KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: sonofdaxjones on April 09, 2009, 03:33:37 PM

Title: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 09, 2009, 03:33:37 PM
(http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/2556/manginograph.jpg)
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: stormnut on April 09, 2009, 03:36:02 PM
(http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/2556/manginograph.jpg)
:users:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 09, 2009, 04:01:08 PM
Because ku's football program couldn't possibly have improved since Mangino took over.


 :jerkoff:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 09, 2009, 04:02:45 PM
Never said that it hadn't Captain Meltdown.

Damn . . .  you're dense.

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 09, 2009, 04:03:36 PM
Oh, by the way.... 52-21.


 :lol:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 09, 2009, 04:04:20 PM
Doesn't bother me in the least Captain Meltdown.

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 09, 2009, 04:08:49 PM
2007 obviously bothers you an awful lot, though.  Did someone say "BCS Orange Bowl?"


 :rofl:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: KanSt43 on April 09, 2009, 04:11:21 PM
2007 obviously bothers you an awful lot, though.  Did someone say "BCS Orange Bowl?"


 :rofl:


You... :lol:...a ku fan.... :lol:.....on a K-State forum.... :lol:...You are one pathetic loser

 :jerkoff: wow
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: EmporiaWildcat on April 09, 2009, 04:11:36 PM
Oh, by the way.... 52-21.


 :lol:


Oh, by the way....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8U6MOiRDlM&feature=PlayList&p=CAF1724B7B0D0798&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=7

 :lol:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 09, 2009, 04:12:45 PM
2007 obviously bothers you an awful lot, though.  Did someone say "BCS Orange Bowl?"


 :rofl:


Nice season for ku . . . I imagine any team with that kind of talent that played a 77 SOS regular season schedule would likely win a lot of games.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: yoga-lika_abana on April 09, 2009, 04:13:18 PM
pretty nice timing for posting this dax. I like your style.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: EmporiaWildcat on April 09, 2009, 04:13:50 PM
2007 obviously bothers you an awful lot, though.  Did someone say "BCS Orange Bowl?"


 :rofl:


You... :lol:...a ku fan.... :lol:.....on a K-State forum.... :lol:...You are one pathetic loser

 :jerkoff: wow

I've been saying the same thing for a while now...
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 09, 2009, 04:17:34 PM
2007 obviously bothers you an awful lot, though.  Did someone say "BCS Orange Bowl?"


 :rofl:


Nice season for ku . . . I imagine any team with that kind of talent that played a 77 SOS regular season schedule would likely win a lot of games.



Okay... so how is that a fluke?  Wasn't Va Tech ranked #3 in the nation going into the Orange Bowl?


 :confused:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: EmporiaWildcat on April 09, 2009, 04:19:10 PM
2007 obviously bothers you an awful lot, though.  Did someone say "BCS Orange Bowl?"


 :rofl:


Nice season for ku . . . I imagine any team with that kind of talent that played a 77 SOS regular season schedule would likely win a lot of games.



Okay... so how is that a fluke?  Wasn't Va Tech ranked #3 in the nation going into the Orange Bowl?


 :confused:

Dear ku fan,

Win the North just once before you start bragging about your football program.

Sincerely,

EMAW'ers everywhere.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: ew2x4 on April 09, 2009, 04:20:14 PM
2007 obviously bothers you an awful lot, though.  Did someone say "BCS Orange Bowl?"


 :rofl:


Nice season for ku . . . I imagine any team with that kind of talent that played a 77 SOS regular season schedule would likely win a lot of games.



Okay... so how is that a fluke?  Wasn't Va Tech ranked #3 in the nation going into the Orange Bowl?


 :confused:

Va Tech's offense that year was about on par with ku's old offenses.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 09, 2009, 04:20:38 PM
Win 12 games in a season, win a BCS bowl, even up the all-time series, and then we'll talk football.  K?


 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 09, 2009, 04:22:17 PM
Notice how I said regular season, and Virginia Tech didn't belong, nor never deserved to be in the Top 5 in the country.   We went over that . . . seriously, they were with in 2 spots of a team that absolutely embarrassed them earlier in the season . . . come on.   But that's the everlasting love affair that the media and the pollsters have for Virginia Tech.

Again, nice season for ku, and no doubt a team with that kind of talent playing a 77 SOS regular season schedule is going to win a lot of games, and likely qualify for a really good bowl game.

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 09, 2009, 04:23:41 PM
Notice how I said regular season, and Virginia Tech didn't belong, nor never deserved to be in the Top 5 in the country.   We went over that . . . seriously, they were with in 2 spots of a team that absolutely embarrassed them earlier in the season . . . come on.   But that's the everlasting love affair that the media and the pollsters have for Virginia Tech.

Again, nice season for ku, and no doubt a team with that kind of talent playing a 77 SOS regular season schedule is going to win a lot of games, and likely qualify for a really good bowl game.





So explain to all of us again how the 2007 season doesn't bother you? 



 :confused:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 09, 2009, 04:27:27 PM
Dude, I posted that knowing you'd be all over it in like 5 minutes, and I was damn close.

Should we go back and find your post ku vs Texas Tech meltdown again, and go over it word for word??

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Skydog on April 09, 2009, 04:27:35 PM
Notice how I said regular season, and Virginia Tech didn't belong, nor never deserved to be in the Top 5 in the country.   We went over that . . . seriously, they were with in 2 spots of a team that absolutely embarrassed them earlier in the season . . . come on.   But that's the everlasting love affair that the media and the pollsters have for Virginia Tech.

Again, nice season for ku, and no doubt a team with that kind of talent playing a 77 SOS regular season schedule is going to win a lot of games, and likely qualify for a really good bowl game.





So explain to all of us again how the 2007 season doesn't bother you? 



 :confused:

I DONT KNOW WHAT TO SAY SO IM GOING TO REPEAT THE SAME QUESTION OVER AND OVER
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: KanSt43 on April 09, 2009, 05:11:13 PM
BMW,

GTFO,

KanSt43
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: SkinnyBenny on April 09, 2009, 05:14:47 PM

Okay... so how is that a fluke?  Wasn't Va Tech ranked #3 in the nation going into the Orange Bowl?


Are you seriously bringing rankings into this?  Have you conveniently forgotten that the entire 2007 season was a complete fluke in every possible way? I mean, even the national champion had two losses, for God's sake.  Virginia Tech being ranked #3 in the nation at the end of the season means absolutely nothing because it's a complete fluke.  Much like ku backing into a BCS bowl when they didn't even win their HALF of the league. 

Sorry, brah.  Fluke.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Chingon on April 09, 2009, 05:19:56 PM
(http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/2556/manginograph.jpg)
WTF did you invent a time machine to make this blurry (red?!?) plot on a Apple IIc?
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 09, 2009, 05:23:36 PM
It was just some online graph creating thing . . .  geez, I ain't gonna spend an hour on that stuff.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: pissclams on April 09, 2009, 05:27:44 PM
Cincinnati played in the Orange Bowl last season, lost by 3 to V Tech   :lol:

Orange Bowl?  More like Orange You Supposed To Be Watching A Relevant Bowl?   :lol:    :cheers:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 09, 2009, 05:28:32 PM
Isn't ku the favorite to win the North this season?


 :confused:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 09, 2009, 05:29:13 PM
Cincinnati played in the Orange Bowl last season, lost by 3 to V Tech   :lol:

Orange Bowl?  More like Orange You Supposed To Be Watching A Relevant Bowl?   :lol:    :cheers:



The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS national championship last season. 


 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: pissclams on April 09, 2009, 05:33:51 PM
contracts bro, not every one ignores the law at every oppy
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 09, 2009, 05:34:10 PM
Isn't ku the favorite to win the North this season?


 :confused:

Yep, lots of pressure on ku this year . . . lets hope Mangino keeps his anger issues in check for everyone's sake.

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 09, 2009, 05:53:46 PM
So if ku is the preseason favorite to win the North, what is the point of this thread?


 :confused:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Hercules Antigua on April 09, 2009, 05:58:22 PM
So if ku is the preseason favorite to win the North, what is the point of this thread?
 :confused:
Good point, I don't even know why they make everyone actually play the games in a season when already have polls available now telling us who the winners will be.

You should hurry and go to Vegas with your information to capitalize on it
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: jeffy on April 09, 2009, 06:00:56 PM
So if ku is the preseason favorite to win the North, what is the point of this thread?


 :confused:

 :jayhook:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 09, 2009, 06:06:35 PM
LOL . . . what in the hell does ku being the PRESEASON favorite have to do with what has happened in REALITY . . . nothing.

Hell, a 5-3 in conference probably wins the north next year.

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 09, 2009, 06:15:29 PM
So ku's expected to be the best team in the division next year, but '07 was a fluke.  Hmmmm....



 :lol:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Babytears on April 09, 2009, 08:46:31 PM
Lots of flukes.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: KanSt43 on April 09, 2009, 08:54:58 PM
So if ku is the preseason favorite to win the North, what is the point of this thread?


 :confused:

K-State was also ranked preseason #11-13 in 2005. Look what happened.

You need to either

a) leave
b) leave
c) kill yourself
d) leave
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: catdude33 on April 09, 2009, 08:58:00 PM
I think maybe nu will win the north.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Brewcrew on April 09, 2009, 11:38:26 PM
thank you for your interest in kansas football   :kstatriot:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 10, 2009, 08:52:24 AM
Thank you for posting on this board again . . . .and again, and again, and again, and again, and again . . .


Captain Meltdown . . . ku has a chance to prove that it wasn't a fluke, but until it actually happens . . . nevermind, you'll never get it.

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Winters on April 10, 2009, 11:53:09 AM
Oh, by the way.... 52-21.


 :lol:
If you really think it gets to us then  :lol:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: PowercatPat on April 10, 2009, 03:40:58 PM
Isn't ku the favorite to win the North this season?


 :confused:

Congrats. I am sure you guys will make a memorial for this great accomplishment.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Oklahoma_Cat on April 10, 2009, 03:46:54 PM
Isn't ku the favorite to win the North this season?


 :confused:

Congrats. I am sure you guys will make a memorialtrophy for this great accomplishment.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: PowercatPat on April 10, 2009, 03:52:23 PM
So if ku is the preseason favorite to win the North, what is the point of this thread?


 :confused:

K-State was also ranked preseason #11-13 in 2005. Look what happened.

You need to either

a) leave
b) leave
c) kill yourself
d) leave

It's impossible to get BMW to leave this board. He lives on this website and needs validation from everyone on here. He is completely obsessed with KSU and what we think of ku. I don't think he will ever have a life.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: icat on April 10, 2009, 05:28:51 PM
BMW....seriously answer the question.  why are you on this board so much?  You are really f@#%$# pathetic.   Why are you so obseesed w/ KSU?  You're also on another free ksu board as well...all the time. 
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Jmo on April 10, 2009, 05:44:09 PM
Isn't ku the favorite to win the North this season?


 :confused:

Yep, lots of pressure on ku this year . . . lets hope Mangino keeps his anger issues in check for everyone's his wife's sake.


fyp... :kstatriot:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 10, 2009, 05:45:04 PM
wut
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: PowercatPat on April 10, 2009, 05:59:25 PM
wut

Good one Ben  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: KSUWFIP on April 11, 2009, 09:54:37 AM
Win 12 games in a season, win a BCS bowl, even up the all-time series, and then we'll talk football.  K?


 :thumbsup:

Okay.

That means you won't come back until then, right?
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: PowercatPat on April 11, 2009, 06:34:59 PM
Win 12 games in a season, win a BCS bowl, even up the all-time series, and then we'll talk football.  K?


 :thumbsup:

Okay.

That means you won't come back until then, right?

QFT. Can we make this happen BMW?
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: ednksu on April 11, 2009, 06:37:31 PM
2007 obviously bothers you an awful lot, though.  Did someone say "BCS Orange Bowl?"


 :rofl:


Nice season for ku . . . I imagine any team with that kind of talent that played a 77 SOS regular season schedule would likely win a lot of games.



Okay... so how is that a fluke?  Wasn't Va Tech ranked #3 in the nation going into the Orange Bowl?


 :confused:

Jesus &@#%ing Christ you are a god damn retard.  Multiple people have tooled you time and time again about much bullcrap that 3 was next to VaTech.  You don't know crap about sports, especially football.  SHUT THE &@#% UP, seriously. 
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: catdude33 on April 11, 2009, 08:02:30 PM
Win 12 games in a season, win a BCS bowl, even up the all-time series, and then we'll talk football.  K?


 :thumbsup:

LOL.  Win a super-elite Alliance Bowl game and then we'll talk. k?  omg.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: dobbie4ksu on April 12, 2009, 01:41:36 AM
Win 12 games in a season, win a BCS bowl, even up the all-time series, and then we'll talk football.  K?


 :thumbsup:

Isnt it funny how ukjr fans tell us to not live in the past with our DOD and with the OOD win over them, but I sure hear them talking a lot about the win against us 52-21...

Hold on
1995-96 41-7
1996-97 38-12
1997-98 48-16
1998-99 54-6
1999-00 50-9
2000-01 52-13
2001-02 40-6
2002-03 64-0 PWND
2003-04 42-6

For an overall score of: KSU-429 vs. ukjr-75...
Didn't even break a hundred in these 9 games combined, HAHA ROFLMA

If you want to live in the past so can we, welcome back Bill oh and BMW STFU!
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Babytears on April 12, 2009, 08:42:59 AM
Having your penis inside of a really hot girl is way more fun while it is happening than remembering it ten years later.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: VGibsonLives on April 12, 2009, 09:06:57 AM
Having your penis inside of a really hot girl is way more fun while it is happening than remembering it ten years later.

How many times are you going to roll this same old tired analogy out? Come on, you're better than that.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Babytears on April 12, 2009, 09:11:39 AM
4 more times.  And Rocky doesn't remember the other time (brain problems).
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: VGibsonLives on April 12, 2009, 09:14:20 AM
4 more times.  And Rocky doesn't remember the other time (brain problems).

thanks for the honesty. Looking forward to some of your new work, though.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: LimestoneOutcropping on April 12, 2009, 12:12:43 PM
So ku's expected to be the best team in the division next year, but '07 was a fluke.  Hmmmm....



 :lol:

Someone may want to tell your fans this  I had more people over to my place to watch the hockey game than went to uk's spring game..
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: wildcat371 on April 12, 2009, 01:28:50 PM
2007 obviously bothers you an awful lot, though.  Did someone say "BCS Orange Bowl?"


 :rofl:


QFT! even espn said you weren't much better last year than in 2007 and was just pussy scheduling, beat OU or Texas and maybe we'll talk about ku being legit :lol:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: PowercatPat on April 12, 2009, 06:33:20 PM
Weird how BMW has completely ignored this topic since questions have been asked.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: mcmwcat on April 12, 2009, 11:36:19 PM
losers who accomplish nothing in the regular season care about winning bowl games.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: phicat1448 on April 13, 2009, 12:07:36 AM
Cincinnati played in the Orange Bowl last season, lost by 3 to V Tech   :lol:

Orange Bowl?  More like Orange You Supposed To Be Watching A Relevant Bowl?   :lol:    :cheers:



The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS national championship last season. 


 :thumbsup:

Orange Bowl:

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=290010259&confId=80

National Championship:

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=290080201&confId=80

they aren't the same idiot
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: jeffy on April 13, 2009, 09:18:37 AM
Cincinnati played in the Orange Bowl last season, lost by 3 to V Tech   :lol:

Orange Bowl?  More like Orange You Supposed To Be Watching A Relevant Bowl?   :lol:    :cheers:



The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS national championship last season. 


 :thumbsup:

Orange Bowl:

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=290010259&confId=80

National Championship:

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=290080201&confId=80

they aren't the same idiot

further pwnage.   :sleep:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: delusionliveshere on April 13, 2009, 11:14:47 AM
It was just some online graph creating thing . . .  geez, I ain't gonna spend an hour on that stuff.


Irony anyone?  Queen Dax spends the majority of his time on all things Jayhawks. 

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: delusionliveshere on April 13, 2009, 11:17:49 AM
Oh, by the way.... 52-21.


 :lol:
If you really think it gets to us then  :lol:


Look here you little dipcrap; you will be awarded a voice when you hit puberty and stop wiping your boogers on your jeans. 
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: jeffy on April 13, 2009, 11:58:28 AM
Oh, by the way.... 52-21.


 :lol:
If you really think it gets to us then  :lol:


Look here you little dipcrap; you will be awarded a voice when you hit puberty and stop wiping your boogers on your jeans. 

Obviously you got to him, Winterz.  Good job!
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 13, 2009, 04:22:31 PM
Deluge . . . another validator in residence.

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: delusionliveshere on April 13, 2009, 04:28:42 PM
Deluge . . . another validator in residence.



 :-*
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 13, 2009, 04:53:29 PM
Cincinnati played in the Orange Bowl last season, lost by 3 to V Tech   :lol:

Orange Bowl?  More like Orange You Supposed To Be Watching A Relevant Bowl?   :lol:    :cheers:



The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS national championship last season. 


 :thumbsup:

Orange Bowl:

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=290010259&confId=80

National Championship:

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=290080201&confId=80

they aren't the same idiot



Never said they were the same.  The Orange Bowl hosted the National Championship, though.  Thanks for playing.


Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: LimestoneOutcropping on April 13, 2009, 05:05:56 PM
Cincinnati played in the Orange Bowl last season, lost by 3 to V Tech   :lol:

Orange Bowl?  More like Orange You Supposed To Be Watching A Relevant Bowl?   :lol:    :cheers:



The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS national championship last season. 


 :thumbsup:

Orange Bowl:

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=290010259&confId=80

National Championship:

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=290080201&confId=80

they aren't the same idiot



Never said they were the same.  The Orange Bowl hosted the National Championship, though.  Thanks for playing.




"thanks for playing" is the lamesburgh you toolbelt.  Bring it better or GTFO.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 13, 2009, 05:20:35 PM
Nice effort.  Maybe next time?


 :confused:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Pittcat on April 13, 2009, 05:24:25 PM
Wait for it...it's coming.  Something stupid is going to show up on my screen.  It's bound to happen right?  I mean ben thinks he just won one.



 :excited:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Bookcat on April 14, 2009, 01:19:20 PM
Kansas was good in 2007. Breezed teh OOC and won on the road vs. A&M, Ostate and took care of business at home and then some. Got picked for an at large bid without winning their division or conference. Congrats. It was a good season.

now,

win the division
win the conference


or stfu
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 14, 2009, 05:04:32 PM
Kansas was good in 2007. Breezed teh OOC and won on the road vs. A&M, Ostate and took care of business at home and then some. Got picked for an at large bid without winning their division or conference. Congrats. It was a good season.

now,

win the division
win the conference


or stfu


I remember when it was "win in Manhattan," and "go to back-to-back bowls." 


 :love:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: phicat1448 on April 14, 2009, 05:55:09 PM
Cincinnati played in the Orange Bowl last season, lost by 3 to V Tech   :lol:

Orange Bowl?  More like Orange You Supposed To Be Watching A Relevant Bowl?   :lol:    :cheers:



The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS national championship last season. 


 :thumbsup:

Orange Bowl:

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=290010259&confId=80

National Championship:

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=290080201&confId=80

they aren't the same idiot



Never said they were the same.  The Orange Bowl hosted the National Championship, though.  Thanks for playing.




nice save  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 14, 2009, 06:24:35 PM
The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS Championship... just like the Fiesta, Rose, and Sugar host it once every four years.  You were flailing at thin air, buddy. 
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: JTKSU on April 14, 2009, 07:03:43 PM
Cincinnati played in the Orange Bowl last season, lost by 3 to V Tech   :lol:

Orange Bowl?  More like Orange You Supposed To Be Watching A Relevant Bowl?   :lol:    :cheers:



The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS national championship last season. 


 :thumbsup:

Yeah.  The play two games at the NC site now.  New to the whole football thing, aren't you?

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: dobbie4ksu on April 14, 2009, 10:48:17 PM
BMW I am stoked to see you implode this fall, you honestly think uk will be better then 4th in the north? Nebraska, Mizzou, and KSU will all be better then your pu$$y school. ku had the weakest schedule ever in 07 and last year with a bit tougher schedule you didn't fair as well. Old Ballz doesn't lose to uk, we have a weak OOC maybe other then UCLA, big maybe, so come conference play State will be rested and ready to dominate. Breath in the past two years cuz Old Ballz is ready to start a new DoD!

 :kstatriot: :kstatriot: :kstatriot: :kstatriot: :kstatriot: :kstatriot: :kstatriot: :kstatriot: :kstatriot: :kstatriot: :kstatriot:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: powercat on April 14, 2009, 11:00:10 PM
ku fans didn't even know they had a football team until late Sept. 07. The fluke thing is true enough. What is even more true is how the NCAA sucks up to ku. Missouri beat them out for the North that year and they still get the better bowl. What? Lou Perkins must have some pretty sweet connections at the home office.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: JTKSU on April 14, 2009, 11:02:35 PM
The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS Championship... just like the Fiesta, Rose, and Sugar host it once every four years.  You were flailing at thin air, buddy. 

Yes, but uk did not play in the rotating BCS NC game.  They did, however, play in what is quickly becoming a second rate BCS Bowl, the Orange Bowl.  Don't bother trying to retract your earlier statement, it'll only result in another Joe Pa-esque meltdown for you.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: phicat1448 on April 14, 2009, 11:22:38 PM
The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS Championship... just like the Fiesta, Rose, and Sugar host it once every four years.  You were flailing at thin air, buddy. 

But it's not called the 'Orange Bowl' which is originally what clams was making fun of when he said "Orange Bowl?  More like Orange You Supposed To Be Watching A Relevant Bowl?"  Maybe if he said "Orange Bowl or any other game sponsored by the Orange Bowl or played in the same same stadium? More like Orange you supposed to be watching a relevant bowl?" then you would be correct.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Bookcat on April 15, 2009, 12:07:06 AM
ku played in the BCS Orange Bowl National Championship Game*






*not the year it was hosted but you get the idea
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Bookcat on April 15, 2009, 12:10:15 AM
At Kansas University.......all we care about are championships*





*well, in basketball, yes, but in football we're content with just winning lots of games and talking trash
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: JTKSU on April 15, 2009, 12:20:35 AM
The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS Championship... just like the Fiesta, Rose, and Sugar host it once every four years.  You were flailing at thin air, buddy. 

But it's not called the 'Orange Bowl' which is originally what clams was making fun of when he said "Orange Bowl?  More like Orange You Supposed To Be Watching A Relevant Bowl?"  Maybe if he said "Orange Bowl or any other game sponsored by the Orange Bowl or played in the same same stadium? More like Orange you supposed to be watching a relevant bowl?" then you would be correct.

QFT.  Think it's called the FedEx BCS National Championship or something like that.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: JTKSU on April 15, 2009, 12:22:59 AM
ku played in the BCS Orange Bowl National Championship Game*






*not the year it was hosted but you get the idea

Hasn't Dolphins Stadium (Pro Player or whatever they call it this year) also hosted the Super Bowl?  So, uk has also played in the Super Bowl, right?
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: cireksu on April 15, 2009, 06:31:56 AM
Miami has hosted the most superbowls.  So ku has actually played in more superbowls than any NFL team.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: TheCatsMeow on April 15, 2009, 09:06:40 AM
This never gets old, I swear I could read this all day.  Dudes gotta be on the edge of depression/suicide.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Bookcat on April 15, 2009, 10:28:47 AM
So ku's expected to be the best team in the division next year, but '07 was a fluke.  Hmmmm....



 :lol:

then its a bet.

ku wins the North next year, right?


 :popcorn:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Bookcat on April 15, 2009, 10:36:29 AM
Quote
The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS national championship last season. 

Oh, so now it is okay to look at the past.

Okay...


We played in the Fiesta Bowl in 2004. You know, come to think of it, I think the Fiesta hosts the National Title game. Well, not the year we played but I was just letting everyone know how important and special we were just to be there.

That was the same year we won the conference by bitch spanking #1 Oklahoma.



So what is the ku measuring stick this year?

beating MU?
winning the North?
beating Snyder?
winning the conference?
making a bowl?


i'm dying to know what you think that I think about ku football.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Babytears on April 15, 2009, 12:46:01 PM
So ku's expected to be the best team in the division next year, but '07 was a fluke.  Hmmmm....



 :lol:

then its a bet.

ku wins the North next year, right?


 :popcorn:

I'll take it.  Why not? 

Terms?
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Babytears on April 15, 2009, 01:12:06 PM
Pansies.  All y'all.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 15, 2009, 01:32:59 PM
The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS Championship... just like the Fiesta, Rose, and Sugar host it once every four years.  You were flailing at thin air, buddy. 

But it's not called the 'Orange Bowl' which is originally what clams was making fun of when he said "Orange Bowl?  More like Orange You Supposed To Be Watching A Relevant Bowl?"  Maybe if he said "Orange Bowl or any other game sponsored by the Orange Bowl or played in the same same stadium? More like Orange you supposed to be watching a relevant bowl?" then you would be correct.



Look, moron.  You're taking it way too far.  My point was that the Orange Bowl is no worse off than any other BCS bowl.  It's still hosting the BCS National Championship once every four years, which signifies to me that the bowl is doing quite well.  Sure, the actual Orange Bowl hasn't had the powerhouse programs it once had, mainly because it takes the ACC champ and an at large.  If you wanna talk about sh*tty programs making a bowl, look no further than the Syracuse/K-State Fiesta Bowl.  Talk about two crappy programs.   ku/Va Tech was two top 10 teams squaring off in what was the best BCS game of '07. 


You idiots continually try to make something out of nothing... that's alright, though.  I would probably resort to those weak tactics if my team sucked as bad as K-State does right now.  Please continue.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 15, 2009, 01:37:38 PM
So ku's expected to be the best team in the division next year, but '07 was a fluke.  Hmmmm....



 :lol:

then its a bet.

ku wins the North next year, right?


 :popcorn:

I'll take it.  Why not? 

Terms?



I'll take the bet as well.  I doubt Bookcat has the balls to put his money where his mouth is, though.  K-State fans are all talk and no walk.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: MadCat on April 15, 2009, 01:54:42 PM

If you wanna talk about sh*tty programs making a bowl, look no further than the Syracuse/K-State Fiesta Bowl.  Talk about two crappy programs.   ku/Va Tech was two top 10 teams squaring off in what was the best BCS game of '07. 


K-State v. Syracuse was entertaining and you know it.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: JTKSU on April 15, 2009, 02:16:56 PM
The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS Championship... just like the Fiesta, Rose, and Sugar host it once every four years.  You were flailing at thin air, buddy. 

But it's not called the 'Orange Bowl' which is originally what clams was making fun of when he said "Orange Bowl?  More like Orange You Supposed To Be Watching A Relevant Bowl?"  Maybe if he said "Orange Bowl or any other game sponsored by the Orange Bowl or played in the same same stadium? More like Orange you supposed to be watching a relevant bowl?" then you would be correct.



Look, moron.  You're taking it way too far.  My point was that the Orange Bowl is no worse off than any other BCS bowl.  It's still hosting the BCS National Championship once every four years, which signifies to me that the bowl is doing quite well.  Sure, the actual Orange Bowl hasn't had the powerhouse programs it once had, mainly because it takes the ACC champ and an at large.  If you wanna talk about sh*tty programs making a bowl, look no further than the Syracuse/K-State Fiesta Bowl.  Talk about two crappy programs.   ku/Va Tech was two top 10 teams squaring off in what was the best BCS game of '07. 


You idiots continually try to make something out of nothing... that's alright, though.  I would probably resort to those weak tactics if my team sucked as bad as K-State does right now.  Please continue.

You mean the game between a 10-1 KSU team and the 9-3, Donavon McNabb-led Syracuse Orangemen (who were riding a seven game win streak)?  How many future NFL HOF candidates were featured in that Orange Bowl?  But yeah, a game featuring the winner of a sorry ACC and a team that didn't even win their own division would be a much bigger game.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 15, 2009, 02:24:49 PM
Syracuse was 9-3?  Thanks for further proving my point.  Oh, and which two BCS programs just had the two worst '09 recruiting classes?  K-State and Syracuse.  Meanwhile, you're trashing on a Va Tech program that has won 10 games or more for like 7 years in a row.  Trashing a Kansas program that was built from the ground up, just like Snyder did at K-State.  ku went 12-1... with one loss coming to a top 5 Mizzou team (on a NEUTRAL field).  Furthermore, the Orange Bowl was the best BCS bowl game in '07.  The other games (Sugar, Fiesta, Rose, BCS title) were all lopsided.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 15, 2009, 02:36:15 PM
Captain Meltdown just bottles up the  :mad: and then lets it all out at once.

Good thing Donovan McNabb wasn't playing for VT in 2007. 

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: phicat1448 on April 15, 2009, 02:59:12 PM
The Orange Bowl hosted the BCS Championship... just like the Fiesta, Rose, and Sugar host it once every four years.  You were flailing at thin air, buddy. 

But it's not called the 'Orange Bowl' which is originally what clams was making fun of when he said "Orange Bowl?  More like Orange You Supposed To Be Watching A Relevant Bowl?"  Maybe if he said "Orange Bowl or any other game sponsored by the Orange Bowl or played in the same same stadium? More like Orange you supposed to be watching a relevant bowl?" then you would be correct.



Look, moron.  You're taking it way too far.  My point was that the Orange Bowl is no worse off than any other BCS bowl.  It's still hosting the BCS National Championship once every four years, which signifies to me that the bowl is doing quite well.  Sure, the actual Orange Bowl hasn't had the powerhouse programs it once had, mainly because it takes the ACC champ and an at large.  If you wanna talk about sh*tty programs making a bowl, look no further than the Syracuse/K-State Fiesta Bowl.  Talk about two crappy programs.   ku/Va Tech was two top 10 teams squaring off in what was the best BCS game of '07. 


You idiots continually try to make something out of nothing... that's alright, though.  I would probably resort to those weak tactics if my team sucked as bad as K-State does right now.  Please continue.

 :lol:

you're right, I'M taking things way to far. Validated yet?  I think you just need another fat chick to hold you and tell you everything is going to be alright.

...and i'll take you bet $500 says ku doesn't win the north next year, see you in November
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 15, 2009, 03:02:41 PM
Yeah, because it's not like Virginia Tech was loaded with talent.  2008 NFL draft picks:


26. Houston Texans:  Duane Brown (OT)

35. Kansas City Chiefs:  Brandon Flowers (CB)

42. Denver Broncos:  Eddie Royal (WR)

72. Buffalo Bills:  Chris Ellis (DE)

118.  Houston Texans:  Xavier Adibi (LB)

148.  Denver Broncos:  Carlton Powell (DT)

174.  San Francisco 49ers:  Josh Morgan (WR)

215.  Baltimore Ravens:  Justin Harper (WR)


Not to mention Victor Harris, a projected 2nd round NFL draft pick in '09.  Yep.... no talent on that '07-08 Va Tech team.


 :jerkoff:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 15, 2009, 03:41:00 PM
They weren't very good at QB Captain Meltdown . . .  :jerkoff:

Lets see, VT ended that season with 3 losses, Syracuse ended their 1997 season with 4 losses . . . huge difference.   #3 (LOL) VT came in at #3 . . . and #1 beat them early in the season by SIX TD's . . . so yeah, they really deserved that #3 spot.   :rolleyes: 

LSU 598 Yards of Total Offense . . . VT 149, LSU lead 28 nothing before VT even scored . . .  but yeah, VT certainly deserved only being 2 spots behind (with 2 losses) LSU; a team that beat them by SIX TD's going into the bowl games.   :rolleyes:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 15, 2009, 03:50:45 PM
Is it possible that a team can improve over the course of the season? 

 :confused:



Anyways, let's talk about Syracuse.  They suck.  They're football program is a disgrace.  They had the worst '09 recruiting class of any BCS school, right behind K-State.  Meanwhile, Va Tech has won 10 games or more for five straight years.  They are loaded with talent from top to bottom. 
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 15, 2009, 03:59:46 PM
Okay . . . I don't know what Syracuse of today has to do with the Donovan McNabb lead Syracuse Orangemen of 1997 . . . but whatever.

I never said teams can't improve, but VT absolutely had no business being ranked #3 in the country going into the 2007 bowl season.   
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Hercules Antigua on April 15, 2009, 04:21:32 PM
Anyways, let's talk about Syracuse.  They suck.  They're football program is a disgrace.  They had the worst '09 recruiting class of any BCS school, right behind K-State.  Meanwhile, Va Tech has won 10 games or more for five straight years.  They are loaded with talent from top to bottom. 
What does the current state of their program have to do how good they were when we played them?  Sure they're junk now but they were Big East champs in '96 '97 and '98.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: MadCat on April 15, 2009, 05:02:35 PM
BMWJhawk is a 4-dimensional being.  Time is as trivial as the circumference of a mule's external rectal sphincter.  We 3-D people wouldn't understand.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 15, 2009, 05:10:44 PM
It's about the perception of the bowl.  You claim the Orange Bowl sucks because it had ku/Va Tech in '07.  I'm just pointing out that the '97 Fiesta Bowl, which featured K-State and Syracuse, wasn't exactly a battle between two powerhouses.  In fact, since then, both programs have hit rock bottom. 
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: cireksu on April 15, 2009, 05:48:27 PM
not sure if there is a way to check this but I think originally you proclaimed the orange bowl as the "best" bcs bowl.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Hercules Antigua on April 15, 2009, 06:07:33 PM
It's about the perception of the bowl.  You claim the Orange Bowl sucks because it had ku/Va Tech in '07.  I'm just pointing out that the '97 Fiesta Bowl, which featured K-State and Syracuse, wasn't exactly a battle between two powerhouses.  In fact, since then, both programs have hit rock bottom. 
So if ku heads back into mediocrity your Orange Bowl win won't be as prestigious?
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: fatty fat fat on April 15, 2009, 06:11:41 PM
when i think sh*tty bcs bowl games, i think 08 orange bowl.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Babytears on April 15, 2009, 06:48:56 PM
It's about the perception of the bowl.  You claim the Orange Bowl sucks because it had ku/Va Tech in '07.  I'm just pointing out that the '97 Fiesta Bowl, which featured K-State and Syracuse, wasn't exactly a battle between two powerhouses.  In fact, since then, both programs have hit rock bottom. 
So if ku heads back into mediocrity your Orange Bowl win won't be as prestigious?

Who says ku isn't mediocre?  Nothing wrong with being mediocre.  My penis looks way bigger going into a small asian girl than it does whilst punjabbing a giant fatty.  Its all perspective.  This may be why its more fun to visit a purlple zone [(this place)/(hot young asian)] rather than [(goodfballteam.com)/(fatty)].  What's going on?
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Bookcat on April 15, 2009, 08:55:46 PM
$50 bones ku doesn't win the North.

We'll paypal it. PM me.

I've won and lost. There are a few others that can vouche for me. MJrod is one of them. If I lose I pay up.

Just reviewed NU's schedule compared to ku's.

I like my chances.    8-)

Does ku really get @ TTech, OU, @ Texas?

cuz NU gets TTech, @ Baylor, and Oklahoma...and I think NU can do better vs. the North than Kansas.

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Babytears on April 15, 2009, 09:08:20 PM
ksu sux.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: The42Yardstick on April 15, 2009, 09:14:27 PM
[(this place)/(hot young asian)] rather than [(goodfballteam.com)/(fatty)]. 

This equation is also able to blow a gaping hole in Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 15, 2009, 09:28:22 PM
$50 bones ku doesn't win the North.

We'll paypal it. PM me.

I've won and lost. There are a few others that can vouche for me. MJrod is one of them. If I lose I pay up.

Just reviewed NU's schedule compared to ku's.

I like my chances.    8-)

Does ku really get @ TTech, OU, @ Texas?

cuz NU gets TTech, @ Baylor, and Oklahoma...and I think NU can do better vs. the North than Kansas.






How about $50 ku covers the spread in Manhattan?


 :confused:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Bookcat on April 15, 2009, 10:07:35 PM
$50 bones ku doesn't win the North.

We'll paypal it. PM me.

I've won and lost. There are a few others that can vouche for me. MJrod is one of them. If I lose I pay up.

Just reviewed NU's schedule compared to ku's.

I like my chances.    8-)

Does ku really get @ TTech, OU, @ Texas?

cuz NU gets TTech, @ Baylor, and Oklahoma...and I think NU can do better vs. the North than Kansas.






How about $50 ku covers the spread in Manhattan?


 :confused:

wha happon to winning the North? You were so confident earlier today.

btw....you call me out for being a betting P U S S and you can't even get the stones to say that ku will straight up beat kstate in manhattan? Geezus dude.  Does your husband post.?
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 15, 2009, 10:18:31 PM
What are you talking about?  You are the one being a pussy, betting AGAINST ku winning the North.  Also, I was going to give you the spread in Manhattan (ku should be favored), but if you want to bet straight up like a dumbass, I will gladly take your money. 
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 15, 2009, 10:41:52 PM
Captain Meltdown is just so damn  :mad: anymore.

Always with the  :mad:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: The42Yardstick on April 15, 2009, 10:56:24 PM
Captain Meltdown is just so damn  :mad: anymore.

Always with the  :mad:

You're getting kind of repetitive, man. That snyder .gif you posted was pretty sweet tho
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 15, 2009, 10:58:22 PM
Meltdown's perpetual  :mad: is kind of repetitive.

How the F can you be a senior in college and be  :mad: 24/7??

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: MadCat on April 15, 2009, 11:01:05 PM
[(this place)/(hot young asian)] rather than [(goodfballteam.com)/(fatty)]. 

This equation is also able to blow a gaping hole in Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.

What?  Position and momentum may be easier predicted by throwing in another variable: chick girthiness (should be a word)? :Rusty:

I used up all my 'awesomeness' points just to post this.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Bookcat on April 15, 2009, 11:33:18 PM
What are you talking about?  You are the one being a pussy, betting AGAINST ku winning the North.  Also, I was going to give you the spread in Manhattan (ku should be favored), but if you want to bet straight up like a dumbass, I will gladly take your money. 

sigh.

u said earlier in this thread the ku would win the north. I said no and that I would bet you they wouldn't. It's really that simple.

ku won't win the North. If they do...fine, put it in your signature...post it all over the intarwebs...

but I've got $50.00 that says they won't.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: PowercatPat on April 16, 2009, 08:14:29 AM
What are you talking about?  You are the one being a pussy, betting AGAINST ku winning the North.  Also, I was going to give you the spread in Manhattan (ku should be favored), but if you want to bet straight up like a dumbass, I will gladly take your money. 

sigh.

u said earlier in this thread the ku would win the north. I said no and that I would bet you they wouldn't. It's really that simple.

ku won't win the North. If they do...fine, put it in your signature...post it all over the intarwebs...

but I've got $50.00 that says they won't.

Nice sig, Book.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: cireksu on April 16, 2009, 09:07:27 AM
c'mon bmw man up and bet him.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: LimestoneOutcropping on April 16, 2009, 10:47:45 AM
It's about the perception of the bowl.  You claim the Orange Bowl sucks because it had ku/Va Tech in '07.  I'm just pointing out that the '97 Fiesta Bowl, which featured K-State and Syracuse, wasn't exactly a battle between two powerhouses.  In fact, since then, both programs have hit rock bottom. 
So if ku heads back into mediocrity your Orange Bowl win won't be as prestigious?

Who says ku isn't mediocre?  Nothing wrong with being mediocre.  My penis looks way bigger going into a small asian girl than it does whilst punjabbing a giant fatty.  Its all perspective.  This may be why its more fun to visit a purlple zone [(this place)/(hot young asian)] rather than [(goodfballteam.com)/(fatty)].  What's going on?

Generally you post like a lost retard trying to find the bathroom but that was  :lol:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Babytears on April 16, 2009, 04:05:25 PM
Get real.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: MadCat on April 16, 2009, 04:50:24 PM
Get real.

Fer shurr!

Like, gag me with a spoon.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Del Tremens on November 17, 2009, 04:22:06 PM
Isn't ku the favorite to win the North this season?


 :confused:

Yep, lots of pressure on ku this year . . . lets hope Mangino keeps his anger issues in check for everyone's sake.



 :popcorn:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 17, 2009, 04:25:07 PM
Just call me:

(http://happyvalleynews.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/nostradamus2.jpg)
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 17, 2009, 04:28:07 PM
I really feel bad for Ben . . . the last 2 years his keyboard has written so many checks that ku football has failed to cover.   

It's . . . well . . . sad really.

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: BMWJhawk on November 17, 2009, 04:31:08 PM
Quit being such a hypocrite, 'Pad.  You guys blindly defended Ron Prince until it was blatantly obvious that the guy wouldn't work out at K-State.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 17, 2009, 04:34:00 PM
LOL yeah Ben . . . we "defended" Ron Prince until about his 15th game at K-State, then unlike you who has done nothing but hang from Mangino's nut sack until 2 months ago, we clowned him repeatedly. 

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: BMWJhawk on November 17, 2009, 05:00:15 PM
LOL yeah Ben . . . we "defended" Ron Prince until about his 15th game at K-State, then unlike you who has done nothing but hang from Mangino's nut sack until 2 months ago, we clowned him repeatedly. 





Bullsh*t, 'Pad.  I've been critical of Mangino many, many times.  Go to phog.net and ask them what I think of Mangino.  The guy's a mediocre football coach.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 17, 2009, 05:02:59 PM
Ben you can get all angered up all day but it won't matter . . . but outside of a couple of sad little post game meltdowns (you know when we told you that would happen) you've been over here telling us all about how Mangino has built ku into a power, and telling us how Mangino was going to bury Snyder this year by 4 or 5 TD's.  

Dude . . . just deal with the reality of Karma here for awhile, it's all good.




Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: JTKSU on November 17, 2009, 05:41:20 PM
LOL yeah Ben . . . we "defended" Ron Prince until about his 15th game at K-State, then unlike you who has done nothing but hang from Mangino's nut sack until 2 months ago, we clowned him repeatedly. 





Bullsh*t, 'Pad.  I've been critical of Mangino many, many times.  Go to phog.net and ask them what I think of Mangino.  The guy's a mediocre football coach.

I'm guessing that a very small amount of research would unearth many off your posts that directly contradict this statement.  I'll give it to you though, when you jump off a bandwagon/meltdown, you go all in.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: JTKSU on November 17, 2009, 05:48:42 PM


Anybody else notice the large amount of uk fans who have deleted their accounts since this thread started?   Nice fanbase they have there.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 17, 2009, 05:50:10 PM


Anybody else notice the large amount of uk fans who have deleted their accounts since this thread started?   Nice fanbase they have there.

And we're so visitor friendly . . . you can say anything here . . . it's one of the last bastions of free speech . . . ksufans.com   :kstatriot:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: JTKSU on November 17, 2009, 05:53:32 PM


Anybody else notice the large amount of uk fans who have deleted their accounts since this thread started?   Nice fanbase they have there.

And we're so visitor friendly . . . you can say anything here . . . it's one of the last bastions of free speech . . . ksufans.com   :kstatriot:

QFT.  It's not like those dudes got banned or anything, they just realized they are idiots and got tired of making fools of themselves.  Nice to see Ben apparently likes the abuse and is back on board.
 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: ew2x4 on November 17, 2009, 06:06:21 PM
So did Ben pay up?
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: BMWJhawk on November 17, 2009, 06:11:33 PM
Ben you can get all angered up all day but it won't matter . . . but outside of a couple of sad little post game meltdowns (you know when we told you that would happen) you've been over here telling us all about how Mangino has built ku into a power, and telling us how Mangino was going to bury Snyder this year by 4 or 5 TD's.  

Dude . . . just deal with the reality of Karma here for awhile, it's all good.









Mangino has improved the football program, but he lost the respect of his players.  Players told Lew they would transfer if Mangino returned.  Whether you guys want to admit it or not, there's some pretty good talent within the ku football program right now.  A coach like Sumlin would have ku right back in contention for the North next season.  




LOL yeah Ben . . . we "defended" Ron Prince until about his 15th game at K-State, then unlike you who has done nothing but hang from Mangino's nut sack until 2 months ago, we clowned him repeatedly.  







Bullsh*t, 'Pad.  I've been critical of Mangino many, many times.  Go to phog.net and ask them what I think of Mangino.  The guy's a mediocre football coach.

I'm guessing that a very small amount of research would unearth many off your posts that directly contradict this statement.  I'll give it to you though, when you jump off a bandwagon/meltdown, you go all in.



I'll always support the ku football program.  As far as Mangino goes, I wanted to believe.  I really did.  The '07 season almost had me convinced, but I could never buy into Mangino 100%.  There's only so many shovel passes a man can tolerate in his life.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Bookcat on November 17, 2009, 06:13:06 PM
Quit being such a hypocrite, 'Pad.  You guys blindly defended Ron Prince until it was blatantly obvious that the guy wouldn't work out at K-State.

your new sig pic made this statement hilariously ironic.

17-10
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: MOKSUAZ on November 17, 2009, 06:14:05 PM
Ben you can get all angered up all day but it won't matter . . . but outside of a couple of sad little post game meltdowns (you know when we told you that would happen) you've been over here telling us all about how Mangino has built ku into a power, and telling us how Mangino was going to bury Snyder this year by 4 or 5 TD's.  

Dude . . . just deal with the reality of Karma here for awhile, it's all good.









Mangino has improved the football program, but he lost the respect of his players.  Players told Lew they would transfer if Mangino returned.  Whether you guys want to admit it or not, there's some pretty good talent within the ku football program right now.  A coach like Sumlin would have ku right back in contention for the North next season.  




LOL yeah Ben . . . we "defended" Ron Prince until about his 15th game at K-State, then unlike you who has done nothing but hang from Mangino's nut sack until 2 months ago, we clowned him repeatedly.  







Bullsh*t, 'Pad.  I've been critical of Mangino many, many times.  Go to phog.net and ask them what I think of Mangino.  The guy's a mediocre football coach.

I'm guessing that a very small amount of research would unearth many off your posts that directly contradict this statement.  I'll give it to you though, when you jump off a bandwagon/meltdown, you go all in.



I'll always support the ku football program.  As far as Mangino goes, I wanted to believe.  I really did.  The '07 season almost had me convinced, but I could never buy into Mangino 100%.  There's only so many shovel passes a man can tolerate in his life.

could it be possible BMW trying to defend himself about not liking Mangino could be better than one of his infamous meltdowns?  more to come as this situation develops.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: BMWJhawk on November 17, 2009, 06:22:36 PM
Quit being such a hypocrite, 'Pad.  You guys blindly defended Ron Prince until it was blatantly obvious that the guy wouldn't work out at K-State.

your new sig pic made this statement hilariously ironic.

17-10




If you hadn't left phog.net three years ago with your tail tucked between your legs, you would have known my dislike for Mangino by this point.  It's so pathetic how you crawl out of your hole once the adversity sets in at ku.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: cireksu on November 17, 2009, 06:36:46 PM
Quit being such a hypocrite, 'Pad.  You guys blindly defended Ron Prince until it was blatantly obvious that the guy wouldn't work out at K-State.

your new sig pic made this statement hilariously ironic.

17-10




If you hadn't left phog.net three years ago with your tail tucked between your legs, you would have known my dislike for Mangino by this point.  It's so pathetic how you crawl out of your hole once the adversity sets in at ku.


BWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Bookcat on November 17, 2009, 06:43:52 PM
Quit being such a hypocrite, 'Pad.  You guys blindly defended Ron Prince until it was blatantly obvious that the guy wouldn't work out at K-State.

your new sig pic made this statement hilariously ironic.

17-10




If you hadn't left phog.net three years ago with your tail tucked between your legs, you would have known my dislike for Mangino by this point.  It's so pathetic how you crawl out of your hole once the adversity sets in at ku.

So, you only act like you love all things Mangino on this board? and that I don't know about your dislike for Mangino because I don't follow you to phog.net? Are you serious?

btw...haven't seen much of you after 17-10 have we?


History Awaited you and it never happened.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: ew2x4 on November 17, 2009, 06:44:16 PM
Quit being such a hypocrite, 'Pad.  You guys blindly defended Ron Prince until it was blatantly obvious that the guy wouldn't work out at K-State.

your new sig pic made this statement hilariously ironic.

17-10




If you hadn't left phog.net three years ago with your tail tucked between your legs, you would have known my dislike for Mangino by this point.  It's so pathetic how you crawl out of your hole once the adversity sets in at ku.

First off, you do the exact same thing here. Secondly, why did you not pay the man???
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: BMWJhawk on November 17, 2009, 06:49:54 PM
I'm not hiding anywhere.  I congratulated you guys after the ku/K_State for a big win.  As far as paying "the man" goes, I have no idea what you're talking about.  No one officially bet me on anything... you guys were too big of pussies to believe in your own team. 
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 17, 2009, 06:51:55 PM
Yeah . . . you lived on this board for months, when ku started to tank you pretty much disappeared Ben . . . good to have you back, but geezus dude, quit trying so hard to cover up the reality of the situation.

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: ew2x4 on November 17, 2009, 06:55:27 PM
I'm not hiding anywhere.  I congratulated you guys after the ku/K_State for a big win.  As far as paying "the man" goes, I have no idea what you're talking about.  No one officially bet me on anything... you guys were too big of pussies to believe in your own team. 

No one officially bet anything because you pussed out. Seriously, go back and read this. You look like a complete pussy. You tried changing the bet and then when he kept offering the bet that you initiated, you pussed out and left.

And to say you didn't go into hiding is hilarious.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: cireksu on November 17, 2009, 07:00:04 PM
how much does it suck to be completely wrong about everything you ever came here talking shlt about?

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: BMWJhawk on November 17, 2009, 07:04:45 PM
Yeah . . . you lived on this board for months, when ku started to tank you pretty much disappeared Ben . . . good to have you back, but geezus dude, quit trying so hard to cover up the reality of the situation.





Dude, that's bullsh*t.  It's been a tough season for ku obviously, but I haven't pulled a Bookcat.  I guess you missed all the posts congratulating K-State on the win against ku, and complimenting Snyder for the job he's done this season.  I had to delete another multiple page thread because some facebook stalker posted my picture.  It seems to me like you're just frustrated that ku is about to hire a legitimate football coach.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: jthutch on November 17, 2009, 07:13:02 PM
What are you talking about?  You are the one being a pussy, betting AGAINST ku winning the North.  Also, I was going to give you the spread in Manhattan (ku should be favored), but if you want to bet straight up like a dumbass, I will gladly take your money. 

Where is this guy did he commit suicide?  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 17, 2009, 07:17:52 PM
I didn't say you didn't come on here to congratulate us with your "the better team lost" thread . . . LOL . . . you're in full on CYA mode now Ben . . . you lived on this board for hours every day for months, until ku started to tank, then it was a post here and there.  

Plus . . . you can never figure it when your getting yanked dude . . . I'd say the consensus on this board was that Mangino had maybe a 50% chance of keeping this job if he went 1-7, damn, remember how  :mad: :mad: :mad: you'd get when we tried to tell you Mangino wasn't that great??    So it's not like we never saw the day Mangino would get canned . . . geez dude, come on Ben.

Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: BMWJhawk on November 17, 2009, 07:21:14 PM
I didn't say you didn't come on here to congratulate us with your "the better team lost" thread . . . LOL . . . you're in full on CYA mode now Ben . . . you lived on this board for hours every day for months, until ku started to tank, then it was a post here and there.  

Plus . . . you can never figure it when your getting yanked dude . . . I'd say the consensus on this board was that Mangino had maybe a 50% chance of keeping this job if he went 1-7, damn, remember how  :mad: :mad: :mad: you'd get when we tried to tell you Mangino wasn't that great??    So it's not like we never saw the day Mangino would get canned . . . geez dude, come on Ben.






Dude, I'm fine.  Like I said, I'm actually kind of excited that ku is going to find itself a football coach that isn't 400 pounds overweight.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: ew2x4 on November 17, 2009, 08:08:32 PM
Yeah . . . you lived on this board for months, when ku started to tank you pretty much disappeared Ben . . . good to have you back, but geezus dude, quit trying so hard to cover up the reality of the situation.





Dude, that's bullsh*t.  It's been a tough season for ku obviously, but I haven't pulled a Bookcat.  I guess you missed all the posts congratulating K-State on the win against ku, and complimenting Snyder for the job he's done this season.

I guess you missed all the posts asking where the hell you went. Besides the one post eating crow and the couple backhanded compliment posts, you've been all but outta here. That and you bail out on bets. Not cool dude.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: JTKSU on November 17, 2009, 08:09:02 PM
Ben you can get all angered up all day but it won't matter . . . but outside of a couple of sad little post game meltdowns (you know when we told you that would happen) you've been over here telling us all about how Mangino has built ku into a power, and telling us how Mangino was going to bury Snyder this year by 4 or 5 TD's.  

Dude . . . just deal with the reality of Karma here for awhile, it's all good.









Mangino has improved the football program, but he lost the respect of his players.  Players told Lew they would transfer if Mangino returned.  Whether you guys want to admit it or not, there's some pretty good talent within the ku football program right now.  A coach like Sumlin would have ku right back in contention for the North next season.  




LOL yeah Ben . . . we "defended" Ron Prince until about his 15th game at K-State, then unlike you who has done nothing but hang from Mangino's nut sack until 2 months ago, we clowned him repeatedly.  







Bullsh*t, 'Pad.  I've been critical of Mangino many, many times.  Go to phog.net and ask them what I think of Mangino.  The guy's a mediocre football coach.

I'm guessing that a very small amount of research would unearth many off your posts that directly contradict this statement.  I'll give it to you though, when you jump off a bandwagon/meltdown, you go all in.



I'll always support the ku football program.  As far as Mangino goes, I wanted to believe.  I really did.  The '07 season almost had me convinced, but I could never buy into Mangino 100%.  There's only so many shovel passes a man can tolerate in his life.

Why in the world would a guy like Sumlin want to go to uk, knowing full well the roster is full of TPs and FCs?  Also, uk only has one thing going for it that Houston doesn't, membership in a major conference.  Seems like if Sumlin was to leave Houston, it would be for a very green pasture, not to coach at a school where the fanbase doesn't give a crap about the football program.
Title: Re: It wasn't a fluke . . .
Post by: Bookcat on November 17, 2009, 09:26:03 PM
Yeah . . . you lived on this board for months, when ku started to tank you pretty much disappeared Ben . . . good to have you back, but geezus dude, quit trying so hard to cover up the reality of the situation.





Dude, that's bullsh*t.  It's been a tough season for ku obviously, but I haven't pulled a Bookcat.  I guess you missed all the posts congratulating K-State on the win against ku, and complimenting Snyder for the job he's done this season.  I had to delete another multiple page thread because some facebook stalker posted my picture.  It seems to me like you're just frustrated that ku is about to hire a legitimate football coach.

pulled a Bookcat? Was I on the phog non-stop over the offseason bragging about how our back-up's were better than Kstate and would destroy your team......? Um, no.


I haven't posted on phog.net regularly since 2005 when it was pretty much common knowledge that phog is a ku homer board with absolutely no objectivity....Its like gopowercat for the high and mighty. Why waste time convincing you turds over there of something you'll never accept? More importantly, why do you insist on bragging up ku on this board when you know its a complete waste of effort?