KSUFans Archives
Sports => The Good, The Bad, and the "Meh" => Topic started by: cas on April 14, 2009, 09:28:05 PM
-
After looking them over, I've come to the conclusion that the Cowboys are going to go 16-0!
HBTC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
-
Can't wait until the Chiefs beat the Steelers. :users:
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.
when they were the Colts
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.
when they were the Colts
Jeebus you're gay, let's see Baltimore won it more recently.
Too bad your illegal blocking schemes don't seem to work without a superstar RB like TD
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.
when they were the Colts
Jeebus you're gay, let's see Baltimore won it more recently.
Too bad your illegal blocking schemes don't seem to work without a superstar RB like TD
are you &@#%ing retarded? i was backing up your argument
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.
when they were the Colts
Jeebus you're gay, let's see Baltimore won it more recently.
Too bad your illegal blocking schemes don't seem to work without a superstar RB like TD
are you fracking retarded? i was backing up your argument
you're a donkey fan, blame me for getting confused. Y'all donkey fans talk outta your arse most of the time anyways.
-
Can't wait until the Chiefs beat the Steelers. :users:
I know, you'll probably be old enough to drink by then!
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.
2007.
-
Too bad your illegal blocking schemes don't seem to work without a superstar RB like TD
It's hard to win when you get penalized each play for our illegal blocking. . .oh wait, blocking someone isn't illegal in the NFL.
:flush:
oh, and our blocking scheme is pretty good, when was the last time that we didn't finish in the top half of the league in rushing offense? Quit being jealous that Denver is an actual good football franchise. We've won as many superbowls as you've been to.
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.
2007.
Naw just cause they had a bad record doesn't mean they were an easy win, just like being .500 doesn't mean the donkeys were a lot better than the Chefs
-
Too bad your illegal blocking schemes don't seem to work without a superstar RB like TD
It's hard to win when you get penalized each play for our illegal blocking. . .oh wait, blocking someone isn't illegal in the NFL.
:flush:
oh, and our blocking scheme is pretty good, when was the last time that we didn't finish in the top half of the league in rushing offense? Quit being jealous that Denver is an actual good football franchise. We've won as many superbowls as you've been to.
Just major Lollersquirts here :flush:
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.
I remember a couple years ago when the Chiefs' OLine pretty much owned Ray Lewis (2004). That was in Baltimore - on monday night.
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.
2007.
Naw just cause they had a bad record doesn't mean they were an easy win, just like being .500 doesn't mean the donkeys were a lot better than the Chefs
They lost by double digits 6 out of their 11 losses, and the teams they beat had a combined record of 30-50. the only team they beat with a winning record was the Steelers and that was the last week of the season where they didn't even play Roethlisberger or Hines Ward. They were an easy win. And Denver was quite a bit better than Kansas City last year. You'd have to be mentally retarded to think that denver wasn't.
-
The last 5 games (Denver twice, Buffalo and Cleveland at home and at Cincinnati) are the ones that catch my eye. If this team comes together maybe we can go on a run at the end of the regular season and, who knows, maybe sneak in like we did a couple of years ago. Anyways.....It's GREAT to be a Royals and Chiefs fan again.
:hope:
-
The last 5 games (Denver twice, Buffalo and Cleveland at home and at Cincinnati) are the ones that catch my eye. If this team comes together maybe we can go on a run at the end of the regular season and, who knows, maybe sneak in like we did a couple of years ago. Anyways.....It's GREAT to be a Royals and Chiefs fan again.
:hope:
Won't beat denver in mile high, will lose to buffalo and cleveland, might beat cinci.
possible 2-3 over those last games. Could be a great december for you guys!
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.
2007.
Naw just cause they had a bad record doesn't mean they were an easy win, just like being .500 doesn't mean the donkeys were a lot better than the Chefs
They lost by double digits 6 out of their 11 losses, and the teams they beat had a combined record of 30-50. the only team they beat with a winning record was the Steelers and that was the last week of the season where they didn't even play Roethlisberger or Hines Ward. They were an easy win. And Denver was quite a bit better than Kansas City last year. You'd have to be mentally retarded to think that denver wasn't.
Simply looking at the numbers a 2 touchdown loss doesn't sound quite a bit better. And that was the worst Chiefs team I have witnessed.
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.
2007.
Naw just cause they had a bad record doesn't mean they were an easy win, just like being .500 doesn't mean the donkeys were a lot better than the Chefs
They lost by double digits 6 out of their 11 losses, and the teams they beat had a combined record of 30-50. the only team they beat with a winning record was the Steelers and that was the last week of the season where they didn't even play Roethlisberger or Hines Ward. They were an easy win. And Denver was quite a bit better than Kansas City last year. You'd have to be mentally retarded to think that denver wasn't.
Simply looking at the numbers a 2 touchdown loss doesn't sound quite a bit better. And that was the worst Chiefs team I have witnessed.
So the Titans weren't quite a bit better than the Jets?
-
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.
2007.
Naw just cause they had a bad record doesn't mean they were an easy win, just like being .500 doesn't mean the donkeys were a lot better than the Chefs
They lost by double digits 6 out of their 11 losses, and the teams they beat had a combined record of 30-50. the only team they beat with a winning record was the Steelers and that was the last week of the season where they didn't even play Roethlisberger or Hines Ward. They were an easy win. And Denver was quite a bit better than Kansas City last year. You'd have to be mentally retarded to think that denver wasn't.
Simply looking at the numbers a 2 touchdown loss doesn't sound quite a bit better. And that was the worst Chiefs team I have witnessed.
So the Titans weren't quite a bit better than the Jets?
I dunno who won?
-
I dunno who won?
Jets won by 3 scores.
-
I dunno who won?
Jets won by 3 scores.
Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?
-
I dunno who won?
Jets won by 3 scores.
Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?
Yeah, but Denver beat Kansas City, so that makes Denver better than KC. But no, because you are saying that KC is better than Denver because they beat Denver, which doesn't make any sense because Denver is better because they beat KC. But. . .Kansas City beat Denver. . .so wait. . .if Kansas City is better than Denver, but Denver is better than KC. I guess that means. . . you are stupid.
-
I dunno who won?
Jets won by 3 scores.
Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?
Yeah, but Denver beat Kansas City, so that makes Denver better than KC. But no, because you are saying that KC is better than Denver because they beat Denver, which doesn't make any sense because Denver is better because they beat KC. But. . .Kansas City beat Denver. . .so wait. . .if Kansas City is better than Denver, but Denver is better than KC. I guess that means. . . you are stupid.
Means we both suck.
-
I dunno who won?
Jets won by 3 scores.
Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?
Yeah, but Denver beat Kansas City, so that makes Denver better than KC. But no, because you are saying that KC is better than Denver because they beat Denver, which doesn't make any sense because Denver is better because they beat KC. But. . .Kansas City beat Denver. . .so wait. . .if Kansas City is better than Denver, but Denver is better than KC. I guess that means. . . you are stupid.
I know you are but what am I?
-
I dunno who won?
Jets won by 3 scores.
Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?
Yeah, but Denver beat Kansas City, so that makes Denver better than KC. But no, because you are saying that KC is better than Denver because they beat Denver, which doesn't make any sense because Denver is better because they beat KC. But. . .Kansas City beat Denver. . .so wait. . .if Kansas City is better than Denver, but Denver is better than KC. I guess that means. . . you are stupid.
The worst Chiefs team I have ever seen, that won only 2 games. Beat the donkeys by two touchdowns, how "good" were the donkeys again? If you want I can keep rephrasing these posts till one literally smacks you in the face.
-
I dunno who won?
Jets won by 3 scores.
Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?
Yeah, but Denver beat Kansas City, so that makes Denver better than KC. But no, because you are saying that KC is better than Denver because they beat Denver, which doesn't make any sense because Denver is better because they beat KC. But. . .Kansas City beat Denver. . .so wait. . .if Kansas City is better than Denver, but Denver is better than KC. I guess that means. . . you are stupid.
The worst Chiefs team I have ever seen, that won only 2 games. Beat the donkeys by two touchdowns, how "good" were the donkeys again? If you want I can keep rephrasing these posts till one literally smacks you in the face.
I never said Denver was good last year, just quite a bit better than the Chiefs. The only argument you would have is if you swept us, but that did not happen.
-
I dunno who won?
Jets won by 3 scores.
Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?
Yeah, but Denver beat Kansas City, so that makes Denver better than KC. But no, because you are saying that KC is better than Denver because they beat Denver, which doesn't make any sense because Denver is better because they beat KC. But. . .Kansas City beat Denver. . .so wait. . .if Kansas City is better than Denver, but Denver is better than KC. I guess that means. . . you are stupid.
The worst Chiefs team I have ever seen, that won only 2 games. Beat the donkeys by two touchdowns, how "good" were the donkeys again? If you want I can keep rephrasing these posts till one literally smacks you in the face.
I never said Denver was good last year, just quite a bit better than the Chiefs. The only argument you would have is if you swept us, but that did not happen.
You post more about Denver than K-State on here :flush:
-
I dunno who won?
Jets won by 3 scores.
Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?
Yeah, but Denver beat Kansas City, so that makes Denver better than KC. But no, because you are saying that KC is better than Denver because they beat Denver, which doesn't make any sense because Denver is better because they beat KC. But. . .Kansas City beat Denver. . .so wait. . .if Kansas City is better than Denver, but Denver is better than KC. I guess that means. . . you are stupid.
The worst Chiefs team I have ever seen, that won only 2 games. Beat the donkeys by two touchdowns, how "good" were the donkeys again? If you want I can keep rephrasing these posts till one literally smacks you in the face.
I never said Denver was good last year, just quite a bit better than the Chiefs. The only argument you would have is if you swept us, but that did not happen.
You post more about Denver than K-State on here :flush:
That's how most Denver fans are. They become like really obsessed. I don't understand it.
-
You post more about Denver than K-State on here :flush:
I just find it funny that this guy apparently thinks that Kansas City was better than Denver last year.
-
You post more about Denver than K-State on here :flush:
I just find it funny that this guy apparently thinks that Kansas City was better than Denver last year.
LOL never said that. :lol:
-
You post more about Denver than K-State on here :flush:
I just find it funny that this guy apparently thinks that Kansas City was better than Denver last year.
LOL never said that. :lol:
I wasn't talking about you.
-
I dunno who won?
Jets won by 3 scores.
Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?
Yeah, but Denver beat Kansas City, so that makes Denver better than KC. But no, because you are saying that KC is better than Denver because they beat Denver, which doesn't make any sense because Denver is better because they beat KC. But. . .Kansas City beat Denver. . .so wait. . .if Kansas City is better than Denver, but Denver is better than KC. I guess that means. . . you are stupid.
The worst Chiefs team I have ever seen, that won only 2 games. Beat the donkeys by two touchdowns, how "good" were the donkeys again? If you want I can keep rephrasing these posts till one literally smacks you in the face.
I never said Denver was good last year, just quite a bit better than the Chiefs. The only argument you would have is if you swept us, but that did not happen.
Quite a bit better w/ a .500 record against the Chiefs.
Stop obsessing, we got Cassel get over it already!
-
You post more about Denver than K-State on here :flush:
I just find it funny that this guy apparently thinks that Kansas City was better than Denver last year.
LOL never said that. :lol:
I wasn't talking about you.
You said this guy and you were quoting me. Nice try with the whole "I wasn't talking to you" :users:
-
You post more about Denver than K-State on here :flush:
I just find it funny that this guy apparently thinks that Kansas City was better than Denver last year.
LOL never said that. :lol:
I wasn't talking about you.
You said this guy and you were quoting me. Nice try with the whole "I wasn't talking to you" :users:
I quoted you, to let you know I was talking to you, I was talking about QuinnMac, if I was talking about you, I would have said, "I just find it funny that you think Kansas City was better than Denver." I guess it really doesn't matter if you thought I was talking about you or not. . .since I wasn't. I was letting you know why I kept talking about Denver.
-
You post more about Denver than K-State on here :flush:
I just find it funny that this guy apparently thinks that Kansas City was better than Denver last year.
LOL never said that. :lol:
I wasn't talking about you.
You said this guy and you were quoting me. Nice try with the whole "I wasn't talking to you" :users:
I quoted you, to let you know I was talking to you, I was talking about QuinnMac, if I was talking about you, I would have said, "I just find it funny that you think Kansas City was better than Denver." I guess it really doesn't matter if you thought I was talking about you or not. . .since I wasn't. I was letting you know why I kept talking about Denver.
That really makes you sense at all.
-
You post more about Denver than K-State on here :flush:
I just find it funny that this guy apparently thinks that Kansas City was better than Denver last year.
LOL never said that. :lol:
I wasn't talking about you.
You said this guy and you were quoting me. Nice try with the whole "I wasn't talking to you" :users:
I quoted you, to let you know I was talking to you, I was talking about QuinnMac, if I was talking about you, I would have said, "I just find it funny that you think Kansas City was better than Denver." I guess it really doesn't matter if you thought I was talking about you or not. . .since I wasn't. I was letting you know why I kept talking about Denver.
Ya watch out Devilkat the tough premium member is trying to push us around. :ohno:
:jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff:
-
You post more about Denver than K-State on here :flush:
I just find it funny that this guy apparently thinks that Kansas City was better than Denver last year.
LOL never said that. :lol:
I wasn't talking about you.
You said this guy and you were quoting me. Nice try with the whole "I wasn't talking to you" :users:
I quoted you, to let you know I was talking to you, I was talking about QuinnMac, if I was talking about you, I would have said, "I just find it funny that you think Kansas City was better than Denver." I guess it really doesn't matter if you thought I was talking about you or not. . .since I wasn't. I was letting you know why I kept talking about Denver.
Ya watch out Devilkat the tough premium member is trying to push us around. :ohno:
:jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff:
I think it is scary when he quotes you and says something you didn't and it ends up that he wasn't talking about you/to you :ohno:
-
I think it is scary when he quotes you and says something you didn't and it ends up that he wasn't talking about you/to you :ohno:
. . .I was quoting you to let you know I was talking to you. You said, "You post more about Denver than K-State on here." So I was telling you why I post so much about Denver, which would be responding to your comment. And I said that it was because "This guy thinks that Kansas City was better than Denver last year." When I said "this guy" I was talking about QuinnMac, I don't know why I'd call you "this guy," when talking to you. I don't know what you don't get about that.
-
I think it is scary when he quotes you and says something you didn't and it ends up that he wasn't talking about you/to you :ohno:
. . .I was quoting you to let you know I was talking to you. You said, "You post more about Denver than K-State on here." So I was telling you why I post so much about Denver, which would be responding to your comment. And I said that it was because "This guy thinks that Kansas City was better than Denver last year." When I said "this guy" I was talking about QuinnMac, I don't know why I'd call you "this guy," when talking to you. I don't know what you don't get about that.
Pure unadulterated failure.
-
I think it is scary when he quotes you and says something you didn't and it ends up that he wasn't talking about you/to you :ohno:
. . .I was quoting you to let you know I was talking to you. You said, "You post more about Denver than K-State on here." So I was telling you why I post so much about Denver, which would be responding to your comment. And I said that it was because "This guy thinks that Kansas City was better than Denver last year." When I said "this guy" I was talking about QuinnMac, I don't know why I'd call you "this guy," when talking to you. I don't know what you don't get about that.
Pure unadulterated failure.
:rolleyes:
-
So to get back on topic about a real team. The Dallas Cowboys, 16-0 or what?
-
So to get back on topic about a real team. The Dallas Cowboys, 16-0 or what?
More like 15-1 I think we can all agree on the chiefs going 16-0 and still losing in the 2nd rd :'byecruelworld: