KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: FHSU92 on September 13, 2009, 08:28:51 AM

Title: What if we had Patterson?
Post by: FHSU92 on September 13, 2009, 08:28:51 AM
If we wouldn't have Fitzed-up the Patterson deal, would we be in better shape?  Would like to know who he would have brought in for QB this year.   :crybaby:
Title: Re: What if we had Patterson?
Post by: michigancat on September 13, 2009, 08:31:26 AM
:jerkoff:
Title: Re: What if we had Patterson?
Post by: Pete on September 13, 2009, 08:32:08 AM
Not really.  We'd still have crap talent.

The difference is that we'd have reason to believe we would get better talent.  Snyder has never recruited well.....Stoops, Leavitt, Mangino, Venables...those dudes recruited well and still do.  Bill, not so much.
Title: Re: What if we had Patterson?
Post by: jester66 on September 13, 2009, 10:22:31 AM
Not really.  We'd still have crap talent.

The difference is that we'd have reason to believe we would get better talent.  Snyder has never recruited well.....Stoops, Leavitt, Mangino, Venables...those dudes recruited well and still do.  Bill, not so much.

Snyders most glaring need is qb.  He's already got 2 in the program that should be able to compete in the north next year.
Title: Re: What if we had Patterson?
Post by: Pete on September 13, 2009, 10:23:58 AM
Not really.  We'd still have crap talent.

The difference is that we'd have reason to believe we would get better talent.  Snyder has never recruited well.....Stoops, Leavitt, Mangino, Venables...those dudes recruited well and still do.  Bill, not so much.

Snyders most glaring need is qb.  He's already got 2 in the program that should be able to compete in the north next year.

2?  Name 1.  I can't think of any.
Title: Re: What if we had Patterson?
Post by: Perry on September 13, 2009, 10:26:38 AM
Not really.  We'd still have crap talent.

The difference is that we'd have reason to believe we would get better talent.  Snyder has never recruited well.....Stoops, Leavitt, Mangino, Venables...those dudes recruited well and still do.  Bill, not so much.

Snyders most glaring need is qb.  He's already got 2 in the program that should be able to compete in the north next year.

2?  Name 1.  I can't think of any.

'spose he's referring to Harper and then for the other I guess Lamur, based off of rumors of him playing well @ qb in practice. That or he believes we've got C-Newt in the bag :dunno:
Title: Re: What if we had Patterson?
Post by: Pete on September 13, 2009, 10:32:26 AM
Not really.  We'd still have crap talent.

The difference is that we'd have reason to believe we would get better talent.  Snyder has never recruited well.....Stoops, Leavitt, Mangino, Venables...those dudes recruited well and still do.  Bill, not so much.

Snyders most glaring need is qb.  He's already got 2 in the program that should be able to compete in the north next year.

2?  Name 1.  I can't think of any.

'spose he's referring to Harper and then for the other I guess Lamur, based off of rumors of him playing well @ qb in practice. That or he believes we've got C-Newt in the bag :dunno:

I think we can all agree than any "report" about any of the quarterbacks on our roster looking "good" in practice are complete and total bullcrap.  Think about it, the best two presumably played last night. 

Adam &@#%ing Barmann would start for this team.
Title: Re: What if we had Patterson?
Post by: Kat Kid on September 13, 2009, 11:07:27 AM
Evridge would be team mvp.  Srsly.