KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: Fledermaus on August 21, 2007, 07:51:30 AM

Title: 2 TE set
Post by: Fledermaus on August 21, 2007, 07:51:30 AM

What do you think about the 2 TE set that we often use?  I'm not a fan of 2 TEs, esp. without a dominating front 5 on the o-line.  It seems to me that using a FB would be a better for picking up penetration through our line, and would help out the rushing attack a lot more.   IMO, Norwood was a terrible blocker, so adding an extra WR would also have been an improvement over 2 TEs.  I know we don't have a true FB right now, but what do you think of the different approaches?

Title: Re: 2 TE set
Post by: PurplePowerhouse on August 21, 2007, 08:05:16 AM

I hate not utiizing a fullback.  Of course, I'm not a huge fan of Prince's offensive schemes anyway.  WCO =  :sleep:

Title: Re: 2 TE set
Post by: cas on August 21, 2007, 09:51:06 AM

Quote from: PurplePowerhouse on August 21, 2007, 08:05:16 AM

I hate not utiizing a fullback.  Of course, I'm not a huge fan of Prince's offensive schemes anyway.  WCO =  :sleep:

Victor Mann would be dominant this season.

Title: Re: 2 TE set
Post by: Poopley on August 21, 2007, 11:07:12 AM

Standing still, Victor Mann always looked like he was about to tip over.  :eek:

Title: Re: 2 TE set
Post by: KSU4ME on August 21, 2007, 11:26:42 AM

1999 we used the 2 TE set with both FB and RB quite a bit.  Just let Beasley stand there until Morgan got open.

Boring as heck, but worked.