KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: ksuno1stunner on June 13, 2007, 05:08:10 PM

Title: 45 quarterbacks had at least 3 star ratings
Post by: ksuno1stunner on June 13, 2007, 05:08:10 PM: They put Klein at #30 yesterday. I'm sure it was a "glitch".
Title: Re: 45 quarterbacks had at least 3 star ratings
Post by: ScubaSteve on June 13, 2007, 05:35:00 PM: Did you actually see this? Crabtree is denying it. I was wondering where it came from.
Title: Re: 45 quarterbacks had at least 3 star ratings
Post by: ksuno1stunner on June 13, 2007, 05:38:01 PM: http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=12958.0

Correct link.
Title: Re: 45 quarterbacks had at least 3 star ratings
Post by: stormnut on June 13, 2007, 05:40:25 PM: Quote from: ScubaSteve on June 13, 2007, 05:35:00 PM
Did you actually see this? Crabtree is denying it. I was wondering where it came from.

I just a cub but I saw it this morning. Wish I would have screen shot that thing. They also had Burris ans 75 OG but now blank.

Rivals is playing games with ranking right now. I would not be surprised if they had a dart board ranking system.
Title: Re: 45 quarterbacks had at least 3 star ratings
Post by: S. Parker on June 13, 2007, 05:47:55 PM: I didn't think there was any way Klein would be a two star. I thought he was going to be a high three star. He's fast, has great size, really accurate, and he seems to have a good arm. His film is really impressive.

I don't get it. He'll be a three star before it's over, but I don't know how to interpret the two star today. Tough break. :confused:
Title: Re: 45 quarterbacks had at least 3 star ratings
Post by: S. Parker on June 13, 2007, 05:54:12 PM: Did Crabtree say anything to you to try to explain his thinking?
Title: Re: 45 quarterbacks had at least 3 star ratings
Post by: vanro031 on June 13, 2007, 05:58:00 PM: Quote from: S. Parker on June 13, 2007, 05:54:12 PM
Did Crabtree say anything to you to try to explain his thinking?
Crabtree doesn't think.. :twobirds:
Title: Re: 45 quarterbacks had at least 3 star ratings
Post by: stormnut on June 13, 2007, 05:59:11 PM: Quote from: S. Parker on June 13, 2007, 05:54:12 PM
Did Crabtree say anything to you to try to explain his thinking?

To be honest, he sounded like a spokes men for a chemical company trying to explain in a press conference why it was a good thing that there plant exploded killing all its workers and leveled a three mile area around it. It sounded like he either was over ruled big time or that he was trying to convince himself what was done was right.
Title: Re: 45 quarterbacks had at least 3 star ratings
Post by: ksuno1stunner on June 13, 2007, 05:59:50 PM: Quote from: S. Parker on June 13, 2007, 05:54:12 PM
Did Crabtree say anything to you to try to explain his thinking?

Said last week he was the #1 QB in Colorado, now says that Elway is higher. Also said they rank by state and then national.
Title: Re: 45 quarterbacks had at least 3 star ratings
Post by: ksudrew on June 13, 2007, 06:02:49 PM: Quote from: ScubaSteve on June 13, 2007, 05:35:00 PM
Did you actually see this? Crabtree is denying it. I was wondering where it came from.

I saw it on the Rivals Football site early this morning as well - Klein was clearly at 30
Title: Re: 45 quarterbacks had at least 3 star ratings
Post by: waks on June 13, 2007, 06:11:14 PM: He completely unraveled and backtracked. He said last week that Klein was a mid 3 star type and that he was better than Jack Elway. And then today he said that he never said Klein was a mid 3 star and that he thought Elway was better. Once this was brought to his attention he just started backtracking saying that he still believes that but they do evals as a team. They won't admit they were wrong and change any of the rankings now but I wouldn't be surprised if this makes them change the rankings later on when they adjust the placings and what not. Thank Stunner for causing that board to completely melt down.