KSUFans Archives
Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: FBWillie on December 30, 2007, 09:51:29 PM
-
Looking over our roster, there appears to be some guys available that have the size needed for D-line. We clearly have a large amount of O-line guys; Is there a specific reason why some of these young guys... who played both ways in HS... aren't playing on D?
http://www.kstatesports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=3062&SPID=212&DB_OEM_ID=400&ATCLID=291714&Q_SEASON=2007
http://www.kstatesports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=3062&SPID=212&DB_OEM_ID=400&ATCLID=291639&Q_SEASON=2007
-
Looking over our roster, there appears to be some guys available that have the size needed for D-line. We clearly have a large amount of O-line guys; Is there a specific reason why some of these young guys... who played both ways in HS... aren't playing on D?
http://www.kstatesports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=3062&SPID=212&DB_OEM_ID=400&ATCLID=291714&Q_SEASON=2007
http://www.kstatesports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=3062&SPID=212&DB_OEM_ID=400&ATCLID=291639&Q_SEASON=2007
If they suck enough to be 2nd string OL why would they be a good option for 1st string D?
-
If they suck enough to be 2nd string OL why would they be a good option for 1st string D?
QFT
-
Looking over our roster, there appears to be some guys available that have the size needed for D-line. We clearly have a large amount of O-line guys; Is there a specific reason why some of these young guys... who played both ways in HS... aren't playing on D?
http://www.kstatesports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=3062&SPID=212&DB_OEM_ID=400&ATCLID=291714&Q_SEASON=2007
http://www.kstatesports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=3062&SPID=212&DB_OEM_ID=400&ATCLID=291639&Q_SEASON=2007
If they suck enough to be 2nd string OL why would they be a good option for 1st string D?
They could at least help with depth on the D-Line instead of never seeing the field as O-Linemen.
-
They aren't fast enough to play defense.
-
Looking over our roster, there appears to be some guys available that have the size needed for D-line. We clearly have a large amount of O-line guys; Is there a specific reason why some of these young guys... who played both ways in HS... aren't playing on D?
http://www.kstatesports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=3062&SPID=212&DB_OEM_ID=400&ATCLID=291714&Q_SEASON=2007
http://www.kstatesports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=3062&SPID=212&DB_OEM_ID=400&ATCLID=291639&Q_SEASON=2007
If they suck enough to be 2nd string OL why would they be a good option for 1st string D?
They could at least help with depth on the D-Line instead of never seeing the field as O-Linemen.
No not really.
-
IIRC, Kendall was recruited as DL.
-
Reread Zachs page he is a D lineman,
"Physically gifted player with excellent work habits... Missed all of 2006 after suffering a season-ending injury during training camp... Has the potential to push for playing time with a strong spring... Can also play offensive line."
-
No kidding, we need speed on defense and some of our prospects coming in have just that.