KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on September 23, 2007, 06:19:59 PM

Title: +15
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 23, 2007, 06:19:59 PM: Damn. Maybe we are really bad.

http://forums.eog.com/online-sportsbooks-and-gambling-discussion/ncaa-lines-next-week-pinn-101558.html
Title: Re: +15
Post by: konofo on September 23, 2007, 06:23:30 PM: Being underrated is profitable. 15 is... very generous.

kono
Title: Re: +15
Post by: WavetheWheat on September 23, 2007, 06:25:58 PM: Seems like a big spread considering Texas' performances this season.

I would guess we will see this line go down this week finishing about 11-12.
Title: Re: +15
Post by: cireksu on September 23, 2007, 06:27:40 PM: not suprising, unranked vs top 10.
Title: Re: +15
Post by: catzacker on September 23, 2007, 06:29:02 PM: UT probably should beat us by 15. They are at home and have better players at nearly every position.
Title: Re: +15
Post by: cireksu on September 23, 2007, 06:30:50 PM: God its disgusting how far we have fallen.
Title: Re: +15
Post by: AzCat on September 23, 2007, 07:44:45 PM: Quote from: catzacker on September 23, 2007, 06:29:02 PM
UT probably should beat us by 15 35.

Fixed it for ya. :yuck:
Title: Re: +15
Post by: Kat Kid on September 23, 2007, 08:02:49 PM: Quote from: catzacker on September 23, 2007, 06:29:02 PM
UT probably should beat us by 15. They are at home and have better players at nearly every position.

Not so fast d-bag!

(http://www.nmnathletics.com.edgesuite.net/pics25/400/JJ/JJTEXRMQCLJNLOR.20060913165600.jpg)
Title: Re: +15
Post by: FHSU92 on September 23, 2007, 08:42:15 PM: Quote from: Kat Kid on September 23, 2007, 08:02:49 PM
Quote from: catzacker on September 23, 2007, 06:29:02 PM
UT probably should beat us by 15. They are at home and have better players at nearly every position.

Not so fast d-bag!

(http://www.nmnathletics.com.edgesuite.net/pics25/400/JJ/JJTEXRMQCLJNLOR.20060913165600.jpg)
I won't dispute the d-bag issue, but the "not so fast"? Are you questioning the 15 pts or UT having better players at nearly every position?
Title: Re: +15
Post by: waks on September 23, 2007, 08:58:47 PM: Quote from: FHSU92 on September 23, 2007, 08:42:15 PM
Quote from: Kat Kid on September 23, 2007, 08:02:49 PM
Quote from: catzacker on September 23, 2007, 06:29:02 PM
UT probably should beat us by 15. They are at home and have better players at nearly every position.

Not so fast d-bag!

(http://www.nmnathletics.com.edgesuite.net/pics25/400/JJ/JJTEXRMQCLJNLOR.20060913165600.jpg)
I won't dispute the d-bag issue, but the "not so fast"? Are you questioning the 15 pts or UT having better players at nearly every position?
He's saying we have a better punter.

ku education showing again. :rolleyes:
Title: Re: +15
Post by: catzacker on September 23, 2007, 09:07:15 PM: Quote from: Kat Kid on September 23, 2007, 08:02:49 PM
Quote from: catzacker on September 23, 2007, 06:29:02 PM
UT probably should beat us by 15. They are at home and have better players at nearly every position.

Not so fast d-bag!

(http://www.nmnathletics.com.edgesuite.net/pics25/400/JJ/JJTEXRMQCLJNLOR.20060913165600.jpg)
Title: Re: +15
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 23, 2007, 09:09:46 PM: zacker, could you even name 5+ UT players?
Title: Re: +15
Post by: catzacker on September 23, 2007, 09:13:26 PM: Quote from: fatty fat fat on September 23, 2007, 09:09:46 PM
zacker, could you even name 5+ UT players?

the arrested ones or the ones that haven't gotten arrested?
Title: Re: +15
Post by: catzacker on September 23, 2007, 09:17:30 PM: I can't name but maybe 3 of USC's players, but I'm pretty sure that doesn't mean they aren't better than KSU.
Title: Re: +15
Post by: catzacker on September 23, 2007, 09:34:54 PM: I'll say this, probably saying UT has "better players at nearly every position" was a bit overboard. Their interior OL has 3 Soph's (although their OT's are Sr.'s). Their defensive front 4 is pretty damn good.