KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: bigDcat on February 05, 2009, 08:14:01 PM

Title: (sigh)
Post by: bigDcat on February 05, 2009, 08:14:01 PM
we aren't even close...
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/bubblewatch?id=84 (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/bubblewatch?id=84)
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: fatty fat fat on February 05, 2009, 08:15:04 PM
you have a great sig.
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: ednksu on February 05, 2009, 08:16:44 PM
Quote from: bigDcat on February 05, 2009, 08:14:01 PM
we aren't even close...
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/bubblewatch?id=84 (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/bubblewatch?id=84)


we are better then OSU home and away and better then A&M at home(our).
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: Bookcat on February 05, 2009, 08:42:11 PM
Ostate? GMAFB

we need to beat them in Iba or beat ku in Bramlage to have any remote shot at a pity invite.
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: Swartzendruber on February 05, 2009, 09:11:51 PM
Quote from: Bookcat on February 05, 2009, 08:42:11 PM
Ostate? GMAFB

we need to beat them in Iba or beat ku in Bramlage to have any remote shot at a pity invite.

FYP.  Its all that matters.  Its what kept us out 2 years ago.
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 07:37:25 AM
Quit looking at the wrong post season projection sites Kazzu fans.  Be patient.  This should be updated soon. (http://www.nitology.com/)

 :kstatriot:
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: steve dave on February 06, 2009, 07:38:43 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 07:37:25 AM
Quit looking at the wrong post season projection sites Kazzu fans.  Be patient.  This should be updated soon. (http://www.nitology.com/)

 :kstatriot:

A home NIT game would be huge imo. 
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 07:41:50 AM
Quote from: steve dave on February 06, 2009, 07:38:43 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 07:37:25 AM
Quit looking at the wrong post season projection sites Kazzu fans.  Be patient.  This should be updated soon. (http://www.nitology.com/)

 :kstatriot:

A home NIT game would be huge imo. 

Hoping for 2 actually; somehow we manage a 2 seed.
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: steve dave on February 06, 2009, 07:48:09 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 07:41:50 AM
Quote from: steve dave on February 06, 2009, 07:38:43 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 07:37:25 AM
Quit looking at the wrong post season projection sites Kazzu fans.  Be patient.  This should be updated soon. (http://www.nitology.com/)

 :kstatriot:

A home NIT game would be huge imo. 

Hoping for 2 actually; somehow we manage a 2 seed.

Would be amazing for Martin to make an as deep/deeper NIT run than Hugs did with less talent. 
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: catzacker on February 06, 2009, 07:50:06 AM
Quote from: steve dave on February 06, 2009, 07:48:09 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 07:41:50 AM
Quote from: steve dave on February 06, 2009, 07:38:43 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 07:37:25 AM
Quit looking at the wrong post season projection sites Kazzu fans.  Be patient.  This should be updated soon. (http://www.nitology.com/)

 :kstatriot:

A home NIT game would be huge imo. 

Hoping for 2 actually; somehow we manage a 2 seed.

Would be amazing for Martin to make an as deep/deeper NIT run than Hugs did with less talent. 

i would blow 7 shemales to get a 2 seed in the NIT and win 2 games. 
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: michigancat on February 06, 2009, 07:53:23 AM
I'm still holding out hope for an NIT roadie at Northwestern.
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: doom on February 06, 2009, 07:55:19 AM
Quote from: catzacker on February 06, 2009, 07:50:06 AM
Quote from: steve dave on February 06, 2009, 07:48:09 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 07:41:50 AM
Quote from: steve dave on February 06, 2009, 07:38:43 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 07:37:25 AM
Quit looking at the wrong post season projection sites Kazzu fans.  Be patient.  This should be updated soon. (http://www.nitology.com/)

 :kstatriot:

A home NIT game would be huge imo. 

Hoping for 2 actually; somehow we manage a 2 seed.

Would be amazing for Martin to make an as deep/deeper NIT run than Hugs did with less talent. 

i would blow 7 shemales to get a 2 seed in the NIT and win 2 games. 

Only 7?  Where is your  :kstatriot: ism?

Quote from: michigancat on February 06, 2009, 07:53:23 AM
I'm still holding out hope for an NIT roadie at Northwestern.

Why do you want to lose to a team that has never made the NCAA's?
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 08:00:36 AM
Plus, NW scares me.  Carmody's elite SLTH-ness combined with the fact that they (and the Big 10 in general) have owned us lately aren't good.  Not good at all.
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: steve dave on February 06, 2009, 08:07:49 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 08:00:36 AM
Plus, NW scares me.  Carmody's elite SLTH-ness combined with the fact that they (and the Big 10 in general) have owned us lately aren't good.  Not good at all.

Would be an interesting style/pace confrontation though
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: McGrowlTowelZac on February 06, 2009, 08:12:59 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 07:37:25 AM
Quit looking at the wrong post season projection sites Kazzu fans.  Be patient.  This should be updated soon. (http://www.nitology.com/)

 :kstatriot:

I would be fine with winning the NIT this year, and waiting to win the NCAA next year.  I can live with that.
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: steve dave on February 06, 2009, 08:20:11 AM
Quote from: McGrowlTowelZac on February 06, 2009, 08:12:59 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 06, 2009, 07:37:25 AM
Quit looking at the wrong post season projection sites Kazzu fans.  Be patient.  This should be updated soon. (http://www.nitology.com/)

 :kstatriot:

I would be fine with winning the NIT this year, and waiting to win the NCAA next year.  I can live with that.

I wouldn't be fine...I'd be f'ing EMAW'd  :ksu:
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: fatty fat fat on February 06, 2009, 08:35:42 AM
how about we focus on a&m, girls?

Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: mcmwcat on February 06, 2009, 08:52:11 AM
no f'n sh|t fats.  a win tomorrow and we might be on the NIT bubble.  any talk of ncaa's is completely trig
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: McGrowlTowelZac on February 06, 2009, 08:54:05 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on February 06, 2009, 08:35:42 AM
how about we focus on a&m, girls?



no doubt, but you can only do that for so long before you start dreaming.  besides, we won't be able to talk about this stuff when we lose.
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: WildGunman on February 06, 2009, 10:21:26 AM
Our 80+ RPI is the reason we didn't a mention.  Getting into the discussion starts by beating A&M (RPI 43)......
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: kst8cat on February 06, 2009, 10:39:32 AM
Quote
Worse, Baylor has beaten only one Big 12 team of consequence (Oklahoma State)

I can't believe ESPN thinks KSU is of no consequence.  Totally shocking.

 :'(
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: purplepowerman on February 06, 2009, 12:38:07 PM
Quote from: kst8cat on February 06, 2009, 10:39:32 AM
Quote
Worse, Baylor has beaten only one Big 12 team of consequence (Oklahoma State)

I can't believe ESPN thinks KSU is of no consequence.  Totally shocking.

 :'(
Espn doesn't even know that KSU exists anymore since Beasley went pro, they have no clue.
Title: Re: (sigh)
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on February 06, 2009, 12:53:56 PM
Quote from: purplepowerman on February 06, 2009, 12:38:07 PM
Quote from: kst8cat on February 06, 2009, 10:39:32 AM
Quote
Worse, Baylor has beaten only one Big 12 team of consequence (Oklahoma State)

I can't believe ESPN thinks KSU is of no consequence.  Totally shocking.

 :'(
Espn doesn't even know that KSU exists anymore since Beasley went pro, they have no clue.

They might've noticed if we had beaten Kentucky, or Iowa, or Oregon, or ku, or NU, or...