Author Topic: 2013 Recruiting Thread (Read 272387 times)

Wackycat08 · « **Reply #3500 on:** June 14, 2013, 02:40:14 PM »

JFC, we could easily sell him playing time. Don't eff this up, Bruce!

pvegs · « **Reply #3501 on:** June 14, 2013, 04:51:31 PM »

Oregon makes sense, too. They don't have a lot coming back and had success with Kazemi as a one year player last season.

Mixed-Nutz · « **Reply #3502 on:** June 18, 2013, 07:17:39 PM »

Quote

@GoodmanESPN: Oregon landed commitment from ex-Iowa St. signee Richard Amardi, source told ESPN. 6-8 forward played at Indian Hills. Has one year to play.

scottwildcat · « **Reply #3503 on:** June 18, 2013, 07:31:43 PM »

lol eff

wabash909 · « **Reply #3504 on:** June 18, 2013, 09:28:04 PM »

Wow, these guys are terrible.

CNS · « **Reply #3505 on:** June 18, 2013, 09:30:12 PM »

Is it officially burnt down? No?

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2

rick daris · « **Reply #3506 on:** June 18, 2013, 09:31:37 PM »

Quote from: CNS on June 18, 2013, 09:30:12 PM

Is it officially burnt down? No?

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2

we haven't seen 5-6 years of bruce as a coach, so no. sorry cns.

Tobias · « **Reply #3507 on:** June 18, 2013, 09:34:42 PM »

like, you can put your #gottlieb4ksu headbands in the attic, but keep them kinda by the door

wabash909 · « **Reply #3508 on:** June 18, 2013, 09:55:11 PM »

The fact that they failed to even get a visit is comical.

PIPE · « **Reply #3509 on:** **Today** at 10:02:16 AM »

Man, we can't even pick up other teams' trash.......Now, I don't mean to bag on this fellow, but any player we are trying to get for next year this late who hasn't signed w/ anyone, I consider trash.

Maybe Currie should be lead recruiting when it is late in the game, since he likes digging through the trash

Man, I am in a bad mood today.....

rick daris · « **Reply #3510 on:** **Today** at 10:05:51 AM »

he's the one person on iowa states team that they decided they no longer wanted and not only did we want him, we couldn't get him. just let that sink in for a bit.

Mixed-Nutz · « **Reply #3511 on:** **Today** at 11:03:20 AM »

I don't know why anybody would thinks loosing a JUCO recruit that has one year to play is a big deal. The problem wasn't going to be solved by Amardi.

Panjandrum · « **Reply #3512 on:** **Today** at 11:21:03 AM »

Quote from: rick daris on Today at 10:05:51 AM

he's the one person on iowa states team that they decided they no longer wanted and not only did we want him, we couldn't get him. just let that sink in for a bit.

CNS · « **Reply #3513 on:** **Today** at 11:22:59 AM »

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on Today at 11:03:20 AM

I don't know why anybody would thinks loosing a JUCO recruit that has one year to play is a big deal. The problem wasn't going to be solved by Amardi.

Quote from: rick daris on Today at 10:05:51 AM

he's the one person on iowa states team that they decided they no longer wanted and not only did we want him, we couldn't get him. just let that sink in for a bit.

kslimlb3 · « **Reply #3514 on:** **Today** at 11:34:07 AM »

Quote from: rick daris on Today at 10:05:51 AM

he's the one person on iowa states team that they decided they no longer wanted and not only did we want him, we couldn't get him. just let that sink in for a bit.

"it hurts, it hurts bad"-steve zissou

wabash909 · « **Reply #3515 on:** **Today** at 12:00:52 PM »

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on Today at 11:03:20 AM

I don't know why anybody would thinks loosing a JUCO recruit that has one year to play is a big deal. The problem wasn't going to be solved by Amardi.

It's a big deal because we don't have any big men on our roster other than 6'-6" Thomas Gipson.

But, yes, as long as we're fine with assembling a roster to play in the Big XII that doesn't include a big man or any big man depth in 2013, then this isn't really a big deal.

emawblast · « **Reply #3516 on:** **Today** at 12:02:21 PM »

we have DJ

CNS · « **Reply #3517 on:** **Today** at 12:03:14 PM »

Guys, it has noting to do with the individual player or his position. It has to do with the fact that we are in the position of need we are in, that it is as late in the offseason as it is, and that even trash doesn't want to come here.

Quit focusing on the individual and their individual ability. It's bigger than that.

Mixed-Nutz · « **Reply #3518 on:** **Today** at 12:49:53 PM »

Quote from: wabash909 on Today at 12:00:52 PM

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on Today at 11:03:20 AM
I don't know why anybody would thinks loosing a JUCO recruit that has one year to play is a big deal. The problem wasn't going to be solved by Amardi.

It's a big deal because we don't have any big men on our roster other than 6'-6" Thomas Gipson.

But, yes, as long as we're fine with assembling a roster to play in the Big XII that doesn't include a big man or any big man depth in 2013, then this isn't really a big deal.

With or with out Amardi we are going to have to play 4 a guard system. I don't think Amardi was going to be better than a DJ with marginal improvements. The lack of big depth was created along time ago before Fincher didn't qualify or before we didn't land a JUCO big. Weber really needed Diaz to be better or needed very good big in the 2012 class. Neither he had much control over. He could of also landed an elite big this year, but we all know that wasn't going to happen.

salcat · « **Reply #3519 on:** **Today** at 01:18:33 PM »

Nkosi Ali??? Hahaha