KSUFans Archives

Fan Life => The Endzone Dive => Topic started by: chum1 on August 22, 2006, 12:27:08 PM

Title: Flames on package = good
Post by: chum1 on August 22, 2006, 12:27:08 PM
(http://www.nissinfoods.com/images/SCChknT.jpg)

Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: AzCat on August 22, 2006, 01:55:07 PM
Flames on guitar = better

(http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d163/YetAnother1/USAV.jpg)
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: pissclams on August 22, 2006, 01:57:18 PM
LOL @ someone eating Top Ramen.

SUCK IT CHUMP1
(http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/B000AQARK2.01-A3CDPEGSIQM61V._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_V1128029537_.jpg)
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 22, 2006, 02:08:16 PM
(http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i43/saulbadguy/KATPAK.jpg)
KATPAK
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: michigancat on August 22, 2006, 02:09:54 PM
Quote from: Saulbadguy on August 22, 2006, 02:08:16 PM
(http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i43/saulbadguy/KATPAK.jpg)
KATPAK

I lol'd.
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: pissclams on August 22, 2006, 03:36:20 PM
x2
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: GoldbrickGangBoss on August 22, 2006, 07:41:50 PM
Chicken flavor Ramen is the only kind worth the 17 cents it costs.

I buy in bulk from Sams Club.
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: chum1 on August 22, 2006, 09:30:16 PM
Quote from: pissclams on August 22, 2006, 01:57:18 PM
SUCK IT CHUMP1

You suck it, bitch.

Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: pissclams on August 22, 2006, 10:32:09 PM
SUCK IT CHUMP1

[email protected]
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: chum1 on August 23, 2006, 12:12:32 AM
You suck it, BITCH!

(http://www.geocities.com/dystoniamusic/SUCK_IT.jpg)

(http://media.shtoink.com/media/pics.funny/pex2.jpg)

Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: pissclams on August 23, 2006, 09:07:41 AM
(http://www.usmm.net/p/mum-chum.jpg)
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 23, 2006, 09:08:50 AM
(http://www.vintagevantage.com/uploads/chum.JPG)
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: pissclams on August 23, 2006, 10:45:09 AM
(http://www.capitola.com/dogs/images/Howl-o-ween/bat-dog.jpg)
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: chum1 on August 23, 2006, 11:16:46 AM
PISSCLAMSPAK
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/7e/Urinal_with_urinal_cake_gsu_cit_2004.jpg/200px-Urinal_with_urinal_cake_gsu_cit_2004.jpg)
(http://cache.boston.com/bonzai-fba/Original_Photo/2006/08/02/1154526463_1744.jpg)
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c3/Knot-hangmans-noose.jpg/250px-Knot-hangmans-noose.jpg)
(http://us.st11.yimg.com/us.st.yimg.com/I/everythingfurniture_1910_1074946848)

Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 23, 2006, 01:06:05 PM
I don't understand the hanging reference.  Or the band-aids.
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: chum1 on August 23, 2006, 02:01:45 PM
The band-aids are for PC's penis after the discharge of clams.  And I am under the impression that you are supposed to want to kill yourself if you live in Topeka.  It's just something I heard one time.

Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 23, 2006, 02:27:34 PM
That is awfully mean.  :mad:
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: chum1 on August 23, 2006, 07:38:21 PM
Quote from: Saulbadguy on August 23, 2006, 02:27:34 PM
That is awfully mean. :mad:

Sorry, Saul.  I fixed it.  It was all PC's fault.

Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: pissclams on August 24, 2006, 10:28:38 PM
SAULPAK
(http://www.moviepoopshoot.com/addicted/images/2004/dec10/4.jpg)
(http://www.jeremy365.com/images2/dog.jpg)
(http://www.jeremy365.com/images2/cat.jpg)
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: Stillwater Cat on August 25, 2006, 08:55:50 AM
Quote from: pissclams on August 24, 2006, 10:28:38 PM
SAULPAK
(http://www.moviepoopshoot.com/addicted/images/2004/dec10/4.jpg)
(http://www.jeremy365.com/images2/dog.jpg)
(http://www.jeremy365.com/images2/cat.jpg)

That's hilarious.   How much for one of those?   :lol:  Is that a shadowy ghost behind the mummy?
Title: Re: Flames on package = good
Post by: ds43fan on August 25, 2006, 08:53:01 PM
wheres the OX56PAK and the TATERSALADPAK and theDS43FANPAK?
 :crybaby: