KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on January 01, 2009, 01:32:08 PM

Title: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: fatty fat fat on January 01, 2009, 01:32:08 PM
looks like Mr. Ganz is having some issues, hmmm?  :stirpot:

can't wait for sekona and the boys to be "coached up"  :kstatriot:
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: LimestoneOutcropping on January 01, 2009, 01:34:12 PM
Koenning could give Sekona a 3rd arm and he'd still be horrible.
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: hemmy on January 01, 2009, 01:36:13 PM
What about 4 arms?

(http://www.stampede-entertainment.com/monstermakers/wallpaper/wp-goro-1-m.jpg)
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: Pett on January 01, 2009, 01:37:46 PM
Koenning D's looks pretty good

It's just too bad though that he's moving his act to the mighty M-I-S-S-I-S-S-I-P-P-I. :'(
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: fatty fat fat on January 01, 2009, 01:41:01 PM
Koenning D's looks pretty good

It's just too bad though that he's moving his act to the mighty M-I-S-S-I-S-S-I-P-P-I. :'(

Sad.  :frown:
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: cireksu on January 01, 2009, 01:55:17 PM
Koenning and Cosh will have Hrebek looking like Jeff Kelly and Terry Pierce in no time with their coaching.
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: CatsNShocks on January 01, 2009, 01:59:51 PM
Seriously, though, when should we expect KSU's D to look like Clemsons does today?
They are absolutely dominating the entire game.
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: cireksu on January 01, 2009, 02:00:39 PM
Seriously, though, when should we expect KSU's D to look like Clemsons does today?
They are absolutely dominating the entire game.

when chris cosh and mo latimore recruit those types of athletes.
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: CatsNShocks on January 01, 2009, 02:02:11 PM
Seriously, though, when should we expect KSU's D to look like Clemsons does today?
They are absolutely dominating the entire game.

when chris cosh and mo latimore recruit those types of athletes.

So...never? :crybaby:
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: cireksu on January 01, 2009, 02:04:46 PM
sorry, meant to say when VK coaches up the players that we have like Kirk into studs with his system and technique.
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: cireksu on January 01, 2009, 02:13:07 PM
seriously though check this out.

http://www.kstatesports.com/SportSelect.dbml?SPSID=3062&SPID=212&DB_OEM_ID=400&SORT_ORDER=5&Q_SEASON=2009&PRINTABLE_PAGE=
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: Lynch_Mob on January 01, 2009, 02:16:49 PM
Koenning D's looks pretty good

It's just too bad though that he's moving his act to the mighty M-I-S-S-I-S-S-I-P-P-I. :'(

Vic is not going there!!! This Koening that is going to MS is a different one. The article was wrong.
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: cireksu on January 01, 2009, 02:17:36 PM
Koenning D's looks pretty good

It's just too bad though that he's moving his act to the mighty M-I-S-S-I-S-S-I-P-P-I. :'(

Vic is not going there!!! This Koening that is going to MS is a different one. The article was wrong.

Whew, thanks for clearing that one up.

Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: catzacker on January 01, 2009, 02:30:17 PM
seriously though check this out.

http://www.kstatesports.com/SportSelect.dbml?SPSID=3062&SPID=212&DB_OEM_ID=400&SORT_ORDER=5&Q_SEASON=2009&PRINTABLE_PAGE=

 :suicideispainless:

...but with our scedule next year, especially if we drop UCLA and Freems comes back, I mean, I guess if we can't get to 7 or 8 wins, just quit football.

  Sat, Sep 05   Massachusetts 
  Sat, Sep 12   TBA   
  Sat, Sep 19   UCLA  at Pasadena, Calif.     
  Sat, Sep 26   TBA 
  Sat, Oct 03   Iowa State  at Kansas City, Mo.     
  Sat, Oct 10   Texas Tech
  Sat, Oct 17   Texas A&M       
  Sat, Oct 24   Colorado      
  Sat, Oct 31   Oklahoma
  Sat, Nov 07   Kansas.       
  Sat, Nov 14   Missouri      
  Sat, Nov 21   Nebraska     

Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: CatsNChiefs on January 01, 2009, 02:43:36 PM
How in the frack do you count ku and MU before ISU and UCLA?
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: cireksu on January 01, 2009, 02:44:10 PM
we will beat A&M and ISU. plus 3 noncons.  that's it.
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: CatsNChiefs on January 01, 2009, 02:59:55 PM
we will beat A&M and ISU. plus 3 noncons.  that's it.


 :limb:
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: catzacker on January 01, 2009, 03:14:35 PM
How in the frack do you count ku and MU before ISU and UCLA?

home games are in bold.

we should win 3 non-cons, if we get rid of UCLA then all 4 non-cons....and then out of ISU, A&M, CU, MU, ku we should at least be able to win 3 of those games.  If not, just quit football all together and focus on paying for more 'Te's in basketball. 
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: CatsNChiefs on January 01, 2009, 03:32:17 PM
home games are in bold.

we should win 3 non-cons, if we get rid of UCLA then all 4 non-cons....and then out of ISU, A&M, CU, MU, ku we should at least be able to win 3 of those games.  If not, just quit football all together and focus on paying for more 'Te's in basketball. 

UCLA is like, not good.  If we have to cancel them to get a 4th noncon win then frack it.
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: Bill Effing Snyder on January 01, 2009, 04:35:27 PM
5-7 or 6-6 at best.
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: catzacker on January 01, 2009, 05:00:08 PM
home games are in bold.

we should win 3 non-cons, if we get rid of UCLA then all 4 non-cons....and then out of ISU, A&M, CU, MU, ku we should at least be able to win 3 of those games.  If not, just quit football all together and focus on paying for more 'Te's in basketball. 

UCLA is like, not good.  If we have to cancel them to get a 4th noncon win then frack it.

this is all moot now with Freems leaving.  5 wins at best.
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: LesMiserables on January 01, 2009, 06:21:04 PM
Clemson's D has a five star DE, 5 four star guys and 5 three star guys 3 of whom were rated among the top 25 guys at their position by Rivals.  He may be a good coach, but he's got some serious talent to work with.   It would take the guy who raised Lazarus from the dead to get that kind of performance out of the "talent" he will have next year.
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: the-deuce on January 01, 2009, 06:34:11 PM
Seriously, though, when should we expect KSU's D to look like Clemsons does today?
They are absolutely dominating the entire game.

hahahaha you were pretty wrong, it was the NU D that dominated the game and ganz came back and played quite well, won the MVP trophy. You guys suck at watching football about as much as you suck at picking guys to lead programs.
Title: Re: Koenning D's looks pretty good
Post by: FBWillie on January 01, 2009, 06:50:41 PM
What about 4 arms?

(http://www.stampede-entertainment.com/monstermakers/wallpaper/wp-goro-1-m.jpg)

always had issues with that character; if he has 4 arms, he should have 4 pectoral muscles. or else he wouldn't be able to move the lower set of arms.