KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on June 10, 2007, 04:36:29 PM

Title: Ready for this?
Post by: fatty fat fat on June 10, 2007, 04:36:29 PM
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y257/rjwalrus97/DSC00176.jpg)



thanks to a 'gpc' poster for the pic
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: kstate16 on June 10, 2007, 04:38:25 PM
prince is huge.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: ksuno1stunner on June 10, 2007, 04:41:22 PM
LOL
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Bullfn33 on June 10, 2007, 04:51:19 PM
 :lol: :ksu: :lol:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: tmramrod91 on June 10, 2007, 05:02:13 PM
LOL
Guy on the right is pretty priceless as well.
Bunny ears   :blush:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: ECN on June 10, 2007, 05:34:53 PM
forgive me, but he is standing like a homo.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: fatty fat fat on June 10, 2007, 05:35:52 PM
forgive me, but he is standing like a homo.

what's with &@#%ing with waks's signature? I was ready to put that in my vid.......
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 10, 2007, 05:36:10 PM
forgive me, but he is standing like a homo.
I kind of noticed this too. I didn't want to say anything though..
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: cas on June 10, 2007, 05:40:45 PM
LOL
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: ECN on June 10, 2007, 05:51:46 PM
who's the douchebag on the far right?
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: willie83 on June 10, 2007, 05:58:08 PM
forgive me, but he is standing like a homo.

Kind of reminds me of a knock kneed band geek, except bigger.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: cyclist on June 10, 2007, 06:04:04 PM
forgive me, but he is standing like a homo.
I kind of noticed this too. I didn't want to say anything though..

OK,  I did do the 'waks'arusa handle, but I didn't jack with the sig.

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 10, 2007, 06:50:56 PM
forgive me, but he is standing like a homo.
I kind of noticed this too. I didn't want to say anything though..

OK,  I did do the 'waks'arusa handle, but I didn't jack with the sig.

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
He's talking about how yesterday the image was really distorted.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: konofo on June 10, 2007, 06:53:43 PM
Your current sig image is 160x120, but your sig is setting it to 640x480, because that is the size you had been using.  Ditch the width/height parameters in your img tag.

kono
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: cyclist on June 10, 2007, 07:10:46 PM
forgive me, but he is standing like a homo.
I kind of noticed this too. I didn't want to say anything though..

OK,  I did do the 'waks'arusa handle, but I didn't jack with the sig.

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
He's talking about how yesterday the image was really distorted.

ok...

:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: catzacker on June 10, 2007, 07:56:21 PM
Wow, Prince's stance is kind of mancer-ish. 
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: highway61 on June 10, 2007, 08:33:15 PM
Something is wrong with the left leg.  Seems like the picture has been photoshopped or something.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: vanro031 on June 10, 2007, 10:43:00 PM
He looks like a John Blake starter kit. When will he get a bra?
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Bullfn33 on June 10, 2007, 10:49:54 PM
forgive me, but he is standing like a homo.
I kind of noticed this too. I didn't want to say anything though..

I think he just had to pee really bad. 
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: kstate16 on June 10, 2007, 10:52:11 PM
this could possibly be one of the best photoshops i've seen.....or it can actually be real. i really cannot tell. bugging the hell out of me..... :curse:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: kstate16 on June 10, 2007, 10:53:54 PM
i'm calling it....it's photoshop. i mean, look at his feet/legs...it just doesn't look right.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: WildFan101 on June 10, 2007, 11:17:17 PM
It's photoshopped... just look at his head and the rest of his body. On the other hand, the guy on the far right is not photoshopped and 100% hilarious.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: fatty fat fat on June 10, 2007, 11:18:24 PM
OT: I absolutely hate the fact that most ksu fans are white/old/males.

damnit. I love diversity.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: cireksu on June 10, 2007, 11:19:49 PM
Has this made it to phog yet?
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: ksuno1stunner on June 10, 2007, 11:21:16 PM
OT: I absolutely hate the fact that most ksu fans are white/old/males.

damnit. I love diversity.

Are your parents huge fans?
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: fatty fat fat on June 10, 2007, 11:25:45 PM
Not really.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: ksuno1stunner on June 10, 2007, 11:34:45 PM
Not really.

Same here.  "Ohhhhh you shourd rike ku!  You go schoor there"
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: ECN on June 10, 2007, 11:45:19 PM
i would bet the 23 dollars in my savings that no photoshop was involved in that gay pose.

HTH.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 11, 2007, 12:01:21 AM
It's not photoshopped. I took the photo...
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: S. Parker on June 11, 2007, 12:15:23 AM
His stance looks kind of odd, I admit, but I think it is just because he is shifting his weight to his right leg in order to give the other guy bunny ears.

The only thing I would say, however, is that he could probably drop a couple pounds.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 11, 2007, 12:17:15 AM
His stance looks kind of odd, I admit, but I think it is just because he is shifting his weight to his right leg in order to give the other guy bunny ears.

The only thing I would say, however, is that he could probably drop a couple pounds.
I have no problem with Prince's homosexuality. It should break a lot of stereotypes regarding K-State. Let him be who he is.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: CatWoman on June 11, 2007, 12:18:08 AM
OT: I absolutely hate the fact that most ksu fans are white/old/males.

damnit. I love diversity.

HEY, watch it fatty!   :rolleyes:

Just the ones who GOLF are white/old/males!
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: CatWoman on June 11, 2007, 12:21:19 AM
His stance looks kind of odd, I admit, but I think it is just because he is shifting his weight to his right leg in order to give the other guy bunny ears.

The only thing I would say, however, is that he could probably drop a couple pounds.
I have no problem with Prince's homosexuality. It should break a lot of stereotypes regarding K-State. Let him be who he is.

Waks, you suck!  :jerkoff:

Actually, all the other guys have their hands on their clubs, which happens to be chest high. Prince is so damn tall and big, that his club is alot shorter than everyone elses.  Hence why he looks so funny holding onto it.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 11, 2007, 12:31:28 AM
His stance looks kind of odd, I admit, but I think it is just because he is shifting his weight to his right leg in order to give the other guy bunny ears.

The only thing I would say, however, is that he could probably drop a couple pounds.
I have no problem with Prince's homosexuality. It should break a lot of stereotypes regarding K-State. Let him be who he is.

Waks, you suck!  :jerkoff:

Actually, all the other guys have their hands on their clubs, which happens to be chest high. Prince is so damn tall and big, that his club is alot shorter than everyone elses.  Hence why he looks so funny holding onto it.
I think it has more to do with the fact that he's a flaming homosexual.*




*Seriously, there is NOTHING wrong with it.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Pike on June 11, 2007, 12:33:19 AM
The guy's got character  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: S. Parker on June 11, 2007, 12:37:23 AM
His stance looks kind of odd, I admit, but I think it is just because he is shifting his weight to his right leg in order to give the other guy bunny ears.

The only thing I would say, however, is that he could probably drop a couple pounds.
I have no problem with Prince's homosexuality. It should break a lot of stereotypes regarding K-State. Let him be who he is.

Waks, you suck!  :jerkoff:

Actually, all the other guys have their hands on their clubs, which happens to be chest high. Prince is so damn tall and big, that his club is alot shorter than everyone elses.  Hence why he looks so funny holding onto it.
I think it has more to do with the fact that he's a flaming homosexual.*

*Seriously, there is NOTHING wrong with it.

This is why I come here. This is hilarious. That picture in the "riding dirty" thread had me laughing too, so I was really disappointed when they took it down.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: pufizzle on June 11, 2007, 01:47:37 AM
Not really.

Same here.  "Ohhhhh you shourd rike ku!  You go schoor there"

This made me nearly pee my pants.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 11, 2007, 02:54:13 AM
Not really.

Same here.  "Ohhhhh you shourd rike ku!  You go schoor there"
Stunner, have I ever told you how much I love your parents? Probably the nicest people you will ever meet. How did they ever raise such an asshole?  :)
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Leyton on June 11, 2007, 04:46:45 AM
Rule #37: One should not allow one's belt to rise beyond the critical point.

(http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/2508/ddqf8.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Poopley on June 11, 2007, 05:11:25 AM
(http://www.cantstopthebleeding.com/img/mangino1024.jpg)

owns

(http://images.usatoday.com/sports/_photos/2006/08/24/prince.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: chum1 on June 11, 2007, 06:48:05 AM
Throw that photo into the case file of evidence that Prince will be a failure.  What do you really see there?  Do you see a winner?  Or do you see a loser?
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Pett on June 11, 2007, 07:44:12 AM
I love Prince's calfs!!!!!!!!!


 :love:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: dmartin on June 11, 2007, 08:14:38 AM
looks like he's trying to hold back a crap or something.  CLENCH!!
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: S. Parker on June 11, 2007, 11:38:23 AM
(http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa151/MauryMcCoy/RonPrince.jpg)

I didn't do this. I got it from another fan. I have to admit I think it's kind of funny though.  :loly:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Racquetball_Ninja on June 11, 2007, 12:02:40 PM
My only question:  Why the hell are they playing the par 3 course out at Wildcat Creek?  That's weak if Prince is relegated to playing out there and not at Colbert. 
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: CatWoman on June 11, 2007, 01:06:10 PM
Ya'll SUCK. What if Prince sees all this? I'm sure he'd take a REAL liking to the fans. And POOPLEY you REALLY suck.  :nutkick:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: S. Parker on June 11, 2007, 01:08:45 PM
Ya'll SUCK. What if Prince sees all this? I'm sure he'd take a REAL liking to the fans. And POOPLEY you REALLY suck.  :nutkick:

If it makes him feel any better I'm not a KSU fan. Although, I also didn't really say that much.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Poopley on June 11, 2007, 01:12:21 PM
Catwoman, I would like nothing more than for Prince to put the beatdown on Mangina. But we took it behind the woodshed last time.  :yuck:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: dmartin on June 11, 2007, 02:15:24 PM
I would hope Prince would laugh and say "damn, that pic does make me look like a tard"
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 11, 2007, 02:36:12 PM
Hopefully Prince has a sense of humor...


And there isn't a Par 3 course at Wildcat.. I'm pretty sure the only Par 3 course in Manhattan is at Colbert..
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: FBWillie on June 11, 2007, 03:27:46 PM
Forgive me, but I don't see anything in that picture that indicates that is a par 3;  Now, I don't play golf, but don't see anything but clubs, dorks and a green.

So what's with the big hang up on it.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Racquetball_Ninja on June 11, 2007, 04:07:06 PM
Hopefully Prince has a sense of humor...


And there isn't a Par 3 course at Wildcat.. I'm pretty sure the only Par 3 course in Manhattan is at Colbert..

My apologies, its a rinky dink 9-hole course out at Wildcat Creek that mine as well be a par 3 course. 

I'd still like to know why he's playing on the kiddie course and not playing out at Colbert.  Seems kind of strange that a KState coach would be playing a golf course that has batting cages and a putt putt course connected to it.  Maybe he's just being Bold and Daring.   :D

Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 11, 2007, 04:50:43 PM
Hopefully Prince has a sense of humor...


And there isn't a Par 3 course at Wildcat.. I'm pretty sure the only Par 3 course in Manhattan is at Colbert..

My apologies, its a rinky dink 9-hole course out at Wildcat Creek that mine as well be a par 3 course. 

I'd still like to know why he's playing on the kiddie course and not playing out at Colbert.  Seems kind of strange that a KState coach would be playing a golf course that has batting cages and a putt putt course connected to it.  Maybe he's just being Bold and Daring.   :D


Wildcat probably auctioned a free game of golf with Coach Prince or something. Prince and Martin both have free memberships to Colbert Hills and Manhattan Country Club in their contracts. Prince's house is being built in Grand Mere. I don't think he's being underappreciated by any means..
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: ksu4tc on June 12, 2007, 08:35:49 AM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v167/ksu4tc/coach_price_golf2.jpg)

Coach Prince jumped the gun.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: ksuno1stunner on June 12, 2007, 09:22:10 AM
How do you know it's wildcat?  Is it the tee markers?  I don't recognize that hole.  I thought it'd be Rolling Meadows, because of the goose.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Racquetball_Ninja on June 12, 2007, 11:57:11 AM
How do you know it's wildcat?  Is it the tee markers?  I don't recognize that hole.  I thought it'd be Rolling Meadows, because of the goose.

Looks like the hole right behind the putting clock to the North.  Dog leg left, you can get to the corner with a 3-iron, go over the trees and get to the green with either a 3-wood or Driver.  Its been a while since I've been out there but I can't think of another course in the area that has a hole with that layout.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Kat Kid on June 12, 2007, 12:49:48 PM
Hopefully Prince has a sense of humor...


And there isn't a Par 3 course at Wildcat.. I'm pretty sure the only Par 3 course in Manhattan is at Colbert..

You'd be wrong.

Par 3 @ Wildcat.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 12, 2007, 02:10:08 PM
Hopefully Prince has a sense of humor...


And there isn't a Par 3 course at Wildcat.. I'm pretty sure the only Par 3 course in Manhattan is at Colbert..

You'd be wrong.

Par 3 @ Wildcat.
Par is 30. 30 divided by 3 is 10. It's a 9 hole course.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: chum1 on June 12, 2007, 02:16:00 PM
For whatever strange reason, I find the debate about Wildcat Creek's crapty golf course even more entertaining than the photo.  waks (as usual) took this thread to a whole new level as far as I am concerned.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Kat Kid on June 12, 2007, 03:58:22 PM
Hopefully Prince has a sense of humor...


And there isn't a Par 3 course at Wildcat.. I'm pretty sure the only Par 3 course in Manhattan is at Colbert..

You'd be wrong.

Par 3 @ Wildcat.
Par is 30. 30 divided by 3 is 10. It's a 9 hole course.

It may be a 9 hole course, but your mom is a 3 hole course and I filled every one.  Is that a par?
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 12, 2007, 04:04:35 PM
Hopefully Prince has a sense of humor...


And there isn't a Par 3 course at Wildcat.. I'm pretty sure the only Par 3 course in Manhattan is at Colbert..

You'd be wrong.

Par 3 @ Wildcat.
Par is 30. 30 divided by 3 is 10. It's a 9 hole course.

It may be a 9 hole course, but your mom is a 3 hole course and I filled every one.  Is that a par?
My mom knows your fiance. Thus, I know your fiance. Thus, Clams really knows your fiance. This topic should be addressed in the Chipotle thread. I shall see you over there.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 12, 2007, 04:05:27 PM
For whatever strange reason, I find the debate about Wildcat Creek's @#%$ty golf course even more entertaining than the photo.  waks (as usual) took this thread to a whole new level as far as I am concerned.
I have a tendency to do that. I feel it adds excitement to the board.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: FBWillie on June 12, 2007, 04:32:08 PM
I can't believe I keep clicking on this stupid ass thread expecting there to be something good in it only to, for some other stupid reason, get wrapped up into if this picture was taken at a &@#%ing par &@#%ing three &@#%ing hole when no one should give a flying &@#%. 


I guess you guys got me!   :baityes:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Meatbag on June 13, 2007, 09:18:55 AM
Prince is bull legged.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: chum1 on June 13, 2007, 10:00:33 AM
30 is closer to 27 than 36.  Plus, the majority of holes are par 3 - very unusual.  I say calling it a par 3 course is allowable.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 13, 2007, 04:09:36 PM
30 is closer to 27 than 36.  Plus, the majority of holes are par 3 - very unusual.  I say calling it a par 3 course is allowable.
2/3 are par 3. KatKid was wrong.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: willie83 on June 13, 2007, 04:37:22 PM
30 is closer to 27 than 36.  Plus, the majority of holes are par 3 - very unusual.  I say calling it a par 3 course is allowable.

I think the official name for a short coarse is 'executive'. There is usually a couple of short par 4's to go along with the majority par 3's.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: chum1 on June 13, 2007, 06:55:48 PM
Good point, willie.  The par 4 holes aren't even real par 4 holes.  All the more reason it is allowable to call it a par 3 course. 
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 13, 2007, 06:58:13 PM
Good point, willie.  The par 4 holes aren't even real par 4 holes.  All the more reason it is allowable to call it a par 3 course. 
Executive. Not par 3. Ninja is still wrong.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: chum1 on June 13, 2007, 07:15:50 PM
Calling it a par 3 is allowable because no one knows that term.  Calling it an executive course would only cause confusion.  Some people might even get angry.  Calling it a par 3 course was definitely the smart move.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 13, 2007, 07:25:48 PM
Quote
A course that consists of nothing but par-3 holes.

http://golf.about.com/cs/golfterms/g/bldef_par3cours.htm (http://golf.about.com/cs/golfterms/g/bldef_par3cours.htm)

You're wrong.  :mad:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: chum1 on June 13, 2007, 07:31:49 PM
I agree that we are misusing the term.  I'm just claiming that its use was appropriate nonetheless.  I could be wrong.  If I'm not, Kat Kid clearly owns you.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 13, 2007, 07:32:33 PM
I agree that we are misusing the term.  I'm just claiming that its use was appropriate nonetheless.  I could be wrong.  If I'm not, Kat Kid clearly owns you.
Jeremy Crabtree probably knows the answer...
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: Racquetball_Ninja on June 18, 2007, 03:19:14 AM
Good point, willie.  The par 4 holes aren't even real par 4 holes.  All the more reason it is allowable to call it a par 3 course. 
Executive. Not par 3. Ninja is still wrong.

For the love of god Waks... change that pixelated oversized sig picture.  Now, about the course... somewhere around the 1st and 2nd page break I conceited that it is not a "true" par 3 course.  However, now that you've pushed your extensive golf knowledge onto all of us I guess its time to prove you wrong. 

For all intensive purposes a true par 3 course does in fact have a par of 27.  Which makes Wildcat Creek not a "true" par 3 course but come on, anybody who's ever tee'd it up knows that a course layout like WC is closer to a par 3 course that a 9 hole course say with a par of 35.

Now comes the fun part... where you're wrong.  An executive course is in fact a par 3 course, you needn't look any further than Colbert Hills.  Don't tell me you're going to argue with Jim Colbert!  http://www.colberthills.com/page/64-1616.htm (http://www.colberthills.com/page/64-1616.htm) 

Regardless... tomato / toe maaa toe...  its a little track and calling it a par 3 course is the most accurate.  Now go back to playing Tiger Woods!   :D
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 18, 2007, 03:26:38 AM
Good point, willie.  The par 4 holes aren't even real par 4 holes.  All the more reason it is allowable to call it a par 3 course. 
Executive. Not par 3. Ninja is still wrong.

For the love of god Waks... change that pixelated oversized sig picture.  Now, about the course... somewhere around the 1st and 2nd page break I conceited that it is not a "true" par 3 course.  However, now that you've pushed your extensive golf knowledge onto all of us I guess its time to prove you wrong. 

For all intensive purposes a true par 3 course does in fact have a par of 27.  Which makes Wildcat Creek not a "true" par 3 course but come on, anybody who's ever tee'd it up knows that a course layout like WC is closer to a par 3 course that a 9 hole course say with a par of 35.

Now comes the fun part... where you're wrong.  An executive course is in fact a par 3 course, you needn't look any further than Colbert Hills.  Don't tell me you're going to argue with Jim Colbert!  http://www.colberthills.com/page/64-1616.htm (http://www.colberthills.com/page/64-1616.htm) 

Regardless... tomato / toe maaa toe...  its a little track and calling it a par 3 course is the most accurate.  Now go back to playing Tiger Woods!   :D
I was going off of someone else's use of the word "executive." I had never heard of executive before. Regardless, it still is not a Par 3 course, no matter how close it is to one. And finally, the picture isn't pixilated for me, so I don't feel the need to change it. Thanks for your time.  :shy:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: chum1 on June 18, 2007, 06:53:36 AM
Let the record show that waks is the only one on the face of the planet that is opposed to describing Wildcat Creek as a par 3 course.  I think this matter is settled.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: FBWillie on June 18, 2007, 09:05:05 AM
... the picture isn't pixilated for me, so I don't feel the need to change it. Thanks for your time.  :shy:

I didn't realize people made signatures so that only themselves cared to see it...  What's the point of that?  Regardless, I see your pic pixaleted on my home computer, but normal on my work.  As soon as you clear your .temp internet files it will start to bother you as well.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 18, 2007, 06:50:51 PM
... the picture isn't pixilated for me, so I don't feel the need to change it. Thanks for your time.  :shy:

I didn't realize people made signatures so that only themselves cared to see it...  What's the point of that?  Regardless, I see your pic pixaleted on my home computer, but normal on my work.  As soon as you clear your .temp internet files it will start to bother you as well.
Tell ECN to fix it. He's the one that made the picture.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: ECN on June 18, 2007, 07:53:46 PM
mine is clear.

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h137/KingslyZissou/1-1a.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: willie83 on June 18, 2007, 09:28:22 PM
Mine is clear now that you posted it again. Thanks Chupa. :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: FBWillie on June 18, 2007, 11:28:09 PM
Wow, It's almost like waks is leaching ECN's photobucket bandwidth and someone, who has access to ECN's photobucket, could teach them a lesson by uploading a completely different picture with the same name as the previous...   Something like tubgirl?     :billypopcorn:

It all makes sense as to why it's been pixelated for the past week.

Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: ECN on June 19, 2007, 09:43:10 AM
i think a lot of peeps attach to my bandwidth.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 19, 2007, 06:33:06 PM
i think a lot of peeps attach to my bandwidth.
I'm not.
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: FBWillie on June 19, 2007, 09:25:22 PM
i think a lot of peeps attach to my bandwidth.
I'm not.

 :lol:

You're sig's properties said KingslyZissou in the photobucket address yesterday...   Now it's different...   hmmm....   
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 19, 2007, 09:30:49 PM
i think a lot of peeps attach to my bandwidth.
I'm not.

 :lol:

You're sig's properties said KingslyZissou in the photobucket address yesterday...   Now it's different...   hmmm....   
:peek:
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: ECN on June 19, 2007, 09:33:35 PM
i think a lot of peeps attach to my bandwidth.
I'm not.

 :lol:

You're sig's properties said KingslyZissou in the photobucket address yesterday...   Now it's different...   hmmm....   

what does it say now?
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: ECN on June 19, 2007, 09:34:08 PM
wabash_cannonball!! damn you
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: waks on June 19, 2007, 09:36:14 PM
wabash_cannonball!! damn you
Actually, it put an extra s in their on accident. It reads as "wasbash_cannonball."
Title: Re: Ready for this?
Post by: ECN on June 19, 2007, 09:37:20 PM
oh.

i dont understand how any of that works anyhow.

whats going on?