KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on July 22, 2006, 12:13:17 PM

Title: Assuming we land Smith, and ku lands Lawrence
Post by: fatty fat fat on July 22, 2006, 12:13:17 PM
http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewrank.asp?ra_key=1560

How would you feel about Prince's recruiting in the state of Kansas in his 1st real year?

I'd be ok with it. It's hard to grab Ballard out of Lawrence.
Title: Re: Assuming we land Smith, and ku lands Lawrence
Post by: ChicoRodriguez on July 22, 2006, 03:33:01 PM
Ballard is a "no-contact" tight end.  I would rather see Lawrence at NU.
Title: Re: Assuming we land Smith, and ku lands Lawrence
Post by: fatty fat fat on July 22, 2006, 07:06:43 PM
Yeah, it's a shame we aren't getting Lawrence.
Title: Re: Assuming we land Smith, and ku lands Lawrence
Post by: chum1 on July 23, 2006, 12:12:25 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on July 22, 2006, 12:13:17 PM
How would you feel about Prince's recruiting in the state of Kansas in his 1st real year?

I'd be ok with it.

I thought you'd say that our list of recruits from Kansas is too long.

Title: Re: Assuming we land Smith, and ku lands Lawrence
Post by: fatty fat fat on July 23, 2006, 12:31:53 AM
Quote from: chum1 on July 23, 2006, 12:12:25 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on July 22, 2006, 12:13:17 PM
How would you feel about Prince's recruiting in the state of Kansas in his 1st real year?

I'd be ok with it.

I thought you'd say that our list of recruits from Kansas is too long.



LOL at some jack off writing about Prince. Most of the UVa people thought highly of him. It's funny that he talks "most knowledgable"....most knowledgable fans would realize that when Prince's offense rank HIGH compared to OTHER ACC offenses in all statistics that are important then he most definitiley DID get the job done. They played 8 games vs. ACC teams per year....it was NOT the offenses fault UVa lost those games. Try grabbing an f-ing clue and looking at UVa's defensive stats..they were horrendous.

LOL...idiots who pretend to know football. I love it!!
Title: Re: Assuming we land Smith, and ku lands Lawrence
Post by: swish1 on July 23, 2006, 12:36:57 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on July 23, 2006, 12:31:53 AM
Quote from: chum1 on July 23, 2006, 12:12:25 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on July 22, 2006, 12:13:17 PM
How would you feel about Prince's recruiting in the state of Kansas in his 1st real year?

I'd be ok with it.

I thought you'd say that our list of recruits from Kansas is too long.



LOL at some jack off writing about Prince. Most of the UVa people thought highly of him. It's funny that he talks "most knowledgable"....most knowledgable fans would realize that when Prince's offense rank HIGH compared to OTHER ACC offenses in all statistics that are important then he most definitiley DID get the job done. They played 8 games vs. ACC teams per year....it was NOT the offenses fault UVa lost those games. Try grabbing an f-ing clue and looking at UVa's defensive stats..they were horrendous.

LOL...idiots who pretend to know football. I love it!!

im confused.  i thought you were anti-prince.
Title: Re: Assuming we land Smith, and ku lands Lawrence
Post by: chum1 on July 23, 2006, 08:46:48 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on July 23, 2006, 12:31:53 AM
Quote from: chum1 on July 23, 2006, 12:12:25 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on July 22, 2006, 12:13:17 PM
How would you feel about Prince's recruiting in the state of Kansas in his 1st real year?

I'd be ok with it.

I thought you'd say that our list of recruits from Kansas is too long.



LOL at some jack off writing about Prince. Most of the UVa people thought highly of him. It's funny that he talks "most knowledgable"....most knowledgable fans would realize that when Prince's offense rank HIGH compared to OTHER ACC offenses in all statistics that are important then he most definitiley DID get the job done. They played 8 games vs. ACC teams per year....it was NOT the offenses fault UVa lost those games. Try grabbing an f-ing clue and looking at UVa's defensive stats..they were horrendous.

LOL...idiots who pretend to know football. I love it!!

LOL...LOL...LOL...Idiots...LOL...Whatever...LOL...LOL!!!

Title: Re: Assuming we land Smith, and ku lands Lawrence
Post by: mjrod on July 23, 2006, 11:29:42 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on July 23, 2006, 12:31:53 AM
Quote from: chum1 on July 23, 2006, 12:12:25 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on July 22, 2006, 12:13:17 PM
How would you feel about Prince's recruiting in the state of Kansas in his 1st real year?

I'd be ok with it.

I thought you'd say that our list of recruits from Kansas is too long.



LOL at some jack off writing about Prince. Most of the UVa people thought highly of him. It's funny that he talks "most knowledgable"....most knowledgable fans would realize that when Prince's offense rank HIGH compared to OTHER ACC offenses in all statistics that are important then he most definitiley DID get the job done. They played 8 games vs. ACC teams per year....it was NOT the offenses fault UVa lost those games. Try grabbing an f-ing clue and looking at UVa's defensive stats..they were horrendous.

LOL...idiots who pretend to know football. I love it!!

A fatty meltdown?

 :popcorn:

Title: Re: Assuming we land Smith, and ku lands Lawrence
Post by: pissclams on July 23, 2006, 11:54:32 AM
LMFAO!
Title: Re: Assuming we land Smith, and ku lands Lawrence
Post by: Andy on July 23, 2006, 12:11:26 PM
Quote from: mjrod on July 23, 2006, 11:29:42 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on July 23, 2006, 12:31:53 AM
Quote from: chum1 on July 23, 2006, 12:12:25 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on July 22, 2006, 12:13:17 PM
How would you feel about Prince's recruiting in the state of Kansas in his 1st real year?

I'd be ok with it.

I thought you'd say that our list of recruits from Kansas is too long.



LOL at some jack off writing about Prince. Most of the UVa people thought highly of him. It's funny that he talks "most knowledgable"....most knowledgable fans would realize that when Prince's offense rank HIGH compared to OTHER ACC offenses in all statistics that are important then he most definitiley DID get the job done. They played 8 games vs. ACC teams per year....it was NOT the offenses fault UVa lost those games. Try grabbing an f-ing clue and looking at UVa's defensive stats..they were horrendous.

LOL...idiots who pretend to know football. I love it!!

A fatty meltdown?

 :popcorn:



yeah where did that come from?
Title: Re: Assuming we land Smith, and ku lands Lawrence
Post by: chum1 on July 23, 2006, 12:31:12 PM
Quote from: ksufan19 on July 23, 2006, 12:11:26 PM
Quote from: mjrod on July 23, 2006, 11:29:42 AM
A fatty meltdown?

yeah where did that come from?

LOL at idiots...LOL...Hilarious...LOL...,...LOL...,...and...LOL!!!

http://mb24.scout.com/fkansasinsiderfrm5.showMessage?topicID=15178.topic

Title: Re: Assuming we land Smith, and ku lands Lawrence
Post by: fatty fat fat on July 23, 2006, 12:44:51 PM
Quote from: mjrod on July 23, 2006, 11:29:42 AM


A fatty meltdown?

 :popcorn:



WPE