KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: ERA7777 on May 30, 2007, 09:45:57 AM

Title: Over/Under
Post by: ERA7777 on May 30, 2007, 09:45:57 AM
What would you set the over/under at for ppg next season for:

Hoskins

Beasley

Walker

I'd probably go w/ 14, 19, and 16.  Could be better though.
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: steve dave on May 30, 2007, 10:11:22 AM
14
eleventy-billion
38
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: WildCatzPhreak on May 30, 2007, 10:15:20 AM
I can see Mike going off on some poor noncon team for like 40-50.  I think he's going to be 20-23ish average ppg.  Hoskins at 14 sounds good.  Walker at 16-18.
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: StayOutOfTrees on May 30, 2007, 12:20:21 PM
Hoskins - 14

Beasley - 22

Walker - 17
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: SUPERKSUFAN on May 30, 2007, 12:23:41 PM
Hoskins - 14

Beasley - 22

Walker - 17


that looks good to me   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: waks on May 30, 2007, 01:05:50 PM
Hoskins - 27 ppg, 11 rpg

Beasley - 58 ppg, 22 rpg, 7 bpg

Walker - 42 ppg, 14 rpg

Pullen - A/TO ratio - 29/0, 13 spg

Sutton - 2ppg, 1 rpg
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: ScubaSteve on May 30, 2007, 01:06:20 PM
14
eleventy-billion
38

Or as my 6-year old says...

40-finity
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: snart on May 30, 2007, 01:35:33 PM
Hoskins - 12
Beasley - 19
Walker - 17
Young - 12
Pullen - 8
Sutton - 9
Stewart - 8
Brown - 6
Samuels - 5
Colon - 4
Patzwald - 1
Kent < 1
Merrriewether < 1
Gilbert < 1
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: snart on May 30, 2007, 01:41:22 PM
Wow!  That's over 101 points per game!  It's going to be a good year!
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: PowercatPosse on May 30, 2007, 01:44:06 PM
Beasley 18
Walker 15
Hoskins 14
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: snart on May 30, 2007, 01:46:59 PM
OK.  With an eye toward really these are my revised figures:

Hoskins - 10
Beasley - 18
Walker - 15
Young - 10
Pullen - 6
Sutton - 8
Stewart - 6
Brown - 4
Samuels - 3
Colon - 3
Patzwald - 1
Kent < 1
Merrriewether < 1
Gilbert < 1

That’s still over 84 points per game though!  It’s still going to be a good year...
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: frankencat on May 30, 2007, 02:20:53 PM
Walker will outscore Beasley

Write it down
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: BullHawkWheel on May 30, 2007, 02:23:30 PM
You guys will not average 6 points more than ku's team last year with a revised 3 point line.  You people are delusional. hope you have shooters because it is going to be zone zone and more zone thrown at you guys.  have fun with that.
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: SUPERKSUFAN on May 30, 2007, 02:26:47 PM
you remind me of the picture posted of Britt Spears....sad  :ku:
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: kimballcat on May 30, 2007, 02:36:15 PM
You guys will not average 6 points more than ku's team last year with a revised 3 point line.  You people are delusional. hope you have shooters because it is going to be zone zone and more zone thrown at you guys.  have fun with that.

 Revised 3 point line?  :ustupid:  You may want to do a little more research on when that rule will be implemented.
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: steve dave on May 30, 2007, 02:38:27 PM
You guys will not average 6 points more than ku's team last year with a revised 3 point line.  You people are delusional. hope you have shooters because it is going to be zone zone and more zone thrown at you guys.  have fun with that.

 Revised 3 point line?  :ustupid:  You may want to do a little more research on when that rule will be implemented.

Give him a break, he flunked out of ku. 
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: PowerCatNation on May 30, 2007, 02:50:26 PM
You guys will not average 6 points more than ku's team last year with a revised 3 point line.  You people are delusional. hope you have shooters because it is going to be zone zone and more zone thrown at you guys.  have fun with that.
Still living in the past huh, thats pretty sad
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: BullHawkWheel on May 30, 2007, 03:10:21 PM
Wow misread that, thought it started next year, not in 08.  Still, you guys will not average more than 77 a game. I gaurantee you that ku's leading scorer will average more than your leading scorer.
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: ksutwisted on May 30, 2007, 03:14:25 PM
My dad can beat up your dad.....

run home now.
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: doom on May 30, 2007, 03:16:24 PM
Wow misread that, thought it started next year, not in 08.  Still, you guys will not average more than 77 a game. I gaurantee you that ku's leading scorer will average more than your leading scorer.

Horseballs.
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: WildCatzPhreak on May 30, 2007, 03:21:03 PM
Wow misread that, thought it started next year, not in 08.  Still, you guys will not average more than 77 a game. I gaurantee you that ku's leading scorer will average more than your leading scorer.

Horseballs.

Yeah, that's a pretty bold guaruntee considering ku's leading scorer switches between four people regularly(Rush, Chalmers, Arthur, Collins) and us bringing Beasley in.
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: waks on May 30, 2007, 03:24:40 PM
Wow misread that, thought it started next year, not in 08.  Still, you guys will not average more than 77 a game. I gaurantee you that ku's leading scorer will average more than your leading scorer.

Horseballs.

Yeah, that's a pretty bold guaruntee considering ku's leading scorer switches between four people regularly(Rush, Chalmers, Arthur, Collins) and us bringing Beasley in.
Not to mention, we had two guys average more than their leading scorer did last year. Cartier (17.1) and Hoskins (14.5) both averaged more than Rush (13.8).
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: snart on May 30, 2007, 03:29:00 PM
Quote
Not to mention, we had two guys average more than their leading scorer did last year.

Don’t confuse the Bong with either statistics or reality because he is too %$#@! stupid for statistics and too delusional for reality...
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: steve dave on May 30, 2007, 03:42:51 PM
Quote
Not to mention, we had two guys average more than their leading scorer did last year.

Don’t confuse the Bong with either statistics or reality because he is too %$#@! stupid for statistics and too delusional for reality...

Oh well, McDonalds probably doesn't even require a GED.
Title: Re: Over/Under
Post by: ERA7777 on May 30, 2007, 03:56:02 PM
I'll go ahead and guarantee that ku averages more missed layups and more handchecks than every team in the big 12.  Possibly the big 12 combined.  Those dirty fu*ks  :adored:

Oh, and it might be hard for anyone on ku's roster to average more points than next year's POY. :koolaid:

Thank you, that is all.