KSUFans Archives
Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on June 26, 2007, 05:46:31 PM
-
in conference play
a few reference points (all done from memory, btw (stud->>fff))
2006: 27.25
2005: 32
2004: 32.4
2003: 15.1
2002: 11.4
2001: 21
2000: 23.25
1999: 17.1
1998: 14
1997: 16.5
1996: 19 (this could be wrong)
I'll go with
24.375
-
25.79
-
18.3
-
16.8 i think if our starters stay healthy we should suprise some people, but beyond our starters there is not much.
-
21.0
-
25
-
27.4 I think our defense will not be as good as last year. Our defense/ coordinator were fairly good. The reason the ppg were a bit higher, is that last year the offense didn't stay on the field for very long. So our defense had to defend for a lot more drives and possessions and Josh threw it into their hands alot.
-
18.5 ppg
-
24.345
-
anything lower than 20 would be phenomenal.
-
anything lower than 20 would be phenomenal.
I was being homerish, but what you just said is absolutely true.
-
PA- 22.6
PF- 25.2
-
-1000000
-
22.3
(http://www.germes-online.com/direct/dbimage/50271634/Smoke_Alarm.jpg)
-
32 PPG
-
26
-
ppg could be higher this year than last and our defense could be improved.
@Auburn
@NU
@Texas
There is some scoring there.
and,
Watts,
Moore,
Baldwin,
McKinney
Chandler
is a good group depending on who you like.
-
<17 will put us in the top 10. And probably Big 12 champs. I'll go with that! :ksu: :ksu: :ksu:
-
ppg could be higher this year than last and our defense could be improved.
@Auburn
@NU
@Texas
There is some scoring there.
and,
Watts,
Moore,
Baldwin,
McKinney
Chandler
is a good group depending on who you like.
Auburn isn't a high scoring offense. They don't help your argument at all.
-
ppg could be higher this year than last and our defense could be improved.
@Auburn
@NU
@Texas
There is some scoring there.
and,
Watts,
Moore,
Baldwin,
McKinney
Chandler
is a good group depending on who you like.
Auburn isn't a high scoring offense. They don't help your argument at all.
That is true but they could kill us on differential.
I could see a 28-0 or 35-0 drubbing and if they can turn us over it could be a little more high scoring on both ends than we think now.
-
ppg could be higher this year than last and our defense could be improved.
@Auburn
@NU
@Texas
There is some scoring there.
and,
Watts,
Moore,
Baldwin,
McKinney
Chandler
is a good group depending on who you like.
Auburn isn't a high scoring offense. They don't help your argument at all.
That is true but they could kill us on differential.
I could see a 28-0 or 35-0 drubbing and if they can turn us over it could be a little more high scoring on both ends than we think now.
I predict they have two defensive touchdowns an offensive touchdown and a field goal.
-
ppg could be higher this year than last and our defense could be improved.
@Auburn
@NU
@Texas
There is some scoring there.
and,
Watts,
Moore,
Baldwin,
McKinney
Chandler
is a good group depending on who you like.
Auburn isn't a high scoring offense. They don't help your argument at all.
Neither is NU. Actually, OK St and Mizzou will probably score more against us than NU or Aub.
-
25
-
ppg could be higher this year than last and our defense could be improved.
@Auburn
@NU
@Texas
There is some scoring there.
and,
Watts,
Moore,
Baldwin,
McKinney
Chandler
is a good group depending on who you like.
Auburn isn't a high scoring offense. They don't help your argument at all.
Neither is NU. Actually, OK St and Mizzou will probably score more against us than NU or Aub.
True.