KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: ksuno1stunner on October 08, 2007, 12:15:16 PM

Title: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: ksuno1stunner on October 08, 2007, 12:15:16 PM
We gain two 3 stars!

ku's win against KSU will hurt them in the long run.
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: ECN on October 08, 2007, 12:16:58 PM
thank GOD.
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: cas on October 08, 2007, 12:19:08 PM
We gain two 3 stars!

ku's win against KSU will hurt them in the long run.

QFT
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: yosh on October 08, 2007, 12:29:41 PM
Who did we get besides Garcia?
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: ksuno1stunner on October 08, 2007, 12:31:53 PM
Who did we get besides Garcia?

Juco AA

http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?Sport=1&pr_key=73072#ticker

(http://www.lahc.cc.ca.us/athletics/football/Defensive%20Backs.JPG)

#4
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: Legore on October 08, 2007, 12:37:53 PM
Are you talking about the JC d-tackle?  What happened to him he's still listed as a committ on rivals. 
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: ksuno1stunner on October 08, 2007, 12:38:59 PM
Are you talking about the JC d-tackle?  What happened to him he's still listed as a committ on rivals. 

http://forums.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=172#s=172&f=2485&t=1178707
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 08, 2007, 01:39:46 PM
We gain two 3 stars!

ku's win against KSU will hurt them in the long run.

elaborate please.
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: McGrowlTowelZac on October 08, 2007, 01:44:53 PM
Are you talking about the JC d-tackle?  What happened to him he's still listed as a committ on rivals. 

http://forums.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=172#s=172&f=2485&t=1178707

Where is ku's recruit heading, now that he spurned the Hawks?
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: mjrod on October 08, 2007, 01:47:23 PM
We gain two 3 stars!

ku's win against KSU will hurt them in the long run.

elaborate please.

Basically, the recruits see KSU beating Top 10 teams.

When they see ku, they only see ku beating nobodies then blowing their entire season on KSU.  We're ku's superbowl.  We're more important than bowl games, than championships.   Recruits don't want to hang their hats on a team where the only game that is important in the entire season is against the instate school (non-rival).

It's sad, but that's all they have.

Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 08, 2007, 02:22:55 PM
Crystal Clear now. Makes sense... ku, the best athletics dept in Lawrence.
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: Pittcat on October 08, 2007, 03:20:42 PM
A 4* renegged on his verbal to ku?  Who?
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: michigancat on October 08, 2007, 03:23:14 PM
I like most juco corners.
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: ksuno1stunner on October 08, 2007, 03:26:24 PM
I like most juco corners.

Agreed.  juco corners and defensive ends are where it's at.
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: Wickedson on October 08, 2007, 06:44:28 PM
We gain two 3 stars!

ku's win against KSU will hurt them in the long run.

elaborate please.

Basically, the recruits see KSU beating Top 10 teams.

When they see ku, they only see ku beating nobodies then blowing their entire season on KSU.  We're ku's superbowl.  We're more important than bowl games, than championships.   Recruits don't want to hang their hats on a team where the only game that is important in the entire season is against the instate school (non-rival).

It's sad, but that's all they have.




Hahahaha,

too bad your HC can't coach the few he does get.

Your star player is a walk-on.  What else can one say?

30-24
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: ksuno1stunner on October 08, 2007, 06:45:13 PM
We gain two 3 stars!

ku's win against KSU will hurt them in the long run.

elaborate please.

Basically, the recruits see KSU beating Top 10 teams.

When they see ku, they only see ku beating nobodies then blowing their entire season on KSU.  We're ku's superbowl.  We're more important than bowl games, than championships.   Recruits don't want to hang their hats on a team where the only game that is important in the entire season is against the instate school (non-rival).

It's sad, but that's all they have.




Hahahaha,

too bad your HC can't coach the few he does get.

Your star player is a walk-on.  What else can one say?

30-24

Do you work at Nebraska Furniture Mart?
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: ew2x4 on October 08, 2007, 06:52:42 PM
This may be ew2x4 premium info (details will be out shortly), but I have insider info that recruits we were in on are now considering ku in addition to us when they weren't even on their radar. Let's hope Mangino kicks it soon.  :ohno:
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: Wickedson on October 08, 2007, 06:53:10 PM
No.  Are you one of these guys Mr. "number one stunna?"

(http://photos3.flickr.com/3250873_a80af12746.jpg)
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: Wickedson on October 08, 2007, 06:54:16 PM
This may be ew2x4 premium info (details will be out shortly), but I have insider info that recruits we were in on are now considering ku in addition to us when they weren't even on their radar. Let's hope Mangino kicks it soon.  :ohno:

With how bad your team looked Saturday I'm not sure Mangino will want anyone who was considering your school.
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: ECN on October 08, 2007, 07:11:25 PM
lol

8 years it took you to score a TD in manhattan. 8 years.

lol.
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: Wickedson on October 08, 2007, 07:14:00 PM
lol

8 years it took you to score a TD in manhattan. 8 years.

lol.

I think for the last 8 years we've been trying to teach your players how to play basketball everytime we came to Manhattan.

Too bad that never took.
Title: Re: ku loses one offer 4 star
Post by: ECN on October 08, 2007, 07:15:07 PM
again, bringing up bball.

8 years, cmon, that was a long time ago.