KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on March 31, 2009, 04:04:18 PM

Title: sixty six
Post by: fatty fat fat on March 31, 2009, 04:04:18 PM: we spent 66 weeks ranked in the top TEN during the DoD.

:'(

http://www.appollarchive.com/football/ap/app_total.cfm?sort=top10app&decade=1990s&rows=25
http://www.appollarchive.com/football/ap/app_total.cfm?sort=top10app&decade=2000s&rows=25
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: hemmy on March 31, 2009, 04:32:34 PM: still 20th for the 2000s :ksu:
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: cireksu on March 31, 2009, 07:03:49 PM: :banghead:
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: Kat Kid on March 31, 2009, 09:20:45 PM: The 6/7 eleven wins streak was sick. Even '01 we beat SC on the road, were in games in Norman and Lincoln when that meant something and still went bowling.

Jesus H. Christ I would triple-felch OB's whole family for that next year.
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: Winters on March 31, 2009, 09:36:41 PM: :'(
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: catdude33 on April 01, 2009, 02:25:19 PM: We will never be that good again. Will we? I just don't see how it could happen.

Darn.
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: nurple on April 02, 2009, 08:56:09 AM: I wish we could quit living in the past so much. That time period was great for us, but it makes us look stupid to constantly re-visit old records and statistics when we can still put a viable team on the field now.
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: mcmwcat on April 02, 2009, 11:22:22 AM: Quote from: nurple on April 02, 2009, 08:56:09 AM
I wish we could quit living in the past so much. That time period was great for us, but it makes us look stupid to constantly re-visit old records and statistics when we can still put a viable team on the field now.

hiring gary patterson might have helped
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: ~WabashRoll~ on April 02, 2009, 01:10:30 PM: Quote from: mcmwcat on April 02, 2009, 11:22:22 AM
Quote from: nurple on April 02, 2009, 08:56:09 AM
I wish we could quit living in the past so much. That time period was great for us, but it makes us look stupid to constantly re-visit old records and statistics when we can still put a viable team on the field now.

hiring gary patterson might have helped

QFT.

Oh well, we'll never know what happened.
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: Bookcat on April 02, 2009, 03:12:04 PM: Quote from: catdude33 on April 01, 2009, 02:25:19 PM
We will never be that good again. Will we? I just don't see how it could happen.

Darn.

'98 good? no.

1996 good. I think so.
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: ksu_FAN on April 02, 2009, 04:10:51 PM: Quote from: Bookcat on April 02, 2009, 03:12:04 PM
Quote from: catdude33 on April 01, 2009, 02:25:19 PM
We will never be that good again. Will we? I just don't see how it could happen.

Darn.

'98 good? no.

1996 good. I think so.

Yeah, and 96 good probably goes 9-3 or 8-4 in the current Big 12.
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: CrimsonBlue on April 02, 2009, 05:32:57 PM: 1996 in how long? 3-4 years? Prince didn't leave a whole lot in the cupboard for Snyder.
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: steve dave on April 02, 2009, 05:53:41 PM: Quote from: BMWJhawk on April 02, 2009, 05:32:57 PM
1996 in how long? 3-4 years? Prince didn't leave a whole lot in the cupboard for Snyder.

If we're lucky :frown:
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: hemmy on April 02, 2009, 06:08:23 PM: IMO, we never have another winning season, and get kicked out of B12

:-X
Title: Re: sixty six
Post by: wildcat371 on April 05, 2009, 12:06:06 PM: Quote from: hemmy on March 31, 2009, 04:32:34 PM
still 20th for the 2000s :ksu:

Time to bring that rank up :thumbsup: