KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: KCcat28 on February 20, 2009, 04:47:33 PM

Title: Ludwig?
Post by: KCcat28 on February 20, 2009, 04:47:33 PM
commence meltdown...  :flush: :flush: :flush:

Edit: for people that don't know what I am talking about he is leaving the program... Does this open the door for BG rumors again?
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: steve dave on February 20, 2009, 04:53:04 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Applejack on February 20, 2009, 04:54:38 PM
Can we just get rid of the football program for a couple years?

This is hilarious.  :lol:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: steve dave on February 20, 2009, 04:55:47 PM
Bill runs off assistants faster than Ron!
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: chum1 on February 20, 2009, 04:58:44 PM
Thanks, old balls.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: KSU176 on February 20, 2009, 05:00:22 PM
Surprise Surprise.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Coach Bake on February 20, 2009, 05:00:57 PM
Must have realized Old Ballz is the real oc.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Joker on February 20, 2009, 05:01:50 PM
When does Koening leave, and where to?
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: KCcat28 on February 20, 2009, 05:03:27 PM
I'd expect the O-line coach to be leaving to because it seems like he and Ludwig are glued at the him...
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Perry on February 20, 2009, 05:06:41 PM
Just so we can bring in an OC that BB wants, right? Right?  :pray:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: KCcat28 on February 20, 2009, 05:07:42 PM
Uh Oh... Jim Harbaugh is said to be the new OC according to a Cal football website... could we be getting a little of the sweet GPC magic?
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: stormnut on February 20, 2009, 05:10:31 PM
Uh Oh... Jim Harbaugh is said to be the new OC according to a Cal football website... could we be getting a little of the sweet GPC magic?

 :powertard:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: steve dave on February 20, 2009, 05:12:38 PM
pending another LMAO GPC fitz up:

Ron,

I speak on behalf of Kansas State University when I say...sorry bro, we made a mistake.  Please come home.

I remain,
steve dave
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: stormnut on February 20, 2009, 05:13:24 PM
pending another LMAO GPC fitz up:

Ron,

I speak on behalf of Kansas State University when I say...sorry bro, we made a mistake.  Please come home.

I remain,
steve dave
[/quote

 :powertard: :powertard:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: kougar24 on February 20, 2009, 05:14:09 PM
KITN lives!

 :rofl:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: steve dave on February 20, 2009, 05:17:42 PM
Congrats on your promotion Mr. Dimel  :lol:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: kougar24 on February 20, 2009, 05:19:06 PM
Congrats on your promotion Mr. Dimel  :lol:

 :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: doom on February 20, 2009, 05:19:53 PM
Maybe Ron never got fired.  He's still in Manhattan.  Maybe it was just a GPC story that never got retracted...
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: steve dave on February 20, 2009, 05:20:39 PM
You know who is probably pretty excited about this news?  Michael Smith.  THE WHOLE GANG IS GOING TO BE BACK TOGETHER!  :ksu:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: mikeycat on February 20, 2009, 05:23:38 PM
&@#% andy ludwig.

http://calbears.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/022009aaa.html
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: mikeycat on February 20, 2009, 05:27:51 PM
by the way, one of you smart web guys needs to figure out when Cal posted that on their site and see if they were Fitz's source...
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Perry on February 20, 2009, 05:28:13 PM
Congrats on your promotion Mr. Dimel  :lol:

 :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:

That's not funny  :frown:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: ~WabashRoll~ on February 20, 2009, 05:41:47 PM
When does Koening leave, and where to?

I'm still surprised it's taken this long.

Old Ballz.  What else can you really say?


Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Pett on February 20, 2009, 05:50:53 PM
You never knew what you had until it's gone...

Seriously guys, we had Utah's fracking offensive coordinator. :angry:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: GoodForAnother on February 20, 2009, 05:53:17 PM
Ludwig: Run the ball?  LOL!
Snyder:  :curse:
Ludwig:  :scared:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: steve dave on February 20, 2009, 06:16:31 PM
Ludwig: Run the ball?  LOL!
Snyder:  :curse:
Ludwig:  :scared:

Snyder:   :cyclist:
Ludwig:   :rolleyes:

Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: catsfan20052006 on February 20, 2009, 06:19:55 PM
commence meltdown...  :flush: :flush: :flush:

Edit: for people that don't know what I am talking about he is leaving the program... Does this open the door for BG rumors again?

BG?
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: hemmy on February 20, 2009, 06:21:46 PM
Ludwig: Run the ball?  LOL!
Snyder:  :curse:
Ludwig:  :scared:

Snyder:   :cyclist:
Ludwig:   :rolleyes:



hate my life  :frown:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: BostonPancake on February 20, 2009, 06:25:22 PM
refrankingdiculous

EDIT:  Koenning won't leave next....Snyder will re-retire.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: treysolid on February 20, 2009, 06:40:24 PM
3 options:

1). Billy Gonzales

2). Sonny Dykes

3). FAIL
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: cireksu on February 20, 2009, 06:47:21 PM
 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: RockyMtnCat on February 20, 2009, 07:01:46 PM
not a good fit with LSnyder system

ever think he might have wanted to go home?????????

good grief



x
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: catzacker on February 20, 2009, 07:04:22 PM
awesome.  i was trying to come up with reasons why i should renew my season tickets.  thanks for saving me some money, old balls.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: fatty fat fat on February 20, 2009, 07:19:17 PM
awesome.  i was trying to come up with reasons why i should renew my season tickets.  thanks for saving me some money, old balls.

qft. why the f*ck would you even bother? Mangino will name the score.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: hemmy on February 20, 2009, 07:30:00 PM
awesome.  i was trying to come up with reasons why i should renew my season tickets.  thanks for saving me some money, old balls.

qft. why the f*ck would you even bother? Mangino will name the score.

my dad pays for my tickets :dunno:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: fatty fat fat on February 20, 2009, 07:31:08 PM
awesome.  i was trying to come up with reasons why i should renew my season tickets.  thanks for saving me some money, old balls.

qft. why the f*ck would you even bother? Mangino will name the score.

my dad pays for my tickets :dunno:

yeah, me 2!
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: hemmy on February 20, 2009, 07:32:47 PM
'member when Mangino brought his best smoky and mirrory team of all time to bsfs ???  we almost won
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: jester66 on February 20, 2009, 07:56:05 PM
Probably clears the way for Bryce. 
Andy obviously didn't make Mrs. Brown happy.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: ~WabashRoll~ on February 20, 2009, 08:09:27 PM
Rex Ryan.

Wesley McGriff.

You join an elite fraternity of K-State coaches, Mr. Ludwig.  I salute you.

 
:kstatriot:

Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: hankh34 on February 20, 2009, 08:10:35 PM
I think Terry Allen might consider the position.  
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Buddha_Cat on February 20, 2009, 08:17:14 PM
How many of his recruits will transfer to Cal now??? :ohno: :ohno: :users:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: steve dave on February 20, 2009, 08:22:05 PM
How many of his recruits will transfer to Cal now??? :ohno: :ohno: :users:

they can't dumbass
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: oneeyedWillie on February 20, 2009, 08:36:18 PM
How many of his recruits will transfer to Cal now??? :ohno: :ohno: :users:

Lucky for us he didn't have any recruits.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Perry on February 20, 2009, 08:36:32 PM
How many of his recruits will transfer to Cal now??? :ohno: :ohno: :users:

All 0 of them?
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: ArchE_Cat on February 20, 2009, 09:34:02 PM
Andy saw the writing on the wall....he saw what it is going to take to turn this around, strike one. He saw that VK is the ordained one, strike two. Tedford, who doesn't likely have long left at Cal, calls...strike three (Andy has a better shot at becoming hc at Cal than at KSU). Plus its easier to get to the bcs from the pac 10. Adios, andrew "I can't recruit" ludwig.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on February 20, 2009, 09:55:32 PM
Silly meltdown, IMO.  We're going to be below average for the next 2-3 season regardless of who our OC is.  The current staff is stepping into a way franked-up situation, and the ones to blame are: (1) Wefald, (2) Krause, (3) Prince, (4) Weiser.

So far, Snyder hasn't really done anything wrong as far as I can tell.  (Not saying he's the answer -- I've wanted Patterson since 2005.)  Snyder brought in crap recruits, but it was probably better than Prince was on track to do.  Snyder also brought in way better coordinators than we've had in years, and hopefully he'll find another one.

I don't understand all this  :runaway:.  We were kinda screwed yesterday, and today we're only marginally more screwed.  And we're still better off than if Prince was the coach.

Stamp me if you want.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: steve dave on February 20, 2009, 09:58:27 PM
Silly meltdown, IMO.  We're going to be below average for the next 2-3 season regardless of who our OC is.  The current staff is stepping into a way franked-up situation, and the ones to blame are: (1) Wefald, (2) Krause, (3) Prince, (4) Weiser.

So far, Snyder hasn't really done anything wrong as far as I can tell.  (Not saying he's the answer -- I've wanted Patterson since 2005.)  Snyder brought in crap recruits, but it was probably better than Prince was on track to do.  Snyder also brought in way better coordinators than we've had in years, and hopefully he'll find another one.

I don't understand all this  :runaway:.  We were kinda screwed yesterday, and today we're only marginally more screwed.  And we're still better off than if Prince was the coach.

Stamp me if you want.

So, in summary, we should have hired Patterson.  We know.  Thanks Hawking.   :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: hemmy on February 20, 2009, 09:59:01 PM
Silly meltdown, IMO.  We're going to be below average for the next 2-3 season regardless of who our OC is.  The current staff is stepping into a way franked-up situation, and the ones to blame are: (1) Wefald, (2) Krause, (3) Prince, (4) Weiser.

So far, Snyder hasn't really done anything wrong as far as I can tell.  (Not saying he's the answer -- I've wanted Patterson since 2005.)  Snyder brought in crap recruits, but it was probably better than Prince was on track to do.  Snyder also brought in way better coordinators than we've had in years, and hopefully he'll find another one.

I don't understand all this  :runaway:.  We were kinda screwed yesterday, and today we're only marginally more screwed.  And we're still better off than if Prince was the coach.

Stamp me if you want.

Stan Parrish for OC  :ksu: :excited:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: NEKS-Cat on February 20, 2009, 10:04:40 PM
Silly meltdown, IMO.  We're going to be below average for the next 2-3 season regardless of who our OC is.  The current staff is stepping into a way franked-up situation, and the ones to blame are: (1) Wefald, (2) Krause, (3) Prince, (4) Weiser.

So far, Snyder hasn't really done anything wrong as far as I can tell.  (Not saying he's the answer -- I've wanted Patterson since 2005.)  Snyder brought in crap recruits, but it was probably better than Prince was on track to do.  Snyder also brought in way better coordinators than we've had in years, and hopefully he'll find another one.

I don't understand all this  :runaway:.  We were kinda screwed yesterday, and today we're only marginally more screwed.  And we're still better off than if Prince was the coach.

Stamp me if you want.

True dat!
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: yadig? on February 20, 2009, 10:30:57 PM
 :banghead: :crybaby: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: sevenyearhawk on February 20, 2009, 10:35:22 PM
Last one out of Manhattan turn off the lights?

But The REAL question is:

will the band play the Wabash Cannonball on the deck of the Catanic as it sinks ...
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: steve dave on February 20, 2009, 10:38:20 PM
Last one out of Manhattan turn off the lights?

But The REAL question is:

will the band play the Wabash Cannonball on the deck of the Catanic as it sinks ...


hilarious coming from a jayhawk....like you losers can talk about college sports to elites like us  :lol:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: michigancat on February 21, 2009, 07:52:23 AM
Silly meltdown, IMO.  We're going to be below average for the next 2-3 season regardless of who our OC is.  The current staff is stepping into a way franked-up situation, and the ones to blame are: (1) Wefald, (2) Krause, (3) Prince, (4) Weiser.

So far, Snyder hasn't really done anything wrong as far as I can tell.  (Not saying he's the answer -- I've wanted Patterson since 2005.)  Snyder brought in crap recruits, but it was probably better than Prince was on track to do.  Snyder also brought in way better coordinators than we've had in years, and hopefully he'll find another one.

I don't understand all this  :runaway:.  We were kinda screwed yesterday, and today we're only marginally more screwed.  And we're still better off than if Prince was the coach.

Stamp me if you want.

Surprised it took 2 pages.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: ~WabashRoll~ on February 21, 2009, 07:55:56 AM
Jonathon Beasley and Del Miller will make a salty tandem as co-OC's.

Not really sweating this Ludwig "news".  I want coaches that want to coach here.

 

Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 21, 2009, 08:31:32 AM
Weren't all the phogtards saying that Ludwig was the only guy on the staff at Oregon a few years ago that didn't get a pay raise, and that Ludwig wasn't exactly "loved" on the Utah staff??

Welcome Billy Gonzales.   :peek:

Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: steve dave on February 21, 2009, 08:49:48 AM
Jonathon Beasley

Are we seriously considering given a position coach from Montana an OC job?  :frown:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Johnny Wichita on February 21, 2009, 09:01:46 AM
Jonathon Beasley

Are we seriously considering given a position coach from Montana an OC job?  :frown:

Ha!  Last time I saw him he was a door man at a comedy club in Wichita.  That was like three years ago. 

God I hope not. 
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: steve dave on February 21, 2009, 09:04:59 AM
Jonathon Beasley

Are we seriously considering given a position coach from Montana an OC job?  :frown:

Ha!  Last time I saw him he was a door man at a comedy club in Wichita.  That was like three years ago. 

God I hope not. 

Wichita Stealth QB experience which is nice
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: jthutch on February 21, 2009, 09:24:46 AM
Jonathon Beasley

Are we seriously considering given a position coach from Montana an OC job?  :frown:

Ha!  Last time I saw him he was a door man at a comedy club in Wichita.  That was like three years ago. 

God I hope not. 

Wichita Stealth QB experience which is nice

Saw him play there once.  game kinda sucked.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: KansasForever on February 21, 2009, 09:50:59 AM
'member when Mangino brought his best smoky and mirrory team of all time to bsfs ???  we almost won

Ron was 10-7 with a bowl game and two wins over Top 10 Texas teams before this game.  7-13 and no wins over ranked/winning teams since.

Mangino 16-7, one Top 5 win and two-time bowl champs since. 

Major tipping point, bros. 

Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: JohnnyUtah on February 21, 2009, 09:57:25 AM
Silly meltdown, IMO.  We're going to be below average for the next 2-3 season regardless of who our OC is.  The current staff is stepping into a way franked-up situation, and the ones to blame are: (1) Wefald, (2) Krause, (3) Prince, (4) Weiser.

So far, Snyder hasn't really done anything wrong as far as I can tell.  (Not saying he's the answer -- I've wanted Patterson since 2005.)  Snyder brought in crap recruits, but it was probably better than Prince was on track to do.  Snyder also brought in way better coordinators than we've had in years, and hopefully he'll find another one.

I don't understand all this  :runaway:.  We were kinda screwed yesterday, and today we're only marginally more screwed.  And we're still better off than if Prince was the coach.

Stamp me if you want.

So, in summary, we should have hired Patterson.  We know.  Thanks Hawking.   :rolleyes:
IT'S PATTERSON!!!!!11!!!111!!1!!!!1!!
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 21, 2009, 10:08:14 AM
'member when Mangino brought his best smoky and mirrory team of all time to bsfs ???  we almost won

Ron was 10-7 with a bowl game and two wins over Top 10 Texas teams before this game.  7-13 and no wins over ranked/winning teams since.

Mangino 16-7, one Top 5 win and two-time bowl champs since. 

Major tipping point, bros. 



Then ku turned around and lost 5 games the next season . . . and smoke and mirrors had run its course.

Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Stupid Fitz on February 21, 2009, 10:26:46 AM
Frank you OB. :chainsaw: :chainsaw: :chainsaw: :chainsaw: :chainsaw: :chainsaw: :chainsaw: :chainsaw:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: gunnar1073 on February 21, 2009, 10:35:13 AM
Ludwig is a douche and has been looking 2 steps ahead his entire career.  He is only going to do what he thinks best for Andy Ludwig, NFL HC and GM.  I'm sure he realized fairly quickly that OB wasn't going to be as forgiving as his former stops when it came to his narcisistic views.  He comes off as some sort of Offensive mercenary.

I say good riddance.

 :woohoo:

Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: steve dave on February 21, 2009, 10:35:50 AM
Ludwig is a douche and has been looking 2 steps ahead his entire career.  He is only going to do what he thinks best for Andy Ludwig, NFL HC and GM.  I'm sure he realized fairly quickly that OB wasn't going to be as forgiving as his former stops when it came to his narcisistic views.  He comes off as some sort of Offensive mercenary.

I say good riddance.

 :woohoo:



lols
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: dccat on February 21, 2009, 10:38:34 AM
Face it, we're a basketball school now, and a mediocre one at that.  Frank is the future, Snyder is the past.  Goodness-gracious-gee-willickers I hope I'm wrong about the latter, but this is terrible news to wake up to on a Saturday morning.  Prove me wrong Coach Snyder, I'm begging you. :crybaby:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: KCcat28 on February 21, 2009, 10:39:31 AM
Goodness-gracious-gee-willickers

LOL
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Buddha_Cat on February 21, 2009, 11:35:52 AM
How many of his recruits will transfer to Cal now??? :ohno: :ohno: :users:

they can't dumbass

Two guys with a combined 120 posts figured it out before you did?   :confused:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: KansasForever on February 21, 2009, 11:40:59 AM
'member when Mangino brought his best smoky and mirrory team of all time to bsfs ???  we almost won

Ron was 10-7 with a bowl game and two wins over Top 10 Texas teams before this game.  7-13 and no wins over ranked/winning teams since.

Mangino 16-7, one Top 5 win and two-time bowl champs since. 

Major tipping point, bros. 



Then ku turned around and lost 5 games the next season . . . and smoke and mirrors had run its course.


8-5 vs. 12-2, 12-1, 11-2, 10-4, 9-4, and 8-5 BCS teams is "smoke and mirrors running its course"?

:lol:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: KansasForever on February 21, 2009, 11:44:52 AM
'member when Mangino brought his best smoky and mirrory team of all time to bsfs ???  we almost won

Ron was 10-7 with a bowl game and two wins over Top 10 Texas teams before this game.  7-13 and no wins over ranked/winning teams since.

Mangino 16-7, one Top 5 win and two-time bowl champs since. 

Major tipping point, bros. 



Then ku turned around and lost 5 games the next season . . . and smoke and mirrors had run its course.


8-5 vs. 12-2, 12-1, 11-2, 10-4, 9-4, and 8-5 BCS teams is "smoke and mirrors running its course"?

:lol:

Four of those six away from home!   :yikes:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 21, 2009, 12:28:41 PM
ku went two complete seasons 2007-2008 . . . and played 1 regular season game against a Final Top 25 team.  Not one school since the inception of the Big 12 has played such a weak schedule over the course of TWENTY FOUR games.  :users:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: KansasForever on February 21, 2009, 12:43:25 PM
ku went two complete seasons 2007-2008 . . . and played 1 regular season game against a Final Top 25 team.  Not one school since the inception of the Big 12 has played such a weak schedule over the course of TWENTY FOUR games.  :users:

Which one of 2008 Oklahoma, 2008 Texas, 2008 Texas Tech, and 2008 Missouri wasn't in the final rankings? 

 :powertard:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: ~WabashRoll~ on February 21, 2009, 12:45:25 PM
And it get's better.

According to Fitzfracked, Ludwig wanted to "return home" and he and Tedford are real close.  (Of course)

Del Miller will slide in to a Co-OC spot.

And OB is trying to convince Michael Smith to make a return to Manhattan.

And I swear to God I am not making this up.

Lol.  Christ.

Where's that gun blowing off a head emoticon??


Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 21, 2009, 12:49:46 PM
I mistyped, I meant 2006 and 2007.

Oh and go tell your phogtard buddies, that you just can't go back redo history and decide that back in the 1990's, ku didn't "emphasize football".  It was at least 8-10 years under Snyder before K-State started spending more money annually on football than ku did.  Just because nobody in the ku constituency cared about football doesn't mean it wasn't "emphasized" . . . damn, how franking dumb are you people??

And I am still waiting on some real facts to prove that K-State athletics is in "dire financial straights" . . . feel free to produce that factual information anytime now.



Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: KansasForever on February 21, 2009, 12:54:16 PM
I mistyped, I meant 2006 and 2007.

Oh and go tell your phogtard buddies, that you just can't go back redo history and decide that back in the 1990's, ku didn't "emphasize football".  It was at least 8-10 years under Snyder before K-State started spending more money annually on football than ku did.  Just because nobody in the ku constituency cared about football doesn't mean it wasn't "emphasized" . . . damn, how franking dumb are you people??

And I am still waiting on some real facts to prove that K-State athletics is in "dire financial straights" . . . feel free to produce that factual information anytime now.


LOL.  I point out that ku went 8-5 against BCS teams that were 12-2, 12-1, 11-2, 10-4, 9-4, and 8-5 in 2008 and your response is to bring up 2006 and you manage to even f*** that up?

LOL at angry  :powertard:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 21, 2009, 12:57:33 PM
I mistyped, I meant 2006 and 2007.

Oh and go tell your phogtard buddies, that you just can't go back redo history and decide that back in the 1990's, ku didn't "emphasize football".  It was at least 8-10 years under Snyder before K-State started spending more money annually on football than ku did.  Just because nobody in the ku constituency cared about football doesn't mean it wasn't "emphasized" . . . damn, how franking dumb are you people??

And I am still waiting on some real facts to prove that K-State athletics is in "dire financial straights" . . . feel free to produce that factual information anytime now.


LOL.  I point out that ku went 8-5 against BCS teams that were 12-2, 12-1, 11-2, 10-4, 9-4, and 8-5 in 2008 and your response is to bring up 2006 and you manage to even f*** that up?

LOL at angry  :powertard:

That pretty much proves my point . . . the weak ass, smoke and mirrors scheduling came to an end and ku losses 5 games. 

How hard is this??   Congrats on beating an 8-5 mu team I guess, Mangino's first win during the regular season over a Final Top 25 team.  In multiple other games, ku got their ass kicked . . . thus, Smoke and Mirrors runs its course . . . again, it's not that hard.

Plus, still waiting on that credible factual information on K-State athletics being in "dire financial straits".

ku in it's last 14 games . . . 8-6.


Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Perry on February 21, 2009, 01:42:23 PM
And it get's better.

According to Fitzfracked, Ludwig wanted to "return home" and he and Tedford are real close.  (Of course)

Del Miller will slide in to a Co-OC spot.

And OB is trying to convince Michael Smith to make a return to Manhattan.

And I swear to God I am not making this up.

Lol.  Christ.

Where's that gun blowing off a head emoticon??



:dunno:
 crap hitting fan
 :scarymovie:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: steve dave on February 21, 2009, 01:44:23 PM
And OB is trying to convince Michael Smith to make a return to Manhattan.

You know who is probably pretty excited about this news?  Michael Smith.  THE WHOLE GANG IS GOING TO BE BACK TOGETHER!  :ksu:

Saw that coming a mile away
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: BMWJhawk on February 21, 2009, 01:54:14 PM
I mistyped, I meant 2006 and 2007.

Oh and go tell your phogtard buddies, that you just can't go back redo history and decide that back in the 1990's, ku didn't "emphasize football".  It was at least 8-10 years under Snyder before K-State started spending more money annually on football than ku did.  Just because nobody in the ku constituency cared about football doesn't mean it wasn't "emphasized" . . . damn, how franking dumb are you people??

And I am still waiting on some real facts to prove that K-State athletics is in "dire financial straights" . . . feel free to produce that factual information anytime now.


LOL.  I point out that ku went 8-5 against BCS teams that were 12-2, 12-1, 11-2, 10-4, 9-4, and 8-5 in 2008 and your response is to bring up 2006 and you manage to even f*** that up?

LOL at angry  :powertard:

That pretty much proves my point . . . the weak ass, smoke and mirrors scheduling came to an end and ku losses 5 games. 

How hard is this??   Congrats on beating an 8-5 mu team I guess, Mangino's first win during the regular season over a Final Top 25 team.  In multiple other games, ku got their ass kicked . . . thus, Smoke and Mirrors runs its course . . . again, it's not that hard.

Plus, still waiting on that credible factual information on K-State athletics being in "dire financial straits".

ku in it's last 14 games . . . 8-6.






ku is 9-5 in its last 14 games, dating back to the win against Va Tech in the BCS Orange Bowl.  Mizzou was 10-4 last season, but of course, you don't really follow football that closely now that your team is an embarrassment.  Just face reality, 'Pad.  ku is leaving K-State's athletic department in the dust, and it's making you really  :curse:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Pett on February 21, 2009, 01:57:19 PM
It's weird Tyrik is reading this thread. Looks like he hasn't got over the fact that he's not going to be a cat. :lol:

Or maybe checking out why his favorite coach at kansas state is leaving? :frown:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: catzacker on February 21, 2009, 02:01:55 PM
And OB is trying to convince Michael Smith to make a return to Manhattan.

You know who is probably pretty excited about this news?  Michael Smith.  THE WHOLE GANG IS GOING TO BE BACK TOGETHER!  :ksu:

Saw that coming a mile away

Like, 9 asst. coaches and as of right now, 2 (Vic and Dickie) have not been part of the train wreck that has been ksu football for the past 5 years.  Even dimel was a GA in '05 (after that loser was out of football for a couple of years).
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 21, 2009, 02:39:29 PM
Yeah . . .  a 9-5 in the last 14 is really "leaving us in the dust"  :rolleyes:

Bentard Validator . . . queen of hyperbole.

Again, still waiting on those actual things called FACTS that K-State athletics is in "dire financial straits".   BigJkutard and Phogtard.net hypothetical guesses are not FACTS.


Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: BMWJhawk on February 21, 2009, 02:48:55 PM
You have completely lost it pad.  Get a fact right every once in a while. 
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 21, 2009, 02:51:47 PM
You have completely lost it pad.  Get a fact right every once in a while. 

The only person who has lost it is you.

Seriously, you just played up being 9 and freaking 5 in the last 14 games as leaving K-State "in the dust".   

What else would you expect from a racist enabler ku validator like Bentard though.

Kind of sad.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Ezah Miester on February 21, 2009, 03:00:48 PM
You have completely lost it pad.  Get a fact right every once in a while. 

ku is mediocre and KSU sucks right now. 'nough said.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: cas on February 21, 2009, 04:26:21 PM
Serves us right for hiring Snyder back in the first place.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: KansasForever on February 21, 2009, 11:00:13 PM
Yeah . . .  a 9-5 in the last 14 is really "leaving us in the dust"  :rolleyes:

Bentard Validator . . . queen of hyperbole.

Again, still waiting on those actual things called FACTS that K-State athletics is in "dire financial straits".   BigJkutard and Phogtard.net hypothetical guesses are not FACTS.




LOL at daxipad.  If it weren't for angry old coots like you, being a fan of a superior university/athletic program wouldn't be nearly as much fun.  It's like the icing on the cake.  I look forward to the depths you will scrape to in 2009-10.  That should be a real doozy for your ku hatingness. 

Cheers!!!!!!    :love:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: Brewcrew on February 21, 2009, 11:08:16 PM
 

What else would you expect from a racist enabler ku validator like Bentard though.

[/quote]

Now hold on a gosh darn minute Jaynie! I thought I was racist enabler ku validator?
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: hemmy on February 21, 2009, 11:34:00 PM
nice use of quotes  :flush:
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: AzCat on February 22, 2009, 12:32:25 AM
Ludwig: vat-grown Utah guy, the mothership called him home.  Moving those guys east of the Rockies is like taking a sea kitten out of the water.
Title: Re: Ludwig?
Post by: berford on February 23, 2009, 02:39:49 PM
Weren't all the phogtards saying that Ludwig was the only guy on the staff at Oregon a few years ago that didn't get a pay raise, and that Ludwig wasn't exactly "loved" on the Utah staff??

Welcome Billy Gonzales.   :peek:



It's HAPPENING!!!! Are you kidding ME!?!?! :clap: :dive: :excited: