KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: acceleration_man on September 30, 2007, 02:19:36 PM

Title: Roland and Houlik
Post by: acceleration_man on September 30, 2007, 02:19:36 PM
Seems noone is talking about these two linebackers, but both of them have been playing quite well the last couple games. Props, guys! They both made good plays against TX and were in on a lot of tackles. We lose Roland but Houlik is just a Soph. A little small, but that's ok. Josh Buhl, II ???

 :hope:

Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: cireksu on September 30, 2007, 02:23:42 PM
Roland has been a great suprise this year.
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: ksuno1stunner on September 30, 2007, 02:24:55 PM
Roland has been a great suprise this year.

He was due to have a breakout year.

Cline and Manu have also been a nice surprise.  Manu hits like a &@#%ing train.
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: hemmy on September 30, 2007, 02:25:36 PM
A. Moore  :'(
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: ksuno1stunner on September 30, 2007, 02:26:44 PM
A. Moore  :'(

Olu Hall and Twon Moore for two years! :ksu: :ksu: :ksu:
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: CatsNChiefs on September 30, 2007, 02:28:20 PM
A. Moore  :'(

Never a bad thing to have an Ace in the hole with one more year of FBIQ.
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: catzacker on September 30, 2007, 02:29:25 PM
Roland has been a great suprise this year.

QFT.  Houlik and Roland have been good.  I was concerned about losing our top two tacklers in Archer and Diles (no matter how much people didn't appreciate/like Archer). Childs really doesn't do anything for me, although he's kind of tough to throw over.  
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: acceleration_man on September 30, 2007, 02:30:25 PM
Quote
Manu hits like a fracking train.

Manu did have a good game as well. Good to hear his name called (non-penalty plays).

Quote
A. Moore   :'(

I will have to say -- although we didn't have arguably two of our best defenders on the field, this staff has done a really good job of building depth. Cheatam had a couple really nice plays as well (that saved our butts down the field).
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: cireksu on September 30, 2007, 02:31:38 PM
Archer was solid, but he wouldn't start on any of our great defenses in the past.
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: McGrowlTowelZac on September 30, 2007, 02:33:24 PM
Did you happen to notice who was right behind Johnson on his KO return TD?  John Houlik.  He does have some speed.

Roland is playing really well.  

Smoke was out there early on, I think we will still see good things from him.  It may just take half the season for him to catch up, ala Rob Jackson.

And yea, I will like our linebackers next year too.
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: acceleration_man on September 30, 2007, 02:33:37 PM
Archer was solid, but he wouldn't start have been the star on any of our great defenses in the past.

FYP
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 30, 2007, 02:34:28 PM
Archer =  :lol:
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: ksuno1stunner on September 30, 2007, 02:35:20 PM
Archer =  :lol:

I think he'd be a great coach.
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: ksuno1stunner on September 30, 2007, 02:39:07 PM
Seriously, isn't it amazing how many of Prince's guys end up contributing?  I looked at the 2006 class, and pretty much every JUCO that's still here is doing something, like 70% of the JUCOs that signed with KSU.  Snyder was like a one and three shot for a JUCO guy to contribute.
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 30, 2007, 02:40:50 PM
I really was worried when Diles got drafter, archer nearly made NFL that we would suck on defense.

Of course, that was before we had all been tibesared.

 :ksu: :ksu:
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: ksuno1stunner on September 30, 2007, 02:43:24 PM
I really was worried when Diles got drafter, archer nearly made NFL that we would suck on defense.

Of course, that was before we had all been tibesared.

 :ksu: :ksu:

"OMG KSU losing coaches.  They will be suck LOL!  RESTORE ORDER!" :flush:

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 30, 2007, 02:46:00 PM
OMG! THEY LOST 4 COACHES! THEY ARE SO &@#%ED!

GBR! 5 STARS!


 :loly: :loly:
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: ksuno1stunner on September 30, 2007, 02:48:21 PM
OMG! THEY LOST 4 COACHES! THEY ARE SO frackED!

GBR! 5 STARS!


 :loly: :loly:

(http://vmedia.rivals.com/IMAGES/Coach/PHOTO/WESLEY-MCGRIFF150.JPG)

 :nahnah:
Title: Re: Roland and Houlik
Post by: Fausto on September 30, 2007, 03:14:08 PM
"Josh Buhl, II"

No, there will not be another Josh Buhl.


"Archer was solid, but he wouldn't start on any of our great defenses in the past."

Archer would have started over Litton in '99, and you could make arguments in other years as well.