KSUFans Archives
Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on June 12, 2009, 02:57:51 PM
-
pretty damned good.
-
Agreed.
We'll still be going over 600 losses here soon. However, without the last 20 years, we would've surpassed 600 losses a long time ago.
-
20 years is a long time. 68% over such a long period is phenomenal, really.
600 losses only shows how amazing our program is. it's our identity.
-
Agreed . . . it would've been very easy to for K-State to chuck it and give up in 1989.
I do give credit to the Weefer and to guys like Steve Miller for gutting it out back then, and allowing us to bitch and moan about 5-7 seasons, when that would've been the 3rd best season K-State had in the previous 30 years before 1989.
-
Uh, are you sure you know how to add correctly fatty?
K-State is 153-85-1 over the last 20 seasons (1989-2008). That's a .642 winning percentage.
http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/big12/kansas_state/yearly_totals.php
-
I like Fatty's math better.
-
I like Fatty's math better.
Me too. :dancin:
This is why Bill is so great, because: the previous 50 seasons to Bill Snyder's arrival, 1939-1988, K-State's record was 122-378-11. That's a .249 winning percentage.
-
Uh, are you sure you know how to add correctly fatty?
K-State is 153-85-1 over the last 20 seasons (1989-2008). That's a .642 winning percentage.
http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/big12/kansas_state/yearly_totals.php
whatever fatty says is true, facts dont matter.
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_State_Wildcats_football
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:KansasStatefootball
600 loses? Good lord, we suck.