KSUFans Archives

Sports => The Good, The Bad, and the "Meh" => Topic started by: sonofdaxjones on October 19, 2006, 02:05:29 PM

Title: In FY 2006
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 19, 2006, 02:05:29 PM
and for the 3rd or 4th consecutive year.

The KSU EstroCat B-ball Program had a net operating loss of over $1.05 milllion dollars.

Had KSU not hosted the WNIT games, the operating loss would've been worse.





Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: Saulbadguy on October 19, 2006, 02:06:20 PM
 :jerkoff:
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: catfan28 on October 19, 2006, 02:14:17 PM
 :jerkoff:
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: KSt8er on October 19, 2006, 02:18:24 PM
Wow, that is a LOT less than I expected for any D1 womens team, WAY TO GO FANS!!!!!!

 :D
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: pissclams on October 19, 2006, 02:21:28 PM
and for the 3rd or 4th consecutive year.

The KSU EstroCat B-ball Program had a net operating loss of over $1.05 milllion dollars.

Had KSU not hosted the WNIT games, the operating loss would've been worse.







Is your contention that KSU should do away with the women's program?
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 19, 2006, 02:24:01 PM
If KSU is going to lose a million a year, every year, at least win something besides the WNIT.

 :tongue:
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: Saulbadguy on October 19, 2006, 02:26:53 PM
If KSU is going to lose a million a year, every year, at least win something besides the WNIT.

 :tongue:
I realize that is probably TIC..but you know the Womens program is good for the university, and the fans.

Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 19, 2006, 02:32:45 PM
Sure ... and it would be even better if they just won something significant.

Lets get what we're paying for, or find somebody else who can get it done besides Coach Conflicted.

Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2006, 02:36:48 PM
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?board=14.0
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: Saulbadguy on October 19, 2006, 02:43:54 PM
Sure ... and it would be even better if they just won something significant.

Lets get what we're paying for, or find somebody else who can get it done besides Coach Conflicted.


It could always be worse. Much, much worse.  As long as they are winning alot of games, who really cares?
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: snart on October 19, 2006, 02:47:14 PM
There are only two sports, at the most, at any school that make money: football and men’s basketball.  And at some schools one of these, or both, don’t make money.  That is a fact of life.  And the non-revenue sports not only include women’s basketball but also track, wrestling, baseball, gymnastics, swimming, hockey, soccer, lacrosse, rowing... you name it, and it loses money.  But all these other sports programs bring a level of prestige and presence to a school and in my opinion are most certainly necessary.  So get used to it and just be glad that at K-State the football, and now the men’s basketball, programs do bring in the money necessary to field these other teams.
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: coitus on October 19, 2006, 03:02:42 PM
mods - can this be moved to the bag 'o tricks folder?

apparently reject fan doesn't understand the complex directory structure of this message board.
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 19, 2006, 03:04:36 PM
You all are missing the point ... I have no problem with KSU pouring big bucks into women's hoops.  I'd just like to see that actually start to pay off sometime in the near future.

I can't see losing over $1 million a year for mediocrity.

Coitus ... apparently you're just a complete douchebag who doesn't understand that Timmy's bag o' tricks forum sucks.



Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: coitus on October 19, 2006, 03:08:00 PM
the bag 'o tricks bag does indeed suck.  no one reads it.  it contains only the worst of the refuse.

i knew this when i asked your thread to be moved there.

can you connect the two dots?
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 19, 2006, 03:08:56 PM
Yeah I did, and it looks a lot like your family tree.

Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: coitus on October 19, 2006, 03:10:54 PM
you are the crown princess of the bag 'o tricks forum.

celebrate accordingly.
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 19, 2006, 03:12:23 PM
I don't think I've ever posted there.

But hey ... it usually takes a queen to recognize a prince.

Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on October 19, 2006, 04:13:02 PM
 :popcorn:
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: coitus on October 19, 2006, 04:25:30 PM
reject -- clean your glasses, weiser's tea bag has blurred your vision.  no one mentioned a prince.

 :ustupid:

Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 19, 2006, 04:30:09 PM
"You're the crown princess"

Okay ... Prince ... Princess ... it takes a queen to create both.

Nice photos on the football board ... It's good to see your type interested in manly pursuits ... sports that is, not actually pursuing men.   





Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: DrJamesANaismith on October 19, 2006, 04:33:33 PM
 :popcorn:
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 19, 2006, 04:38:13 PM
Having to put that lifesized picture of Giles in Timeout must  have been tough StalkerFreakBoy.

You're in our prayer circle.



Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: DrJamesANaismith on October 19, 2006, 04:41:43 PM
How'd things work out for you on phognet today Daxi?
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 19, 2006, 04:45:33 PM
Fine ... I guess you put down the Jergins long enough to complain to Tom didn't ya, ya little StalkerFreak.

Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: DrJamesANaismith on October 19, 2006, 04:49:02 PM
Sorry son, I wasn't around to witness your implosion. I'm sure it was pure entertainment...as it usually is when you're getting bent over.

 :beerchug:
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 19, 2006, 04:52:58 PM
Implosion ... you're guys didn't like me making fun of coach hairpiece.  There's nothing to implode over unless you're a squawk fan.

Bentover?? Come on man ... please don't bring your sexual proclivities over to this family board StalkerFreak.

Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: DrJamesANaismith on October 19, 2006, 05:17:50 PM
You get abused every time you show up. You're slightly out of your element there daxi. You always have been, and you're not even bright enough to know it.

How many boards are you currently banned from? That should give you a clue....but it won't.
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: Saulbadguy on October 19, 2006, 05:18:09 PM
You all are missing the point ... I have no problem with KSU pouring big bucks into women's hoops.  I'd just like to see that actually start to pay off sometime in the near future.

I can't see losing over $1 million a year for mediocrity.

Coitus ... apparently you're just a complete douchebag who doesn't understand that Timmy's bag o' tricks forum sucks.




Would you rather us lose $2 million a year for an awful team? 

I just pulled that number out of my ass - but can you check to see how much money ku loses?  Colorado? Iowa State?
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 19, 2006, 05:47:08 PM
You get abused every time you show up. You're slightly out of your element there daxi. You always have been, and you're not even bright enough to know it.

How many boards are you currently banned from? That should give you a clue....but it won't.


You're right, with the "great posters" like St. LouisJaySquawk (cochair ku marketing club refreshment committee), addidasquawk, DocSquawkSmith, the now disappeared Jayhoax, the now disappeared GoldBrick, the ubiquitous PittsburghJaySquawk, and the timely Steel "I played for bear bryant dammit" Squawk ... I am out my element, god love'm and  you.    Doc ... they get angry over a sig line ... a freaking sig line.   You can't have any fun with guys who are that thin skinned. 

Plus, don't even attempt to claim that Flocknet exists on some plain (or is it plane ... indeed I think it is) of higher browishness (not a word for you ku folks) ... that simply falls back into the ku mindset of:  If we tell ourselves something enough times, it has to be true.

You continually reference things like the ability to be "bent over" on a BBS, or to be "owned" on a BBS ... come on now, how absolutely retarded is that concept StalkerFreak ... you're right any person that thinks a long those lines is out of my element.

Writers Note:  I am very disappointed in this lengthy reply to StalkerFreakBoy.   :yuck:

Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: Saulbadguy on October 19, 2006, 08:12:50 PM
I think adidashawk/booyahku is ok, along with All4ku, pittsburgjayhawk, and BMWJayhawk.

Naismith is a moron. He still thinks you and pissclams are the same person.
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: pissclams on October 20, 2006, 12:26:16 AM
BMW is a complete douchebag, addidas would be one but he's still got his training wheels on.
It only takes 5 minutes on Phog to realize what a complete moron BMW is, right up there with Dr.McDoucheMyAnalLips.

All4, Pitts, and Booya all are ok.
Title: Re: In FY 2006
Post by: fatty fat fat on October 22, 2006, 12:55:30 PM
Drop WBB. Worthless POS