KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on November 22, 2008, 08:04:54 PM

Title: great win ksu.
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 22, 2008, 08:04:54 PM
you've made me happy.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: 1albatross on November 22, 2008, 08:06:27 PM
Great is overstating it a bit, but definitely solid.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: Lurker on November 22, 2008, 08:07:40 PM
Great is overstating it a bit, but definitely solid.

come on let the kid be happy.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: doom on November 22, 2008, 08:10:09 PM
This was an easily dropable game.  Should be thrilled.   :billypopcorn:
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: Winters on November 22, 2008, 08:10:37 PM
 :ksu:
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: 1albatross on November 22, 2008, 08:11:02 PM
Great is overstating it a bit, but definitely solid.

come on let the kid be happy.

I think posting makes him happy.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: CrazyCat on November 22, 2008, 08:11:22 PM
double double by the tiger.  Nice to see a decent FT percentage.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: mjrod on November 22, 2008, 08:12:27 PM
Well coached team.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: hemmy on November 22, 2008, 08:12:55 PM
NCAA Tourney LOCK
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2008, 08:15:39 PM
In KSUBB era AK thru BH this game was a loss.  Its hard, but we need to change our fan mindset.  Will take time.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: 1albatross on November 22, 2008, 08:18:58 PM
AK?
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2008, 08:22:36 PM
After Kruger, Before Huggins.  The era of basketball most of us know well.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: 1albatross on November 22, 2008, 08:24:41 PM
Got ya.  I was thinking BH was Bob Huggins.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: cas on November 22, 2008, 08:36:47 PM
In KSUBB era AK thru BH this game was a loss.  Its hard, but we need to change our fan mindset.  Will take time.

Couldn't be more true. I really need to change my Wooly years mindset.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: hemmy on November 22, 2008, 08:37:51 PM
CSU lost to Washington, who lost to the Portland Pilots, just FYI
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: Butt Fugly on November 22, 2008, 08:44:59 PM
CSU lost to Washington, who lost to the Portland Pilots, just FYI


CSU also beat Oakland, our next opponent.

Oakland beat Oregon at Oregon in overtime.

We of course play Oregon @ Oregon.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: 1albatross on November 22, 2008, 08:45:53 PM
In KSUBB era AK thru BH this game was a loss.  Its hard, but we need to change our fan mindset.  Will take time.

Couldn't be more true. I really need to change my Wooly years mindset.

Wooly was bad, but not nearly as bad as Asbury imo.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: StayOutOfTrees on November 22, 2008, 08:47:30 PM
Frank survived another game without his head exploding in anger, good sign.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: kougar24 on November 22, 2008, 08:47:54 PM
I agree with fatty: great win, for the reason FAN stated.

This was the type of game we became content losing for so many years recently. We were ahead almost the whole time and answered every one of their runs, while shooting poorly ourselves.

Can't be unhappy about this.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: cas on November 22, 2008, 08:48:12 PM
In KSUBB era AK thru BH this game was a loss.  Its hard, but we need to change our fan mindset.  Will take time.

Couldn't be more true. I really need to change my Wooly years mindset.

Wooly was bad, but not nearly as bad as Asbury imo.

True. csourk really doesn't remember a great deal about the Asbury Era, thankfully.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: Chingon on November 22, 2008, 08:48:18 PM
It's a great win.

We lose that game every time for the past 20 years.

Yes even with Bob Huggins's team.

Clemente and White Tiger made clutch plays all night.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2008, 08:49:58 PM
Asbury won a few of those games.  Wooly never won those games.  And I say that as a confessed Woolite.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: ksu_FAN on November 22, 2008, 08:55:34 PM
Wait.  Forgot about Fred in Casper.  Other than that, Wooly never won these.  Ever.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 22, 2008, 09:01:23 PM
Wait.  Forgot about Fred in Casper.  Other than that, Wooly never won these.  Ever.

i was out of this world happy after that win.

so pathetic.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: chum1 on November 22, 2008, 09:03:09 PM
Somehow, people started just assuming that Asbury was worse than Wooldridge in every way.  Wooldridge didn't ever really do anything.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: sys on November 22, 2008, 09:08:54 PM
Wait.  Forgot about Fred in Casper.

also wsu in 2003.


didn't lose a ton either.  didn't hardly schedule non bcs roads after his 1st year.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: thefridge on November 22, 2008, 09:11:55 PM
solid win that has me  :dancin:
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: kstatecollegian on November 22, 2008, 09:12:26 PM
Wait.  Forgot about Fred in Casper.

also wsu in 2003.


didn't lose a ton either.  didn't hardly schedule non bcs roads after his 1st year.
Lost to Washington State that year in Wazzu.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: Prince McJunkins on November 22, 2008, 09:14:21 PM
Somehow, people started just assuming that Asbury was worse than Wooldridge in every way.  Wooldridge didn't ever really do anything.

I don't think Asbury ever beat a ranked opponent. Wooly beat at least a handful.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 22, 2008, 09:20:18 PM
Somehow, people started just assuming that Asbury was worse than Wooldridge in every way.  Wooldridge didn't ever really do anything.

I don't think Asbury ever beat a ranked opponent. Wooly beat at least a handful.

66-51 over OU wants to say, "Hello"
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: cas on November 22, 2008, 09:22:22 PM
Wait.  Forgot about Fred in Casper.  Other than that, Wooly never won these.  Ever.

i was out of this world happy after that win.

so pathetic.

Oh man.

I'll never forget the people that said, "I can't believe KSU lost to Wyoming." I confidently replied, "Fred Peete doesn't lose to Wyoming."
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: sys on November 22, 2008, 09:23:26 PM
didn't hardly schedule non bcs roads after his 1st year.
Lost to Washington State that year in Wazzu.

the ones he did schedule and lose were bad though.  did asbury have a umkc (wooly) or lamar (altman) game?  prolly did, but i can't recall one.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: Prince McJunkins on November 22, 2008, 09:32:19 PM
Somehow, people started just assuming that Asbury was worse than Wooldridge in every way.  Wooldridge didn't ever really do anything.

I don't think Asbury ever beat a ranked opponent. Wooly beat at least a handful.

66-51 over OU wants to say, "Hello"

Ah. 1999. I even went to that one.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 22, 2008, 09:34:06 PM
Somehow, people started just assuming that Asbury was worse than Wooldridge in every way.  Wooldridge didn't ever really do anything.

I don't think Asbury ever beat a ranked opponent. Wooly beat at least a handful.

66-51 over OU wants to say, "Hello"

Ah. 1999. I even went to that one.

 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: Saulbadguy on November 22, 2008, 10:38:40 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvYrpEuv88s
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: JTKSU on November 23, 2008, 02:18:38 AM
Great is overstating it a bit, but definitely solid.

come on let the kid be happy.

How are you rooting for him?  Fatty's family flying jets into the Twin Towers changed everything.  Why do you think he has that stupid flight tracker as his sig?  He's rubbing it in our faces!!
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 23, 2008, 02:19:50 AM


Naw. I just like airports.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: JTKSU on November 23, 2008, 02:22:07 AM


Naw. I just like airports.

Yeah, and the Unibomber liked the post office.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: Dub on November 23, 2008, 08:39:04 AM
Frank survived another game without his head exploding in anger, good sign.

LOL and we think Mangino is a prime candidate for a heart attack.  Maybe Frank should consider Anger Management Classes. :pray:
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: ~WabashRoll~ on November 23, 2008, 09:38:04 AM
I liked the way you could audibly hear him berating our players and the referees last night.

I also think I like the high school kid they had doing the play by play better than Wyatt and Stanbot combined.

Excellent win last night all around.

Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: ~WabashRoll~ on November 23, 2008, 09:42:59 AM
Also.

My intensity of man love for Jamar Samuels right now easily equals my intensity of hatred for Tim Fitzgerald.

Those free thows last night were freaking clutch.  When he hit the technicals and then the white tiger followed it up with a three, that was the dagger in the second half.

Guy's got a good shooting stroke.  He's only going to get better.

Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: Lurker on November 23, 2008, 09:50:03 AM
Great is overstating it a bit, but definitely solid.

come on let the kid be happy.

How are you rooting for him?  Fatty's family flying jets into the Twin Towers changed everything.  Why do you think he has that stupid flight tracker as his sig?  He's rubbing it in our faces!!

If he's happy he won't go all suicide bomber on us!
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: rundown87 on November 23, 2008, 01:10:04 PM
you've made me happy.
QFT, I was 65% sure we would lose.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: HugeCat on November 23, 2008, 01:13:46 PM
Somehow, people started just assuming that Asbury was worse than Wooldridge in every way.  Wooldridge didn't ever really do anything.

Asbury didn't inherite the piece o $hit program that Wooly inherited.

Asbury didn't have to clean up after the POS coach that Wooly had to.

Asbury = Asshat :jerkoff:
Wooly = Good Dood :skillz:
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: rundown87 on November 23, 2008, 01:16:22 PM
Somehow, people started just assuming that Asbury was worse than Wooldridge in every way.  Wooldridge didn't ever really do anything.

Asbury didn't inherite the piece o $hit program that Wooly inherited.

Asbury didn't have to clean up after the POS coach that Wooly had to.

Asbury = Asshat :jerkoff:
Wooly = Good Dood  Nice Guy :skillz:

remember when we didn't understand the MCMW theory?  Glad we got that out of the way.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: pissclams on November 23, 2008, 02:12:38 PM
you've made me happy.
head back to the football board, loser.   :flush:
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: fatty fat fat on November 23, 2008, 02:14:06 PM
you've made me happy.
head back to the football board, loser.   :flush:

hey, back off, loser!
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: pissclams on November 23, 2008, 02:19:45 PM
whateve.  no room for part time basketball fans on the Martin train bro. 

 :cheers:
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: sys on November 23, 2008, 02:27:10 PM
head back to the football board, loser.   :flush:

 :love:
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: A-Lishious on November 23, 2008, 02:39:24 PM
Also.

My intensity of man love for Jamar Samuels right now easily equals my intensity of hatred for Tim Fitzgerald.

Those free thows last night were freaking clutch.  When he hit the technicals and then the white tiger followed it up with a three, that was the dagger in the second half.

Guy's got a good shooting stroke.  He's only going to get better.



QFT. If Samuals can put on some good weight, this kid will be good for years to come.  :cyclist:
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: A-Lishious on November 23, 2008, 02:40:50 PM


remember when we didn't understand the MCMW theory?  Glad we got that out of the way.
[/quote]

Wasnt Ty Hughes a Wooly 'Cruit? Just saying...
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: rundown87 on November 23, 2008, 02:42:59 PM


remember when we didn't understand the MCMW theory?  Glad we got that out of the way.

Wasnt Ty Hughes a Wooly 'Cruit? Just saying...
[/quote]

yeah, but what did they do when they found out he was a criminal?

Now look at what we did when we found out Denis was. . .

MCMW out in full force in manhattan
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: JTKSU on November 23, 2008, 02:56:03 PM
Also.

My intensity of man love for Jamar Samuels right now easily equals my intensity of hatred for Tim Fitzgerald.

Those free thows last night were freaking clutch.  When he hit the technicals and then the white tiger followed it up with a three, that was the dagger in the second half.

Guy's got a good shooting stroke.  He's only going to get better.



QFT. If Samuals can put on some good weight, this kid will be good for years to come.  :cyclist:

Put on weight?  Are we talking about basketball, or football?
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: A-Lishious on November 23, 2008, 03:00:28 PM
Also.

My intensity of man love for Jamar Samuels right now easily equals my intensity of hatred for Tim Fitzgerald.

Those free thows last night were freaking clutch.  When he hit the technicals and then the white tiger followed it up with a three, that was the dagger in the second half.

Guy's got a good shooting stroke.  He's only going to get better.



QFT. If Samuals can put on some good weight, this kid will be good for years to come.  :cyclist:

Put on weight?  Are we talking about basketball, or football?

Dude is a bean pole and he plays 4. on top of that. he isnt Durant. There fore, it will be an issue when he is up against a legit big man who can toss himself around. Hence, put on weight. Keep up bra.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: FHSU92 on November 23, 2008, 03:11:02 PM
Hopin' Sams can put KG weight on...that would be sik yo.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: JTKSU on November 23, 2008, 03:11:32 PM
Also.

My intensity of man love for Jamar Samuels right now easily equals my intensity of hatred for Tim Fitzgerald.

Those free thows last night were freaking clutch.  When he hit the technicals and then the white tiger followed it up with a three, that was the dagger in the second half.

Guy's got a good shooting stroke.  He's only going to get better.



QFT. If Samuals can put on some good weight, this kid will be good for years to come.  :cyclist:

Put on weight?  Are we talking about basketball, or football?

Dude is a bean pole and he plays 4. on top of that. he isnt Durant. There fore, it will be an issue when he is up against a legit big man who can toss himself around. Hence, put on weight. Keep up bra.

bra. he's the same height and only ten pounds lighter than Julian Wright. bra.  hence, there fore, himself.  he's not Kevin Garnett. bra.  Jim Rome is awesome. bra.    

The point is, Jamar doesn't play with his back to the rim.  If he was a power forward type of player (which he isn't) he would need to get bigger.  But he isn't, so he doesn't.  Unless he plans on getting involved in some pro wrestling, I think he'll be ok.  bra.  Remember, just because uk won a national championship doesn't mean you're suddenly not a dumbass anymore.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: ksufanatic7 on November 23, 2008, 04:57:39 PM
Who was on the call last night since Wyatt and Stan were at the bill? Matt Walters and...?
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: Legore on November 23, 2008, 05:53:11 PM
Also.

My intensity of man love for Jamar Samuels right now easily equals my intensity of hatred for Tim Fitzgerald.

Those free thows last night were freaking clutch.  When he hit the technicals and then the white tiger followed it up with a three, that was the dagger in the second half.

Guy's got a good shooting stroke.  He's only going to get better.



QFT. If Samuals can put on some good weight, this kid will be good for years to come.  :cyclist:

Put on weight?  Are we talking about basketball, or football?

Dude is a bean pole and he plays 4. on top of that. he isnt Durant. There fore, it will be an issue when he is up against a legit big man who can toss himself around. Hence, put on weight. Keep up bra.

bra. he's the same height and only ten pounds lighter than Julian Wright. bra.  hence, there fore, himself.  he's not Kevin Garnett. bra.  Jim Rome is awesome. bra.    

The point is, Jamar doesn't play with his back to the rim.  If he was a power forward type of player (which he isn't) he would need to get bigger.  But he isn't, so he doesn't.  Unless he plans on getting involved in some pro wrestling, I think he'll be ok.  bra.  Remember, just because uk won a national championship doesn't mean you're suddenly not a dumbass anymore.

Agreed the talk about Jamar putting on weight is over done.  He's a long lean guy by nature he's not going to turn into a wide body.  He'll put on some weight and he'll get stronger but you don't want to change his body type there are a ton of great players with his build.  He's getting almost as many minutes at the 3 as he is the 4.   Going forward we're going to have plenty of big bodies let Samuels play the role he's suited for and let Ron Anderson, Curtis Kelly, Walley Judge, Jordan Henriquez etc play the roles they're suited for. 
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: Dr. Funke on November 23, 2008, 06:12:50 PM
Who was on the call last night since Wyatt and Stan were at the bill? Matt Walters and...?

dave riggert.  ksal fella.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: A-Lishious on November 23, 2008, 07:08:48 PM
Also.

My intensity of man love for Jamar Samuels right now easily equals my intensity of hatred for Tim Fitzgerald.

Those free thows last night were freaking clutch.  When he hit the technicals and then the white tiger followed it up with a three, that was the dagger in the second half.

Guy's got a good shooting stroke.  He's only going to get better.



QFT. If Samuals can put on some good weight, this kid will be good for years to come.  :cyclist:

Put on weight?  Are we talking about basketball, or football?

Dude is a bean pole and he plays 4. on top of that. he isnt Durant. There fore, it will be an issue when he is up against a legit big man who can toss himself around. Hence, put on weight. Keep up bra.

bra. he's the same height and only ten pounds lighter than Julian Wright. bra.  hence, there fore, himself.  he's not Kevin Garnett. bra.  Jim Rome is awesome. bra.    

The point is, Jamar doesn't play with his back to the rim.  If he was a power forward type of player (which he isn't) he would need to get bigger.  But he isn't, so he doesn't.  Unless he plans on getting involved in some pro wrestling, I think he'll be ok.  bra.  Remember, just because uk won a national championship doesn't mean you're suddenly not a dumbass anymore.

J Wright was in another league than Samuals. JW also needed to(and did) put on a GOOD weight as well. I was saying if Samuals can get bigger, he will be better down low. He doesnt have the long range game to be a true wing (by the way sys, who is KSU looking at for this spot?). So dont be a moron and think you have the depth to have a 6-8 guy who kant shoot the three out there. MorAn.  :jerkoff:
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: JTKSU on November 23, 2008, 07:13:30 PM
Also.

My intensity of man love for Jamar Samuels right now easily equals my intensity of hatred for Tim Fitzgerald.

Those free thows last night were freaking clutch.  When he hit the technicals and then the white tiger followed it up with a three, that was the dagger in the second half.

Guy's got a good shooting stroke.  He's only going to get better.



QFT. If Samuals can put on some good weight, this kid will be good for years to come.  :cyclist:

Put on weight?  Are we talking about basketball, or football?

Dude is a bean pole and he plays 4. on top of that. he isnt Durant. There fore, it will be an issue when he is up against a legit big man who can toss himself around. Hence, put on weight. Keep up bra.

bra. he's the same height and only ten pounds lighter than Julian Wright. bra.  hence, there fore, himself.  he's not Kevin Garnett. bra.  Jim Rome is awesome. bra.    

The point is, Jamar doesn't play with his back to the rim.  If he was a power forward type of player (which he isn't) he would need to get bigger.  But he isn't, so he doesn't.  Unless he plans on getting involved in some pro wrestling, I think he'll be ok.  bra.  Remember, just because uk won a national championship doesn't mean you're suddenly not a dumbass anymore.

J Wright was in another league than Samuals. JW also needed to(and did) put on a GOOD weight as well. I was saying if Samuals can get bigger, he will be better down low. He doesnt have the long range game to be a true wing (by the way sys, who is KSU looking at for this spot?). So dont be a moron and think you have the depth to have a 6-8 guy who kant shoot the three out there. MorAn.  :jerkoff:

Um, Jamar is a back-up.  So are you saying we need to go three deep with players of his caliber?  And Julian Wright is, right now, only ten pounds heavier than Jamar.  BTW, what was JW's three point percentage at ku?  Moron.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: A-Lishious on November 23, 2008, 09:12:38 PM
Frack you are dumb. I am arguing for Jamal being a good low post player in the 4! Hence he should put on some good Muscle weight. Good teams (like last years ku team) have four guys to rotate in down low. Since KSU doesnt have that (yet) and Samuels doesnt have an outside three pointer that is consisten, why the hell would he play the three?

If youre going to be a bball skewl, know youre sh*t out JT before you spout off.  :skillz:
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: JTKSU on November 23, 2008, 09:25:20 PM
Frack you are dumb. I am arguing for Jamal being a good low post player in the 4! Hence he should put on some good Muscle weight. Good teams (like last years ku team) have four guys to rotate in down low. Since KSU doesnt have that (yet) and Samuels doesnt have an outside three pointer that is consisten, why the hell would he play the three?

If youre going to be a bball skewl, know youre sh*t out JT before you spout off.  :skillz:

Ok, so if you don't shoot well from three, you have to play the 4 or 5.  Got it.  I'm just glad these uk fans are here to share their infinite basketball knowledge with us lowly wannabe basketball fans.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: A-Lishious on November 23, 2008, 10:07:08 PM
Insecure little butt douche.

I commented on Samuels having good potential and that putting on weight would make him better. In youre sh*t stained eyes, i have invaded KSUfans.com in order to subvert you to the truth that is kuism. wow. Again, JT, your Douchery is amazing.

Moving on.

Sys, is there a a true Wing on the team (shooter with real size)? Solomon Hill is great to be mentioned with along with T Boyd, but I dont see KSU getting either. Until Sutton gets his jumpshot down (even then, he doesnt have have that 6-5 thru 6-7 size) hes just a great defender on the court and an offensive liability.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: JTKSU on November 23, 2008, 10:12:52 PM
Insecure little butt douche.

I commented on Samuels having good potential and that putting on weight would make him better. In youre sh*t stained eyes, i have invaded KSUfans.com in order to subvert you to the truth that is kuism. wow. Again, JT, your Douchery is amazing.

Moving on.

Sys, is there a a true Wing on the team (shooter with real size)? Solomon Hill is great to be mentioned with along with T Boyd, but I dont see KSU getting either. Until Sutton gets his jumpshot down (even then, he doesnt have have that 6-5 thru 6-7 size) hes just a great defender on the court and an offensive liability.

Dom is 6'5".
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: sys on November 23, 2008, 10:13:45 PM
is there a a true Wing on the team (shooter with real size)?

you mean the 2009-2010 team?  mcgruder is supposed to be able to shoot a bit.  other limitations aside, awaji can shoot.  and russell has great size.

don't think either hill or boyd (def. not boyd) would be an upgrade over any of those guys as shooters.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: A-Lishious on November 23, 2008, 10:28:33 PM
Im going on GPC figures so, definietly could be wrong, but hes listed as 6-4 195. Hell Clemente is only listed at 5-11 150 when he arrived on campus at the U.

I havnt really read up on Russell but he looks promising. Hes listed as a pg but really? At 6-4? And with Clemente/Pullen, PG is kinda crowded. Contrarily, with McGruder and Awaji there (and big Fred too) SG is stacked too. Counting Sutton, and it doesnt seem that KSU hasnt had a true wing player since Bill Walker, who didnt even play the three. How do you see that lineup stacking up?
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: JTKSU on November 23, 2008, 10:32:18 PM
Im going on GPC figures so, definietly could be wrong, but hes listed as 6-4 195. Hell Clemente is only listed at 5-11 150 when he arrived on campus at the U.

I havnt really read up on Russell but he looks promising. Hes listed as a pg but really? At 6-4? And with Clemente/Pullen, PG is kinda crowded. Contrarily, with McGruder and Awaji there (and big Fred too) SG is stacked too. Counting Sutton, and it doesnt seem that KSU hasnt had a true wing player since Bill Walker, who didnt even play the three. How do you see that lineup stacking up?


Um, that was four games ago. 

Here's what our SID site has for Sutton:
23       Sutton, Dominique       F      6-5      210      So.      Durham, N.C. (The Patterson (N.C.) School)
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: A-Lishious on November 23, 2008, 10:39:33 PM
If those arnt an exagerration then KSU will have the 3 spot locked up for a while as long as Sutton kan nail down some 3's at a pretty good rate. Thats important to have someone like him (size wise) to match up and be able to shoot over other bigger gaurds. When he goes to the bench, KSU will have an undersized lineup in at g's but there are advantages and disadvantages to it as well.

See JT, talking Bball doesnt have to involve douchbaggery.  :cheers:
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: sys on November 23, 2008, 10:45:10 PM
1.  clemente, pullen, russell
2.  pullen, brown, awaji, russell, mcgruder, sutton
3.  sutton, awaji, mcgruder, russell
small 4.  judge, samuels, kelly, anderson, sutton
big 4. kelly, judge, anderson, samuels, henriquez


to start to the season anyways.
Title: Re: great win ksu.
Post by: JTKSU on November 23, 2008, 10:47:37 PM
1.  clemente, pullen, russell
2.  pullen, brown, awaji, russell, mcgruder, sutton
3.  sutton, awaji, mcgruder, russell
small 4.  judge, samuels, kelly, anderson, sutton
big 4. kelly, judge, anderson, samuels, henriquez


to start to the season anyways.

Henriquez at the 4 or 5 will be a real nice match-up problem for teams to have to think about.  Supposedly he plays nice D, and I would really like to see another 4 guarding him around the arc.