KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: catdude33 on March 03, 2008, 09:01:25 PM

Title: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: catdude33 on March 03, 2008, 09:01:25 PM
We're not going to be.  I don't care how much some of our defensive recruits weigh, they're all JUCOS and they won't be very good this year.  Our returners all proved that they suck last year, so let's not count on them too much.  Our defense will be in the bottom 1/4 of the Big XII.

And please save me the "our offense should be extremely explosive" nonsense. We lost Jordy, who statistics show we threw to 98% of the time last year.  We lost our starting running back, who wasn't that good, but what does that tell you about who was behind him?    Sure our offensive line should improve this year....just like the last 3 years.  Won't happen.  But hey, those JUCO wide recievers sure look impressive on paper...WR is one of the toughest transitions to make to the next level so expecting production from those "burners" this year is pretty dumb.

Be warned, there will be "hype" videos abounding in the next few months, followed by spring practice and spring game posts talking about how "player x has really progressed" and "player y is an absolute beast."  Well both x and y are going to suck when they actually get on the field and we're not going to win very many games this year, and we're certainly not going to a bowl.

Be strong people.  Hold onto that feeling you had after the Fresno State game.  We'll all be better off.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: fatty fat fat on March 03, 2008, 09:04:40 PM
Through 8 games of the 2007 season, KSU ranked #15 in the sagarin power poll.

When we lost a few defensive starters, we went in the tank.

Just a few, "nuggets" to chew over, imo.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: catdude33 on March 03, 2008, 09:08:42 PM
Through 8 games of the 2007 season, KSU ranked #15 in the sagarin power poll.

When we lost a few defensive starters, we went in the tank.

Just a few, "nuggets" to chew over, imo.

Don't do this.  One "vid." from you and half of this place will be disappointed if we don't win 8 games.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: catzacker on March 03, 2008, 09:21:56 PM
Through 8 games of the 2007 season, KSU ranked #15 in the sagarin power poll.

When we lost a few defensive starters, we went in the tank.

Just a few, "nuggets" to chew over, imo.

Don't do this.  One "vid." from you and half of this place will be disappointed if we don't win 8 games.

I love fats' vids, but if he makes one, we win like 2 games next year.  It's the Fattytube curse. 
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: joelcat on March 03, 2008, 09:44:08 PM
I would rather go into the season optimistic and be disappointed, than go in thinking we are going to lose and be proved correct.


Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 03, 2008, 11:06:55 PM
Like I keep saying; 6 or 7 wins isn't out of the question.  I can't see any more than that though.

Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: Bullfn33 on March 03, 2008, 11:27:18 PM
Through 8 games of the 2007 season, KSU ranked #15 in the sagarin power poll.

When we lost a few defensive starters, we went in the tank.

Just a few, "nuggets" to chew over, imo.

This has been my platform.  Until I see us giving up 10 straight scoring possessions with a healthy non-beaten down squad, I won't believe we suck as bad as the last four games.  I keep thinking back to the defense we fielded at Auburn and Texas when we had guys like Antwon Moore(:love:).  We aren't going to win the North but I don't buy the we totally suck hype just yet.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 03, 2008, 11:33:11 PM
Okay, say I buy into the "it was the injuries and lack of depth".   You know I've seen plenty of teams with injuries and lack of depth that didn't give up 10 straight scoring drives to a suckass team like Nebraska.

Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: Legore on March 04, 2008, 12:31:11 PM
We're not going to be.  I don't care how much some of our defensive recruits weigh, they're all JUCOS and they won't be very good this year.  Our returners all proved that they suck last year, so let's not count on them too much.  Our defense will be in the bottom 1/4 of the Big XII.

And please save me the "our offense should be extremely explosive" nonsense. We lost Jordy, who statistics show we threw to 98% of the time last year.  We lost our starting running back, who wasn't that good, but what does that tell you about who was behind him?    Sure our offensive line should improve this year....just like the last 3 years.  Won't happen.  But hey, those JUCO wide recievers sure look impressive on paper...WR is one of the toughest transitions to make to the next level so expecting production from those "burners" this year is pretty dumb.

Be warned, there will be "hype" videos abounding in the next few months, followed by spring practice and spring game posts talking about how "player x has really progressed" and "player y is an absolute beast."  Well both x and y are going to suck when they actually get on the field and we're not going to win very many games this year, and we're certainly not going to a bowl.

Be strong people.  Hold onto that feeling you had after the Fresno State game.  We'll all be better off.

Not sure why the offensive line is still everyone's whipping boy but it case you were not watching it actually did improve last year.  We had a back go for 1200 yards and average 6.5 YPC and had one of the better offenses in the league.  Still don't think we'll be very good next year but just thought I would throw that in.   The o-line was pretty good last year and will be better next year.  The defense was awful last year and I'm not really sure what it's going to be this year probably anywhere from slightly below average to awful.  If it's slightly below average we can squeak out 6 wins if it's awful probably 3. 

   
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: opcat on March 04, 2008, 01:21:13 PM
I don't know how you could predict until you know how good these new players can play.

I think the defense will improve greatly.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: catdude33 on March 04, 2008, 01:27:38 PM
The reason I say that the offensive line was terrible is because of all the drive killing penalties they committed last year.  Very undisciplined.  Don't see this changing much.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: Brock Landers on March 04, 2008, 01:30:32 PM
What fun would it be if we didn't get our expectations unreasonably high before the season?  It makes the meltdown threads that much more spectacular.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: catdude33 on March 04, 2008, 01:44:30 PM
What fun would it be if we didn't get our expectations unreasonably high before the season?  It makes the meltdown threads that much more spectacular.

Maybe its the fact that we had really high hopes for bball this year, but meltdowns are getting a little "played" for me.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: Bullfn33 on March 04, 2008, 02:38:18 PM
Okay, say I buy into the "it was the injuries and lack of depth".   You know I've seen plenty of teams with injuries and lack of depth that didn't give up 10 straight scoring drives to a suckass team like Nebraska.



I think injuries and lack of depth is probably magnified more so in a 3-4 than in a traditional 4-3.  We aren't as good as what we saw at Auburn and Texas and probably not as bad as what we saw at Nebraska and Fresno but somewhere in between.  Fair?
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: Chingon on March 04, 2008, 02:55:26 PM
KSU Football 2008:

Lasciate Ogni Speranza Voi Ch'Entrate

Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: fatty fat fat on March 04, 2008, 04:43:25 PM
Freeman may be a star.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: catdude33 on March 04, 2008, 06:26:55 PM
Freeman may be a star.

The closest Freeman will ever get to a star is when he rushed the court after we beat ku and stood next to Beasley.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: WildCatzPhreak on March 04, 2008, 10:07:01 PM
I don't get why people trash JFree.  He's actually a really good quarterback.  The reason his numbers aren't great are because his supporting cast has been craptastic.

Our defense can't really be any worse than the end of the year last year.

I think we're gonna be really bad.  5 wins would be a good year.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: stormnut on March 04, 2008, 11:12:18 PM
Freeman may be a star.

The closest Freeman will ever get to a star is when he rushed the court after we beat ku and stood next to Beasley.

I think I will add this to may quotes that will come back to bit some one list. :cheers:
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: WilliesToeNail on March 05, 2008, 07:12:18 PM
What fun would it be if we didn't get our expectations unreasonably high before the season?  It makes the meltdown threads that much more spectacular.


Exactly. We've been doing it in basketball for years. Although our idea of high expectations for the bball team has been "if we win the Big12 tourney, we're in, baby!!!"
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: cas on March 05, 2008, 07:26:18 PM
Freeman may be a star.

QFT.

(http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l226/csourk/scary.jpg)
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: catdude33 on March 05, 2008, 10:15:00 PM
Freeman could be the best QB in the world, but he'll be throwing to a bunch of first year JUCO retards and a linebacker.  They will make him look suckie.  Come on people, grow up.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: fatty fat fat on March 05, 2008, 10:24:09 PM
Freeman could be the best QB in the world, but he'll be throwing to a bunch of first year JUCO retards and a linebacker.  They will make him look suckie.  Come on people, grow up.

You mean like Darnell Mcdonald? Quincy Morgan? James Terry? Deon Murphy?

Go to hell, f*cking fan of the 3 seed. :mad:
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: Kat Kid on March 05, 2008, 10:49:14 PM
ok, here's the thing.  we got freeman, we got 'not a deep threat' murphy, we got pooshkey/musturd and we got leon patton.  It ain't all-star, but it ain't the worst.  If our linebacker wideout doesn't crap all over himself again, then we may have something there despite losing jordy.

the bad part?

ummmmmmmmmmmm......the defense.  Sweet sassy molassey the defense.  Since 2003 it has been sucktastic, but last year it was completely out of control.  Seriously.  OUT OF CONTROL.

Quick recap:

2003
16.3ppg/283.1ypg

2004
30.6ppg/349.6ypg

2005
27.7ppg/359.5ypg

2006
23.8ppg/345.6ypg

2007
30.8ppg/400.6ypg

Really Prince fooled us with '06.  When taken in context, it is flukey/lucky.  Held teams to a few more fg's, got some more rz to's.  whatevs.

But '07?  We earned that.  30 points a game and 400 yards ON AVERAGE A GAME.  Remember when Stan would get all excitable and talk about how T-Tech with their fantsy pants shoot and ladders nintendo offense might come in to Manhattan and put up 400 yards on us?  Well, everyone did that.  The whole year long.

Jesus Christ what an embarassment.  And we didn't even play Tech.  And we played Baylor.  And Auburn.  &@#% me.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: catdude33 on March 05, 2008, 11:45:07 PM
Freeman could be the best QB in the world, but he'll be throwing to a bunch of first year JUCO retards and a linebacker.  They will make him look suckie.  Come on people, grow up.

You mean like Darnell Mcdonald? Quincy Morgan? James Terry? Deon Murphy?

Go to hell, f*cking fan of the 3 seed. :mad:

Quote from: fatty fat fat
having incredibly low expectations is going to pretty much rock.

What the frack has happened to you??!
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: FBWillie on March 06, 2008, 08:36:58 PM

But '07?  We earned that.  30 points a game and 400 yards ON AVERAGE A GAME.  Remember when Stan would get all excitable and talk about how T-Tech with their fantsy pants shoot and ladders nintendo offense might come in to Manhattan and put up 400 yards on us?  Well, everyone did that.  The whole year long.


In all fairness, those numbers were skewed a bit by 700 yards at Nebraska.   
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: Kat Kid on March 06, 2008, 09:16:58 PM

But '07?  We earned that.  30 points a game and 400 yards ON AVERAGE A GAME.  Remember when Stan would get all excitable and talk about how T-Tech with their fantsy pants shoot and ladders nintendo offense might come in to Manhattan and put up 400 yards on us?  Well, everyone did that.  The whole year long.


In all fairness, those numbers were skewed a bit by 700 yards at Nebraska.   


My point is that the yards per game was pretty much constant post-'03 until this year.  The 400 ypg is just a further indication that this year we were much further away from a bowl game than many think.

I think next year will be worse and that is saying something.  I think we are reaching a new tier of suckiness.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: fatty fat fat on March 06, 2008, 09:18:48 PM

But '07?  We earned that.  30 points a game and 400 yards ON AVERAGE A GAME.  Remember when Stan would get all excitable and talk about how T-Tech with their fantsy pants shoot and ladders nintendo offense might come in to Manhattan and put up 400 yards on us?  Well, everyone did that.  The whole year long.


In all fairness, those numbers were skewed a bit by 700 yards at Nebraska.   


My point is that the yards per game was pretty much constant post-'03 until this year.  The 400 ypg is just a further indication that this year we were much further away from a bowl game than many think.

I think next year will be worse and that is saying something.  I think we are reaching a new tier of suckiness.

True, but it will be VERY entertaining. I also don't see that little nip of hope early in the season, that made the later part of the season so crushing back in 2007.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: Kat Kid on March 06, 2008, 09:41:20 PM

But '07?  We earned that.  30 points a game and 400 yards ON AVERAGE A GAME.  Remember when Stan would get all excitable and talk about how T-Tech with their fantsy pants shoot and ladders nintendo offense might come in to Manhattan and put up 400 yards on us?  Well, everyone did that.  The whole year long.


In all fairness, those numbers were skewed a bit by 700 yards at Nebraska.   


My point is that the yards per game was pretty much constant post-'03 until this year.  The 400 ypg is just a further indication that this year we were much further away from a bowl game than many think.

I think next year will be worse and that is saying something.  I think we are reaching a new tier of suckiness.

True, but it will be VERY entertaining. I also don't see that little nip of hope early in the season, that made the later part of the season so crushing back in 2007.

Could you see Freeman becoming a Lynn Dickey or Archie Manning where everyone just comes to the games with absolutely no expectations except to watch a really great QB?  That is pretty much my last hope.  If Freeman can show another big improvement over last year and make himself a legit NFL prospect, it would be fun, I guess.

The whole thing is going to suck ass until the release of seeing Ron Prince meet complete failure and the excitement of a coaching search.  I'm done with him.  I bitched about people not giving him enough time, about their racism, about them needlessly piling on him about crap that doesn't matter (his reading habits, the re-branding, the slogans) and predicted this whole fiasco playing out as a self-fulfilling prophecy, but he brought a ton on himself.  The scheduling was one thing, but the recruiting coupled with the coaching turnover and then throw all his other eccentricities on top?  I can't defend it any more, I can't take it any more.

It is just painful and sh1tty.  Losing to ku again won't be fun.  Getting raped by Nebraska won't be fun.  Losing to CU won't be fun.  Losing to MU won't be fun.  Getting assrammed by Booby Stoops won't be fun.  Dropping two completely senseless non-cons won't be fun.

I don't see much fun.  I see a slight possibility of entertaining, but even that is a stretch.  It will suck, let's not fool ourselves.

The season after next season when there are truly no expectations left and Prince is either on his way out or another coach is on his way in might be fun, but not next season.

Bleah. :yuck:
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: catzacker on March 06, 2008, 09:49:19 PM
I wonder if Stoops will be mean and run it up.  He kind of called off the dogs in '05, but that may  have been because he wanted to get the hell out of the stadium as quicklly as possible before another kid blew himself up. 
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: catdude33 on March 06, 2008, 10:05:23 PM

But '07?  We earned that.  30 points a game and 400 yards ON AVERAGE A GAME.  Remember when Stan would get all excitable and talk about how T-Tech with their fantsy pants shoot and ladders nintendo offense might come in to Manhattan and put up 400 yards on us?  Well, everyone did that.  The whole year long.


In all fairness, those numbers were skewed a bit by 700 yards at Nebraska.   


My point is that the yards per game was pretty much constant post-'03 until this year.  The 400 ypg is just a further indication that this year we were much further away from a bowl game than many think.

I think next year will be worse and that is saying something.  I think we are reaching a new tier of suckiness.

True, but it will be VERY entertaining. I also don't see that little nip of hope early in the season, that made the later part of the season so crushing back in 2007.

Could you see Freeman becoming a Lynn Dickey or Archie Manning where everyone just comes to the games with absolutely no expectations except to watch a really great QB?  That is pretty much my last hope.  If Freeman can show another big improvement over last year and make himself a legit NFL prospect, it would be fun, I guess.

The whole thing is going to suck ass until the release of seeing Ron Prince meet complete failure and the excitement of a coaching search.  I'm done with him.  I bitched about people not giving him enough time, about their racism, about them needlessly piling on him about crap that doesn't matter (his reading habits, the re-branding, the slogans) and predicted this whole fiasco playing out as a self-fulfilling prophecy, but he brought a ton on himself.  The scheduling was one thing, but the recruiting coupled with the coaching turnover and then throw all his other eccentricities on top?  I can't defend it any more, I can't take it any more.

It is just painful and sh1tty.  Losing to ku again won't be fun.  Getting raped by Nebraska won't be fun.  Losing to CU won't be fun.  Losing to MU won't be fun.  Getting assrammed by Booby Stoops won't be fun.  Dropping two completely senseless non-cons won't be fun.

I don't see much fun.  I see a slight possibility of entertaining, but even that is a stretch.  It will suck, let's not fool ourselves.

The season after next season when there are truly no expectations left and Prince is either on his way out or another coach is on his way in might be fun, but not next season.

Bleah. :yuck:

qft.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: catdude33 on June 03, 2008, 10:55:50 PM
You forced me to bump this PW.  This is your doing.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: chum1 on June 03, 2008, 10:59:04 PM
We'll be better.  Just not as much as most everyone else.  Our unoffical motto can be BEHIND THE CURVE.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: scottb1987 on June 04, 2008, 09:30:11 AM
I guarantee 10 wins if...


we have some sexy black unis for football

 :ksu:
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: steve dave on June 04, 2008, 09:38:53 AM
sexy black unis for football

Would help with 'cruits.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: CatTeam on June 04, 2008, 10:40:42 AM
The suckiest thing about KSU football are the fans who crap on the team, the coach and individual players IN JUNE!! This team showed early last year that they are capable of competing at a high level.  Yes we lost and fizzled at the end of the year.  But how a "fan" can trash the entire next season before it is played, is beyond me.  Ergo... SOME K-State "fans" really suck!!  :chainsaw:





But '07?  We earned that.  30 points a game and 400 yards ON AVERAGE A GAME.  Remember when Stan would get all excitable and talk about how T-Tech with their fantsy pants shoot and ladders nintendo offense might come in to Manhattan and put up 400 yards on us?  Well, everyone did that.  The whole year long.


In all fairness, those numbers were skewed a bit by 700 yards at Nebraska.   


My point is that the yards per game was pretty much constant post-'03 until this year.  The 400 ypg is just a further indication that this year we were much further away from a bowl game than many think.

I think next year will be worse and that is saying something.  I think we are reaching a new tier of suckiness.

True, but it will be VERY entertaining. I also don't see that little nip of hope early in the season, that made the later part of the season so crushing back in 2007.

Could you see Freeman becoming a Lynn Dickey or Archie Manning where everyone just comes to the games with absolutely no expectations except to watch a really great QB?  That is pretty much my last hope.  If Freeman can show another big improvement over last year and make himself a legit NFL prospect, it would be fun, I guess.

The whole thing is going to suck ass until the release of seeing Ron Prince meet complete failure and the excitement of a coaching search.  I'm done with him.  I bitched about people not giving him enough time, about their racism, about them needlessly piling on him about crap that doesn't matter (his reading habits, the re-branding, the slogans) and predicted this whole fiasco playing out as a self-fulfilling prophecy, but he brought a ton on himself.  The scheduling was one thing, but the recruiting coupled with the coaching turnover and then throw all his other eccentricities on top?  I can't defend it any more, I can't take it any more.

It is just painful and sh1tty.  Losing to ku again won't be fun.  Getting raped by Nebraska won't be fun.  Losing to CU won't be fun.  Losing to MU won't be fun.  Getting assrammed by Booby Stoops won't be fun.  Dropping two completely senseless non-cons won't be fun.

I don't see much fun.  I see a slight possibility of entertaining, but even that is a stretch.  It will suck, let's not fool ourselves.

The season after next season when there are truly no expectations left and Prince is either on his way out or another coach is on his way in might be fun, but not next season.

Bleah. :yuck:
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: JR Ewing on June 04, 2008, 10:51:55 AM
The suckiest thing about KSU football are the fans who crap on the team, the coach and individual players IN JUNE!! This team showed early last year that they are capable of competing at a high level.  Yes we lost and fizzled at the end of the year.  But how a "fan" can trash the entire next season before it is played, is beyond me.  Ergo... SOME K-State "fans" really suck!!  :chainsaw:

If you don't care for the discourse over here, maybe you should go play in someone else's sandbox.  Be sure to get permission from your Mommy first.  She'll want to make sure your diaper isn't poopie.

Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: JR Ewing on June 04, 2008, 10:54:28 AM
Quote
The suckiest thing about KSU football are

the blowout losses.

But hey, that's just my opinion.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: steve dave on June 04, 2008, 11:05:09 AM
Quote
The suckiest thing about KSU football are

the blowout losses.

But hey, that's just my opinion.

I vote for getting progressively worse as the season goes on  :ksu:
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: tmramrod91 on June 04, 2008, 11:58:53 AM
Quote
The suckiest thing about KSU football are

the blowout losses.

But hey, that's just my opinion.

I vote for getting progressively worse as the season goes on  :ksu:

^^absolute worst possible thing to happen.

Beg. of yr we're all like  :dancin: :notworthy: (to ron)
End of yr   :runaway: x a million
 :'( :'( :'( for all of emawland
 :lol: :rofl: for rest of big 12 (mainly nubs)
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: pwrcat1 on June 04, 2008, 01:57:02 PM
Quote
The suckiest thing about KSU football are

the blowout losses.

But hey, that's just my opinion.

I vote for getting progressively worse as the season goes on  :ksu:


its a sad cycle.
^^absolute worst possible thing to happen.

Beg. of yr we're all like  :dancin: :notworthy: (to ron)
End of yr   :runaway: x a million
 :'( :'( :'( for all of emawland
 :lol: :rofl: for rest of big 12 (mainly nubs)
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: catdude33 on June 04, 2008, 02:35:25 PM
The suckiest thing about KSU football are the fans who crap on the team, the coach and individual players IN JUNE!! This team showed early last year that they are capable of competing at a high level.  Yes we lost and fizzled at the end of the year.  But how a "fan" can trash the entire next season before it is played, is beyond me.  Ergo... SOME K-State "fans" really suck!!  :chainsaw:

Hey fellow EMAW, just because a person thinks that we are going to be absolutely terribe at football for the next several years doesn't make them any less of a fan.  For example, just because I like the movie Hope Floats doesn't make me any less of a man. Understand?  It's an analogy.




Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: Bookcat on June 04, 2008, 11:49:48 PM
My hunches say we start out strong again..possibly a victory @ Louisville that will get us all riled up for a big letdown come October...

but hey, all I can do is wear my purple, drink some beers, have some brats, and try to enjoy the home games.

Not sure if I'm going ot have the time for the road trips...I'm a jinx anyway.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: pwrcat1 on June 04, 2008, 11:52:27 PM
My hunches say we start out strong again..possibly a victory @ Louisville that will get us all riled up for a big letdown come October...

but hey, all I can do is wear my purple, drink some beers, have some brats, and try to enjoy the home games.

Not sure if I'm going ot have the time for the road trips...I'm a jinx anyway.

the second half of your post...sounds beautiful. 
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: fatty fat fat on June 05, 2008, 12:12:24 AM
Nyquil is utterly perfect for dealing w/tough ksu losses. When I still cared (OSU loss) i nearly took out an entire bottle. Tough night.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: joelcat on June 05, 2008, 12:52:34 AM
I guarantee 10 wins if...
we have some sexy black unis for football

 :ksu:

Any fan that thinks we should have black unis should move to boulder, Columbia, or Lubbock. The scum of the earth is made of black-uni-loving fans. Black unis already ruined basketball, i hope they don't do the same to football.

-still bleeding purple (not black)
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: pwrcat1 on June 05, 2008, 12:52:52 AM
Nyquil is utterly perfect for dealing w/tough ksu losses. When I still cared (OSU loss) i nearly took out an entire bottle. Tough night.


nyquil is a pretty good solution for anything. granted its supposedly worse on your liver than everclear.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: AzCat on June 05, 2008, 01:19:43 AM
Through 8 games of the 2007 season, KSU ranked #15 in the sagarin power poll.

When we lost a few defensive starters, we went in the tank.

Just a few, "nuggets" to chew over, imo.

Over / under on '08 KSUFB wins = 3.5.  Chew on that. :users:
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: steve dave on June 05, 2008, 07:52:55 AM
I guarantee 10 wins if...
we have some sexy black unis for football

 :ksu:

Any fan that thinks we should have black unis should move to boulder, Columbia, or Lubbock. The scum of the earth is made of black-uni-loving fans. Black unis already ruined basketball, i hope they don't do the same to football.

-still bleeding purple (not black)

I agree with your entire post....also it's opposite day (< ZINGGGGERRRRR!!!!!!1!!!)
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: catdude33 on June 05, 2008, 08:46:03 AM
I guarantee 10 wins if...
we have some sexy black unis for football

 :ksu:

Any fan that thinks we should have black unis should move to boulder, Columbia, or Lubbock. The scum of the earth is made of black-uni-loving fans. Black unis already ruined basketball, i hope they don't do the same to football.

-still bleeding purple (not black)

I will fight you.
Title: Re: Preemptive strike against "we might be good afterall" posts
Post by: scottb1987 on June 05, 2008, 09:41:07 AM
I guarantee 10 wins if...
we have some sexy black unis for football

 :ksu:

Any fan that thinks we should have black unis should move to boulder, Columbia, or Lubbock. The scum of the earth is made of black-uni-loving fans. Black unis already ruined basketball, i hope they don't do the same to football.

-still bleeding purple (not black)

That's the kind of post that screams, "I'm a RACIST!" :nono: