KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: catdude33 on April 06, 2007, 11:41:13 AM

Title: Short Term vs. Long Term
Post by: catdude33 on April 06, 2007, 11:41:13 AM
JMO, but &@#% long term.  Thinking long term has gotten us nowhere in the last 20 years.  We need to keep this recruiting class intact by retaining FM and DH.  We can be awesome for one year, and I can get season tickets one more time and watch Beasley, Walker, Sutton, Hoskins, etc. dominate.  We can end that &@#%ing streak at the Bram, make the sweet 16+, and then go back to sucking and I won't care.  Just give me next year.  That is all I ask. 
Title: Re: Short Term vs. Long Term
Post by: KSUGRAD2001 on April 06, 2007, 11:49:44 AM
This is also the best long term solution!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   You would be crazy to think that this recruiting class would not help KSU gain national attention.  It is not the coaches, it is the players!!  KSU will be a more appealing job if they go to the elite eight a couple years in a row.  It would be easier for K-state to get a better coach later on if Martin and Hill leave on down the road.  If we lose these recruits where in the hell would we be?