KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: chum1 on August 02, 2006, 10:58:36 AM

Title: Jon Cornish
Post by: chum1 on August 02, 2006, 10:58:36 AM
Which is more lame:  (a) being really excited that Jon Cornish is your team's running back or (b) being excited that ku has a running back that might be able to rush for 1000 yards?

You might answer (b) because you think, "well, if you put Cornish on a great team, he could be pretty good."  But in that case you're really not getting excited about Cornish, himself, are you?  I can't think of any good reason to answer (a).  I remember when we used to get excited about hoping that we would not suck anymore.  ku isn't in nearly as bad of a situation as we were, though.

I'm stumped.  They surely can't be equally lame.  One has to be lamer than the other, right?

http://mb24.scout.com/fkansasinsiderfrm5.showMessage?topicID=15329.topic

Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 02, 2006, 11:15:41 AM
(http://img271.imageshack.us/img271/331/cornishsig4rr.jpg)
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: michigancat on August 02, 2006, 11:46:26 AM
I don't know if that thread is as bad as the one for the linebacker with 20 career tackles.
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: chum1 on August 02, 2006, 12:52:20 PM
They must have been twenty humdingers.  I missed that one.  You have a look-alike over there.

http://mb24.scout.com/fkansasinsiderfrm5.showMessageRange?topicID=15327.topic&start=8&stop=8

Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: michigancat on August 02, 2006, 12:57:00 PM
http://mb24.scout.com/fkansasinsiderfrm5.showMessage?topicID=15232.topic
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: ksufan2145 on August 02, 2006, 02:46:18 PM
ku hasn't had a 1000 yard rusher since sometime in the mid 90's.  The dirty birds would consider Cornish going over the century mark one hell of an accomplishment sadly enough.
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: pissclams on August 02, 2006, 03:33:49 PM
ku good team
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: GoldbrickGangBoss on August 02, 2006, 06:27:36 PM
You can only wish that you had Cornish.
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: michigancat on August 02, 2006, 06:35:48 PM
You can only wish that you had Cornish.

I would prefer some of his linemen.
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: fatty fat fat on August 02, 2006, 07:29:10 PM
Thomas Clayton is better.
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: Andy on August 02, 2006, 07:34:43 PM
Thomas Clayton is better.


which really is pretty sad.
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: PowercatPosse on August 02, 2006, 07:48:23 PM
Cornish is a self proclaimed "stud" by some ku fans.  He was such a stud that last year he could not steal away the job completly from worthless Clark Green.

Clayton was dissappointing at times last year.  Running behind the worst OL in the Big 12 did not help matters.  If Clayton does not step up his game, he will be watching Johnson get all the carries. 

And running for a 1000 yds is not that great if you stay healthy and get almost all the carries.  JJ Smith was a good back (not a stud) and he had over 1000 yds, even with a Ksu pass happy attack of May and the WR trio (K-Lock, Running and Ty)
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: fatty fat fat on August 02, 2006, 07:49:19 PM
Cornish ran all over NU and MU.

So did Clayton.
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: chum1 on August 02, 2006, 07:59:42 PM
No one in their right mind would take Cornish over Clayton.  Even if Cornish was a lot better than Clayton, though, it would still be totally lame to get excited about him.  Lameness is part of Cornish's essence.  And getting excited about lameness is lame.

Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: PowercatPosse on August 02, 2006, 08:06:32 PM
Cornish is such a stud, that with ku's offense being abismal and ranked 103rd going into their bowl game, he never became the man and always shared the load with Clark Green.   

I asked them why he was not geting 25 carries and not getting 90 percent of the workload.  I don't think Junior RBs (who are studs) share the load with an average back (like Green) when your offense sucks a**

 :loly: to the Phoggies
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: ksufan2145 on August 02, 2006, 09:38:56 PM
You know what, I think we're being too hard on him.  We must give props when props are due...

I mean come on, he's CANADIAN!!
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: Leyton on August 03, 2006, 02:59:56 AM
The most interesting part of this thread? I learned Cornish's first name - I thought it was Josh.  Good times.
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: markp68 on August 03, 2006, 10:18:34 AM
Cornish is such a stud, that with ku's offense being abismal and ranked 103rd going into their bowl game, he never became the man and always shared the load with Clark Green.   

I asked them why he was not geting 25 carries and not getting 90 percent of the workload.  I don't think Junior RBs (who are studs) share the load with an average back (like Green) when your offense sucks a**

 :loly: to the Phoggies

Cornish participated heavily in special teams, mainly because he made a huge difference when he was in there.  This resulted in less participation in the offense, unfortunately.  Also, his pass-blocking and pass-catching skills were not as good as Clark Green's were.  I am hoping for a better all-around back this year in Corn-dawg.
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: PowercatPosse on August 03, 2006, 02:09:46 PM
Playing ST is all and good.  Sproles and Newman both played a ton on ST and it did not take away from the offensive/defensive duties.    Some of his ST duties may have taken a little of Cornish's ability to play on offense, but Green still led the team in carries. 

I think he was a better runner than Green.  I just don't think he was all that, and that is why Green saw just as much if not more PT that Corny.
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: MrWhite on August 03, 2006, 02:44:33 PM
Cornish


=


(http://www.thepamperingprince.com/pink_triangle.gif)
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: Joker on August 03, 2006, 02:58:01 PM
Cornish


=


(http://www.thepamperingprince.com/pink_triangle.gif)

How bout them WUSL Bears!!
Title: Re: Jon Cornish
Post by: markp68 on August 03, 2006, 03:53:40 PM
Playing ST is all and good.  Sproles and Newman both played a ton on ST and it did not take away from the offensive/defensive duties.    Some of his ST duties may have taken a little of Cornish's ability to play on offense, but Green still led the team in carries. 

I think he was a better runner than Green.  I just don't think he was all that, and that is why Green saw just as much if not more PT that Corny.

Yeah, he mainly needs to work on blocking and catching the ball.  He is very fast, has really good acceleration and he is developing good vision and competitiveness.  He is Canadian, so he had quite a football learning curve when he got here.  :)