Late _FANalysis: QB controversy?

[kso_FAN]

http://goEMAW.com/blog/?p=2956

[_33]

I've always known that Sams should be the guy, but it's nice to see some irrefutable stats back it up.  Thank you _FAN.

[CNS]

I straight to bottom'ed and felt justified in my stance.

Thanks FAN!

[MadCat]

Very Samsteresting if true.

[IPA4Me]

Thanks for the breakdown.

[Trim]

T-Y.

Prior to staight-to-the-bottom'n, I control-F'd "dink."

[kso_FAN]

T-Y.

Prior to staight-to-the-bottom'n, I control-F'd "dink."

[steve dave]

Nice job fan.

[Gooch]

I hope the Mods are paying _Fan appropriately so he does not get lured away by the competition.

[danholke]

Nice breakdown, thanks for the analysis. I would even compare Jake's best 7 drives to Daniel's only 7, and would not be surprised if they are still in favor of Sams. However, there is so much potential to have them both involved in drives to confuse the defense - reverses/sweeps/screen passes to Sams, or pitch to Waters for a pass, double pass plays, etc.

[_33]

However, there is so much potential to have them both involved in drives to confuse the defense - reverses/sweeps/screen passes to Sams, or pitch to Waters for a pass, double pass plays, etc.

The only problem I can potentially see with these is that we will never, ever do any of them.

[danholke]

However, there is so much potential to have them both involved in drives to confuse the defense - reverses/sweeps/screen passes to Sams, or pitch to Waters for a pass, double pass plays, etc.

The only problem I can potentially see with these is that we will never, ever do any of them.

"So you're telling me there's a chance..."
-Dumb & Dumber
Or was that #hcrp?

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

I get much more excited for the brutha package, than the honkey package.