KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: LesMiserables on June 10, 2009, 10:28:12 AM

Title: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: LesMiserables on June 10, 2009, 10:28:12 AM
2.  UT
3.  OU
14. OSU
19. NU
28. TT
42. BU
44. ku
53. CU
56. KSU
57. MU
69. aTm
85. ISU
Other teams of interest: UCLA 21, ULL 112

Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: Bookie Pimp on June 10, 2009, 10:34:17 AM
2.  UT
3.  OU
14. OSU
19. NU
28. TT
42. BU
44. ku
53. CU
56. KSU
57. MU
69. aTm
85. ISU
Other teams of interest: UCLA 21, ULL 112




How does Bailer's ass smell?   It appears that y'all are the closest to it...

 :yuck:
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: KITNfury on June 10, 2009, 10:47:08 AM
Tied for second!  :ksu:
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: FelixRex on June 10, 2009, 11:02:35 AM
56...with a bullet
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: KSUTOMMY on June 10, 2009, 11:15:40 AM
I am sayin' it right now, OBz is Phil Steele's  :lick: lover  :love: - that is the ONLY way we get this kind of pub.
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: willie83 on June 10, 2009, 12:28:04 PM
Weird that ku would be picked to win the north when NU is 25 spots ahead of them.
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: WavetheWheat on June 10, 2009, 12:31:03 PM
Weird that ku would be picked to win the north when NU is 25 spots ahead of them.

Steele picks ku 4th in the north.
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: FBWillie on June 10, 2009, 12:53:23 PM
Weird that ku would be picked to win the north when NU is 25 spots ahead of them.

Steele picks ku 4th in the north.


perfectly logical.   How a teams schedule lines up has nothing to do with how great or how horrible they are.   See ku 2007.  KSU has a favorable north schedule this year. We SHOULD have advantage over most of the north teams this year; a good team with our schedule should produce a North crown.   
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: scottwildcat on June 10, 2009, 01:27:07 PM

Other teams of interest: UCLA 21, ULL 112



 :confused: they are really suposed to be that good?
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: Bhyaaaaa! on June 10, 2009, 05:44:42 PM
P Steele on radio on Big 12,

"Last year I got beat up by Kansas fans in the offseason. I picked them third last year in the Big 12 North. ku fans let me know about it and as it turned out they did end up third."
 P Steele  :lol: @ ku
 




Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: Bhyaaaaa! on June 10, 2009, 05:47:21 PM
P Steele, "If you follow KSU any of the last 3 years, their season would just tank. I think Bill steps into a good situation. They only have 3 big 12 road games this year. 4 home games + neutral site. Wins against, ku MU Tamu, CU, ISU, and a couple non-cons. From a losing season to a bowl. One of best turnarounds next year."  :powertard:


Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: fatty fat fat on June 10, 2009, 05:48:02 PM
P Steele, "If you follow KSU any of the last 3 years, their season would just tank. I think Bill steps into a good situation. They only have 3 big 12 road games this year. 4 home games + neutral site. Wins against, ku MU Tamu, CU, ISU, and a couple non-cons. From a losing season to a bowl. One of best turnarounds next year."  :powertard:




STEELE BITCHES!

 :woot:
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: Bhyaaaaa! on June 10, 2009, 05:51:18 PM
Steele just won't shut up about it, "Yes, big loss at QB, gotta figure there is going to be more option. Look at em last year. They were playing pretty good. They were 4-2 into the Colorado game. CU pulls a redshirt off on a true freshie in wk 6. He gets a td on both possessions and CU wins. Only points they get. If it wasn't for that KSU is 5-2 maybe they have more confidence and don't tank. Bill Snyder doesn't let that happen."

Boom.  :kstatriot:
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: fatty fat fat on June 10, 2009, 05:52:20 PM
Steele just won't shut up about it, "Yes, big loss at QB, gotta figure there is going to be more option. Look at em last year. They were playing pretty good. They were 4-2 into the Colorado game. CU pulls a redshirt off on a true freshie in wk 6. He gets a td on both possessions and CU wins. Only points they get. If it wasn't for that KSU is 5-2 maybe they have more confidence and don't tank. Bill Snyder doesn't let that happen."

Boom.  :kstatriot:

that cu bit was incred. logic. steele is now razzin ku fans.  :lol:
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: KITNfury on June 10, 2009, 10:21:03 PM
I want to listen to this. I get lonely sometimes and need new material.
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: Bookcat on June 10, 2009, 11:41:13 PM
Phil Steele has managed to convince me that we might make 6 wins.

He is relentlessly EMAW.


ku tards are just miffed because NO MEDIA outlets like them. Even their own LJW mocks them.
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: Bookcat on June 10, 2009, 11:42:22 PM
When your biggest media ally is this tard:


(http://media.kusports.com/img/site/col-sigs/keegan.jpg)


I can understand the frustration.
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: delusionliveshere on June 11, 2009, 12:44:51 AM
Phil Steele has managed to convince me that we might make 6 wins.

He is relentlessly EMAW.


ku tards are just miffed because NO MEDIA outlets like them. Even their own LJW mocks them.
Probably has a lot to do with Chuck Woodling being a MU tard.  Same with that other &@#%er that can't produce any decent journalism (see the dude from McPherson)
Title: Re: Phil Steele "Power Poll" Big 12 teams
Post by: FelixRex on June 11, 2009, 09:41:38 AM
Phil Steele has managed to convince me that we might make 6 wins.

QFT

These are great talking points, and just show (once again) why Steele-MAW is the best in the biz.