KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: ksuno1stunner on October 07, 2007, 11:34:40 AM

Title: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: ksuno1stunner on October 07, 2007, 11:34:40 AM
"woulda coulda shoulda"

 :'(
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: cireksu on October 07, 2007, 11:40:43 AM
yes, and they show you that if you take away our special teams and just focus on getting pressure on freeman that you've got a great chance to beat us because we don't make any adjustments.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: kstate16 on October 07, 2007, 11:52:15 AM
yes, and they show you that if you take away our special teams and just focus on getting pressure on freeman that you've got a great chance to beat us because we don't make any adjustments.
qft. frack.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: Dan Rydell on October 07, 2007, 01:03:18 PM
Both ranked.  If we end the year having only lost to teams that are ultimately ranked, I'll be pretty happy.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 07, 2007, 01:16:29 PM
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.

Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: cireksu on October 07, 2007, 01:18:22 PM
What if I told you that we gift wrapped that game for ku?

what a mind &@#% that is!
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: ew2x4 on October 07, 2007, 01:20:15 PM
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



ku did not dominate in all aspects. We had a TD taken away because of a bogus holding call. You had an INT off a facemask, so it's not like all the freak things went our way. Our D held ku when our LB's knew who to cover. Our offense was able to move the ball in the first half just fine. All in all, we were two really even teams. It shows how much you know about football (not surprised).
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 07, 2007, 01:24:02 PM
If anything, ku should have won by more.  K-State was clearly an inferior opponent.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: cireksu on October 07, 2007, 01:26:28 PM
KSU should have kicked deep after we took that late 4th quarter lead.  You can thank Ron Prince for handing you that game.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 07, 2007, 01:30:15 PM
No, you can thank ku for keeping it as close as it was.  Mangino almost F'ed up when he decided not to take the points when ku got stopped at your 15-yard line.  You also got 2nd-life after a terrible roughing the kicker penalty that never should have been called.  That drive resulted in a TD when ku should have had the ball after a 3-and-out.  ku gift-wrapped a TD with an INT off the facemask deep in our own territory.  Derek Fine and Briscoe both dropped sure TD passes and ku botched an extra point.  I'm just disappointed ku only won by 6. 
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: Dan Rydell on October 07, 2007, 01:33:42 PM
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



Actually, KSU should have been up 28-7 at half.  I expect ku would have folded after that.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 07, 2007, 01:35:23 PM
LOL @ how bad K-State is at football
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: cireksu on October 07, 2007, 01:36:25 PM
roughing the punter is roughing the punter, just because it goes against you doesnt mean it didn't happen.  Roughing the punter doesn't mean tackling him.


an
LOL @ how bad K-State is at football


and he concedes.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 07, 2007, 01:39:19 PM
Roughing the punter is when you blatantly hit the punter after the play is over.  Your dumbass punter fell on top of one of ku's players and they called that a roughing the kicker penalty.  If anything, it was a running into the kicker penalty, which still wouldn't have been enough to give K-State a first down. 
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: fatty fat fat on October 07, 2007, 01:40:30 PM
Roughing the punter is when you blatantly hit the punter after the play is over.  Your dumbass punter fell on top of one of ku's players and they called that a roughing the kicker penalty.  If anything, it was a running into the kicker penalty, which still wouldn't have been enough to give K-State a first down. 

the only reason ku won last year was the momentum after this same call.

glass houses dude.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 07, 2007, 01:41:37 PM
ku won by 3 TD's last year.  It wasn't even close. 
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: catzacker on October 07, 2007, 01:43:53 PM
Roughing the punter is when you blatantly hit the punter after the play is over.  Your dumbass punter fell on top of one of ku's players and they called that a roughing the kicker penalty.  If anything, it was a running into the kicker penalty, which still wouldn't have been enough to give K-State a first down. 

Seriously, you're f'ing stupid.  It was roughing the kicker, they all ran into our kicker.  But fine, I'll give you that penalty and if you give me the phantom personal foul on AA and phantom holding on Mastrud that killed two potential scoring drives.  Both of those were entirely worse than a judgement call between running into and roughing because clearly a penatly occurred.   Look, you won because you could run the ball.  
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: cireksu on October 07, 2007, 01:44:03 PM
Roughing the punter is when you blatantly hit the punter after the play is over.  Your dumbass punter fell on top of one of ku's players and they called that a roughing the kicker penalty.  If anything, it was a running into the kicker penalty, which still wouldn't have been enough to give K-State a first down. 

no roughing the punter is blatantly hitting or not giving him room to land.

learn football.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: WILDCAT NATION on October 07, 2007, 01:46:30 PM
The argyle sweatered douche is still around?

I'll be damned.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: kstate16 on October 07, 2007, 02:16:56 PM
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



ku did not dominate in all aspects. We had a TD taken away because of a bogus holding call. You had an INT off a facemask, so it's not like all the freak things went our way. Our D held ku when our LB's knew who to cover. Our offense was able to move the ball in the first half just fine. All in all, we were two really even teams. It shows how much you know about football (not surprised).
Don't forget EVERY fumble ku had went right back to you guys, those could've been huge.  just another example of more things that went your way. although, this is not an excuse, just proving you wrong.  you won in the second half after taking momentum and running down our throats.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: ksuno1stunner on October 07, 2007, 03:04:02 PM
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



And KSU should have held on to their lead with 4 minutes left.

ku fans are pathetic, IMO.

Yesterday after the game I was watching more cfb at my friend's...a ku fan was talking mad crap...couldn't name a QB other than Whittemore in the last 5 years, didn't know where Vick went to college, and was wondering what "75 seconds" meant when there was "75 sec" on the field.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: ksuno1stunner on October 07, 2007, 03:04:42 PM
I'll give you your 50 though, I crap out 50 dollars for breakfast.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: hemmy on October 07, 2007, 03:05:29 PM
Roughing the punter is when you blatantly hit the punter after the play is over.  Your dumbass punter fell on top of one of ku's players and they called that a roughing the kicker penalty.  If anything, it was a running into the kicker penalty, which still wouldn't have been enough to give K-State a first down. 

Go back to basketball

Apparently this is the first every football game you watched because roughing (not running into) IS NOT blatantly hitting the punter after the play, although it can include that.  Refs always call aggressive penalties when it comes to such situation, K-State happened to make that mistake of being under the punter as he comes down far more than once last year.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on October 07, 2007, 03:09:43 PM
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



And KSU should have held on to their lead with 4 minutes left.

ku fans are pathetic, IMO.

Yesterday after the game I was watching more cfb at my friend's...a ku fan was talking mad crap...couldn't name a QB other than Whittemore in the last 5 years, didn't know where Vick went to college, and was wondering what "75 seconds" meant when there was "75 sec" on the field.

LOL

Do you think Arthur Brown enjoyed the game?
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: ksuno1stunner on October 07, 2007, 03:11:26 PM
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



And KSU should have held on to their lead with 4 minutes left.

ku fans are pathetic, IMO.

Yesterday after the game I was watching more cfb at my friend's...a ku fan was talking mad crap...couldn't name a QB other than Whittemore in the last 5 years, didn't know where Vick went to college, and was wondering what "75 seconds" meant when there was "75 sec" on the field.

LOL

Do you think Arthur Brown enjoyed the game?

He wasn't there.  Bryce was, but I don't think that'll change his opinion of KSU, since he is a lifelong fan.  He's no bandwagon ku fan.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on October 07, 2007, 03:13:24 PM
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



And KSU should have held on to their lead with 4 minutes left.

ku fans are pathetic, IMO.

Yesterday after the game I was watching more cfb at my friend's...a ku fan was talking mad crap...couldn't name a QB other than Whittemore in the last 5 years, didn't know where Vick went to college, and was wondering what "75 seconds" meant when there was "75 sec" on the field.

LOL

Do you think Arthur Brown enjoyed the game?

He wasn't there.  Bryce was, but I don't think that'll change his opinion of KSU, since he is a lifelong fan.  He's no bandwagon ku fan.

I have to admit, part of the reason I'm enjoying the afterglow of the win so immensely is because I know that you go to ku.  It's going to be a fun week for you, sir.

Enjoy!
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: ksuno1stunner on October 07, 2007, 03:14:29 PM
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



And KSU should have held on to their lead with 4 minutes left.

ku fans are pathetic, IMO.

Yesterday after the game I was watching more cfb at my friend's...a ku fan was talking mad crap...couldn't name a QB other than Whittemore in the last 5 years, didn't know where Vick went to college, and was wondering what "75 seconds" meant when there was "75 sec" on the field.

LOL

Do you think Arthur Brown enjoyed the game?

He wasn't there.  Bryce was, but I don't think that'll change his opinion of KSU, since he is a lifelong fan.  He's no bandwagon ku fan.

I have to admit, part of the reason I'm enjoying the afterglow of the win so immensely is because I know that you go to ku.  It's going to be a fun week for you, sir.

Enjoy!

I caught a lot of "flack" for the power towel video, so that will be my excuse this week.  I'm prepared.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: Legore on October 07, 2007, 03:20:12 PM
No, you can thank ku for keeping it as close as it was.  Mangino almost F'ed up when he decided not to take the points when ku got stopped at your 15-yard line.  You also got 2nd-life after a terrible roughing the kicker penalty that never should have been called.  That drive resulted in a TD when ku should have had the ball after a 3-and-out.  ku gift-wrapped a TD with an INT off the facemask deep in our own territory.  Derek Fine and Briscoe both dropped sure TD passes and ku botched an extra point.  I'm just disappointed ku only won by 6. 

We got a field goal after the roughing the kicker not a TD.  When Briscoe dropped the TD ku scored about 4 plays later on a middle screen so it had no affect on the score.  Fine should have caught the ball in the endzone that one did cost you 4 points.  KSU blew chances in the first half and ku blew chances in the second.  In the end I think things evened out pretty well break wise and the better team won the game by about the right score.  

Besides mistakes and funny bunces are part of every game ku muffed two points in the first half and got lucky bounces on both.   KSU had a FG that looked good the whole way hit the post and bounced out insead of going through. KSU had several penalties that killed drives when they had excellent field position at least two of the penalties were questionable calls and knocked KSU out of field goal range.  ku got an int on a tipped ball at the end of the first half that set them up to tie the score the player that tipped the ball was only in position to tip it because he was totally stoned by the KSU o-lineman.  We had some similar plays like that go our way against Texas last week it's just part of the game.   No team ever plays a perfect game and if they ever did they would probably beat just about anyone with ease.  
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: BMWJhawk on October 07, 2007, 04:52:03 PM
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



And KSU should have held on to their lead with 4 minutes left.

ku fans are pathetic, IMO.

Yesterday after the game I was watching more cfb at my friend's...a ku fan was talking mad crap...couldn't name a QB other than Whittemore in the last 5 years, didn't know where Vick went to college, and was wondering what "75 seconds" meant when there was "75 sec" on the field.

Because all ku fans are exactly the same.

Can't wait to collect my $50 on Monday.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: BullHawkWheel on October 07, 2007, 05:04:56 PM
bmw, they will never admit, even though they know it deep inside, that ku is a better fb team than ksu.  we dont have to admit anything, we just let the scoreboard do the talking for us.

(http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/7372/kstatescoreboarduy0.jpg)

Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: ksuno1stunner on October 07, 2007, 05:08:33 PM
bmw, they will never admit, even though they know it deep inside, that ku is a better fb team than ksu.  we dont have to admit anything, we just let the scoreboard do the talking for us.

You should have taken one of our better jumbotron, it's pretty.
Title: Re: Auburn and Kansas
Post by: Racquetball_Ninja on October 07, 2007, 06:42:15 PM
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



Was that you that just about got the f*ck knocked out of them in the north endzone?