I don't think they're evil and my post farther up the thread wasn't really scientific in nature. Plants need CO2, warmer climates have longer growing seasons1, 3rd world countries will get no where on the back of alternative energy.
I've also never been a denier2 I am just smart enough to understand that the science is not settled3, and that politcal agendas are driving warmest propagandist science, thus rendering it in need of questioning every step of the way.
1. Your original statement had nothing to do with growing seasons, but rather posited that it is evolutionarily easier to adapt to warmer climates as opposed to colder climates, which in your words, meant "certain death". (Also, not true).
2. You're right. I purposely misrepresented your position on the issue because your language intimated that you thought an abundance of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and a warming climate was actually a positive effect, which is an even stupider position to have than being a denier. I was actually trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. Thank you for bringing that lapse in judgement to my attention.
3. Through my arguments, I think I've highlighted that you don't understand the science. So how you be smart enough to know that the science isn't settled?