KSUFans Archives
Fan Life => The Endzone Dive => Topic started by: Brock Landers on April 22, 2009, 03:55:09 PM
-
http://www.cjonline.com/news/state/2009-04-22/senators_nbaf_lawsuit_frivolous (http://www.cjonline.com/news/state/2009-04-22/senators_nbaf_lawsuit_frivolous)
Give it up, Texas. You'll always be a distant second to us. First it was football and basketball. Then it was the battle over Bioterrorism labs.
Please stop before you embarrass yourselves further Texas.
-
Seems like someone here predicted that ... oh yeah, it was me.
-
Who messed with Texas? We did.
:'byecruelworld:
-
good lord i hate Texas
-
lol.
you just have to laugh at them.
I don't care who gets it either way....but I feel the lawsuit won't make it very far in federal court. Their argument is not based on statistical data which proves that the NBAF facility would be cheaper to run and would produce more cutting edge research in Texas rather than in Manhattan. Their lawsuit is based on the concept that our politicians had an "in" with the NBAF. You can't prove or disprove that is part of the selection process.
if they can find proof that Manhattan took steps, or had a part in any process or activity that was not allowed to the other site candidates in Texas, North Carolina, Pittsburgh...etc....then they have a case. Good luck Texas.
-
yeah, did anyone actually read the document? it was hilariously absurd. they made like 250 bullet points of why it shouldn't be in manhattan, and around 50 of them had to do w/tornadoes.
Seems like someone here predicted that ... oh yeah, it was me.
you are a complete loser
-
Thornton also suggested the Kansas big was simply better organized that the Texas one. "We reached out to the vet schools; they don't have a vet school (in their consortium)," he said. "We reached out to animal health companies; they don't have animal health companies."
Thorton nails it.
In a scenario where Kansas's bid is overturned for the Texas bid...then that will be more of a statement of "irregularities" in the bidding process vs. the three year process all of the states particpated in to begin with. What Judge is going to rule against Kstate? It is the most logical choice.
1. Vet School
2. Animal Health
3. Cheap to live here
4. Cheap labor market (KSU undergrad part-timers)
5. Willie the Wildcat
6. Got damn we own Texas in every way :dancin:
-
140. Had DHS conducted an objective site-by-site comparative analysis, it would have concluded that the risk of tornadoes, and more severe tornadoes, is greater in Manhattan, Kansas than it is in San Antonio Texas.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
-
The Texas consortium's chairman, John Kerr, called the selection of the Manhattan, Kan., site "grossly irresponsible, the equivalent of playing Russian roulette with Mother Nature."
LOL (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/T/TX_BIOTHREAT_LABORATORY_TXOL-?SITE=TXSAE&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT)
-
Interesting that the release of pathogens is such a talking point with them...considering we have a much smaller population than San Antonio.
They also mentioned all the cattle we have. yeah, San Antonio. Hardly any cattle 'round them parts.
Geezus christ if this isn't thrown out by mid summer I'll be shocked. It is, by every definition, a frivilous case.
-
Yeah they were talking about this a long time ago. Mr. Texas said he fully planned on suing if Manhattan did indeed get the selection. The ultimate scenario would be Texas going ahead and winning (through p'tics) and then some ridiculous disease getting released.<lols God forbid it be FMD and Texas' cattle industry gets destroyed. It doesn't matter WHERE it would happen... A disease release would decimate livestock industries and overload human health care-giving capacities no matter what.
-
Manhattan is the best choice; the last time San Antonio had anything of value to the US, those fags lost it to a bunch of mexicans. :angryMJ:
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KV8xc8QMnpc
-
C'mon guys, they have a point. Remember when that F4 tornado ripped through campus last summer, destroying our current (level 3) Bio-Security Research facility?
-
This article is shows how rediculous it is, plus it was done by a law student.
Link: http://www.bringonthecats.com/2009/4/22/849199/texans-dont-deal-well-with-losing
-
140. Had DHS conducted an objective site-by-site comparative analysis, it would have concluded that the risk of tornadoes, and more severe tornadoes, is greater in Manhattan, Kansas than it is in San Antonio Texas.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
QFT.
Whoever said that is a complete douche. I guess he is unaware of such things as structural engineers.
-
Don't worry guys, the only judge that matters is very EMAW
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pq7FktNEY20
-
Don't worry guys, the only judge that matters is very EMAW
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pq7FktNEY20
hahaha