KSUFans Archives
Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: NorthChamps07 on September 30, 2007, 05:57:48 PM
-
It's simple. This game will not be close. They have stomped directional schools. Whoop deedoo! They haven't seen anything like the D they will see Saturday. They haven't seen an O like they will see on Saturday. They played weak competition and had a bye week. Texas played week competition, waxing Rice 58-14, before the Cats came to town. Texas had the revenge motive, a 4-0 record and the home field advantage. They also had some skill players who will play on Sunday. We beat the H#** out them physically and on the scoreboard.
When the Sqawks come to town, we have the revenge motive. The home field advantage. The talent advantage. They have their week ooc and a bye week. They will see speed that overwhelmed Texas. They will see a defense that hasn't given up 100 yards to any rusher. They will see a defense that punished every QB we have faced. They will see a team ready to prove a point.
This game is pretty simple. When we show up and play like we can, they will be shell shocked and pounded into the turf. Like the little brother who threatens his big brother.
His rants(message board BS) are to be ignored. When he steps up to prove his point (game day), smack his A$$ down.
So when they come with their trash about being 4-0. Just tell them that the #24 Wildcats look forward to a great time on Saturday!
:ksu: :ksu: :ksu:
-
Aren't you a Nubbie fan? I'm so confused but that may be due to the pbr train I'm riding.
-
The speed that overwhelmed Texas didn't prepare well enough last year. We need to focus, and we'll win, but if we just decide we're going to roll, we're no going anywhere.
-
So far everything north champs has said has pretty much come true....so yeah
-
The speed that overwhelmed Texas didn't prepare well enough last year. We need to focus, and we'll win, but if we just decide we're going to roll, we're no going anywhere.
Nobody knows this better than Ron Prince, Josh Freeman, Ian Campbell, Justin Roland, Jordy Nelson, Marcus Watts, James Johnson, James Franklin, Tim Tibesar.... Feel me?
We will be ready and the hawks will receive a beat down that will leave no question as to who is THE football school in Kansas! Go State! :woohoo:
-
How anyone can expect a blowout after last year is beyond me.
ku's D coordinator really knows how to &@#% up our offense. He'll cluster his defense close, clog the short game, including the flat, making any short throw a danger and making our run game average. He also knows that the best way to get Josh to make mistakes is to force him to throw into coverage instead of blitzing. Kind of a Brad Smith strategy.
If we can throw a few balls successfully downfield to prevent them from clogging up the short game, we'll be a lot more efficient and score a lot more. I don't know if we can though.
I really like how our defense matches up against their offense though. I expect them to pass a lot. We've got a pretty good secondary, especially if Watts and Moore end up playing on Saturday. Our pass-rush is pretty sick, and our ability to tip balls isn't going to bode well for Reesing. I really like how effective the 3-4 has been against the run so I don't expect to see much there.
Special teams and field position will probably mean a lot in this game.
-
How anyone can expect a blowout after last year is beyond me.
ku's D coordinator really knows how to frack up our offense. He'll cluster his defense close, clog the short game, including the flat, making any short throw a danger and making our run game average. He also knows that the best way to get Josh to make mistakes is to force him to throw into coverage instead of blitzing. Kind of a Brad Smith strategy.
If we can throw a few balls successfully downfield to prevent them from clogging up the short game, we'll be a lot more efficient and score a lot more. I don't know if we can though.
I really like how our defense matches up against their offense though. I expect them to pass a lot. We've got a pretty good secondary, especially if Watts and Moore end up playing on Saturday. Our pass-rush is pretty sick, and our ability to tip balls isn't going to bode well for Reesing. I really like how effective the 3-4 has been against the run so I don't expect to see much there.
Special teams and field position will probably mean a lot in this game.
I think at home we're able to get short passes to Nelson and Murphy when needed, get Johnson and Patton going enough to get some TD's. No matter how many of you guys bitch, we do not want to throw it deep against Talib. They don't have the run game they had last year, and Reesing hasn't seen any real competition so I think we win, but probably by one touch, maybe a touch and a FG.
-
To be honest, just because ku has played community colleges so far doesn't mean they suck. It just means they haven't played anyone yet. They haven't even gone on the road yet, so yeah, that may hurt them, but it may not hurt them as much as you might think. These are still essentially the same teams as last year.
I'm feeling like 1995 all over again, when Top 10 ku with Grinnin' Glen Mason came to town and they scored that first touchdown with that big pass in the middle. After that... well, you know what happened. 41-7. :beerchug:
Here's to hoping.
-
How anyone can expect a blowout after last year is beyond me.
ku's D coordinator really knows how to frack up our offense. He'll cluster his defense close, clog the short game, including the flat, making any short throw a danger and making our run game average. He also knows that the best way to get Josh to make mistakes is to force him to throw into coverage instead of blitzing. Kind of a Brad Smith strategy.
If we can throw a few balls successfully downfield to prevent them from clogging up the short game, we'll be a lot more efficient and score a lot more. I don't know if we can though.
I really like how our defense matches up against their offense though. I expect them to pass a lot. We've got a pretty good secondary, especially if Watts and Moore end up playing on Saturday. Our pass-rush is pretty sick, and our ability to tip balls isn't going to bode well for Reesing. I really like how effective the 3-4 has been against the run so I don't expect to see much there.
Special teams and field position will probably mean a lot in this game.
I think ku will do what they did last year....their DB's will play press and even in zone won't be more than 5 yards off the ball. Load the box up and blitz Freeman because with the corners playing press or closer to the LOS, he can't make quick reads. I'd really like to see us use the TE up the seam more this game. We're going to have to find a way to get vertical offensively or get a running game going.
-
How anyone can expect a blowout after last year is beyond me.
ku's D coordinator really knows how to frack up our offense. He'll cluster his defense close, clog the short game, including the flat, making any short throw a danger and making our run game average. He also knows that the best way to get Josh to make mistakes is to force him to throw into coverage instead of blitzing. Kind of a Brad Smith strategy.
If we can throw a few balls successfully downfield to prevent them from clogging up the short game, we'll be a lot more efficient and score a lot more. I don't know if we can though.
I really like how our defense matches up against their offense though. I expect them to pass a lot. We've got a pretty good secondary, especially if Watts and Moore end up playing on Saturday. Our pass-rush is pretty sick, and our ability to tip balls isn't going to bode well for Reesing. I really like how effective the 3-4 has been against the run so I don't expect to see much there.
Special teams and field position will probably mean a lot in this game.
I think ku will do what they did last year....their DB's will play press and even in zone won't be more than 5 yards off the ball. Load the box up and blitz Freeman because with the corners playing press or closer to the LOS, he can't make quick reads. I'd really like to see us use the TE up the seam more this game. We're going to have to find a way to get vertical offensively or get a running game going.
-
How anyone can expect a blowout after last year is beyond me.
ku's D coordinator really knows how to frack up our offense. He'll cluster his defense close, clog the short game, including the flat, making any short throw a danger and making our run game average. He also knows that the best way to get Josh to make mistakes is to force him to throw into coverage instead of blitzing. Kind of a Brad Smith strategy.
If we can throw a few balls successfully downfield to prevent them from clogging up the short game, we'll be a lot more efficient and score a lot more. I don't know if we can though.
I really like how our defense matches up against their offense though. I expect them to pass a lot. We've got a pretty good secondary, especially if Watts and Moore end up playing on Saturday. Our pass-rush is pretty sick, and our ability to tip balls isn't going to bode well for Reesing. I really like how effective the 3-4 has been against the run so I don't expect to see much there.
Special teams and field position will probably mean a lot in this game.
Finally. A mature user w/ knowledge of the game.
I totally agree w/ your take.
To win the game, ku will need to shut the special teams down and avoid costly mistakes. UT didn't and they paid for it.
Its going to be a heckuva game.
-
ku fans say that Young has their corners play pretty soft. Deon Murphy's going to have to be on fire cause ku's true freshman corner hasn't faced anybody like him all year.
-
The difference btw last yrs game and this yrs game will come down to 2 things:
1) KSU's offensive line
2) KSU's run D
ku pretty much owned both those units last year.
BUT, ku hasn't been tested as a team in '07. They havent been on the road and been punched in the mouth. No one knows how they will react in front of 55,000 fans after a huge play for the opposition. Who knows...they may fold just like UT did......
And I agree with most, the vertical passing game will be a key factor in KSU moving the ball. Although, AU and UT both knew Jordy underneath is KSU's offense, and couldnt stop it.
-
3) Freeman being Sarah Lee in terms of turn overs. That's what needs to not happen this year.
-
I bet if we threw in the Statue of Liberty play in it would work for a big gain.
-
It would be a mistake to think we will get as many turn overs against ku as we did Texas. If KSU doesn't turn the ball over ku could have a long day. It could be a closer score though. Now, if we have turn overs all bets are off. That's why it got ugly last year. We basicly gave ku the game.
-
This game is much different then last year for several reasons:
1. It's in Manhattan not Lawrence
2. Freeman is older and wiser and KSU's o-line is many times better then the rag tag unit that went into Lawrance last year. Auburn and Texas got 2 and 1 sacks on KSU and that is with 80K screaming at the top of their lungs. ku has struggled to generate a pass rush against lessor teams. No reason to think ku's pass rush will pose a big problem to us this year. Also Freeman turned it over consistently on the road last season. That hasn't been the case this year and this game is at home where he has never turned it over much.
3. No more cover 2 this year. I said it last year when everyone was on his jock but Raheem sucked as a DC and his scheme sucked for the college game. Prince has pretty much said the same thing about last year's defense. We're playing much better D this year especially vs. the run and we've faced better competion then ku already and we've done it on the road.
4. KSU clearly didn't handle the win over Texas well last year and came into the game unprepared. It was just an awful peformance that I don't think will be repeated. The guys won't forget what happened last year and people have been talking about this game for weeks now.
Not predicting a KSU blowout or anything but it will be much different then last year. That game was a fluke the way it went. ku deserved to win but the spread wasn't reflective of the teams kind of like us beating Texas by 20 isn't reflective of the teams. In fact the KSU v ku game last year reminded me a lot of the Texas v KSU game this year except for the fact we were on the road when we beat Texas and ku was at home when they beat us.
-
To be honest, just because ku has played community colleges so far doesn't mean they suck. It just means they haven't played anyone yet. They haven't even gone on the road yet, so yeah, that may hurt them, but it may not hurt them as much as you might think. These are still essentially the same teams as last year.
I'm feeling like 1995 all over again, when Top 10 ku with Grinnin' Glen Mason came to town and they scored that first touchdown with that big pass in the middle. After that... well, you know what happened. 41-7. :beerchug:
Here's to hoping.
We were up 10-0 when that byrd bomb happened. Two quick scores on bad punt snaps set the tone early.
-
My bad, my memory can be selective sometimes. ;)
-
Other than the obvious differences from last years situation...as in, our O-line is much better and our run D is much better.
After beating Texas last season, the team was drained physically and emotionally. First big win under Prince and though we were up a bunch in that game, we ended up barely hanging on. We sort of threw everything we possibly coule at UT to win that game. We were banged up and drained for the next week, I dont think anyone got up for that game.
This year we were on a mission. We physically beat down UT, a team that may be playing crappy but is loaded with size and talent. This team is on a mission and though I dont think we blow ku out, I'd be shocked with a home loss to the hawks.
-
Stat line from last year says that we had decent offensive output. Our offense is improved, experienced and they have something to prove. If they can move the ball against Auburn and Texas, on the road, I like our prospects against ku at home.
Just like going down to Texas, last year was irrelevant. Does anybody really expect us to hand htem the ball 6 times this year? Will they have a 200 yard rusher? Is ku suddenly going to be a solid road team?
In order for ku to be in this game their offense and defense will have to be equal to or greater than Texas'. Remember, Texas was at home with a revenge motive. ku is undefeated on the road and unfamiliar with the level of football we play. That's why I expect a blow out!
:ksu:
Stats from 2006: Kansas Kansas State
TOTAL FIRST DOWNS 21 20
TOTAL NET YARDS 355 362
Total Plays 59 74
Average Gain 6 4.9
NET YARDS RUSHING 247 118
Rushes 36 30
Average per rush 6.9 3.9
NET YARDS PASSING 108 244
How anyone can expect a blowout after last year is beyond me.
ku's D coordinator really knows how to frack up our offense. He'll cluster his defense close, clog the short game, including the flat, making any short throw a danger and making our run game average. He also knows that the best way to get Josh to make mistakes is to force him to throw into coverage instead of blitzing. Kind of a Brad Smith strategy.
If we can throw a few balls successfully downfield to prevent them from clogging up the short game, we'll be a lot more efficient and score a lot more. I don't know if we can though.
I really like how our defense matches up against their offense though. I expect them to pass a lot. We've got a pretty good secondary, especially if Watts and Moore end up playing on Saturday. Our pass-rush is pretty sick, and our ability to tip balls isn't going to bode well for Reesing. I really like how effective the 3-4 has been against the run so I don't expect to see much there.
Special teams and field position will probably mean a lot in this game.
-
Our passing game suffered against the Hoax last year because Figurs and Moriera didn't play and Jordy was slowed with injuries.
Different story this year and at home.
-
ku will have to be at least + 2 in TO margin and gain several huge plays on special teams in order to win. With their road record, I simply don't see it. I don't think we'll run away from them, but I'll be extremely disappointed if the Cats lose this game.
-
Have to have a vertical passing game.
-
Have to have a vertical passing game.
True, but the question is will ku give us that? They are primarily a zone team, so it will be interesting to see. Also, after UT went away from cover 4, they played 2 deep safeties and took away flats, so they never really gave us vertical seems either. The question will be can we dink and dunk vs cover 2 with the flats covered up and get enough run game to move the ball? The opening vs cover 2 are behind the corners and underneath the safeties, but that's a tough through. Also behind the LBs and in front of the safties in the middle. Its a tougher D against our O IF we can't establish the run, but we should still be able to find some openings. It will be interesting to see how we handle it.
-
Have to have a vertical passing game.
True, but the question is will ku give us that? They are primarily a zone team, so it will be interesting to see. Also, after UT went away from cover 4, they played 2 deep safeties and took away flats, so they never really gave us vertical seems either. The question will be can we dink and dunk vs cover 2 with the flats covered up and get enough run game to move the ball? The opening vs cover 2 are behind the corners and underneath the safeties, but that's a tough through. Also behind the LBs and in front of the safties in the middle. Its a tougher D against our O IF we can't establish the run, but we should still be able to find some openings. It will be interesting to see how we handle it.
I'd like to see our TE used a bit more (if possible), Jordy used in the slot and Murphy split out wide (on the same side as Jordy).
-
Have to have a vertical passing game.
True, but the question is will ku give us that? They are primarily a zone team, so it will be interesting to see. Also, after UT went away from cover 4, they played 2 deep safeties and took away flats, so they never really gave us vertical seems either. The question will be can we dink and dunk vs cover 2 with the flats covered up and get enough run game to move the ball? The opening vs cover 2 are behind the corners and underneath the safeties, but that's a tough through. Also behind the LBs and in front of the safties in the middle. Its a tougher D against our O IF we can't establish the run, but we should still be able to find some openings. It will be interesting to see how we handle it.
I'd like to see our TE used a bit more (if possible), Jordy used in the slot and Murphy split out wide (on the same side as Jordy).
Here's one thing we could have going with our 2 back shotgun stuff. We ran several sets where we swung the back. If you do that to the 2 WR side and get protection, you can do some sort of combo route that could get that CB (in cover 2) in a bind. You get a deep route with an intermediate underneath plus the back swinging to that side. As a CB if you play the intermediate route, the back is going to get 5-10 (at least) on the swing. If you play the swing, you have 10 or so on the intermediate route. You only hope is to get a LB out there, which is tougher in the 4-3 and will open up the running game or inside throws. This will be a fun match-up to watch.
-
Have to have a vertical passing game.
True, but the question is will ku give us that? They are primarily a zone team, so it will be interesting to see. Also, after UT went away from cover 4, they played 2 deep safeties and took away flats, so they never really gave us vertical seems either. The question will be can we dink and dunk vs cover 2 with the flats covered up and get enough run game to move the ball? The opening vs cover 2 are behind the corners and underneath the safeties, but that's a tough through. Also behind the LBs and in front of the safties in the middle. Its a tougher D against our O IF we can't establish the run, but we should still be able to find some openings. It will be interesting to see how we handle it.
I'd like to see our TE used a bit more (if possible), Jordy used in the slot and Murphy split out wide (on the same side as Jordy).
I think that's exactly what we're going to see.
KSU by 17 at the end of the 1st qrt.
Very long day for ku...in 5 days!
Go CATS!
-
Have to have a vertical passing game.
True, but the question is will ku give us that? They are primarily a zone team, so it will be interesting to see. Also, after UT went away from cover 4, they played 2 deep safeties and took away flats, so they never really gave us vertical seems either. The question will be can we dink and dunk vs cover 2 with the flats covered up and get enough run game to move the ball? The opening vs cover 2 are behind the corners and underneath the safeties, but that's a tough through. Also behind the LBs and in front of the safties in the middle. Its a tougher D against our O IF we can't establish the run, but we should still be able to find some openings. It will be interesting to see how we handle it.
I'd like to see our TE used a bit more (if possible), Jordy used in the slot and Murphy split out wide (on the same side as Jordy).
We would use our TE more if Norwood could play, but Mastrud isn't really Mr. Dependable and we've got two recievers doing their jobs fairly well. I want to see a Lamark or Pierce bomb, since it's probably a ridiculous notion and ku won't see it coming.
-
Have to have a vertical passing game.
I'd like to see our TE used a bit more (if possible), Jordy used in the slot and Murphy split out wide (on the same side as Jordy).
Agree that the TE down the middle should be open and feel we will win the TO battle with McAndy having the dropsies.
-
Have to have a vertical passing game.
True, but the question is will ku give us that? They are primarily a zone team, so it will be interesting to see. Also, after UT went away from cover 4, they played 2 deep safeties and took away flats, so they never really gave us vertical seems either. The question will be can we dink and dunk vs cover 2 with the flats covered up and get enough run game to move the ball? The opening vs cover 2 are behind the corners and underneath the safeties, but that's a tough through. Also behind the LBs and in front of the safties in the middle. Its a tougher D against our O IF we can't establish the run, but we should still be able to find some openings. It will be interesting to see how we handle it.
I'd like to see our TE used a bit more (if possible), Jordy used in the slot and Murphy split out wide (on the same side as Jordy).
Here's one thing we could have going with our 2 back shotgun stuff. We ran several sets where we swung the back. If you do that to the 2 WR side and get protection, you can do some sort of combo route that could get that CB (in cover 2) in a bind. You get a deep route with an intermediate underneath plus the back swinging to that side. As a CB if you play the intermediate route, the back is going to get 5-10 (at least) on the swing. If you play the swing, you have 10 or so on the intermediate route. You only hope is to get a LB out there, which is tougher in the 4-3 and will open up the running game or inside throws. This will be a fun match-up to watch.
Freeman was fitting it into a small window against UT on those plays. The LB would kind of commit a bit to the RB out of the backfield and Freeman would fit it between the LB in the flat and the safety/corner. It was giving me a heart attack all day. In the 2 back sets, I think we're going to run even more out of them. I don't remember if we ran any true screens out of that set, but we gave the look and instead through those swing passes.
-
Have to have a vertical passing game.
True, but the question is will ku give us that? They are primarily a zone team, so it will be interesting to see. Also, after UT went away from cover 4, they played 2 deep safeties and took away flats, so they never really gave us vertical seems either. The question will be can we dink and dunk vs cover 2 with the flats covered up and get enough run game to move the ball? The opening vs cover 2 are behind the corners and underneath the safeties, but that's a tough through. Also behind the LBs and in front of the safties in the middle. Its a tougher D against our O IF we can't establish the run, but we should still be able to find some openings. It will be interesting to see how we handle it.
I'd like to see our TE used a bit more (if possible), Jordy used in the slot and Murphy split out wide (on the same side as Jordy).
Here's one thing we could have going with our 2 back shotgun stuff. We ran several sets where we swung the back. If you do that to the 2 WR side and get protection, you can do some sort of combo route that could get that CB (in cover 2) in a bind. You get a deep route with an intermediate underneath plus the back swinging to that side. As a CB if you play the intermediate route, the back is going to get 5-10 (at least) on the swing. If you play the swing, you have 10 or so on the intermediate route. You only hope is to get a LB out there, which is tougher in the 4-3 and will open up the running game or inside throws. This will be a fun match-up to watch.
Freeman was fitting it into a small window against UT on those plays. The LB would kind of commit a bit to the RB out of the backfield and Freeman would fit it between the LB in the flat and the safety/corner. It was giving me a heart attack all day. In the 2 back sets, I think we're going to run even more out of them. I don't remember if we ran any true screens out of that set, but we gave the look and instead through those swing passes.
True, there is a ton of stuff we can do out of that set that we didn't show vs UT. With Patton and Johnson, its really a great look for us. Plus, its such a change up from our 2 TE, 2 WR stuff. Most people are overlooking it, but it really is a great offensive wrinkle for our personel.
And that skinny post behind the CB is there, but you are right, it is a dangerous route. I'm beginning to trust Freeman's decision making though, he's simply a much more sound QB than he was last year and he's not trying to make plays that aren't there. ku might expect the same mistakes, but they are really stupid if they are.
-
Hey we can sit here and play armchairPrince all you want - what it boils down to is JF will not make the mistakes he made last yr, and he will have someone to throw the ball to. Our defense is lights out - PERIOD!!! Anyone who doubts our strength after what we did this year against UT is crazy - sure, if we were playing LSU this week, I would say that the UT game was a tune up and we would probably get squashed, but come on now, we are playing ku... IN FOOTBALL!!! If we can win by 20 in Austin, guys we can win by 40+ at home against a team with one legit player on the D and mini me at QB. I think this one should be put to bed.
good night
-
Have to have a vertical passing game.
True, but the question is will ku give us that? They are primarily a zone team, so it will be interesting to see. Also, after UT went away from cover 4, they played 2 deep safeties and took away flats, so they never really gave us vertical seems either. The question will be can we dink and dunk vs cover 2 with the flats covered up and get enough run game to move the ball? The opening vs cover 2 are behind the corners and underneath the safeties, but that's a tough through. Also behind the LBs and in front of the safties in the middle. Its a tougher D against our O IF we can't establish the run, but we should still be able to find some openings. It will be interesting to see how we handle it.
I'm picturing a game similar to last year where they load the box, blitz often, and dare us to go deep. Until we hit one deep, the flats and the running game are pretty much taken away. Hitting one or two deep ones would really change things.
Just a guess.
-
It's simple. This game will not be close. They have stomped directional schools. Whoop deedoo! They haven't seen anything like the D they will see Saturday. They haven't seen an O like they will see on Saturday. They played weak competition and had a bye week. Texas played week competition, waxing Rice 58-14, before the Cats came to town. Texas had the revenge motive, a 4-0 record and the home field advantage. They also had some skill players who will play on Sunday. We beat the H#** out them physically and on the scoreboard.
When the Sqawks come to town, we have the revenge motive. The home field advantage. The talent advantage. They have their week ooc and a bye week. They will see speed that overwhelmed Texas. They will see a defense that hasn't given up 100 yards to any rusher. They will see a defense that punished every QB we have faced. They will see a team ready to prove a point.
This game is pretty simple. When we show up and play like we can, they will be shell shocked and pounded into the turf. Like the little brother who threatens his big brother.
His rants(message board BS) are to be ignored. When he steps up to prove his point (game day), smack his A$$ down.
So when they come with their trash about being 4-0. Just tell them that the #24 Wildcats look forward to a great time on Saturday!
:ksu: :ksu: :ksu:
Hmm. Sounds like much the same situation Texas was in going into last Saturday's game.
I think we best stick to our game, forget revenge, etc., and clobber the toucans... just because they're the toucans! Man, I hate ku!
EMAW! :ksu: :hope:
-
Funny you would say so, about revenge. I had the same thought after my previous post. Agreed, line up and stomp them because we can! :thumbsup:
It's simple. This game will not be close. They have stomped directional schools. Whoop deedoo! They haven't seen anything like the D they will see Saturday. They haven't seen an O like they will see on Saturday. They played weak competition and had a bye week. Texas played week competition, waxing Rice 58-14, before the Cats came to town. Texas had the revenge motive, a 4-0 record and the home field advantage. They also had some skill players who will play on Sunday. We beat the H#** out them physically and on the scoreboard.
When the Sqawks come to town, we have the revenge motive. The home field advantage. The talent advantage. They have their week ooc and a bye week. They will see speed that overwhelmed Texas. They will see a defense that hasn't given up 100 yards to any rusher. They will see a defense that punished every QB we have faced. They will see a team ready to prove a point.
This game is pretty simple. When we show up and play like we can, they will be shell shocked and pounded into the turf. Like the little brother who threatens his big brother.
His rants(message board BS) are to be ignored. When he steps up to prove his point (game day), smack his A$$ down.
So when they come with their trash about being 4-0. Just tell them that the #24 Wildcats look forward to a great time on Saturday!
:ksu: :ksu: :ksu:
Hmm. Sounds like much the same situation Texas was in going into last Saturday's game.
I think we best stick to our game, forget revenge, etc., and clobber the toucans... just because they're the toucans! Man, I hate ku!
EMAW! :ksu: :hope: