KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: ksuno1stunner on August 12, 2006, 07:16:00 PM

Title: hughes
Post by: ksuno1stunner on August 12, 2006, 07:16:00 PM
(https://www.accesskansas.org/images/rso_images/SOP07086.jpg)

HUGHES, TYLER JOHN
SEX OFFENDER

Last Known Address as of: 7/25/2006
1126 BLUEMONT APT 1
MANHATTAN, KS 66502
County: RILEY
Race/Sex: W / M
Date of Birth: 9/11/1984
Registered Since: 5/25/2006
Offense: AGGRAVATED INDECENT LIBERTIES W/CHILD

https://www.accesskansas.org/ssrv-registered-offender/searchName.do;jsessionid=FF9FA0AC5BA31769A39B9D77F79DD686
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: GoldbrickGangBoss on August 12, 2006, 07:21:54 PM
The bad news just keeps on coming for you guys.
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: ksuno1stunner on August 12, 2006, 07:23:55 PM
The bad news just keeps on coming for you guys.

http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/sports/colleges/kansas_state_university/15230772.htm
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: GoldbrickGangBoss on August 12, 2006, 07:33:19 PM
Beasley could still do to you what he did to Charlotte.

Imagine the mental breakdown.
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: fatty fat fat on August 12, 2006, 07:37:56 PM

Imagine the mental breakdown.

http://mb24.scout.com/fkansasinsiderfrm3.showMessage?topicID=73788.topic
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: GoldbrickGangBoss on August 12, 2006, 07:45:30 PM
What happened to your pro-football/anti-basketball stance?

How has it changed?
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: catfan28 on August 12, 2006, 08:22:38 PM
Hughes can't last 8 minutes on the court...what makes him think he will last that long in jail?  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: GoldbrickGangBoss on August 12, 2006, 08:26:40 PM
What differentiates aggravated indecent liberties w/ a child from sexual assault?
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: KSU176 on August 12, 2006, 08:40:04 PM
Quote
Beasley could still do to you what he did to Charlotte.

Keep those fingers crossed when you pray every night.
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: PowerCatScott on August 12, 2006, 08:58:40 PM
Forgive me for being graphic, but I believe it depends on penetration and what you penetrate with.  No penetration (ie fondling, etc) is indecent liberties,Fingers/foreign objects etc are aggravated indecent liberties, penis is sexual assualt (or rape is most people call it).  That could be wrong, but thats the way I remember it from covering a sex assault story during my days at the Collegian.
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: catsfan20012002 on August 12, 2006, 09:31:03 PM
Not that it matters but it has to do with something that happened before he came to KSU.
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: michigancat on August 12, 2006, 09:36:07 PM
WTF?
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: swish1 on August 12, 2006, 11:06:13 PM
how was this not reported when he signed with kstate?  also it indicates that hes been registered since 5/25/2006 so if this happened before he came to kstate what took so long to register?
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: snart on August 13, 2006, 12:27:17 AM
It's all Huggins fault!  KSU should fire his worthless ass!  A better coach would have made this kid a priest, or possibly the next pope...
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: PowerCatScott on August 13, 2006, 12:29:47 AM
The way I see it, it HAD to have happened pre-KSU. In order to be listed as a registered sex offender, you have to have been CONVICTED of a particularly violent sexual crime and/or one involving someone under the age of 18.  I cannot imagine there could have been a trial/guilty plea whatever without anyone having heard about it.  Still you'd think we'd have heard about it anyway and the registered since 5/26/06 is confusing as well.  This whole thing is just bizarre.

Also, we should hold off judgement (not that anyone on here has so far) until we know the facts.  It very well could have been a case of a 16 y/o and a 14 y/o that upset the parents or something like that. 
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: BooyahKU on August 13, 2006, 12:36:47 AM
WTF?

my thoughts exactly.  he really can't pull any tail 18 or over?
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: ksuno1stunner on August 13, 2006, 01:47:08 AM
in hughes defense she could of been 17 and looked 21 and screwed him over.  now he can't do anything about it
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: BooyahKU on August 13, 2006, 01:50:47 AM
in hughes defense she could of been 17 and looked 21 and screwed him over.  now he can't do anything about it

i check ID's looking out for my own good.  i can't imagine how much more i'd do if i were a collegiate athelte.
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: GoldbrickGangBoss on August 13, 2006, 01:51:30 AM
16 is the age of consent in Kansas.
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: ksuno1stunner on August 13, 2006, 01:52:57 AM
in hughes defense she could of been 17 and looked 21 and screwed him over.  now he can't do anything about it

i check ID's looking out for my own good.  i can't imagine how much more i'd do if i were a collegiate athelte.

yea, he should of been more responsible.  but he shouldn't be considered a "child molester" for that.  save that for marco martin  :yuck:
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: Trim on August 13, 2006, 10:49:18 AM
Corrected


See K.S.A. 21-3504.

When a 19-year old bangs his hs sophmore girlfriend who is still 15 going on 16, that's aggravated indecent liberties with a child.  When this happens, the girl's parents are usually pissed (not about the age of the dude, but because their daughter's doing guys period).  The local prosecutor has to do something to appease the parents, but doesn't think a 19-year old doing his girlfriend who may only be 2-3 school years apart warrants prison.  A deal is reached where the dude will plead guilty to the technical crime, but all parties agree that the usual mandatory prison won't be imposed.  The rub is that the guy has to register as a sex offender, with no way to distinguish typical hs activity from what's usually thought of sex offenders.

The same statute could also apply to 40-year old dudes who troll roller skating rinks for 12-15 year-olds and do stuff to them.  Those people go to prison, but are still guilty of and registered as the same offender that Hughes is.

I'm guessing the first scenario here is what happened to Hughes.

With appeals to the criminal case as well as to the administrative aspects of the registration, it wouldn't be odd for this to have happened in high school but just getting registered now.

If the dude is 18 or less and less than 4 years older than the girl, it's "only" unlawful voluntary sexual relations per K.S.A. 21-3522.
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 13, 2006, 11:22:33 AM
Would MCMW[/i] be innapropriate for this thread?
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on August 13, 2006, 03:53:21 PM
Would MCMW[/i] be innapropriate for this thread?

Yes, because he was a Wooly guy.  The MCMW was offset by "nice guy".
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: Trim on August 13, 2006, 10:18:17 PM
Leave it to Wooldridge to screw up something as simple as MCMW.
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: ChiefCatchacold on August 14, 2006, 07:32:31 AM
occurred before his 18th birthday (http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/sports/colleges/kansas_state_university/15268005.htm)
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: snart on August 14, 2006, 08:04:24 AM
We truly live in a fucqed up world if a 17 year old kid can’t put his hand down the skirt of a consenting 16 year old girl.  By that standard I guess we should all be listed as sex criminals...
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: Andy on August 14, 2006, 03:29:40 PM
We truly live in a fucqed up world if a 17 year old kid can’t put his hand down the skirt of a consenting 16 year old girl.  By that standard I guess we should all be listed as sex criminals...

agreed.  it was definitely easier being a teenager in the 90s than today
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: Andy on August 14, 2006, 03:33:35 PM
Weiser just announced Hughes is dismissed from the team---per KK

I was guessing they were gonna take this opportunity to boot him off the team...but that said its probably too late to fill his scholly.
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: swish1 on August 15, 2006, 01:56:23 AM
Weiser just announced Hughes is dismissed from the team---per KK

I was guessing they were gonna take this opportunity to boot him off the team...but that said its probably too late to fill his scholly.

the team is better off with an empty scholarship than hughes.  and im not kidding.  hes terrible.
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: MrWhite on August 15, 2006, 01:47:32 PM
where o where can we find a replacement for the 1.8 pts and 2.2 rpg?
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: pissclams on August 15, 2006, 02:03:03 PM
you?
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: MrWhite on August 15, 2006, 02:34:43 PM
i might be able to swing that.

no chance i could match his personal foul production though.

i'm in awe of his hacking game.
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: Trim on August 15, 2006, 03:15:42 PM
Quote
The Mercury has learned from Johnson Country District Attorney Paul Morrison that there were two victims, both males and under the age of 14, and that Hughes pled guilty to a single charge.

So much for my legal theory that Hughes used his BMOC status to hook up with some sophmore chick.

http://www.wildcatdaily.com/view/article.asp?sectionid=Home/News&id=248-2006-08-15-47561-57

Bslimz, isn't it bad for prospective AG's to be giving out details of sealed juvenile cases?
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: pissclams on August 15, 2006, 03:34:54 PM
Quote
The Mercury has learned from Johnson Country District Attorney Paul Morrison that there were two victims, both males and under the age of 14, and that Hughes pled guilty to a single charge.

The Mercury has confirmed that the indecent activities went on for a number of years.

 :yuck: :confused: :yuck: :confused: :yuck: :confused: :yuck:
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: catsfan20012002 on August 15, 2006, 04:14:36 PM
Johnson County District Attorney Paul Morrison said the reason the case took so long to surface was because “it didn’t come to the attention of law enforcement until about three years after it happened. It is not uncommon at all to have a delay in cases like this.”

Ok.....If it took 3 years for it to come to their attention.....How can they prove it happened?
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: catsfan20012002 on August 15, 2006, 07:07:58 PM
The Mercury has more on this incident tonight and it's disturbing. Tyler's dad says that "it's not what it seems" and had a "no comment" for how KSU has handled the situation and how Tyler is doing.

It's sad that it would appear that this, no matter if it's true or false, has ruined Tyler forever. I'm shocked that members of FHCJW's staff new about this when they recruited him.
Title: Re: hughes
Post by: AzCat on August 15, 2006, 07:36:33 PM
Given what the Merc had to say it appears that Tyler was cruising the parks for sub-14 year-old boys.  Too mad he wasn't hooping it up in NoCal, no one would have noticed one more gay child molester up there.

And I'm calling "BS" on his dad's "legally I can't talk about it" line.  Just because the records are sealed doesn't mean he can't talk about what happened, he'd be fine so long as he didn't identify his son's victims.