KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: opcat on June 24, 2009, 01:44:09 PM

Title: Ny times
Post by: opcat on June 24, 2009, 01:44:09 PM
http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/the-quad-countdown-no-70-kansas-state/
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: The Nasti on June 24, 2009, 01:50:21 PM
Ouch, #70...that hurts.


Of course, it hurt less once I realized that d-bag author wrote this...

"...the team won’t be subjected to another year of Ron Price...
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: The1BigWillie on June 24, 2009, 01:53:09 PM
Ouch, #70...that hurts.

Pretty optimistic IMO
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: Chingon on June 24, 2009, 02:01:59 PM
New York Times?
New York Times?
You think you're better than us?
Us? U. S.? USA?
No Way!
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: Oklahoma_Cat on June 24, 2009, 02:04:09 PM
Quote
last year ksufans.com got referenced. what the hell ny times?

otherwise, great write-up. go cats!!

— fatty fat fat

 :lol:
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: WillieWannabe on June 24, 2009, 02:23:29 PM
Ouch, #70...that hurts.

Pretty optimistic IMO

We were #86 last year FWIW...the Synder Effect
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: KSUTOMMY on June 24, 2009, 02:37:34 PM
That article had it all folks - it spelled out that RP is a charleton and has NO BUSINESS in a HC capacity. IMO the most telling of all statements in the article was when he wrote: "Unfortunately, due to his predecessor’s ineptness, Snyder will again be forced to spend much of his first season cleaning up a messy roster and, in the process, reversing the foul culture that came to define this program over the prior two seasons."

Thanks again for the memories Ron Prince
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: sonofdaxjones on June 24, 2009, 02:45:20 PM
no KSUFans.com . . . that's a wtf.

Otherwise this dude is spot on, on the Prince "legacy".

Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: Panjandrum on June 24, 2009, 03:00:42 PM
now KSUFans.com . . . that's a wtf.

Otherwise this dude is spot on, on the Prince "legacy".



I was surprised that they had KSUFans.com on there.  As far as I know, that's the least popular of the three sites.  Of course, I don't have 'numbers' to back me up on that, but it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: steve dave on June 24, 2009, 03:09:11 PM
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.

agreed
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: Rick Daris on June 24, 2009, 03:12:20 PM
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.

agreed

you think they'd sell it if someone tried to buy it? how much you think they'd charge for that craphole.
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: steve dave on June 24, 2009, 03:16:53 PM
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.

agreed

you think they'd sell it if someone tried to buy it? how much you think they'd charge for that craphole.

Exactly $2,500.
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: mjrod on June 24, 2009, 04:30:54 PM
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.

agreed

you think they'd sell it if someone tried to buy it? how much you think they'd charge for that craphole.

Exactly $2,500.

 :angryMJ:
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: cyclist on June 24, 2009, 05:00:17 PM
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.

agreed

you think they'd sell it if someone tried to buy it? how much you think they'd charge for that craphole.

Exactly $2,500.

 :angryMJ:

Got dang it, SD !

You know what happens when MJ gets ticked off at us admins...

:ohno:      :ohno:       :ohno:       :ohno:
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: FelixRex on June 24, 2009, 05:03:13 PM
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.

agreed

To be fair, he researched that article when we had the monopoly on "ops". Not really a level playing field.
Title: Re: Ny times
Post by: Rick Daris on June 24, 2009, 06:01:22 PM
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.

agreed

To be fair, he researched that article when we had the monopoly on "ops". Not really a level playing field.

you should post here more and there less.