KSUFans Archives

Fan Life => The Endzone Dive => Topic started by: michigancat on August 10, 2007, 10:14:08 AM

Title: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: michigancat on August 10, 2007, 10:14:08 AM
So, I've started following this stuff really early this year.

Who do you like?  I don't really like anyone.  The debates I've seen seem like a circus of jackasses parading around.

Probably John Edwards and Fred Thompson (probably because he isn't a candidate) are my favorites from each party so far.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: ECN on August 10, 2007, 10:24:09 AM
there is NO way im getting into a political debate.

that could lead to a flame holy war.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: michigancat on August 10, 2007, 10:25:27 AM
there is NO way im getting into a political debate.

that could lead to a flame holy war.

That would be great.  I still haven't registered to vote in KCMO.  :peek:

I need to get on that.  I'll probably register as a democrat, since they win like all the local elections.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: asava on August 10, 2007, 10:28:37 AM
there is NO way im getting into a political debate.

that could lead to a flame holy war.

can we talk about religon to?!
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: ECN on August 10, 2007, 10:34:33 AM
Let's talk about baseball
Talk a little small talk
There's gotta be a good joke
That you've heard
Let's talk about NASCARs
Old Hollywood movie stars
Let's talk about anything
Anything in this world
But politics, religion and her
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: michigancat on August 10, 2007, 10:44:05 AM
I'm annoyed that none of the republicans attended the gay issues debate.  Since I don't think any of the candidates will affect me all that much, things like gay rights tend to be more important.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: AzCat on August 10, 2007, 12:40:32 PM
Republicans:
1. Newt Gingrich would be a clear #1 for me ... if only he were electable.
2. Tom Tancredo gets high marks for calling 'em like he sees 'em.
3. Rudy Giuliani is clearly the best candidate among those who might actually get the nomination.

Democrats:
1. Zell Miller - he really needs to run.
2. None of the above.  Obama wants to invade Pakistan and the rest want to nationalize 20% of the economy.  Bad mojo all the way around here.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: TheShocker on August 10, 2007, 12:44:11 PM
Republicans:
1. Newt Gingrich would be a clear #1 for me ... if only he were electable.
2. Tom Tancredo gets high marks for calling 'em like he sees 'em.
3. Rudy Giuliani is clearly the best candidate among those who might actually get the nomination.

Democrats:
1. Zell Miller - he really needs to run.
2. None of the above.  Obama wants to invade Pakistan and the rest want to nationalize 20% of the economy.  Bad mojo all the way around here.


WTF? Giuliani is the most worthless candidate being discussed across both parties.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: ECN on August 10, 2007, 12:45:36 PM
qft
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: slucat on August 10, 2007, 01:17:20 PM
The thing that bothers me the most right now is the reluctancy of the republican candidates to participate in the you tube debate hosted by CNN. That's like slapping the consituants in the face, "we don't care what the public has for questions, its not importaint enough"...basically...way to reach out to the younger voters (who turned out in record numbers in the last election).
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: TheShocker on August 10, 2007, 01:42:13 PM
The thing that bothers me the most right now is the reluctancy of the republican candidates to participate in the you tube debate hosted by CNN. That's like slapping the consituants in the face, "we don't care what the public has for questions, its not importaint enough"...basically...way to reach out to the younger voters (who turned out in record numbers in the last election).


The republicans know that their bread is buttered by old conservatives and the god fearin' folk in the bible belt. They've never made an effort to cater to young voters and eventually that will probably catch up to them. Up to this point it really hasn't hurt them at all.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: FBWillie on August 15, 2007, 10:04:33 AM
I don't really think it matters who runs for the republican side as everything is pointing to Americans wanting a Democrat in office next term.   I just hope like hell it's not Hillary. 

My wife Loves Obama and I haven't started paying attention yet...  I tend to hate all politicians.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Fausto on August 15, 2007, 10:23:50 AM
""we don't care what the public has for questions, its not importaint enough"..."

Did you watch the Dems do YouTube?  The public is a talking sock?  They may have taken the questions, but more than half of the candidates did not even answer the questions posed.  They went right to their own talking points.  How is that *caring* about what the the public (including a talking sock) had for questions?  They were not answering the questions! 

The only dem I could see myself voting for is Joe Biden...and that ain't gonna happen.  Mitt is really the only contender right now I could really see throwing my vote towards.  That said, we're over a year away from an actual vote. 

Nevada is an early caucus, so I have to deal with these idiots more than otherwise. 
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Houstoncat93 on August 15, 2007, 04:24:58 PM
Republicans:
1. Newt Gingrich would be a clear #1 for me ... if only he were electable.
2. Tom Tancredo gets high marks for calling 'em like he sees 'em.
3. Rudy Giuliani is clearly the best candidate among those who might actually get the nomination.

Democrats:
1. Zell Miller - he really needs to run.
2. None of the above.  Obama wants to invade Pakistan and the rest want to nationalize 20% of the economy.  Bad mojo all the way around here.


WTF? Giuliani is the most worthless candidate being discussed across both parties.

What problems do you have with Giuliani?  Have you read his book and what he accomplished in NYC?  He sure seems like a viable choice to me.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: TheShocker on August 15, 2007, 04:28:50 PM
Republicans:
1. Newt Gingrich would be a clear #1 for me ... if only he were electable.
2. Tom Tancredo gets high marks for calling 'em like he sees 'em.
3. Rudy Giuliani is clearly the best candidate among those who might actually get the nomination.

Democrats:
1. Zell Miller - he really needs to run.
2. None of the above.  Obama wants to invade Pakistan and the rest want to nationalize 20% of the economy.  Bad mojo all the way around here.


WTF? Giuliani is the most worthless candidate being discussed across both parties.

What problems do you have with Giuliani?  Have you read his book and what he accomplished in NYC?  He sure seems like a viable choice to me.


The only reason Giuliani is being considered as a presidential candidate is because he lucked into being mayor when 9/11 occurred. Without the 9/11 hype he is nothing.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: KungFoooKitty on August 15, 2007, 04:42:33 PM
Republicans:
1. Newt Gingrich would be a clear #1 for me ... if only he were electable.
2. Tom Tancredo gets high marks for calling 'em like he sees 'em.
3. Rudy Giuliani is clearly the best candidate among those who might actually get the nomination.

Democrats:
1. Zell Miller - he really needs to run.
2. None of the above.  Obama wants to invade Pakistan and the rest want to nationalize 20% of the economy.  Bad mojo all the way around here.


WTF? Giuliani is the most worthless candidate being discussed across both parties.

What problems do you have with Giuliani?  Have you read his book and what he accomplished in NYC?  He sure seems like a viable choice to me.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4196/is_20070205/ai_n17198933 (http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4196/is_20070205/ai_n17198933)

He is viable until all the red state god and gun folks look at his record.  Giuliani =  :flush: when his voting record comes to light.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: cas on August 15, 2007, 04:49:50 PM
I'm going to write in ECN.









* if I could, only 15.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: slucat on August 15, 2007, 05:51:03 PM
""we don't care what the public has for questions, its not importaint enough"..."

Did you watch the Dems do YouTube?  The public is a talking sock?  They may have taken the questions, but more than half of the candidates did not even answer the questions posed.  They went right to their own talking points.  How is that *caring* about what the the public (including a talking sock) had for questions?  They were not answering the questions! 

The only dem I could see myself voting for is Joe Biden...and that ain't gonna happen.  Mitt is really the only contender right now I could really see throwing my vote towards.  That said, we're over a year away from an actual vote. 

Nevada is an early caucus, so I have to deal with these idiots more than otherwise. 



 :sleep:

Sorry you have no sense of humor (talking sock), but not even showing up for a debate event that would generally reach the young voter...hmmmm?
 :ustupid:
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Kat Kid on August 15, 2007, 06:54:46 PM
""we don't care what the public has for questions, its not importaint enough"..."

Did you watch the Dems do YouTube?  The public is a talking sock?  They may have taken the questions, but more than half of the candidates did not even answer the questions posed.  They went right to their own talking points.  How is that *caring* about what the the public (including a talking sock) had for questions?  They were not answering the questions! 

The only dem I could see myself voting for is Joe Biden...and that ain't gonna happen.  Mitt is really the only contender right now I could really see throwing my vote towards.  That said, we're over a year away from an actual vote. 

Nevada is an early caucus, so I have to deal with these idiots more than otherwise. 


Why do you like Mitt?

He seems by far the most phony of any candidates.  Hillary is probably more calculating than Mitt, but she executes her shady, focus group-speak with precision.  Mitt just blatantly panders to whatever constituency he needs at that moment.  His commitment to "double" Gitmo takes the cake as the most ignorant, disinterested pander of the campaign of any candidate thus far.

Kat Kid's official breakdown

Best candidates:

Republican
Ron Paul

Democrat
Obama

Literally the only candidate that has 100% credibility in my mind is Ron Paul.  His stated platform involves a return to the gold standard and the destruction of most any federal program you can think of.  Guliani would have us living in a police state with National I.D. cards and cameras on every street corner, McCain has had his spine surgically removed and looks like a court jester compared to his former self.  Brownback is crazy.  Huckabee is weird.  Thompson is half as qualified as Obama with 1/28th his intelligence.  On the Donkey side, Edwards can't even get a campaign message out that doesn't deal with his hair and is so scripted and phony that he has proven himself more worthless than Kerry (no small feat).  Richardson is interesting but appears better suited as a cabinet member or V.P.  Gravel is very angry about everything.  Joe Biden has a good command of the war but completely unfit for the Presidency and more of an asset in the Senate being a loudmouth and shouting people down on Sunday mornings.  kucinich?  There are no words.  Chris Dodd is a waste of stage space.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Kat Kid on August 15, 2007, 07:08:27 PM
Why Guliani scares the poop out of me:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A01E2D9173CF933A15750C0A962958260 (http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A01E2D9173CF933A15750C0A962958260)

Quote
"We look upon authority too often and focus over and over again, for 30 or 40 or 50 years, as if there is something wrong with authority. We see only the oppressive side of authority. Maybe it comes out of our history and our background. What we don't see is that freedom is not a concept in which people can do anything they want, be anything they can be. Freedom is about authority. Freedom is about the willingness of every single human being to cede to lawful authority a great deal of discretion about what you do."

-Rudy Guliani
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: fatty fat fat on August 15, 2007, 07:28:38 PM
guliana did good job of 9/11
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: mjrod on August 15, 2007, 08:45:48 PM
Fred Thompson runs, it's over.

Republican for four more years.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: KungFoooKitty on August 15, 2007, 09:14:25 PM
Fred Thompson runs, it's over.

Republican for four more years.


 :lol: at Repubs believing Thompson is the second coming of Reagan.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Saulbadguy on August 15, 2007, 09:14:47 PM
Don't really care.  Fortune 500 companies run this country, not politicians.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: michigancat on August 15, 2007, 09:21:25 PM
Why Guliani scares the poop out of me:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A01E2D9173CF933A15750C0A962958260 (http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A01E2D9173CF933A15750C0A962958260)

Quote
"We look upon authority too often and focus over and over again, for 30 or 40 or 50 years, as if there is something wrong with authority. We see only the oppressive side of authority. Maybe it comes out of our history and our background. What we don't see is that freedom is not a concept in which people can do anything they want, be anything they can be. Freedom is about authority. Freedom is about the willingness of every single human being to cede to lawful authority a great deal of discretion about what you do."

-Rudy Guliani

Jesus Christ.

F(ck that clown.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: michigancat on August 16, 2007, 11:03:59 AM
That Ron Paul guy looks pretty good.  (relative)
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Houstoncat93 on August 16, 2007, 02:15:09 PM
Quote
At the core the struggle is philosophical. There are many, many things that can be done in law enforcement to protect us better. There are many things that can done to create a government that is more responsive and more helpful. The fact is that we're fooling people if we suggest to them the solutions to these very, very deep-seated problems are going to be found in government. . . .

Quote
We're going to come through this when we realize that it's all about, ultimately, individual responsibility. That in fact the criminal act is about individual responsibility and the building of the respect for the law and ethics is also a matter of individual responsibility.

Not exactly police state type of thinking if you read the rest of the article.  If you really want to get to know the candidates go read their books.  Both Guliani's and Obama's are good reads and gives you a real good feel for how they make their decisions.  That is much more important to me as a voter than their positions on individual issues.

Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: shaft3500 on August 16, 2007, 03:00:33 PM
what the hell are the democrats thinking. they could steamroll this election if they just put someone half way likable up there with all this anti-republican backlash. (see: last election) yet their top two choices are an intolerable bionic woman and a half black guy. idiots... :banghead:

here's what i think will get it done for them edwards/obama 08
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: michigancat on August 16, 2007, 03:08:20 PM
what the hell are the democrats thinking. they could steamroll this election if they just put someone half way likable up there with all this anti-republican backlash. (see: last election) yet their top two choices are an intolerable bionic woman and a half black guy. idiots... :banghead:

Are you saying half-black guys aren't halfway likeable?

???
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: TheShocker on August 16, 2007, 03:30:49 PM
what the hell are the democrats thinking. they could steamroll this election if they just put someone half way likable up there with all this anti-republican backlash. (see: last election) yet their top two choices are an intolerable bionic woman and a half black guy. idiots... :banghead:

here's what i think will get it done for them edwards/obama 08

Edwards is a turd. I'd vote for Obama though.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: shaft3500 on August 16, 2007, 03:40:30 PM
what the hell are the democrats thinking. they could steamroll this election if they just put someone half way likable up there with all this anti-republican backlash. (see: last election) yet their top two choices are an intolerable bionic woman and a half black guy. idiots... :banghead:

Are you saying half-black guys aren't halfway likeable?

???

nope, but i am saying there are some canidates that would have a better chance at getting elected.

Remember, auburn fans vote too!
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Kat Kid on August 16, 2007, 06:03:55 PM
what the hell are the democrats thinking. they could steamroll this election if they just put someone half way likable up there with all this anti-republican backlash. (see: last election) yet their top two choices are an intolerable bionic woman and a half black guy. idiots... :banghead:

Are you saying half-black guys aren't halfway likeable?

???

nope, but i am saying there are some canidates that would have a better chance at getting elected.

Remember, auburn fans vote too!

And they haven't voted for a democrat since Wallace.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: sys on August 16, 2007, 10:15:38 PM
biden or richardson.  all the others suck.  biden and richardson kind of suck too.  god, our country sucks.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: chum1 on August 16, 2007, 11:12:36 PM
http://www.vicfeazell.com/pres.shtml (http://www.vicfeazell.com/pres.shtml)

Quote
End the War on Drugs and Legalize All Victimless Crimes.

Synchronize all those darn traffic lights (an idea whose time has come).

Deal firmly and swiftly with Iran and North Korea before it is too late. Negotiating with these two is like trying to pet a rattlesnake. You may get a couple of pets in, but it will bite you.

(http://www.vicfeazell.com/images/viccourt.jpg)(http://www.vicfeazell.com/P1010029.jpg)
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Fausto on August 17, 2007, 12:26:22 AM
"Why do you like Mitt?"

Mitt has real world experience. 

Why is it every seemingly every 4th U.S. Senator in running in '08.  When is the last time a sitting U.S. Senator was elected to President?

It's simple...they just don't have the leadership qualities needed and have too much of a record of flip-flopping to be taken seriously.

"Sorry you have no sense of humor (talking sock)"

So because I don't find a sock funny I have NO sense of humor.  That's funny!  Proving, yes, I do have a sense of humor.

Hey, let's all have a 420 party and watch the 'pubs YouTube debate!

Do you actually want to debate the point I highlighted...or would you rather just call me names?

Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Kat Kid on August 17, 2007, 12:38:57 AM
"Why do you like Mitt?"

Mitt has real world experience. 

Why is it every seemingly every 4th U.S. Senator in running in '08.  When is the last time a sitting U.S. Senator was elected to President?

It's simple...they just don't have the leadership qualities needed and have too much of a record of flip-flopping to be taken seriously.

"Sorry you have no sense of humor (talking sock)"

So because I don't find a sock funny I have NO sense of humor.  That's funny!  Proving, yes, I do have a sense of humor.

Hey, let's all have a 420 party and watch the 'pubs YouTube debate!

Do you actually want to debate the point I highlighted...or would you rather just call me names?

Your quotes about Mitt hopefully are illustrative of a deeply sarcastic sense of humor.

I don't understand why a President not being elected from the Senate since Kennedy has anything to do with the current crop of candidates and why you should or shouldn't support them.  A reasonable argument one could conceive of would be that they are unelectable based on empirical evidence.  Instead you say they don't have "leadership experience" and contrast this with Mitt's "real world experience", presumably as Governor of Massachusetts.  You finish up by hilariously asserting that Presidential candidates from the Senate "have too much of a record of flip-flopping to be taken seriously."  Have you read/listened to/researched Mitt's "evolving" positions on abortion and gay rights?  Did you decide to vote for him based solely on his Canadian Mountie Jaw-line?  WTF?


Hope this doesn't blow your mind too much:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9IJukYUbvI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9IJukYUbvI)

   
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Fausto on August 17, 2007, 01:02:40 AM
My comments on the U.S. Senators running is not a comment to support Mitt, rather just a comment.  Sorry if you took it otherwise.  You asked a question, I gave you a succinct one sentence answer.  I should have better seperated my comments.  I don't believe I would be telling you why I like Mitt in expressing what I did as a general comment about U.S. Senators running for President.  Mitt obviously does not fall into that category and my comment was a negitive...so it really doesn't relate to him at all. 

It is obvious you don't like Romney.  I'm trying to figure out how you define "real world experience" as being the Governor of a state.  No reason to describe that further, that simply tells me the viewpoint you are coming from.  A governorship is really a political position.   It's a position within the government, which I do not define as "the real world".  If this offends you because you believe being involved in a government beaucracy is "the real world", I am sorry to have offended you.  I believe otherwise.   We will disagree.  Is a governorship more of a leadership position than a U.S. Senator...absolutely.   

I am not familiar with this Canadian Mountie Jaw-line thing you speak off.  Unfortuantely I've lived a sheltered life and never met a Canadian Mountie or in any information I've seen about them noticed they all had similar jaw-lines.  Perhaps you could tell me what physical characteristics I have seen to make me an Alan Keyes voter in previous presidential primaries?  I am interested to find out the how my mind comes to the conclusions it does in selecting Presidential candidates based on your long-standing study of it.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Kat Kid on August 17, 2007, 01:09:39 AM
How have you reconciled your distaste for flip-floppers with Romney's record?
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Fausto on August 17, 2007, 01:14:11 AM
Interesting....

You don't want to answer my questions...but will continue to ask more of me.

I've never said I had a distaste for flip-floppers.  Please go back and read my one sentence where I used the term.

Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Kat Kid on August 17, 2007, 09:10:13 AM
Interesting....

You don't want to answer my questions...but will continue to ask more of me.

I've never said I had a distaste for flip-floppers.  Please go back and read my one sentence where I used the term.

Your question was rhetorical.

Do you define 'real world experience' as growing up in a privileged political family?  Private Equity investment?  Private sector work in general?

I I don't view 'the real world' as govt., but I don't think people that aren't running a capitalist enterprise aren't in 'the real world' either.

I just am honestly really curious as to why you support Romney?  Is it specific issues or character in general?  Do you find his explanations for why he has reversed all of his 'culture wars' positions compelling?  Do you subscribe to his 'double Gitmo' mindlessness?

My interest is piqued. 
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Fausto on August 17, 2007, 10:46:15 AM
"I just am honestly really curious as to why you support Romney?"

What a perfectly put together sentence.  Yes, it appears you are questioning your curiousity as to why I support Romney.

Honestly?  No.  Not buying it.  Sorry, you've lost any credibility at this point.  Why would I seriously want to answer your questions?  (Don't worry, I don't expect you to answer that question...you've not dealt with any other of mine to this point)  So you can continue to talk about people's "jaw-line" like that matters to anything?  If you wanted to discuss this seriously at one time I would have done that with you.  Not now.  All you seemingly want to do is have me answer questions so you can continue to rail on the guy.  I don't play that game.  You can do that all on your own, without further insulting me.

Ohh, and before you pull out the "You're just voting for Romney because all of you Mormons stick together" card...I'm not Mormon.  Continue to have whatever fanatical thoughts you having come up with from your vast knowledge of me.  It's all quite funny.

This all has been a great example of the "Powertard Master" nature of this board.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: michigancat on August 17, 2007, 10:49:43 AM
I don't like Romney because he thinks it's his job to protect my kids from smut.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: sys on August 17, 2007, 12:13:16 PM
fausto - your responses to kk are weird.  he is just asking you to describe what you find appealing about romney.  why avoid answering?
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Fausto on August 17, 2007, 02:02:07 PM
"why avoid answering?"

I have answered.  Go back and read.

Why is Kat Kid avoiding answering my questions...and why are not you calling him out for that?
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: TheShocker on August 17, 2007, 02:16:14 PM
I'm pretty sure that Fausto is Mitt's mommy.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: michigancat on August 17, 2007, 02:24:38 PM
"why avoid answering?"

I have answered.  Go back and read.

Why is Kat Kid avoiding answering my questions...and why are not you calling him out for that?

Is this your complete answer?

Quote
Mitt has real world experience. 
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: fatty fat fat on August 17, 2007, 02:28:45 PM
Quote
This all has been a great example of the "Powertard Master" nature of this board.

lol's. Don't get mad that you aren't considered one of the "elites" on this message board.

Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Fausto on August 17, 2007, 02:38:55 PM
"Is this your complete answer?"

Hell no.  Why would I waste my time to provide a complete and full answer to a guy who has already disrepected the candidate I support saying what he previously said?  "Phony" "ignorant" etc. etc..

Rusty, that would be like me fully discussing the games I have seen Ron Anderson perform in with you.  You've already made up your mind...life is too short.

"Don't get mad that you aren't considered one of the "elites" on this message board."

Yes, LOL FFF.  My life just won't be complete until I am considered elite on this board.  I am working so hard to make that happen.  Wife, Kids, good retirement are small goals in comparison.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: michigancat on August 17, 2007, 02:42:04 PM
"Is this your complete answer?"

Hell no.  Why would I waste my time to provide a complete and full answer to a guy who has already disrepected the candidate I support saying what he previously said?  "Phony" "ignorant" etc. etc..

Rusty, that would be like me fully discussing the games I have seen Ron Anderson perform in with you.  You've already made up your mind...life is too short.

Actually, I appreciated your analysis.  I think you're the only person on the planet, (save our coaches, Drexel's coaches, and the DC Assault mouthpiece) that has watched him play and noticed him, so it was good stuff.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Kat Kid on August 17, 2007, 03:16:40 PM
"why avoid answering?"

I have answered.  Go back and read.

Why is Kat Kid avoiding answering my questions...and why are not you calling him out for that?

Fausto Question (FQ):
"Why is it every seemingly every 4th U.S. Senator in running in '08.  When is the last time a sitting U.S. Senator was elected to President?"

Kat Kid Answer (KKA):
I don't understand why a President not being elected from the Senate since Kennedy has anything to do with the current crop of candidates and why you should or shouldn't support them.

Analysis:  The first question didn't even warrant a question mark on your part and was clearly rhetorical, the second I answered.

1 Question (Q) / 1 Answer (A)

FQ:  "I'm trying to figure out how you define "real world experience" as being the Governor of a state." . .

wait..


"No reason to describe that further, that simply tells me the viewpoint you are coming from."


1Q/1A + 1 aborted question by Fausto

FQ:
Perhaps you could tell me what physical characteristics I have seen to make me an Alan Keyes voter in previous presidential primaries?  I am interested to find out the how my mind comes to the conclusions it does in selecting Presidential candidates based on your long-standing study of it.

KKA:
"How have you reconciled your distaste for flip-floppers with Romney's record?"

Analysis:
The first question appears to be rhetorical, but apparently this must be the question you want answered because I answered all the rest of them.  The bolded section would require a little more cooperation.

Conclusion:
1Q/1A + 1 aborted question + 2 rhetorical quesitons + one request that you've obstructed my attempts to satisfy

I would like to enlist your help in showing me which questions (serious) I haven't answered of yours.  I would like a surge of support in helping to produce a case study on your presidential preferences, but I NEED YOUR HELP!

If you really support Romney, then stand up and tell me why or stop posting I don't care, but don't keep claiming I'm ducking some brilliantly poised questions of yours.

Hope that helps.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: michigancat on August 29, 2007, 08:34:12 AM
Strippers for Ron Paul:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPfPnF4Mbog&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ereason%2Ecom%2Fblog%2Fshow%2F122222%2Ehtml
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Kat Kid on October 23, 2007, 03:42:38 PM
Bump!

More discussion needed.

Paging Fausto......Fausto.......Fausto.....
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: steve dave on October 23, 2007, 03:52:01 PM
I'm a Brownback girl!  Sam is more conservative than Tom Osborne and he is spooky conservative.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APZMV9leyMA

I may ask my wife who she is voting for and then tell her I'm voting for the other person to cancel out her vote thus making her not vote (did this last year and she vowed never to tell me who she is voting for but I can find out, there are ways). 
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: Kat Kid on October 23, 2007, 04:11:24 PM
Quote
"Actually, just look at what Osam, uh, Barack Obama, said just yesterday. Barack Obama calling on radicals, jihadists of all different types, to come together in Iraq. That is the battlefield. That is the central place, he said. Come join us under one banner," - Mitt Romney.

Seriously.  What a piece of sh1t!

Quote
Romney's South Carolina spokesman Will Holley told reporters several hours later that Romney misspoke when discussing Obama at another point in the speech, as the AP first reported, by saying "Osam-." It was a slip of the tongue," Holley said.

It was just a 'slip of the tongue.'  Or a calculated political move. . .  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: waks on January 03, 2008, 11:46:59 PM
Bump for new thoughts?
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: PCR on January 04, 2008, 03:04:17 AM
Mr. Hankey >>> Any of the Republicans

The Obama win was pretty exciting.  Now we will see if he can keep it going into the next week or 2.  Then the Fox News smear campaign will start in full force and hopefully the American public isn't dumb enough to fall for it this time around.  Fortunately there's a whole group of voters aged 32 and under who WILL be voting this year and don't get their news from the TV.  Big turnout among Gen Y= big problems for the old guard.
Title: Re: 2008 Presidential election
Post by: AzCat on January 04, 2008, 12:40:54 PM
Yes yes, all the young fools were going to elect Howard Dean last time weren't they?  How'd that work out for you?   :users: