KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: Iceberg on June 30, 2009, 11:18:16 PM

Title: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: Iceberg on June 30, 2009, 11:18:16 PM: If the Henrys have yet to take courses of sign a LOI, and Seff is talking to the press about this whole situation... doesn't that violate recruiting rules?
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: sys on June 30, 2009, 11:23:14 PM: Quote from: Iceberg on June 30, 2009, 11:18:16 PM
If the Henrys have yet to take courses of sign a LOI, and Seff is talking to the press about this whole situation... doesn't that violate recruiting rules?

no.
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on June 30, 2009, 11:25:19 PM: Apparently they've signed a grant in aid agreement. But I need to talk a look at NCAA.org to verify that a grant in aid agreement allows a coach to discuss a recruit. It probably does, but for my own edification I want to know.
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: Iceberg on June 30, 2009, 11:40:54 PM: Gotcha, thanks for the fill in
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: cokansan on July 02, 2009, 12:17:28 PM: Where is Sonofdax? Shouldn't he ba all over this?
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: hillwalking03 on July 02, 2009, 12:27:41 PM: Since Xavier already signed a LOI with Memphis, he was not allowed to sign another one. That's the NCAA's rule. Since CJ is a walkon, there are no rules preventing Self from discussing him.
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: Iceberg on July 02, 2009, 01:19:07 PM: Quote from: hillwalking03 on July 02, 2009, 12:27:41 PM
Since Xavier already signed a LOI with Memphis, he was not allowed to sign another one. That's the NCAA's rule. Since CJ is a walkon, there are no rules preventing Self from discussing him.

Gotcha. Sometimes these rules get so complicated it is hard to see whats what.
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: ew2x4 on July 02, 2009, 03:26:56 PM: Quote from: cokansan on July 02, 2009, 12:17:28 PM
Where is Sonofdax? Shouldn't he ba all over this?

Are you retarded?
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: BMWJhawk on July 02, 2009, 03:31:13 PM: Nice to know Daxipad's cult following is alive and well.

:flush:
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: ew2x4 on July 02, 2009, 03:32:41 PM: Quote from: BMWJhawk on July 02, 2009, 03:31:13 PM
Nice to know Daxipad's cult following is alive and well.

:flush:

You're boring.
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 02, 2009, 03:40:04 PM: It's a very thin line between being able to make public comment on grant in aid only kids and and walk on kids. It's always been my understanding that you couldn't public-ally comment on walk on's until after the start of school, or even after the start of practice.
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: BMWJhawk on July 02, 2009, 03:43:44 PM: Both Henry brothers are enrolled at ku for the fall semester.
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 02, 2009, 03:49:23 PM: Enrolling and actually attending the school are two entirely different things.

This is almost getting back to your:

"I have slant and phog.net premium membership therefore I know that doesn't happen" logic

Or . . . .

You're inability to understand the difference between compulsory and/or voluntary fees/charges.
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: BMWJhawk on July 02, 2009, 03:50:17 PM: Quote from: sonofdaxjones on July 02, 2009, 03:49:23 PM
Enrolling and actually attending the school are two entirely different things.

This is almost getting back to your:

"I have slant and phog.net premium membership therefore I know that doesn't happen" logic

Or . . . .

You're inability to understand the difference between compulsory and/or voluntary fees/charges.

Hmmm... how about the ability to decipher between "your" and "you're?"
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 02, 2009, 03:53:47 PM: This is what you are left with Bentard:

"Dax is bat$hit crazy"

and

Grammatical and spelling errors.

You're at the lowest ebb of a complete beatdown.
Title: Re: Possible infraction on Seff?
Post by: hillwalking03 on July 02, 2009, 06:01:34 PM: Quote from: sonofdaxjones on July 02, 2009, 03:40:04 PM
It's a very thin line between being able to make public comment on grant in aid only kids and and walk on kids. It's always been my understanding that you couldn't public-ally comment on walk on's until after the start of school, or even after the start of practice.

Not arguing, but does it make a difference if the kid only signed a grant-in-aid or if he previously signed a LOI and then signed a grant in aid? Do they even make that distinction?