Author Topic: _FANalysis: K-State QBs  (Read 7329 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ksu_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27020
    • View Profile
_FANalysis: K-State QBs
« on: November 04, 2013, 10:30:19 PM »
http://goEMAW.com/blog/?p=3193

Do with this what you wish.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2013, 10:36:37 PM »
I can't believe you went to all that trouble just to stay on the fence. Also, you say the team will be better if ONE of them becomes the guy. But if Waters is ever the guy, we're mumped, and #burnitdown.

Seriously: Sams. #LIFE. That is the correct answer.

Offline ksu_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27020
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2013, 10:41:48 PM »
I can't believe you went to all that trouble just to stay on the fence. Also, you say the team will be better if ONE of them becomes the guy. But if Waters is ever the guy, we're mumped, and #burnitdown.

Seriously: Sams. #LIFE. That is the correct answer.

I don't know, this version seems pretty boring and not very analytical to me: http://goEMAW.com/blog/?p=3220

Offline libliblibliblibliblib

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40414
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2013, 10:42:52 PM »
I don't know, this version seems pretty boring and not very analytical to me: http://goEMAW.com/blog/?p=3220

straight to the bottom  :D
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

I think.you.are deep down.a.trans cowboy gravy eater.

Offline stunted

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2237
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2013, 10:44:08 PM »
Wow. The big plays isnt even close.

The other things are too close and can be reasoned by variance.

30 drives each is nothing, especially only a 4 td difference. I'll run some standard deviation numbers later but I can already tell its a crapshoot so far.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2013, 10:45:40 PM »
I can't believe you went to all that trouble just to stay on the fence. Also, you say the team will be better if ONE of them becomes the guy. But if Waters is ever the guy, we're mumped, and #burnitdown.

Seriously: Sams. #LIFE. That is the correct answer.

I don't know, this version seems pretty boring and not very analytical to me: http://goEMAW.com/blog/?p=3220

Way better.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 35635
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2013, 10:56:52 PM »
Looks like Waters is benefiting from sharing drives w/ Sams. (Sams-only drives have higher YPP and PPD). And ZERO three and outs for Sams. ZERO!

Conclusion, you're an idiot if you don't think Sams should be the full time QB. Good grief.

Offline ksu_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27020
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2013, 10:58:47 PM »
Looks like Waters is benefiting from sharing drives w/ Sams. (Sams-only drives have higher YPP and PPD). And ZERO three and outs for Sams. ZERO!

I think they've benefited from each other.

Offline libliblibliblibliblib

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40414
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2013, 11:04:33 PM »
Looks like Waters is benefiting from sharing drives w/ Sams. (Sams-only drives have higher YPP and PPD). And ZERO three and outs for Sams. ZERO!

Conclusion, you're an idiot if you don't think Sams should be the full time QB. Good grief.

 :eek:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

I think.you.are deep down.a.trans cowboy gravy eater.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 35635
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2013, 11:06:43 PM »
Also, when you factor in time of possession (key for our week defense) and the fact that Sams is younger the choice is just more clear.

Offline The Whale

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 954
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2013, 11:22:52 PM »
#ZERO3O vs. #H3O

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2013, 11:31:50 PM »
Looks like Waters is benefiting from sharing drives w/ Sams. (Sams-only drives have higher YPP and PPD). And ZERO three and outs for Sams. ZERO!

I think they've benefited from each other.

Sams benefits from his own superior abilities, not from anything Carson Coff--er, Jake Waters--does.

Offline eastcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2387
  • We in here bruhh!
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2013, 11:44:23 PM »
Looks like Waters is benefiting from sharing drives w/ Sams. (Sams-only drives have higher YPP and PPD). And ZERO three and outs for Sams. ZERO!

I think they've benefited from each other.

Sams benefits from his own superior abilities, not from anything Carson Coff--er, Jake Waters--does.

Pretty sure Sams has come in on goal-go situations after Water's drives 3 or 4 times in the last 2 weeks. 1 notable one was Rose's TD last week.
Quote from: Kim Carnes
Jake Waters and Will Spradling give us the best chance to win. Daniel Sams can't throw and Jevon Thomas isn't even smart enough to qualify, let alone learn HCBW's offense.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13294
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #13 on: November 05, 2013, 05:56:41 AM »
Sams.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 61324
  • SP? all of that--->
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #14 on: November 05, 2013, 06:14:40 AM »
Good stuff _FAN. Thanks.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #15 on: November 05, 2013, 06:46:27 AM »
nice job _Fan.  It's too close to call for this cat fan.


Offline ksu_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27020
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #16 on: November 05, 2013, 07:22:00 AM »
nice job _Fan.  It's too close to call for this cat fan.



:cheers:


Offline ksupamplemousse

  • formerly ksudeuce
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4261
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #17 on: November 05, 2013, 07:33:25 AM »
"I call it emotionally drunk..." - oscar Weber

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 61324
  • SP? all of that--->
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #18 on: November 05, 2013, 07:37:44 AM »

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #19 on: November 05, 2013, 08:11:35 AM »
_FAN-
Honest question, what percent of Sams' drives occurred without the two biggest playmakers at WR? Infer what you want, but I think you could look at your sheets and answer that pretty quickly. I am just curious.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 61324
  • SP? all of that--->
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #20 on: November 05, 2013, 08:12:48 AM »
_FAN-
Honest question, what percent of Sams' drives occurred without the two biggest playmakers at WR? Infer what you want, but I think you could look at your sheets and answer that pretty quickly. I am just curious.

should note Waters drives without them too. it's not just sams that was handicapped by missing the two playmakers.

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #21 on: November 05, 2013, 08:14:20 AM »
_FAN-
Honest question, what percent of Sams' drives occurred without the two biggest playmakers at WR? Infer what you want, but I think you could look at your sheets and answer that pretty quickly. I am just curious.

should note Waters drives without them too. it's not just sams that was handicapped by missing the two playmakers.
Agreed.

Offline ksu_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27020
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #22 on: November 05, 2013, 08:14:49 AM »
_FAN-
Honest question, what percent of Sams' drives occurred without the two biggest playmakers at WR? Infer what you want, but I think you could look at your sheets and answer that pretty quickly. I am just curious.

65% for Sams and 21% for Waters.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 61324
  • SP? all of that--->
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #23 on: November 05, 2013, 08:15:33 AM »
_FAN-
Honest question, what percent of Sams' drives occurred without the two biggest playmakers at WR? Infer what you want, but I think you could look at your sheets and answer that pretty quickly. I am just curious.

65% for Sams and 21% for Waters.

wow

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5133
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis: K-State QBs
« Reply #24 on: November 05, 2013, 08:16:33 AM »
i lean towards sams but have accepted the two qb thing for two reasons. 1. they are both running the ball 10+ times a game. one of them will get hurt at some point and it will be sad but the football team won't be as mumped as it would be otherwise. 2. it's a way to teach both of them that turning the ball over is the worst thing that a human can do during their time on this planet.

those aren't great reasons, but i'm rationalizing so that i'm not so upset about our guy's playing time.