Ouch, #70...that hurts.
last year ksufans.com got referenced. what the hell ny times?
otherwise, great write-up. go cats!!
— fatty fat fat
Ouch, #70...that hurts.
Pretty optimistic IMO
now KSUFans.com . . . that's a wtf.
Otherwise this dude is spot on, on the Prince "legacy".
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.
agreed
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.
agreed
you think they'd sell it if someone tried to buy it? how much you think they'd charge for that craphole.
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.
agreed
you think they'd sell it if someone tried to buy it? how much you think they'd charge for that craphole.
Exactly $2,500.
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.
agreed
you think they'd sell it if someone tried to buy it? how much you think they'd charge for that craphole.
Exactly $2,500.
:angryMJ:
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.
agreed
it's the only KSU BBS that I really have no intention of frequenting.
agreed
To be fair, he researched that article when we had the monopoly on "ops". Not really a level playing field.