

Kinda how that USM game wasn't in any way indicative of how good ku is.....our loss @Laffy was in no way indicative of how good KSU is.

If there is anything we have learned from the North this year..its that you really don't know who is going to show up on any given Saturday.

P.S. UTEP's defense is ranked 118th in the country.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: wes mantooth on October 19, 2009, 09:51:24 PM
Pretty easy to stack the box on Colorado when Cody Hawkins is the starting QB.  Surprising how LFBIQ this board actually is. 

ahha. Yes Tyler Hansen is such a threat in the air that there is no way you can ever put 8 guys in there. That second coming of Tim Tebow can just eat you up in the air or on the ground against ku's 22nd ranked rush defense. Just no way.
 

 :popcorn:

Was this Hansen's first start?  Even funnier if so.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 19, 2009, 09:52:06 PM
Pretty easy to stack the box on Colorado when Cody Hawkins is the starting QB.  Surprising how LFBIQ this board actually is. 

ahha. Yes Tyler Hansen is such a threat in the air that there is no way you can ever put 8 guys in there. That second coming of Tim Tebow can just eat you up in the air or on the ground against ku's 22nd ranked rush defense. Just no way.
 

 :popcorn:



He has the ability to roll out of the pocket and scramble, unlike Hawkins.  The LFBIQ is staggering.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: Bookcat on October 19, 2009, 09:52:29 PM
we're rushing for more ypg than Ostate right now.


take that Prince you dumb p.o.s.

prince recruited thomas

Snyder is using him wisely... Prince would have found a way to ruin him...

:rolleyes:

we'll see if snyder does any better.  (you know, in wins and losses)

Jesus let it go. The speculation game is a waste.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: Bookcat on October 19, 2009, 09:54:29 PM
Pretty easy to stack the box on Colorado when Cody Hawkins is the starting QB.  Surprising how LFBIQ this board actually is. 

ahha. Yes Tyler Hansen is such a threat in the air that there is no way you can ever put 8 guys in there. That second coming of Tim Tebow can just eat you up in the air or on the ground against ku's 22nd ranked rush defense. Just no way.
 

 :popcorn:



He has the ability to roll out of the pocket and scramble, unlike Hawkins.  The LFBIQ is staggering.

I agree..we'll be spread out somewhat and they'll bootleg us to death on Saturday vs. our DE's. I could see us giving up over 100 rushing yards to Stewart and Hansen.

so,
CU's Tyler Hansen was enough to take down #17 undefeated ku.

If posting on this board makes you feel better bout that...then fine with me.

1st in the North! EMAW
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: dobbie4ksu on October 19, 2009, 09:56:11 PM
I always was a fan of yours Bookcat lol
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: Bookcat on October 19, 2009, 09:57:49 PM
BMWValidator.....


where would you rank Tyler Hansen among Big XII QB's?

This should be great.


Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: wes mantooth on October 19, 2009, 09:58:45 PM
Pretty easy to stack the box on Colorado when Cody Hawkins is the starting QB.  Surprising how LFBIQ this board actually is. 

ahha. Yes Tyler Hansen is such a threat in the air that there is no way you can ever put 8 guys in there. That second coming of Tim Tebow can just eat you up in the air or on the ground against ku's 22nd ranked rush defense. Just no way.
 

 :popcorn:



He has the ability to roll out of the pocket and scramble, unlike Hawkins.  The LFBIQ is staggering.

Prince called LaLa's Desourmeaux the best qb he's seen.  We didn't believe that either.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 19, 2009, 10:00:55 PM
BMWValidator.....


where would you rank Tyler Hansen among Big XII QB's?

This should be great.







Not sure, but he's a sh*t ton better than Cody Hawkins. 
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: LimestoneOutcropping on October 19, 2009, 10:07:11 PM
BMWValidator.....


where would you rank Tyler Hansen among Big XII QB's?

This should be great.







Not sure, but he's a sh*t ton better than Cody Hawkins. 

At least he looked that way on saturday. 
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: Dick Knewheizel on October 19, 2009, 10:13:44 PM
Nobody ought to be telling us about T[a]ylor Hanson.  If it wasn't for that "mmm bop" singing d-bag Prince would have made a bowl last year and he'd probably still be our coach.

That being said, I have a love and hate feelings for this Hanson fella
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: catsdo on October 19, 2009, 10:14:17 PM
Even Baylor held Iowa State under 30 points.  
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: Pett on October 19, 2009, 10:15:34 PM
Louisiana-Lafayette says hello.

Colorado says hello (the worst team in the big 12 north btw). :shy:

And I'd much rather choose to lose an OOC game with no meaning then a Big XII game that your team should've won big...
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: ksu_FAN on October 19, 2009, 10:18:37 PM
I'll give Hansen this; he played a large role in helping Ron Prince get fired.  Other than that I'm not sure which of the 4 starts he had last year when he failed to throw for 100 yards is more impressive.  Or the 1 TD he had to 4 picks.  Clearly he is a much better player than Hawk's boy.
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: Doom and Gloom on October 19, 2009, 11:03:01 PM
So remind me again how ku isn't K-State's super bowl.  I thought you guys had a game this week against Colorado, yet all you can do is talk about how much ku sucks.

I'm pretty sure K-State's super bowl will be the game in Lincoln, which will probably be for both bowl eligibility and the Big 12 North Title. 8-)
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: FHSU92 on October 19, 2009, 11:06:37 PM
BMWValidator.....


where would you rank Tyler Hansen among Big XII QB's?

This should be great.




Not sure, but he's a sh*t ton better than Cody Hawkins. 

What were Cody's stats Sat before they pulled him?
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: JTKSU on October 19, 2009, 11:19:56 PM
So remind me again how ku isn't K-State's super bowl.  I thought you guys had a game this week against Colorado, yet all you can do is talk about how much ku sucks.

just picking on the craptiest defense remaining on our schedule.



Don't you still play Colorado and Mizzou?  




PS.  ku is 9th in the country in sacks.

FYI, uk had 15 sacks through their first 4 games, 4 in the last two games.  Kinda going in the wrong direction, don't you think?
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: The42Yardstick on October 20, 2009, 02:22:25 PM
The more important thing that needs to be pointed out in this thread is that the OP was emulating tigerboard, which should be punishable by castration performed by steve dave (or dave steve)

 :pirate_grrr: :piratecaptain: :Carl:
Title: Re: We should run the ball all over ku. (nm)
Post by: JTKSU on October 21, 2009, 02:33:06 AM
The more important thing that needs to be pointed out in this thread is that the OP was emulating tigerboard, which should be punishable by castration performed by steve dave (or dave steve)

 :pirate_grrr: :piratecaptain: :Carl:

Intervention!!!