KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: jarrr on September 09, 2006, 05:32:21 PM

Title: Fitz's credibility
Post by: jarrr on September 09, 2006, 05:32:21 PM
He must be pretty damn confident in the mystran, or I dont think he would leak it out. If there turns out to be no mystran he has lost alot of credibility. Really, the only reason for him to leak the info is so he can say "I told you so" when the news is announced, so if there is none he looks stupid.
Title: Re: Fitz's crediibility
Post by: Dan Rydell on September 09, 2006, 05:34:02 PM
Tim Floyd.

Credibility is not something that seems to have FITZ overly concerned.
Title: Re: Fitz's crediibility
Post by: AzCat on September 09, 2006, 05:35:58 PM
Yep.  The $10/month GPC crew are so far up Fitz's ass they'll probably never even question him about the rumor if no one shows.  It's all about sucking in more subscribers for Fitz.
Title: Re: Fitz's crediibility
Post by: mjrod on September 09, 2006, 05:39:48 PM
 :popcorn:
Title: Re: Fitz's crediibility
Post by: jarrr on September 09, 2006, 05:45:14 PM
well, whatever credibility he does have left, should all be completely gone if his rumor flops. Everyone with a rivals account should cancel it immediately if it proves to be wrong. At least scout puts out information that is real, and seems more organized about it. I wouldnt ever pay for info I can eventually get anyway, but I definately wouldnt pay for info I eventually find out is wrong. I will give him props if his rumor turns out to be true, but his balls are on the chopping block right now and if the mystran is a no show, "chop".
Title: Re: Fitz's crediibility
Post by: mjrod on September 09, 2006, 05:47:03 PM
well, whatever credibility he does have left, should all be completely gone if his rumor flops. Everyone with a rivals account should cancel it immediately if it proves to be wrong. At least scout puts out information that is real, and seems more organized about it. I wouldnt ever pay for info I can eventually get anyway, but I definately wouldnt pay for info I eventually find out is wrong. I will give him props if his rumor turns out to be true, but his balls are on the chopping block right now and if the mystran is a no show, "chop".

 :lol:

That release about Venables being hired that appeared on Yahoo! that was supposed to be supersecret ....

Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: hillwalking03 on September 09, 2006, 06:24:14 PM
The Iowa recruiting guy for scout.com reported that Ron Prince would be the new KSU head coach, and for six days, Fitz and Kietz said no way.  They said their sources said Venebales.  After that, I can't believe any K-Stater would listen to anything those two say.  How does a KSU "insider" get scooped by the Iowa recruiting expert?
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: chum1 on September 09, 2006, 06:38:46 PM
(http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/b990a1d35d.jpg)

Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: gibleis on September 09, 2006, 07:25:30 PM
Or Fitz will say "we were sitting on this".  He always says that when he gets scooped.
Title: Re: Fitz's crediibility
Post by: pissclams on September 09, 2006, 07:56:58 PM
well, whatever credibility he does have left, should all be completely gone if his rumor flops. Everyone with a rivals account should cancel it immediately if it proves to be wrong. At least scout puts out information that is real, and seems more organized about it. I wouldnt ever pay for info I can eventually get anyway, but I definately wouldnt pay for info I eventually find out is wrong. I will give him props if his rumor turns out to be true, but his balls are on the chopping block right now and if the mystran is a no show, "chop".
Credibility comes with respect.  I can't respect any idiot that would start this bullcrap rumor in the first place.
Prior to this jackass starting this rumor to add $$ a month to his subscription base should come his concern for the program.
It didn't.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: sys on September 09, 2006, 09:36:58 PM
The Iowa recruiting guy for scout.com reported that Ron Prince would be the new KSU head coach, and for six days, Fitz and Kietz said no way. They said their sources said Venebales. After that, I can't believe any K-Stater would listen to anything those two say. How does a KSU "insider" get scooped by the Iowa recruiting expert?

far be it from me to defend fitz.... but i don't remember this at all.  in fact. what i recall is fitz and his minions reporting that contrary to the all the national and local speculation about venables, he was not going to be seriously considered.

i have no recollection about what kk may have been saying, but i'm pretty sure one of gopowercat's finest moments was in undermining the persistent venables rumors.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: hillwalking03 on September 09, 2006, 09:43:10 PM
The Iowa recruiting guy for scout.com reported that Ron Prince would be the new KSU head coach, and for six days, Fitz and Kietz said no way. They said their sources said Venebales. After that, I can't believe any K-Stater would listen to anything those two say. How does a KSU "insider" get scooped by the Iowa recruiting expert?

far be it from me to defend fitz.... but i don't remember this at all.  in fact. what i recall is fitz and his minions reporting that contrary to the all the national and local speculation about venables, he was not going to be seriously considered.

i have no recollection about what kk may have been saying, but i'm pretty sure one of gopowercat's finest moments was in undermining the persistent venables rumors.

I don't know what he was posting on GPT, but on 810 with KK he said noway to prince.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: sys on September 09, 2006, 09:52:28 PM
to clarify, i i just remember fitz saying venables had no chance.  no recollection on what he was saying about prince, or when he was saying it.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 09, 2006, 10:32:44 PM
Fitz is pretty damn credible. Seriously.

Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: chum1 on September 09, 2006, 10:54:00 PM
Quote
Tuesday’s Tulsa World had claimed that Fitzgerald’s Web site had announced that Brent Venables already had the K-State job...“I don’t know where the newspaper got that,” Fitzgerald said. “We never reported anything like that. We haven’t even reported that he will be interviewed. But we’ve talked to the sports editor there, and we’re told there will be a correction run (today).”
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:coIjZImX2TcJ:www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/sports/13288116.htm+fitzgerald+venables+powercat&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2

Is anything on that site really considered reporting?

Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 09, 2006, 11:24:31 PM
Fitz always said venables was never a candidate.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: kougar24 on September 10, 2006, 11:30:15 AM
Yes, and he also really got owned on the Prince hire by little ol' Scout.com.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: mjrod on September 10, 2006, 04:03:29 PM
Yes, and he also really got owned on the Prince hire by little ol' Scout.com.

:rolleyes:
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: GoldbrickGangBoss on September 10, 2006, 04:06:51 PM
Yes, and he also really got owned on the Prince hire by little ol' Scout.com.

:rolleyes:

He did.

There is no denying it.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: kougar24 on September 10, 2006, 05:22:53 PM
Nope, there sure isn't.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: ds43fan on September 10, 2006, 05:33:40 PM
i hate fitz but this 1 im gonna say hes right on
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: gibleis on September 10, 2006, 05:41:41 PM
Scout did break the Prince hiring but that didn't stop Fitz from making a commercial claiming he did.  I don't care which site does what, were all KSU fans.  But to flat out lie like he has on 2 times is rediculous.  Worthless individual in my book.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: RU4KSU2 on September 10, 2006, 07:06:24 PM
Yep. The GoPowercat commercial claiming the Prince scoop does make my skin crawl.  I was online when the Prince story first broke on Scout.  Watched it unfold first hand.  I do not see how he can claim to have had the Prince inside story, I know that is a lie.

I hope he is right on the mystery transfer, but I am not going to get my hopes up just becuase he says it is so.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: jeffy on September 10, 2006, 09:50:16 PM
So if it wrankles Scout so much about the Prince-hire claim, why haven't they sued?
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: kougar24 on September 10, 2006, 10:09:01 PM
So if it wrankles Scout so much about the Prince-hire claim, why haven't they sued?

Maybe they have.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: mjrod on September 10, 2006, 11:36:33 PM
So if it wrankles Scout so much about the Prince-hire claim, why haven't they sued?

Maybe they have.

You guys are becoming incredibly ridiculous.  Please explain to me that even after the "Iowa" source said it was going to happen, why did the KSF.COM release their premium info that came out through Yahoo! saying something totally different?

Seems to me you guys are interchanging facts.  Scout is not the same as KSF.COM.   Maybe someone in the scout network had alluded or even said so, the KSU site did something different.

All a matter of perspective.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: WILDCAT NATION on September 11, 2006, 08:31:09 AM
They may have just added a suit to the one that is pending, or was pending...Not sure if that's ever been resolved...

The subsequent posts about mystran have certainly been interesting.

Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: michigancat on September 11, 2006, 08:37:44 AM

You guys are becoming incredibly ridiculous.  Please explain to me that even after the "Iowa" source said it was going to happen, why did the KSF.COM release their premium info that came out through Yahoo! saying something totally different?


The brilliant Venables article preceded the Iowa source...and the Iowa source beat everyone to the punch.  I read his post not five minutes after hearing Fitz say on 810 he still had no idea who it was going to be. 

Of course, Fitz probably knew it was Prince, but didn't want Temple or Middle Tennesse State to catch wind of it and steal him away at the last minute.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: Kat Kid on September 11, 2006, 08:54:05 AM
I think Fitz is just too beholden to KSU.  To develop ANY sort of relationship wherein Snyder would so much as let Fitz within two footballs fields of Vanier to drop off copies of Powercat Illustrated he had to be totally up Snyder's/Administration's ass.  I think Fitz is a Ksu homer first reporter second.

Once you view him through this lens, everything comes into focus.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 11, 2006, 10:25:20 AM
gopowercat.com reported the Prince news first.

That is how it will go down in history.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: Kat Kid on September 11, 2006, 10:30:15 AM
gopowercat.com reported the Prince news first.

That is how it will go down in history.

They certainly broke Snyder to retire, but Fitz got scooped by one of his own posters.  I know the guy who broke it.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: GoldbrickGangBoss on September 11, 2006, 10:35:41 AM
So if it wrankles Scout so much about the Prince-hire claim, why haven't they sued?

Maybe they have.

You guys are becoming incredibly ridiculous.  Please explain to me that even after the "Iowa" source said it was going to happen, why did the KSF.COM release their premium info that came out through Yahoo! saying something totally different?

Seems to me you guys are interchanging facts.  Scout is not the same as KSF.COM.   Maybe someone in the scout network had alluded or even said so, the KSU site did something different.

All a matter of perspective.


This must be your way of patting yourself on the back and reassuring yourself that it was money well spent paying a thief for ksu sports information that you get half a day before the rest of the world.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 11, 2006, 10:38:30 AM
you've got to give Fitz credit. Gpc.com is the has the 10th most subscribers on the rivals network.

It's hilarious seeing some of you rag on gpc.com, then feed Fitz his 10 bucks a month.

Good stuff.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: chum1 on September 11, 2006, 11:10:29 AM
I think Fitz is a Ksu homer first reporter second.

you've got to give Fitz credit. Gpc.com is the has the 10th most subscribers on the rivals network.

I'd say he's a salesman first (we've got the hottest inside info...act now or you'll miss out), a homer second, and that's about all.

Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: mjrod on September 11, 2006, 11:12:15 AM

You guys are becoming incredibly ridiculous.  Please explain to me that even after the "Iowa" source said it was going to happen, why did the KSF.COM release their premium info that came out through Yahoo! saying something totally different?


The brilliant Venables article preceded the Iowa source...and the Iowa source beat everyone to the punch.  I read his post not five minutes after hearing Fitz say on 810 he still had no idea who it was going to be. 

Of course, Fitz probably knew it was Prince, but didn't want Temple or Middle Tennesse State to catch wind of it and steal him away at the last minute.

Clarke posted that information in the free forum of ksf.com like four days into the first week.  The yahoo article appeared the following saturday.

You guys gotta hand it to the ksf.com people who initially had spend money on GPC accounts to scoop info from the Wabash.   Remember TexasCat?

LOL!

Stop ignoring reality folks.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: michigancat on September 11, 2006, 11:22:42 AM

Clarke posted that information in the free forum of ksf.com like four days into the first week.  The yahoo article appeared the following saturday.

You guys gotta hand it to the ksf.com people who initially had spend money on GPC accounts to scoop info from the Wabash.   Remember TexasCat?


No, Fitz had reported Prince was a candidate on Wednesday of the second week, and Clark reported that he was hired less than a day later - the Washington Post picked up on it that night.  He also included info that said Snyder was f'ing pissed.  The SeanK "scoop" came before this...it might not have made it to Yahoo, but it was originally posted on Tuesday, Nov. 29. 

http://kansasstate.scout.com/2/472419.html

For the most part, I think both sites are ripoffs, but Josh Clark owned gp on the Prince story.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 11, 2006, 11:24:26 AM
Quote
This information is to STAY HERE! We work hard to bring you breaking news and go the extra mile to bring you inside the decision. We ask that you do not post this elsewhere or discuss this elsewhere- Please respect that. Just like Vegas- what happens here- STAYS HERE! Thanks
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 11, 2006, 11:36:42 AM
I just want to know what ChiTwnCat would have to say about this ... he's got an explanation/spin/apology for everything that goes on at KSU, so I am sure he's got a spin for all of this as well.



Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: mjrod on September 11, 2006, 11:36:56 AM

Clarke posted that information in the free forum of ksf.com like four days into the first week.  The yahoo article appeared the following saturday.

You guys gotta hand it to the ksf.com people who initially had spend money on GPC accounts to scoop info from the Wabash.   Remember TexasCat?


No, Fitz had reported Prince was a candidate on Wednesday of the second week, and Clark reported that he was hired less than a day later - the Washington Post picked up on it that night.  He also included info that said Snyder was f'ing pissed.  The SeanK "scoop" came before this...it might not have made it to Yahoo, but it was originally posted on Tuesday, Nov. 29. 

http://kansasstate.scout.com/2/472419.html

For the most part, I think both sites are ripoffs, but Josh Clark owned gp on the Prince story.

I saw the post by Josh Clarke the first week after Snyder retired that Prince was being interviewed.  I remember it well because that information appeared on GPC before Fitz posted candidates, (they started that over the weekend) and then yes, Prince's article appeared the following week.   People on GPC were dismissing the scout information and it came back up later when it was announced that Prince was being hired.

I don't think Josh owned anyone, he was telling what he had heard through his sources.   And it wasn't that Clarke was right, so much that Clarke got ahold of information and reported it first on ksf.com as going towards Prince.   I don't know where people got the idea that Snyder was pissed, but apparently, Scout got that wrong too.

 :jerkoff:
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: michigancat on September 11, 2006, 11:44:44 AM
I saw the post by Josh Clarke the first week after Snyder retired that Prince was being interviewed.  I remember it well because that information appeared on GPC before Fitz posted candidates, (they started that over the weekend) and then yes, Prince's article appeared the following week.   People on GPC were dismissing the scout information and it came back up later when it was announced that Prince was being hired.

You're confusing his "Prince is interviewing" post with his "Prince is pretty much a done deal and Snyder is pissed" post.


I don't think Josh owned anyone, he was telling what he had heard through his sources.   And it wasn't that Clarke was right, so much that Clarke got ahold of information and reported it first on ksf.com as going towards Prince.   

Fine...he "scooped" Fitz in a major way, then, and Fitz has no right to claim he broke the story.


I don't know where people got the idea that Snyder was pissed, but apparently, Scout got that wrong too.

How do you know that - because Fitz told you?

:jerkoff:
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: WilliamTheWildcat on September 11, 2006, 11:45:28 AM
I just want to know what ChiTwnCat would have to say about this ... he's got an explanation/spin/apology for everything that goes on at KSU, so I am sure he's got a spin for all of this as well.

 :popcorn:
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: mjrod on September 11, 2006, 12:00:35 PM
Give me a break Rusty.    There is a difference between being scooped and breaking a story first although I'm not surprised that you and some of the other Fitz haters do not understand that.   Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

 :jerkoff:
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: chum1 on September 11, 2006, 12:01:28 PM
I don't know where people got the idea that Snyder was pissed, but apparently, Scout got that wrong too.
How do you know that - because Fitz told you?

Other than that he wasn't pissed, what did GPC say about Snyder's reaction to Prince?  I want to compare notes.

Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: hillwalking03 on September 11, 2006, 12:08:55 PM

You guys are becoming incredibly ridiculous.  Please explain to me that even after the "Iowa" source said it was going to happen, why did the KSF.COM release their premium info that came out through Yahoo! saying something totally different?


The brilliant Venables article preceded the Iowa source...and the Iowa source beat everyone to the punch.  I read his post not five minutes after hearing Fitz say on 810 he still had no idea who it was going to be. 

Of course, Fitz probably knew it was Prince, but didn't want Temple or Middle Tennesse State to catch wind of it and steal him away at the last minute.

Clarke posted that information in the free forum of ksf.com like four days into the first week.  The yahoo article appeared the following saturday.

You guys gotta hand it to the ksf.com people who initially had spend money on GPC accounts to scoop info from the Wabash.   Remember TexasCat?

LOL!

Stop ignoring reality folks.



The info was also posted on Phog and the Iowa site the same day as it was on KSF.com.  He then came back on to reiterate his info despite the denials from Fitz and KK.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: michigancat on September 11, 2006, 12:23:29 PM
Give me a break Rusty.    There is a difference between being scooped and breaking a story first although I'm not surprised that you and some of the other Fitz haters do not understand that.   Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

 :jerkoff:

I'm not a hater...I just don't think it's cool for lies to be spread.  If Clark didn't "break the story" first, the Washington Post sure did.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/934338981.html?dids=934338981:934338981&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&fmac=&date=Dec+1%2C+2005&author=&desc=Cavs+Lose+at+Least+1+Assistant

Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

If it was false, why hasn't anyone sued?

:jerkoff:
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: chum1 on September 11, 2006, 12:26:43 PM
The phrase "you heard it here first" would accurately describe KSF but not GPC in this case.  I think something like that gets at the central issue here (as opposed to reporting vs. breaking stories or Scout vs. KSF) and it is the notion behind that phrase that was apparently misapplied in the commercial.

Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: mjrod on September 11, 2006, 12:42:00 PM
Give me a break Rusty.    There is a difference between being scooped and breaking a story first although I'm not surprised that you and some of the other Fitz haters do not understand that.   Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

 :jerkoff:

I'm not a hater...I just don't think it's cool for lies to be spread.  If Clark didn't "break the story" first, the Washington Post sure did.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/934338981.html?dids=934338981:934338981&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&fmac=&date=Dec+1%2C+2005&author=&desc=Cavs+Lose+at+Least+1+Assistant

Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

If it was false, why hasn't anyone sued?

:jerkoff:

You don't sue unless there has been harm caused to you.  You have to have standing to sue.  Or didn't you know that?

And why do you think what Fitz said was a lie?   Where was his lie?  That he broke the story of Prince's hiring first?   How many people follow the WP for KSU sports?

You say you don't hate, but you're calling him a liar.   I find that interesting.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: mjrod on September 11, 2006, 12:42:59 PM
The phrase "you heard it here first" would accurately describe KSF but not GPC in this case.  I think something like that gets at the central issue here (as opposed to reporting vs. breaking stories or Scout vs. KSF) and it is the notion behind that phrase that was apparently misapplied in the commercial.

All I saw was a message on a message board that he was being hired.   Where was the article that Josh wrote stating so in the news accounts?
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: michigancat on September 11, 2006, 12:48:47 PM
Give me a break Rusty.    There is a difference between being scooped and breaking a story first although I'm not surprised that you and some of the other Fitz haters do not understand that.   Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

 :jerkoff:

I'm not a hater...I just don't think it's cool for lies to be spread.  If Clark didn't "break the story" first, the Washington Post sure did.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/934338981.html?dids=934338981:934338981&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&fmac=&date=Dec+1%2C+2005&author=&desc=Cavs+Lose+at+Least+1+Assistant

Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

If it was false, why hasn't anyone sued?

:jerkoff:

You don't sue unless there has been harm caused to you.  You have to have standing to sue.  Or didn't you know that?

And why do you think what Fitz said was a lie?   Where was his lie?  That he broke the story of Prince's hiring first?   How many people follow the WP for KSU sports?

You say you don't hate, but you're calling him a liar.   I find that interesting.


Umm...a lot of KSU fans saw the Post story that night.  Fitz is a liar because he say whatever he said about "you heard it here first" when he neither "broke the news" or "scooped the story" or did anything firstvia random post or published story.  And I don't hate someone just because they lie in a television commercial.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: kougar24 on September 11, 2006, 12:49:18 PM
Let's make this simple:

GPC.com did not break the Prince hiring first.

 :popcorn:
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: mjrod on September 11, 2006, 12:54:55 PM
Give me a break Rusty.    There is a difference between being scooped and breaking a story first although I'm not surprised that you and some of the other Fitz haters do not understand that.   Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

 :jerkoff:

I'm not a hater...I just don't think it's cool for lies to be spread.  If Clark didn't "break the story" first, the Washington Post sure did.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/934338981.html?dids=934338981:934338981&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&fmac=&date=Dec+1%2C+2005&author=&desc=Cavs+Lose+at+Least+1+Assistant

Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

If it was false, why hasn't anyone sued?

:jerkoff:

You don't sue unless there has been harm caused to you.  You have to have standing to sue.  Or didn't you know that?

And why do you think what Fitz said was a lie?   Where was his lie?  That he broke the story of Prince's hiring first?   How many people follow the WP for KSU sports?

You say you don't hate, but you're calling him a liar.   I find that interesting.


Umm...a lot of KSU fans saw the Post story that night.  Fitz is a liar because he say whatever he said about "you heard it here first" when he neither "broke the news" or "scooped the story" or did anything firstvia random post or published story.  And I don't hate someone just because they lie in a television commercial.

Yeah, a "lot" of KSU fans saw the story.

 :jerkoff:
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: michigancat on September 11, 2006, 12:56:19 PM
Give me a break Rusty.    There is a difference between being scooped and breaking a story first although I'm not surprised that you and some of the other Fitz haters do not understand that.   Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

 :jerkoff:

I'm not a hater...I just don't think it's cool for lies to be spread.  If Clark didn't "break the story" first, the Washington Post sure did.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/934338981.html?dids=934338981:934338981&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&fmac=&date=Dec+1%2C+2005&author=&desc=Cavs+Lose+at+Least+1+Assistant

Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

If it was false, why hasn't anyone sued?

:jerkoff:

You don't sue unless there has been harm caused to you.  You have to have standing to sue.  Or didn't you know that?

And why do you think what Fitz said was a lie?   Where was his lie?  That he broke the story of Prince's hiring first?   How many people follow the WP for KSU sports?

You say you don't hate, but you're calling him a liar.   I find that interesting.


Umm...a lot of KSU fans saw the Post story that night.  Fitz is a liar because he say whatever he said about "you heard it here first" when he neither "broke the news" or "scooped the story" or did anything firstvia random post or published story.  And I don't hate someone just because they lie in a television commercial.

Yeah, a "lot" of KSU fans saw the story.

 :jerkoff:

I guess it didn't come first, then.  :confused:
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: mjrod on September 11, 2006, 01:03:29 PM
Give me a break Rusty.    There is a difference between being scooped and breaking a story first although I'm not surprised that you and some of the other Fitz haters do not understand that.   Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

 :jerkoff:

I'm not a hater...I just don't think it's cool for lies to be spread.  If Clark didn't "break the story" first, the Washington Post sure did.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/934338981.html?dids=934338981:934338981&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&fmac=&date=Dec+1%2C+2005&author=&desc=Cavs+Lose+at+Least+1+Assistant

Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

If it was false, why hasn't anyone sued?

:jerkoff:

You don't sue unless there has been harm caused to you.  You have to have standing to sue.  Or didn't you know that?

And why do you think what Fitz said was a lie?   Where was his lie?  That he broke the story of Prince's hiring first?   How many people follow the WP for KSU sports?

You say you don't hate, but you're calling him a liar.   I find that interesting.


Umm...a lot of KSU fans saw the Post story that night.  Fitz is a liar because he say whatever he said about "you heard it here first" when he neither "broke the news" or "scooped the story" or did anything firstvia random post or published story.  And I don't hate someone just because they lie in a television commercial.

Yeah, a "lot" of KSU fans saw the story.

 :jerkoff:

I guess it didn't come first, then.  :confused:

Perhaps I didn't make myself clear.  Fitz was the first one to publish a story on a sports media outlet that follows KSU athletics.

And like I said, what's a "lot" of KSU fans that you know saw the article?

Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: michigancat on September 11, 2006, 01:10:58 PM
Give me a break Rusty.    There is a difference between being scooped and breaking a story first although I'm not surprised that you and some of the other Fitz haters do not understand that.   Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

 :jerkoff:

I'm not a hater...I just don't think it's cool for lies to be spread.  If Clark didn't "break the story" first, the Washington Post sure did.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/934338981.html?dids=934338981:934338981&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&fmac=&date=Dec+1%2C+2005&author=&desc=Cavs+Lose+at+Least+1+Assistant

Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

If it was false, why hasn't anyone sued?

:jerkoff:

You don't sue unless there has been harm caused to you.  You have to have standing to sue.  Or didn't you know that?

And why do you think what Fitz said was a lie?   Where was his lie?  That he broke the story of Prince's hiring first?   How many people follow the WP for KSU sports?

You say you don't hate, but you're calling him a liar.   I find that interesting.


Umm...a lot of KSU fans saw the Post story that night.  Fitz is a liar because he say whatever he said about "you heard it here first" when he neither "broke the news" or "scooped the story" or did anything firstvia random post or published story.  And I don't hate someone just because they lie in a television commercial.

Yeah, a "lot" of KSU fans saw the story.

 :jerkoff:

I guess it didn't come first, then.  :confused:

Perhaps I didn't make myself clear.  Fitz was the first one to publish a story on a sports media outlet that follows KSU athletics.



His commercial definitely didn't make that clear, and even that's probably debatable if you actually look at an hour-by-hour record of when stories were released.

The article was linked to at least one of the free boards, so I'm guessing a couple thousand saw it.  I'm also guessing it got linked on the Wabash board that night.  How many subscribers does Fitz have?
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: mjrod on September 11, 2006, 01:14:37 PM
His commercial definitely didn't make that clear, and even that's probably debatable if you actually look at an hour-by-hour record of when stories were released.

The article was linked to at least one of the free boards, so I'm guessing a couple thousand saw it.  I'm also guessing it got linked on the Wabash board that night.  How many subscribers does Fitz have?

Well, I would think that when you're talking about media outlets that follow KSU sports, the one I always think of first is the Washington Post.

I don't know how many subscribers he has.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: michigancat on September 11, 2006, 01:16:34 PM
His commercial definitely didn't make that clear, and even that's probably debatable if you actually look at an hour-by-hour record of when stories were released.

The article was linked to at least one of the free boards, so I'm guessing a couple thousand saw it.  I'm also guessing it got linked on the Wabash board that night.  How many subscribers does Fitz have?

Well, I would think that when you're talking about media outlets that follow KSU sports, the one I always think of first is the Washington Post.


:jerkoff:
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: ScubaSteve on September 11, 2006, 06:27:13 PM
Give me a break Rusty.    There is a difference between being scooped and breaking a story first although I'm not surprised that you and some of the other Fitz haters do not understand that.   Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

 :jerkoff:

I'm not a hater...I just don't think it's cool for lies to be spread.  If Clark didn't "break the story" first, the Washington Post sure did.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/934338981.html?dids=934338981:934338981&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&fmac=&date=Dec+1%2C+2005&author=&desc=Cavs+Lose+at+Least+1+Assistant

Josh Clarke's comment on Snyder being pissed was truth?   Was that scooped?

If it was false, why hasn't anyone sued?

:jerkoff:

You don't sue unless there has been harm caused to you.  You have to have standing to sue.  Or didn't you know that?

And why do you think what Fitz said was a lie?   Where was his lie?  That he broke the story of Prince's hiring first?   How many people follow the WP for KSU sports?

You say you don't hate, but you're calling him a liar.   I find that interesting.


Umm...a lot of KSU fans saw the Post story that night.  Fitz is a liar because he say whatever he said about "you heard it here first" when he neither "broke the news" or "scooped the story" or did anything firstvia random post or published story.  And I don't hate someone just because they lie in a television commercial.

Yeah, a "lot" of KSU fans saw the story.

 :jerkoff:

I guess it didn't come first, then.  :confused:

Perhaps I didn't make myself clear.  Fitz was the first one to publish a story on a sports media outlet that follows KSU athletics.



His commercial definitely didn't make that clear, and even that's probably debatable if you actually look at an hour-by-hour record of when stories were released.

The article was linked to at least one of the free boards, so I'm guessing a couple thousand saw it.  I'm also guessing it got linked on the Wabash board that night.  How many subscribers does Fitz have?

There sure is a lot of masterbating going on in this thread.  Find yourselves some women!!
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: GoldbrickGangBoss on September 11, 2006, 07:08:23 PM
Mj is letting his hatred for all things SeanK get in the way.

That or he has some enormous love for Fitz for some reason.

Combination of both.

KSF broke the story first. They should have probably pimped that fact more so Fitz couldn't try and steal it(among other things he's stolen).

hth
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: WILDCAT NATION on September 11, 2006, 07:46:42 PM
MJ, you didn't go and become an investor in PI on us did you?

This thing with the mystery transfer is just downright funny.
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: ScubaSteve on September 11, 2006, 07:51:27 PM
MJ, you didn't go and become an investor in PI on us did you?

This thing with the mystery transfer is just downright funny.


What's funny about it?
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: WILDCAT NATION on September 11, 2006, 07:58:04 PM
All the usual things.

How you doing tonight anyway Tim?

Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 11, 2006, 08:52:14 PM
MJ, you didn't go and become an investor in PI on us did you?

This thing with the mystery transfer is just downright funny.


Thirty-seven months.

370 dollars. Right to Fitz's pocket.

Shouldn't a hospital janitor do better things with his hourly pay?

:confused:
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: wildcat79 on September 11, 2006, 10:07:20 PM
Obviously a slow new night! What of bunch of @$+#$#$
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: WILDCAT NATION on September 11, 2006, 10:42:44 PM
MJ, you didn't go and become an investor in PI on us did you?

This thing with the mystery transfer is just downright funny.


Thirty-seven months.

370 dollars. Right to Fitz's pocket.

Shouldn't a hospital janitor do better things with his hourly pay?

:confused:


It's free...and that janitor job pays just fine.....
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: ScubaSteve on September 12, 2006, 12:20:37 AM
All the usual things.

How you doing tonight anyway Tim?



It's Steve.  Can't you read?
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: jeffy on September 12, 2006, 08:54:29 AM
Scout is now reporting that the Twin Towers have collapsed.  Looks like it's going to be a sad day, one that changes our lives forever!
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: ksuno1stunner on September 12, 2006, 09:24:44 AM
Scout is now reporting that the Twin Towers have collapsed.  Looks like it's going to be a sad day, one that changes our lives forever!

you're the biggest gopowertard on this site
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: jeffy on September 12, 2006, 01:46:20 PM
 :crybaby:

Now you've hurt my feelings, too!
Title: Re: Fitz's credibility
Post by: BarryMcCockner on September 12, 2006, 10:47:14 PM
I can't believe I'm saying this, but Goldy actually has it right this time.  The KSU education must be paying dividends.