KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: The Manhatter on August 23, 2007, 03:56:14 PM

Title: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: The Manhatter on August 23, 2007, 03:56:14 PM
Olu Hall is now in the white pages!!

 :ksu: :ksu: :ksu:
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: BMWJhawk on August 23, 2007, 03:56:36 PM
1 tackle in 94 snaps = impressive
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: The Manhatter on August 23, 2007, 03:59:00 PM
1 tackle in 94 snaps = impressive

94 "plays"...not "snaps"

"plays" = special teams as well as in kick return units.

Thanks.  Arkansas fans  :sleep: over Norman leaving while UVa fans  :crybaby: :banghead: :curse: over Hall leaving.

But yeah..thanks for the stat.   :users:
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: BMWJhawk on August 23, 2007, 04:00:30 PM
Jordy Nelson is a white receiver.  He must suck.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: The Manhatter on August 23, 2007, 04:02:50 PM
Jordy Nelson is a white receiver.  He must suck.

not a 170lb non-athlete used as bait for Mustain and Williams.  Nelson = proven.  Nelson = 50lbs bigger, stronger than Norman.  Nelson = 3 career TD's OVER 73 yards in a power conference.  Nelson = winner/champion.

Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 23, 2007, 04:03:04 PM
Who the hell is Andrew Norman? Is he going to ku?
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: BMWJhawk on August 23, 2007, 04:04:09 PM
5th-highest rated Arkansas recruit = LOL

Mr. ONE Tackle in 94 snaps = OMG
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: fatty fat fat on August 23, 2007, 04:04:46 PM
Jordy Nelson is a white receiver.  He must suck.

not a 170lb non-athlete used as bait for Mustain and Williams.  Nelson = proven.  Nelson = 50lbs bigger, stronger than Norman.  Nelson = 3 career TD's OVER 73 yards in a power conference.  Nelson = winner/champion.



Jordy upon hearing your praise of him

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Bocs46__RY

He's so humble!
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: michigancat on August 23, 2007, 04:07:07 PM
Jordy Nelson is a white receiver.  He must suck.

not a 170lb non-athlete used as bait for Mustain and Williams.  Nelson = proven.  Nelson = 50lbs bigger, stronger than Norman.  Nelson = 3 career TD's OVER 73 yards in a power conference.  Nelson = winner/champion.



Jordy upon hearing your praise of him

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Bocs46__RY

He's so humble!

Damn.  I'm so proud of the great citizens we have representing us.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: stormnut on August 23, 2007, 04:08:05 PM
5th-highest rated Arkansas recruit = LOL

Mr. ONE Tackle in 94 snaps = OMG

That is like saying 5th most likely player to be a father to his sister!!
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: ksuno1stunner on August 23, 2007, 04:09:15 PM
#67 recruit in the country


 :eek: :eek: :eek:

(http://vmedia.rivals.com/IMAGES/PROSPECT/PHOTO/OLUHALL2200.JPG)\

 :ksu: :ksu: :ksu:
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 23, 2007, 04:11:52 PM
5th-highest rated Arkansas recruit = LOL

Mr. ONE Tackle in 94 snaps = OMG
Is the 5th highest rated Arkansas recruit coming to ku?
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: The Manhatter on August 23, 2007, 04:16:09 PM
Let us summarize...

beaks are bummed out for NOT landing...

(http://vmedia.rivals.com/IMAGES/PROSPECT/PHOTO/ANDREWNORMAN200.JPG)



so beak turns and makes fun of...

(http://vmedia.rivals.com/IMAGES/PROSPECT/PHOTO/OLUHALL2200.JPG)



And when reminded again of not landing...

(http://vmedia.rivals.com/IMAGES/PROSPECT/PHOTO/ANDREWNORMAN200.JPG)


beak retaliates by mocking: http://youtube.com/watch?v=J63y3yng_fc (http://youtube.com/watch?v=J63y3yng_fc)


TRUE STORY.

Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 23, 2007, 04:18:41 PM
Why would you pimp someone who is not even coming?
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: steve dave on August 23, 2007, 04:19:04 PM
(http://vmedia.rivals.com/IMAGES/PROSPECT/PHOTO/OLUHALL2200.JPG)
 :ohno:

(http://vmedia.rivals.com/IMAGES/PROSPECT/PHOTO/ANDREWNORMAN200.JPG)

 :lol: :lol:  He looks like one of their basketball recruits   :lol: :lol:

Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: fatty fat fat on August 23, 2007, 04:21:22 PM
Why would you pimp someone who is not even coming?

seriously. weird angle taken by bmw. it's why hox is much more crafty.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 23, 2007, 04:23:49 PM
Why would you pimp someone who is not even coming?

seriously. weird angle taken by bmw. it's why hox is much more crafty.
Hox is pure genius.  He covers his tracks and doesn't let any juicy tidbits of personal information spill out for us to prey on.  "192 inch Mitsubishi HDTV" and "inside sources" isn't nearly as good as all those pictures of Ben Michael. 

Plus Hox makes up crap while Ben Michael tries to use actual stats to prove his ridiculous points.  How can you defend against that?   :ohno:
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: kougar24 on August 23, 2007, 04:41:04 PM
Am I the only one who has noticed how stubbornly ku fans latch onto a single stat when trying to make an argument? The put it in their pockets and pull it out when they run out of things to say. Then they go into Repeat mode.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: michigancat on August 23, 2007, 04:49:30 PM
Hox is pure genius.  He covers his tracks and doesn't let any juicy tidbits of personal information spill out for us to prey on.   

Well, maybe not on this site....

:peek:
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: michigancat on August 23, 2007, 05:05:56 PM
Why would you pimp someone who is not even coming?

seriously. weird angle taken by bmw. it's why hox is much more crafty.
Hox is pure genius.  He covers his tracks and doesn't let any juicy tidbits of personal information spill out for us to prey on.  "192 inch Mitsubishi HDTV" and "inside sources" isn't nearly as good as all those pictures of Ben Michael. 

Plus Hox makes up crap while Ben Michael tries to use actual stats to prove his ridiculous points.  How can you defend against that?   :ohno:

OK, I'd feel bad about posting this if he hadn't said he could dominate who he thought was me in basketball based on the katpak'r picture.  But he's real mean and stuff.

(http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c131/rlj4794/hox.jpg)
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: fatty fat fat on August 23, 2007, 05:06:44 PM
(http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c131/rlj4794/hox.jpg)


 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

YES!
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: ECN on August 23, 2007, 05:07:12 PM
nice velcro's tard pocket.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: fatty fat fat on August 23, 2007, 05:11:52 PM
(http://members.cox.net/ksufan/hox.JPG)
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: fatty fat fat on August 23, 2007, 05:20:08 PM
(http://members.cox.net/ksufan/reesing.JPG)
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: sonofchadmay on August 23, 2007, 05:37:50 PM
(http://members.cox.net/ksufan/reesing.JPG)

Wow...I played in pick up games with that clown in Bonner Springs.  He thought he was the crap but he couldn't even dominate a bunch of overweight pieces of crap like me.  Seriously, total clown.  This all makes sense now.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: fatty fat fat on August 23, 2007, 05:40:55 PM
(http://members.cox.net/ksufan/hox22.JPG)
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: fatty fat fat on August 23, 2007, 05:41:35 PM
Quote
Wow...I played in pick up games with that clown in Bonner Springs.  He thought he was the crap but he couldn't even dominate a bunch of overweight pieces of crap like me.  Seriously, total clown.  This all makes sense now.

lol. thanks.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: BMWJhawk on August 23, 2007, 05:55:23 PM
The last big-time ACC transfer (Thomas Clayton) worked out really well for K-State.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: michigancat on August 23, 2007, 05:57:43 PM
(http://members.cox.net/ksufan/hox22.JPG)

LOL
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on August 23, 2007, 06:23:16 PM
The last big-time ACC transfer (Thomas Clayton) worked out really well for K-State.

N
F
L
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: stormnut on August 23, 2007, 06:24:41 PM
The last big-time ACC transfer (Thomas Clayton) worked out really well for K-State.

N
F
L

ku fans don't know what that stands for.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: kougar24 on August 23, 2007, 06:27:38 PM
The last big-time ACC transfer (Thomas Clayton) worked out really well for K-State.

N
F
L

ku fans don't know what that stands for.

Non
Fat
Latte
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: cireksu on August 23, 2007, 06:34:01 PM
39-20 guys 39-20.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: Bookcat on August 23, 2007, 08:16:06 PM
You can make fun of idiotic ku posts because they've won 2 of the last three. :jerkoff:
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: WilliamTheWildcat on August 23, 2007, 08:28:03 PM


Quote
OK, I'd feel bad about posting this if he hadn't said he could dominate who he thought was me in basketball based on the katpak'r picture.  But he's real mean and stuff.

(http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c131/rlj4794/hox.jpg)
[/quote]

Holy sh.i.t.  Is that really him?  He looks like a lawyer who lost a big traffic ticket case.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 23, 2007, 09:18:45 PM
Why would you pimp someone who is not even coming?

seriously. weird angle taken by bmw. it's why hox is much more crafty.
Hox is pure genius.  He covers his tracks and doesn't let any juicy tidbits of personal information spill out for us to prey on.  "192 inch Mitsubishi HDTV" and "inside sources" isn't nearly as good as all those pictures of Ben Michael. 

Plus Hox makes up crap while Ben Michael tries to use actual stats to prove his ridiculous points.  How can you defend against that?   :ohno:

OK, I'd feel bad about posting this if he hadn't said he could dominate who he thought was me in basketball based on the katpak'r picture.  But he's real mean and stuff.

(http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c131/rlj4794/hox.jpg)
God bless you, Rusty.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: Sandman on August 24, 2007, 12:10:31 AM
The last big-time ACC transfer (Thomas Clayton) worked out really well for K-State.

N
F
L

Yeah, I mean who cares that he didn't do crap for KSU.  At least he got drafted.

And this Olu guy; Marvin Simmons-esque?
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: ksuno1stunner on August 24, 2007, 02:21:46 AM
The last big-time ACC transfer (Thomas Clayton) worked out really well for K-State.

N
F
L

Yeah, I mean who cares that he didn't do crap for KSU.  At least he got drafted.

And this Olu guy; Marvin Simmons-esque?

Doubt it.  Simmons was a head case.  Read my thread on what Virginia fans thought of him.

http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=14995.0

Quote
This kid worked his ass off and its a shame things didn't go his way while in Cville.

 :ksu: :ksu: :ksu:

Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: ksuno1stunner on August 24, 2007, 02:25:28 AM
The last big-time ACC transfer (Thomas Clayton) worked out really well for K-State.

N
F
L

Yeah, I mean who cares that he didn't do crap for KSU.  At least he got drafted.


(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v113/2/10/17014616/n17014616_34228653_7991.jpg)

(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v113/2/10/17014616/n17014616_34228651_7717.jpg)

(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v79/20/5/17010556/n17010556_33388736_6161.jpg)

Is it true that Mangino has never had a player drafted?

While Prince already has 3, and they all seem to be doing pretty well, especially Diles. :ksu:

KSU :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu:
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: BMWJhawk on August 24, 2007, 10:06:59 AM
Not true, and Thomas Clayton sucked for K-State. 
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: JTKSU on August 24, 2007, 10:32:44 AM
Not true, and Thomas Clayton sucked for K-State. 

As near as I can tell, the Fatman has only had two players drafted.  For an average of 0.5 players drafted per year.  Better lock that guy into a new contract.  Oh, wait...

Adrian Jones- 4th rd. of 2004 (123th overall)
David McMillan- 5th rd. of 2005 (139th overall)

http://kuathletics.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/players-in-pros.html (http://kuathletics.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/players-in-pros.html)
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: FBWillie on August 24, 2007, 10:32:53 AM
I was bored this morning; tired of waiting for a good opportunity to post this so here goes.

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j11/wildcatjerrod/Hox.jpg)
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 24, 2007, 10:36:39 AM
Not true, and Thomas Clayton sucked for K-State. 

As near as I can tell, the Fatman has only had two players drafted.  For an average of 0.5 players drafted per year.  Better lock that guy into a new contract.  Oh, wait...

Adrian Jones- 4th rd. of 2004 (123th overall)
David McMillan- 5th rd. of 2005 (139th overall)

http://kuathletics.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/players-in-pros.html (http://kuathletics.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/players-in-pros.html)
Those are Terry Allen recruits. 
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: BMWJhawk on August 24, 2007, 10:39:09 AM
Then how does Prince already get credit for 3 draft picks?

Those guys were Snyder recruits.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 24, 2007, 10:41:47 AM
Then how does Prince already get credit for 3 draft picks?

Those guys were Snyder recruits.
Well, this year is the year that Mangino should finally get some of his own guys in the league, right?
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: BMWJhawk on August 24, 2007, 10:43:18 AM
Right, but I could really care less as long as our football program shows improvement and continues to dominate our rivals.

BTW, Mangino already has some of his own guys in the league.  (Charles Gordon, Charlton Keith)
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: ksu4tc on August 24, 2007, 11:02:43 AM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v167/ksu4tc/joyhox.jpg)
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: ksuno1stunner on August 24, 2007, 11:04:32 AM
Then how does Prince already get credit for 3 draft picks?

Those guys were Snyder recruits.

Ummm...he utilized them very well...they sucked before last year.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: ksuno1stunner on August 24, 2007, 12:17:28 PM
(http://inside.kstatesports.com/images/2007/BG_nfl.jpg)

 :ksu:
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: Fledermaus on August 24, 2007, 12:34:49 PM
BTW, Mangino already has some of his own guys in the league.  (Charles Gordon, Charlton Keith)

Hey I just noticed that Gordon is wearing purple and Terrence Newman's number in the pros.
At least Gordon is trying to better himself. 
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: JTKSU on August 24, 2007, 12:37:57 PM
BTW, Mangino already has some of his own guys in the league.  (Charles Gordon, Charlton Keith)

Hey I just noticed that Gordon is wearing purple and Terrence Newman's number in the pros.
At least Gordon is trying to better himself. 
As a Viking fan, I hope to God Gordon doesn't spend any quality minutes on the field this year, or ever.  If he's playing alot, than our secondary is even worse than I was afraid of.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: BMWJhawk on August 24, 2007, 12:47:35 PM
Charles Gordon is a football player, not a combine specialist.  The Vikings are going to be good this year and Charles will see a lot of playing time at the nickelback position.
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: fatty fat fat on August 24, 2007, 12:49:17 PM
(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v113/2/10/17014616/n17014616_34228651_7717.jpg)



 :love: :love: :love: :love:
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: JTKSU on August 24, 2007, 01:04:04 PM
Charles Gordon is a football player, not a combine specialist.  The Vikings are going to be good this year and Charles will see a lot of playing time at the nickelback position.
Yeah that 4.65 he ran at the combine really showed that he's no combine specialist. 
Title: Re: he's no Andrew Norman BUT..
Post by: ksuno1stunner on August 24, 2007, 01:51:48 PM
(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v113/2/10/17014616/n17014616_34228651_7717.jpg)



 :love: :love: :love: :love:

I know what you're thinking.  He is so good looking.