KSUFans Archives
Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: cireksu on November 24, 2008, 07:12:59 AM
-
phil bennett
:flush:
-
i don't see phil coming back. could lightening really strike twice?
-
i don't see phil coming back. could lightening really strike twice?
ZOMG! :lol:
-
Seriously though, who would we rather have (assuming of course BV isn't coming): Bennett or Koening? I can't decide. Not pleased with either I guess.
-
i don't see phil coming back. could lightening really strike twice?
ZOMG! :lol:
zacker is the best.
-
Seriously though, who would we rather have (assuming of course BV isn't coming): Bennett or Koening? I can't decide. Not pleased with either I guess.
Bennett, but only because he allegedly has connections in Texas (although bill will let him recruit til November anyways). Dunno where Koening has connections. That being said, if people want to see what Phil's defense will look like with no talent, pop in the game film from the last 2 years.
-
Gp will eat bennett alive if he comes close to the dallas area.
-
so what is wrong with Phil Bennet. Pitts defense looked pretty good to me the couple of times i watched them this year. you dumbasses probably want to keep tibs.
-
so what is wrong with Phil Bennet. Pitts defense looked pretty good to me the couple of times i watched them this year. you dumbasses probably want to keep tibs.
He will be our next head coach, and he is a loser.
-
Seriously though, who would we rather have (assuming of course BV isn't coming): Bennett or Koening? I can't decide. Not pleased with either I guess.
Bennett, but only because he allegedly has connections in Texas (although bill will let him recruit til November anyways). Dunno where Koening has connections. That being said, if people want to see what Phil's defense will look like with no talent, pop in the game film from the last 2 years.
Wrong. Phil utilizes something called the "blitz," which is something that has not been seen in Manhattan for a few years.
-
Seriously though, who would we rather have (assuming of course BV isn't coming): Bennett or Koening? I can't decide. Not pleased with either I guess.
Bennett, but only because he allegedly has connections in Texas (although bill will let him recruit til November anyways). Dunno where Koening has connections. That being said, if people want to see what Phil's defense will look like with no talent, pop in the game film from the last 2 years.
Wrong. Phil utilizes something called the "blitz," which is something that has not been seen in Manhattan for a few years.
omfg. why are people so dumb? why do i keep biting on sh*t like this?
-
Seriously though, who would we rather have (assuming of course BV isn't coming): Bennett or Koening? I can't decide. Not pleased with either I guess.
Bennett, but only because he allegedly has connections in Texas (although bill will let him recruit til November anyways). Dunno where Koening has connections. That being said, if people want to see what Phil's defense will look like with no talent, pop in the game film from the last 2 years.
Wrong. Phil utilizes something called the "blitz," which is something that has not been seen in Manhattan for a few years.
omfg. why are people so dumb? why do i keep biting on sh*t like this?
i don't know. when can we start a new board?
-
so what is wrong with Phil Bennet. Pitts defense looked pretty good to me the couple of times i watched them this year. you dumbasses probably want to keep tibs.
:flush:
-
so what is wrong with Phil Bennet. Pitts defense looked pretty good to me the couple of times i watched them this year. you dumbasses probably want to keep tibs.
He will be our next head coach, and he is a loser.
that is what the flush was for.
I don't doubt his coordinating abilities.
I am kinda scared about how he adjusts to the offenses of the big 12.