KSUFans Archives
Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: catsfan20052006 on January 21, 2009, 10:12:48 PM
-
We've already played two ranked teams and the surprise of the Big XII, at least at home, in Nebraska and 6 out of our next 7 look winnable:
at Colorado W
Missouri W
at Texas L
Iowa State W
at Texas A&M W
Texas Tech W
Kansas W
What happens if we're 6-5 with 5 games to go?
-
The only bright side I can find is that Sutton played well. At least he hasn't quit. Yet.
-
We've already played two ranked teams and the surprise of the Big XII, at least at home, in Nebraska and 6 out of our next 7 look winnable:
at Colorado W
Missouri W
at Texas L
Iowa State W
at Texas A&M W
Texas Tech W
Kansas W
What happens if we're 6-5 with 5 games to go?
Mizzou just went into Stillwater and rolled by 20 something. Iowa St. is a pick em. This team going to College Station and winning, :nono:. Tech maybe. ku? Did you watch the Baylor game?
-
Is this "The OFFICIAL" Bright Side thread?
-
What happens if we're 6-5 with 5 games to go?
Plane crashes for 3/4 of the teams in the Big 12? Is this a riddle?
-
No doubt the white kid for Tech is going to kill us just like last year
-
We probably won't win a road game. Colorado :dunno:
-
The only bright side I can find is that Sutton played well. At least he hasn't quit. Yet.
They started trying w/ about 4 minutes left, too. Pullen's missed layup was almost a nice moment.
-
We will not beat Mizzou...
-
No doubt the white kid for Tech is going to kill us just like last year
Dang, forgot all about him. He is all :drool: watching us right now.
-
Mizzou ain't rolling no more.
-
Mizzou ain't rolling no more.
by crapty, what happened? ok, mizzou is back on the table....as a maybe.
-
They pulled out a win . . . by 2 I think, 360 cut off.
-
we are not winning 6 of 7 games. gmafb
-
They pulled out a win . . . by 2 I think, 360 cut off.
Last I saw they were up almost twenty I thought.
Oh and I like your Hyena. Was that from Maxim?
-
we are not winning 6 of 7 games. gmafb
2 maybe 3 wins . . . this team is completely lost out there and Frank doesn't have the first clue. But he does run multiple defenses.
-
Frank was fairly positive in postgame.
-
Frank was fairly positive in postgame.
You ever notice how nice the guys are when the cops show up for a domestic violence call on Cops? But you know he beats the holy hell out of that bitch the second the cops leave.
-
clemente was good. sutton played hard. kent wasn't bad. pullen didn't hurt the team.
really, there were quite a few positives.
-
Frank was fairly positive in postgame.
You ever notice how nice the guys are when the cops show up for a domestic violence call on Cops? But you know he beats the holy hell out of that bitch the second the cops leave.
Frank's just in fightin, clawin, scratchin mode. Most K-Stater's get all :dancin: if they hear their coach talkin about fightin, clawin and scratchin out there.
-
No doubt the white kid for Tech is going to kill us just like last year
Dang, forgot all about him. He is all :drool: watching us right now.
Voskul. That flukemaster.
-
No doubt the white kid for Tech is going to kill us just like last year
Dang, forgot all about him. He is all :drool: watching us right now.
Voskul. That flukemaster.
Wait, are you saying he didn't shoot like that the rest of the year? :yikes:
-
samuels looking like he was going to kill someone walking thru the post game handshake line :thumbsup:
colon getting in anderson's face after he didn't get back on d :thumbsup:
-
clemente was good. sutton played hard. kent wasn't bad. pullen didn't hurt the team.
really, there were quite a few positives.
Kent was &@#%ing horrible, as usual
-
clemente was good. sutton played hard. kent wasn't bad. pullen didn't hurt the team.
really, there were quite a few positives.
Kent was fracking horrible, as usual
Scored in double digits. :eyeseeyou:
-
clemente was good. sutton played hard. kent wasn't bad. pullen didn't hurt the team.
really, there were quite a few positives.
Kent was fracking horrible, as usual
Scored in double digits again. :eyeseeyou:
'
fyp
:eyeseeyou:
-
we will destroy Tech in Bramlage. mark it down!
-
clemente was good. sutton played hard. kent wasn't bad. pullen didn't hurt the team.
really, there were quite a few positives.
Kent was fracking horrible, as usual
Scored in double digits again. :eyeseeyou:
'
fyp
:eyeseeyou:
Dude looks horrible doing it, but he keeps putting in 10+ every night and playing good D. Just wish he was doing that coming off our bench. Not sure why he starts over JamSam. Samuels' upside blows Kent out of the water.
-
Not sure why he starts over JamSam. Samuels' upside blows Kent out of the water.
you know how everyone is bitching about why dunn was open against the zone all night long (wasn't actually all night, but it felt like it). a lot of that was samuels' fault. that's a big part of why he doesn't start/get more minutes.
-
Not sure why he starts over JamSam. Samuels' upside blows Kent out of the water.
you know how everyone is bitching about why dunn was open against the zone all night long (wasn't actually all night, but it felt like it). a lot of that was samuels' fault. that's a big part of why he doesn't start/get more minutes.
Nope. That was all Frank.
-
The next team from a bcs conference Kstate beats will be its first. You're a quarter of the way to being melvin watkinsed! :lick:
-
Not sure why he starts over JamSam. Samuels' upside blows Kent out of the water.
you know how everyone is bitching about why dunn was open against the zone all night long (wasn't actually all night, but it felt like it). a lot of that was samuels' fault. that's a big part of why he doesn't start/get more minutes.
Not sure why we didn't switch out of that zone. Matching Samuels with a guard doesn't sound like the best idea to me.
-
Is this "The OFFICIAL" Bright Side thread?
"Official" threads are soooo 2008. :rolleyes: