KSUFans Archives
Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: cas on June 11, 2008, 11:05:16 AM
-
http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=172&f=2485&t=2549817&p=3
From about page 3 on.
Weird thread.
-
The LOL'er about the phogtards is that everyone like KSU and Tech is only "WAC" worthy, like they've just dominated those schools since the inception of the Big 12.
-
What does it say...for the few of us that won't and don't have a sign in for other there. TIA
-
So Tech, the most consistent program in the 12 (bowl games every year since the inception of the conference) and KSU, probably the fourth-best program since the inception of the conference, belong in the WAC...and ku (just finished above third in the their division for the first time ever) is a Big 12 power?
-
Basically that ku will dominate TTU although that they have gone like 1-9 against TTU.
ku fans say TTU is a "fraud" and they have never accomplished anything. Then they bring out education figures. You know, the whole 9 yards.
ku fans find it apaulling that TTU fans dare to talk smack on their might 'awks. It isn't like TTU has done anything over... make that forever!!
-
Basically that ku will dominate TTU although that they have gone like 1-9 against TTU.
ku fans say TTU is a "fraud" and they have never accomplished anything. Then they bring out education figures. You know, the whole 9 yards.
ku fans find it apaulling that TTU fans dare to talk smack on their might 'awks. It isn't like TTU has done anything over... make that forever!!
Not sure how they can only be 1-9 vs TTU as they didn't lose to them last year? I believe the pwn3d them, as their only loss was to Mizzou and had a point spread of like a gazillion.
-
Not sure how they can only be 1-9 vs TTU as they didn't lose to them last year?
9-1 All-Time. 5-1 since the inception of the Big 12.
-
Well ku is now a bona fide National Collegiate Football Power . . . so their fans are right to rag on another team that they have .100 winning % against all time, and a .166 winning % against in Big 12 play.
-
Not sure how they can only be 1-9 vs TTU as they didn't lose to them last year?
9-1 All-Time. 5-1 since the inception of the Big 12.
My sarcastic pt was they didn't beat them either (or UT/OU).
-
Boise State has a better winning percentage against ou then ku whats that saying
-
I understand that since your program is circling the drain, that you have to believe that historical records have some bearing on how this season's games will be decided. But they don't. Just like when you all claimed that because ku hadn't won in Manhattan in forever, it meant we weren't going to win last year. It doesn't really work that way.
ku being 1-9 against Tech will have no bearing on who wins the game in Lawrence. Crabtree on the other hand . . .
-
leon . . . that was a valiant effort.
But you see, the jest of this thread has nothing to do with future wins, losses, or what will or won't decide games, or what was proclaimed in the past vis-a-vis records and losing streaks and what not.
Now, take a step back, regroup and give it another shot.
-
I understand that since your program is circling the drain, that you have to believe that historical records have some bearing on how this season's games will be decided. But they don't. Just like when you all claimed that because ku hadn't won in Manhattan in forever, it meant we weren't going to win last year. It doesn't really work that way.
ku being 1-9 against Tech will have no bearing on who wins the game in Lawrence. Crabtree on the other hand . . .
just shut the &@#% up you &@#%ing retard
-
I understand that since your program is circling the drain, that you have to believe that historical records have some bearing on how this season's games will be decided. But they don't. Just like when you all claimed that because ku hadn't won in Manhattan in forever, it meant we weren't going to win last year. It doesn't really work that way.
ku being 1-9 against Tech will have no bearing on who wins the game in Lawrence. Crabtree on the other hand . . .
No one said it did, duh duh duh (Mencia-style). Follow sonny's advice, regroup and try again.
Just so you understand the pt (obvious lfbiq), hard to consider ku a fb power when they're 1-9 vs a conference team that only finishes ~3rd in the south division.
-
Well ku is now a bona fide National Collegiate Football Power . . . so their fans are right to rag on another team that they have .100 winning % against all time, and a .166 winning % against in Big 12 play.
So what is the all-time record between ku and Ksu in football? Can I bring some percentages up here? Or am I not allowed to delve too far into the past since that would destroy you?
Let me know.
-
Well ku is now a bona fide National Collegiate Football Power . . . so their fans are right to rag on another team that they have .100 winning % against all time, and a .166 winning % against in Big 12 play.
So what is the all-time record between ku and Ksu in football? Can I bring some percentages up here? Or am I not allowed to delve too far into the past since that would destroy you?
Let me know.
While you are at it..please add in your bowl and conference winning history - break the conference record down by how many times have you won either the North or the Big 12...TIA
-
Well ku is now a bona fide National Collegiate Football Power . . . so their fans are right to rag on another team that they have .100 winning % against all time, and a .166 winning % against in Big 12 play.
So what is the all-time record between ku and Ksu in football? Can I bring some percentages up here? Or am I not allowed to delve too far into the past since that would destroy you?
Let me know.
While you are at it..please add in your bowl and conference winning history - break the conference record down by how many times have you won either the North or the Big 12...TIA
i'll settle for how many times they've played for the North or the Big 12
-
Well ku is now a bona fide National Collegiate Football Power . . . so their fans are right to rag on another team that they have .100 winning % against all time, and a .166 winning % against in Big 12 play.
ku Fan: "PAST!!!! WE ARE SUPER AWESOME NOW!!!!!!"
-
Would the powercats make fun of the Incredible Hulk because he was once David Banner before he got all :curse:? F*ck no...unless you want your legs torn off. You see, guys, the mighty Jayhawks didn't get big and mean and powerful by some long process of working out and eating vitamins and sh1t. It was as quick as a Banner transformation. And just because Dave WAS a whiney pansy, it doesn't mean the Hulk is. This needs to be recognized.
-
Would the powercats make fun of the Incredible Hulk because he was once David Banner before he got all :curse:? F*ck no...unless you want your legs torn off. You see, guys, the mighty Jayhawks didn't get big and mean and powerful by some long process of working out and eating vitamins and sh1t. It was as quick as a Banner transformation. And just because Dave WAS a whiney pansy, it doesn't mean the Hulk is. This needs to be recognized.
When was ku ever considered a national power for more than.. say.. two years?
-
Banner calms down.
-
Well ku is now a bona fide National Collegiate Football Power . . . so their fans are right to rag on another team that they have .100 winning % against all time, and a .166 winning % against in Big 12 play.
So what is the all-time record between ku and Ksu in football? Can I bring some percentages up here? Or am I not allowed to delve too far into the past since that would destroy you?
Let me know.
I guess the whole "in Big 12 play" threw Goldy off, and the fact that I was talking about Texas Tech.
-
Would the powercats make fun of the Incredible Hulk because he was once David Banner before he got all :curse:? F*ck no...unless you want your legs torn off. You see, guys, the mighty Jayhawks didn't get big and mean and powerful by some long process of working out and eating vitamins and sh1t. It was as quick as a Banner transformation. And just because Dave WAS a whiney pansy, it doesn't mean the Hulk is. This needs to be recognized.
huh? question? are you comparing the hulk with chickens?
-
Would the powercats make fun of the Incredible Hulk because he was once David Banner before he got all :curse:? F*ck no...unless you want your legs torn off. You see, guys, the mighty Jayhawks didn't get big and mean and powerful by some long process of working out and eating vitamins and sh1t. It was as quick as a Banner transformation. And just because Dave WAS a whiney pansy, it doesn't mean the Hulk is. This needs to be recognized.
someone went to the movies this weekend.
:billypopcorn: