KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: kougar24 on September 05, 2006, 01:40:06 PM

Title: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: kougar24 on September 05, 2006, 01:40:06 PM
As I watched the Miami/FSU game, one thought kept occurring to my buddy and I: roll our QB out...get him away from the chaos that the O-line allows to ensue.

Why wouldn't we roll him out? He's got decent legs too...he could at least pick up a few yards on a covered play.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: opcat on September 05, 2006, 02:27:20 PM
Yes and some cutblocking.  Take them down.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: greasd up deaf guy on September 05, 2006, 02:32:30 PM
What about eye-gouging the D-Line?
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 05, 2006, 02:32:54 PM
Rolling a QB out requires a Big-time Arm.

Dyl doesn't have.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: michigancat on September 05, 2006, 02:33:27 PM
Rolling a QB out requires a Big-time Arm.

Dyl doesn't have.

What about rolling out Josh Freeman?
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: kougar24 on September 05, 2006, 03:47:28 PM
Fatty, with our O-line, our QB (whichever it is) will likely be throwing on the run a lot anyway. Might as well give him some initial space to buy time before he has to chuck it away.

Let me phrase this another way: is there a valid reason to NOT roll him out?
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 05, 2006, 03:52:46 PM
The Valid Reason is the "jamming a square peg into a round hole" concept of implementing a new offense.

Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: kougar24 on September 05, 2006, 03:56:00 PM
Are you saying you can't roll out in the WCO?
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: AzCat on September 05, 2006, 04:10:12 PM
No he's saying the Meier is insufficiently athletic to properly execute a WCO-style offense.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 05, 2006, 04:12:55 PM
I guess the bigger question is ... do we really know what DM can do anymore??

Or ... was he so locked down by the coaching staff in this last game he could do much of anything.??

I am also trying to understand why the WCO seemingly means no more QB running game??

Did KSU run the shotgun 1 time Saturday night ... I have only seen bits and pieces of the video, so I don't know for sure.

Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: AzCat on September 05, 2006, 04:19:12 PM
I guess the bigger question is ... do we really know what DM can do anymore??

Or ... was he so locked down by the coaching staff in this last game he could do much of anything.??

I'm sure James Franklin was right there on the sideline saying, "OK Dylan go out there and loft a pass gently into double coverage late over the middle.  And whatever you do keep your eye on the receiver from the snap all the way through until the play ends."  Meier is borderline physically incapable of playing QB for a I-A program.  Oh &*$@!, our starting QB is a cripple. 

:popcorn:
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: plaincat on September 05, 2006, 04:30:22 PM
Rolling a QB out requires a Big-time Arm.

Dyl doesn't have.

That is simply wrong.  He threw some bullets on Saturday night.  I was surprised that Jordy caught the pass for his 30 yd gain because Meier threw it so hard.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: kougar24 on September 05, 2006, 04:35:43 PM
I'm not buying the "Meier physically can't throw on the run" argument just yet.

Roll the f*cker out. Can't be any worse than last Saturday.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 05, 2006, 04:37:40 PM
Roberson was PERFECT for rolling out.


(http://espn-att.starwave.com/i/abcsports/bcs/!2001/0926/photo/s_roberson_i.jpg)
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: AzCat on September 05, 2006, 04:39:11 PM
Roll the f*cker out. Can't be any worse than last Saturday.

Yes it can, you'll see in a couple of weeks.   :dancin:
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: mjrod on September 05, 2006, 04:40:33 PM
Roberson was PERFECT for rolling out.


(http://espn-att.starwave.com/i/abcsports/bcs/!2001/0926/photo/s_roberson_i.jpg)

Roberson was more physically gifted than Meier.

In fact, when it comes to being physically gifted, Bishop and Roberson were miles ahead of the next qb.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: kougar24 on September 05, 2006, 04:44:39 PM
Roberson was perfect for lots of things.

We don't have Roberson.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: Andy on September 05, 2006, 07:46:56 PM
Roberson was perfect for lots of things.

We don't have Roberson.

crap you are right
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: Fedor on September 06, 2006, 02:05:53 PM
I'm pretty sure he rolled out on the two point conversion.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: kougar24 on September 06, 2006, 05:15:28 PM
I'm pretty sure he rolled out on the two point conversion.

And by God, what was the result of the play?
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: ds43fan on September 06, 2006, 06:38:54 PM
Roberson was PERFECT for rolling out.


(http://espn-att.starwave.com/i/abcsports/bcs/!2001/0926/photo/s_roberson_i.jpg)
the memories :crybaby:
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: GoldbrickGangBoss on September 06, 2006, 06:48:31 PM
Just let Scary figure out the Smart thing to do.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: Fedor on September 06, 2006, 09:45:52 PM
I'm pretty sure he rolled out on the two point conversion.

And by God, what was the result of the play?

A three yard completion.  I see what you mean, string a few of those together and you end up with 4th and 1.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: ds43fan on September 06, 2006, 09:47:27 PM
RUN LEON PATTON GET TOUCHDOWN its that easy
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: opcat on September 06, 2006, 09:51:19 PM
A good question for the media to ask Prince is if Meier is allowed to scramble freely.

Haven't gotten an answer on that.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: Andy on September 07, 2006, 12:06:34 AM
ssshhhhhh   secret weapon
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: kougar24 on September 07, 2006, 12:21:31 AM
I'm pretty sure he rolled out on the two point conversion.

And by God, what was the result of the play?

A three yard completion.  I see what you mean, string a few of those together and you end up with 4th and 1.

You can't possibly be that stupid.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: Fedor on September 07, 2006, 11:48:57 AM
I'm pretty sure he rolled out on the two point conversion.

And by God, what was the result of the play?

A three yard completion.  I see what you mean, string a few of those together and you end up with 4th and 1.

You can't possibly be that stupid.

Well, 3x3 does equal 9.  But I'm not here to argue the mind blowing mysteries of basic math with you.

I was under the impression that this board was where all the witty, flippant, sarcastic cool kids posted.  Maybe not. 
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: michigancat on September 07, 2006, 11:52:17 AM
I was under the impression that this board was where all the witty, flippant, sarcastic cool kids posted.  Maybe not. 

 :love:
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: Dan Rydell on September 07, 2006, 12:12:30 PM
Quote
I was under the impression that this board was where all the witty, flippant, sarcastic cool kids posted.  Maybe not.


Well yes, we do.  But so do fatty and Kougar.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 07, 2006, 12:15:30 PM
Quote
I was under the impression that this board was where all the witty, flippant, sarcastic cool kids posted.  Maybe not.


Wrong. This board just sucks in general. I'm being serious, there are zero positives here.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: Dan Rydell on September 07, 2006, 12:17:26 PM
^^^^^^

Exhibit A.

 :sleep:
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 07, 2006, 12:18:48 PM
(http://myspace-653.vo.llnwd.net/01009/35/60/1009790653_l.jpg)
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: JavaCat on September 07, 2006, 12:19:24 PM
Quote
Wrong. This board just sucks in general. I'm being serious, there are zero positives here.

Then you won't mind being banned.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: michigancat on September 07, 2006, 12:20:52 PM
(http://myspace-653.vo.llnwd.net/01009/35/60/1009790653_l.jpg)

Link.

Seriously.
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 07, 2006, 12:21:21 PM
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=2285.0


 :lol:
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: WavetheWheat on September 07, 2006, 12:59:02 PM
you mean like this?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4326406739297995550
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 07, 2006, 01:09:55 PM
I don't get it.

Squawks on our boards ... post after post about KSU on Squawk boards.

Don't the fans of the greatest college football team on the planet, coming off their 1st winning season in 10 years (their 8th winning season in the last 37 years) have anything better to talk about??

Look at Mangino's stellar road record in conference play ... a future 3 time Heisman winner at QB, and a stadium stuffed to the breaking point on Saturdays.

Certainly there's more to talk about in Squawkville then KSU.

Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: kougar24 on September 07, 2006, 06:35:34 PM
Quote
I was under the impression that this board was where all the witty, flippant, sarcastic cool kids posted.  Maybe not.


Well yes, we do.  But so do fatty and Kougar.

F*cker.  :chainsaw:
Title: Re: What about rolling Meier out?
Post by: WilliamTheWildcat on September 07, 2006, 10:10:42 PM
Who's the guy flipping off?  The empty Dean Dome?   Guy's got a real set of mouse balls. 

Or he's a phognet poster who seems very at home on his knees.

Probably both.