KSUFans Archives
Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: scoopeloo on October 20, 2007, 05:41:45 PM
-
1. Charles just lays the ball on the ground for no reason with Buffs within easy FG position.
2. Buffs miss a tackle on Reesing, who then runs 50 yards for an eventual FG.
3. Buffs drop easy first down pass in ku territory.
4. Jayhawk defender with very late hit but no flag.
5. Buffs miss FG.
It's almost a comedy of good luck for the Hawks, so far.
-
Was #1 really a fumble? I watched it in slow'mo and I'm on the fence.
-
Was #1 really a fumble? I watched it in slow'mo and I'm on the fence.
I think his knee was down with the ball still in his hand, but nobody is going to overturn something that boneheaded.
kono
-
I just figured it was an obvious review candidate at the very least.
-
This is really a comedy of errors.
kono
-
Surely the offensive juggernaut that is ku is just sandbagging it for the second half/fourth quarter.
-
we should have never lost to them, i think we may have been playing too tight that game. if we'd played them later in the season, i think we'd win.
but oh well, our loss, we blew it.
cu will probably hang around, and instead of winning, like the ou game, they'll blow any chances ku gives them.
how about the pick by the ku lineman, and then he fumbled it right back,
-
and now CU throws a tipped pass INT while in FG range.
CU should have 3 FGs at this point and ku, with one positive offensive play, should have a doughnut.
this game should be 9-0 CU.
-
CU vs. ku =
(http://a1259.g.akamai.net/f/1259/5586/5d/images.art.com/images/-/Cripple-Fight--C11756058.jpeg)
-
A fracking gambling probe of the Buff team is an absolute must.
-
and now CU throws a tipped pass INT while in FG range.
CU should have 3 FGs at this point and ku, with one positive offensive play, should have a doughnut.
this game should be 9-0 CU.
just like last year.
-
Also, some of the wrost clock management ever. Colorado got the ball at midfield with 2:30 and took at least 45 seconds off the clock for one play.
-
Oh, it's no doubt, ku is the luckiest f*cking team i have ever seen.
-
not to give ku any credit, but wasn't the championship OSU team a few years ago the luckiest team ever? :cyclist:
-
ku got away with a big facemask on that last drive of cu's
-
The awesomest team ever wins by 5 in Boulder? Must have been an off night, D game at least.
-
not to give ku any credit, but wasn't the championship OSU team a few years ago the luckiest team ever? :cyclist:
I think you meant OU of 2000, right? They were definitely the luckiest team I have ever seen. :forked:
-
The awesomest team ever wins by 5 in Boulder? Must have been an off night, D game at least.
Our offense played too tight, when we needed it though, Heisman Reesing got the job done. Im glad it went down like this because we will need our O next week to move up to 8-0 baby!
-
ku is lucky that CU is just that bad.
-
1. cody should never be taking snaps
2. never
-
CU is bad did you see that 2 minute drill? First down sack, second down fumbled snap, third down bad shotgun shap messes up play, fourth down pass hits a guy in stride and he drops it...................game over.
-
Three reasons ku needs to enjoy this season
1. OU
2. Texas
3. Texas Tech
:popcorn:
-
ku is lucky. They aren't very good.
-
Hey, we won our two road games with our C- effort. :twobirds:
-
Hey, we won our two road games with our C- effort. :twobirds:
LOL at "c-effort" against the only teams with a pulse you've played. FYI, you just aren't that good.
-
Yes, we are so not that good that we won at K-State and at CU. Congrats?
-
We are not good, but we do have a pulse. :ksu:
-
Your ability to recognize a pulse might solidify #3 in the North for you!!! :woot:
-
ku isn't very good. Very lucky this year.
-
Verily. :love:
-
Three reasons ku needs to enjoy this season
1. OU
2. Texas
3. Texas Tech
:popcorn:
BINGO!
and there are four more
4. aTm usually a power in the south - lame duck coach
5. NU is a festering, pussy mess
6. OSU has no defense*
7. ISU at home
*but then again, tonight we had no defense either.
-
ku is still playing with all 22 of their original starters and they have not lost in turnover margin yet. I believe they are truly charmed this year. That is, until they meet Mizzou in KC.
-
Hey, we won our two road games with our C- effort. :twobirds:
LOL. You seriously don't realize that those are the only two D1 caliber football teams you've played this year, do you? It wasn't a C- effort, you're honestly just not that great.
-
Three reasons ku needs to enjoy this season
1. OU
2. Texas
3. Texas Tech
:popcorn:
ku plays all 3 next year
-
Oklahoma couldn't get a win in Boulder. You clowns are still in denial about ku? Wow... I thought maybe the 30-24 road win in Manhattan might have convinced you people.
Hey, we won our two road games with our C- effort. :twobirds:
LOL. You seriously don't realize that those are the only two D1 caliber football teams you've played this year, do you? It wasn't a C- effort, you're honestly just not that great.
ku played average against both K-State and Colorado. ku has the potential to play much better and will just continue to improve as the season goes along. Winning on the road in Manhattan and Boulder are not easy, and like it or not, ku has only played one D-1AA team this year, just like K-State. Honestly, put the schedule talk to rest. ku has taken care of business and its time for you idiots to admit it.
-
I love that Reesing is just a soph. Dude has no talent curve at all.
2007 season:
ku in close games: 2-0
KSU in close games: 0-3
that's what it comes down to imo, the tables will turn soon.
-
I love that Reesing has led his team to a 7-0 record and a #9 ranking in the BCS standings.
-
well, i for one am done bashing. its surprised the F outta me.
-
I love that Reesing is just a soph. Dude has no talent curve at all.
2007 season:
ku in close games: 2-0
KSU in close games: 0-3
that's what it comes down to imo, the tables will turn soon.
We're pretty much ku last year, but a lot better.
Freeman is improving at a sickening rate.
-
Freeman is improving at a sickening rate.
qft, it's disgusting really. :yuck:
-
I love that Reesing is just a soph. Dude has no talent curve at all.
2007 season:
ku in close games: 2-0
KSU in close games: 0-3
that's what it comes down to imo, the tables will turn soon.
We're pretty much ku last year, but a lot better.
Freeman is improving at a sickening rate.
Not at all. You lose your only good receiver and your best running back along with several key players on defense. K-State might be in rebuilding mode next season.
-
I love that Reesing is just a soph. Dude has no talent curve at all.
2007 season:
ku in close games: 2-0
KSU in close games: 0-3
that's what it comes down to imo, the tables will turn soon.
We're pretty much ku last year, but a lot better.
Freeman is improving at a sickening rate.
LOLZ..
-
http://boards.kusports.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=731004&an=0&page=0#731004
-
I love that Reesing is just a soph. Dude has no talent curve at all.
2007 season:
ku in close games: 2-0
KSU in close games: 0-3
that's what it comes down to imo, the tables will turn soon.
We're pretty much ku last year, but a lot better.
Freeman is improving at a sickening rate.
Not at all. You lose your only good receiver and your best running back along with several key players on defense. K-State might be in rebuilding mode next season.
We lost Yamon and Jermaine and seem to be doing fine now. And losing Johnson isn't a huge loss, everyone knows what Patton is capable of (youtube).
-
Freeman in Big 12 play:
104-164, 63%, 6.7 per attempt, 1100 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
Reesing:
56-95, 59%, 6.4 per attempt, 607 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
-
Freeman in Big 12 play:
104-164, 63%, 6.7 per attempt, 1100 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
Reesing:
56-95, 59%, 6.4 per attempt, 607 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
So you'd rather have Freeman than Reesing? interesting.
-
Freeman in Big 12 play:
104-164, 63%, 6.7 per attempt, 1100 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
Reesing:
56-95, 59%, 6.4 per attempt, 607 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
So you'd rather have Freeman than Reesing? interesting.
:lol:
-
Reesing (7-0, 3-0)
Freeman (4-3, 2-2)
-
Reesing (7-0, 3-0)
Freeman (4-3, 2-2)
Prince (11-9 6-6)
Mangino (Irrelevant, 14-29)
-
Prince (11-9 6-6)
Mangino (Irrelevant, 14-29)
Has Mangino seriously lost double the games he's won? :eek:
-
Freeman in Big 12 play:
104-164, 63%, 6.7 per attempt, 1100 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
Reesing:
56-95, 59%, 6.4 per attempt, 607 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
So you'd rather have Freeman than Reesing? interesting.
Are all brand new ku football fans this retarded?
-
Reesing (7-0, 3-0)
Freeman (4-3, 2-2)
At least we got the better quarterback. There's no turning back from this point (as I will illustrate in a graph). Now we just need to work on that defensive line, and we'll be golden.
-
(http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/7400/freemanbetterthanreesinhe3.jpg)
It seems we are finally past the intersection point.
Freeman's better than Reesing, it happens, but that's just what potential is all about.
-
You'll be whining about Freeman's potential well into his senior year.
Might take a while to even out his int/td gap. That is, assuming he doesn't lengthen it as opposed to thinning it.
-
K-State fans desperately seeking for moral victories any way they can find them. It looks like the Josh Freeman circle jerk is back in full force.
-
In 2006, ku fans were desperately seeking for moral victories any way they could find them.
FYP
-
2006???
The same year the Jayhawks beat K-State 39-20?
-
I :love: todd reesing.
-
A lot of both, IMHO. More luck - neither OU or UT on their schedule this year...
aTm, OSU and misery loom ahead for them. Expect much of that luck to run out.
:ksu:
-
Freeman in Big 12 play:
104-164, 63%, 6.7 per attempt, 1100 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
Reesing:
56-95, 59%, 6.4 per attempt, 607 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
You think this is definitive? So Freeman averages a whopping .3 more yards per attempt while being equal in TDs despite throwing 69 more passes and having Jordy Nelson on his team. We also run the ball (successfully at that), therefore no need for Reesing to air it up constantly. But hang your hat on that .3.
And Reesing is 7-0 compared to Freeman's 4-3. And that's what everyone here told me what mattered in comparing Meier's and Freeman's stats from last year. But since we're switching Reesing with Meier that logic no longer stands, correct?
-
ku.......w/ Freeman.......would have a much better shot at staying undefeated than ku w/ Reesing.
-
Freeman in Big 12 play:
104-164, 63%, 6.7 per attempt, 1100 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
Reesing:
56-95, 59%, 6.4 per attempt, 607 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
You think this is definitive? So Freeman averages a whopping .3 more yards per attempt while being equal in TDs despite throwing 69 more passes and having Jordy Nelson on his team. We also run the ball (successfully at that), therefore no need for Reesing to air it up constantly. But hang your hat on that .3.
And Reesing is 7-0 compared to Freeman's 4-3. And that's what everyone here told me what mattered in comparing Meier's and Freeman's stats from last year. But since we're switching Reesing with Meier that logic no longer stands, correct?
Freeman has played a much tougher Big XII schedule so far. Add to it the fact that Reesing has never had to play All-American (lol), Aquib Talib, and apparently Freeman doesn't have near the running game that Reesing has. You're right, wins are what matter. But all we're saying is that yes, we do have the better quarterback, and it's really not even close.
-
WAKS, I can always rely on you to inject a shot of reality into a thread... ku fans, I remember when this happened to us in 03 and I thought that we could go out and kill everyone - uh, yeah we had a reality check at the fiesta bowl. I was getting ready to throw out the fact that ku's sched is pathetic - but you beat me to it.
Reesing=Hypel (sp?) IMO - puts all the air in the world under the ball and hopes for the best. Freeman throws frozen ropes - get it? Why do you think that Tech qbs and Hypel have done nada in the league? Oh, two other things - I think that it will be interesting to see now that ku is a "top 10" BCS team how they stack up against the other talent in the country. 2nd if ku is all that good, they dont look average against crappy teams, elite ku is not. Next year will be the benchmark.
-
Freeman in Big 12 play:
104-164, 63%, 6.7 per attempt, 1100 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
Reesing:
56-95, 59%, 6.4 per attempt, 607 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
You think this is definitive? So Freeman averages a whopping .3 more yards per attempt while being equal in TDs despite throwing 69 more passes and having Jordy Nelson on his team. We also run the ball (successfully at that), therefore no need for Reesing to air it up constantly. But hang your hat on that .3.
And Reesing is 7-0 compared to Freeman's 4-3. And that's what everyone here told me what mattered in comparing Meier's and Freeman's stats from last year. But since we're switching Reesing with Meier that logic no longer stands, correct?
Average per attempt matters because Freeman's completion percentage is 4% higher, despite throwing similar length passes. We all heard "Freeman has a high rate because he only dumps the ball off and throws screens". Not true. Just watch the OSU game highlights, he's running all over the place and hitting his receivers in stride.
The reason we LOL'd at comparing stats last year was because they were true freshman, and crap happens back then. Everyone in the country knew Freeman would eventually be the better quarterback, but most of you thought his limitless potential was bogus, saying he'd be a great tight end. It's nice for that potential to kick in pretty early, as Freeman appears to be well on his way to becoming the next JaMarcus Russell.
-
K-State fans desperately seeking for moral victories any way they can find them.
Sounds familiar, doesn't it?
After all, our 3 losses came down to the last few minutes of each game.
-
Freeman in Big 12 play:
104-164, 63%, 6.7 per attempt, 1100 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
Reesing:
56-95, 59%, 6.4 per attempt, 607 yards, 6 TD, 3 INT
You think this is definitive? So Freeman averages a whopping .3 more yards per attempt while being equal in TDs despite throwing 69 more passes and having Jordy Nelson on his team. We also run the ball (successfully at that), therefore no need for Reesing to air it up constantly. But hang your hat on that .3.
And Reesing is 7-0 compared to Freeman's 4-3. And that's what everyone here told me what mattered in comparing Meier's and Freeman's stats from last year. But since we're switching Reesing with Meier that logic no longer stands, correct?
Freeman has played a much tougher Big XII schedule so far. Add to it the fact that Reesing has never had to play All-American (lol), Aquib Talib, and apparently Freeman doesn't have near the running game that Reesing has. You're right, wins are what matter. But all we're saying is that yes, we do have the better quarterback, and it's really not even close.
Much better Big 12 schedule? You've played Texas, but we played you who beat Texas and won. KSU>UT. ku beat KSU at BSFS. We won at Colorado where OU lost. You got CU at BSFS. CU in Boulder>CU in Manhattan. OSU is no defensive jugernaut (ask Tech or Troy), and since we're camparing QBs that's what matters. Baylor's D certainly sucks as well, but it's no worse than OSU's. To be fair, Freeman did have to go against ku's D and Reesing doesn't have to.
Reesing wins games. Freeman worries about how good he looks. You all seem happy with Freeman (4-3). That's good. We're very happy with Reesing (7-0). Looks like both teams got what they need. Everyone should be happy!!!!!
-
Much better Big 12 schedule?
Yes. and it's not even close.
-
Much better Big 12 schedule?
Yes. and it's not even close.
I told you how I disagree, now give me your insight. Now remember, we're talking about our respective QB's here, so let's concentrate on the defenses both have faced. You all did have to play ku and we don't, beyond that I'd say it's even.
-
we have the #11 rated schedule, ku checks in at 97.
-
we have the #11 rated schedule, ku checks in at 97.
game, set, checkmate
-
we have the #11 rated schedule, ku checks in at 97.
The discussion was about Big 12 games. But I can see why you had to change the parameters.
-
I wouldn't take anyone on K State's roster.
That team has no heart and their skills are suspect.
Maybe Jordy Nelson, he could be my number 3 or 4 WR...
-
we have the #11 rated schedule, ku checks in at 97.
game, set, checkmate
It's game, set, match genius.....
-
sure is a lot of ku hate (jealousy) on here.
-
we have the #11 rated schedule, ku checks in at 97.
game, set, checkmate
It's game, set, match genius.....
get a brain! moran
-
we have the #11 rated schedule, ku checks in at 97.
game, set, checkmate
It's game, set, match genius.....
Ball four, you're out!
-
It's really sad that educated individuals (I assume these ku fans attended college) come across as this stupid. Really, you guys are just fracking dumb.
-
(http://img35.picoodle.com/img/img35/6/10/22/f_54990178167m_6af1ac3.jpg)
Awesome outfit, I have a shirt just like that!
-
(http://img35.picoodle.com/img/img35/6/10/22/f_54990178167m_6af1ac3.jpg)
Awesome outfit, I have a shirt just like that!
damn I'm pretty!
-
(http://img35.picoodle.com/img/img35/6/10/22/f_54990178167m_6af1ac3.jpg)
Awesome outfit, I have a shirt just like that!
damn I'm pretty! an obvious Nascar fan
fyp
-
that's a cool douchebeard.
-
douchebeard.
Fantastic word