51
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: LOL TRUMP
« on: June 08, 2017, 01:35:17 PM ».@SarahHuckabee: 'The president is not a liar' https://t.co/3KYBTGvteX pic.twitter.com/O21zTjU3QY
— POLITICO (@politico) June 8, 2017
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
52
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Trump owns Russia
« on: June 07, 2017, 06:47:45 PM »From Comey. Pretty amazing--POTUS conceding his aides may have been guilty of collusion with hostile foreign power. pic.twitter.com/GHuRgNJGbV
— Max Boot (@MaxBoot) June 7, 2017
Jan 26-Yates warns WH re Flynn. Next day, Trump demands loyalty from Comey.
— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) June 7, 2017
Feb 13-Flynn is fired. Next day, Trump asks Comey to drop case.
53
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Trump owns Russia
« on: June 07, 2017, 08:53:08 AM »There's nothing new under the sun.
We've seen the Flynn transcripts, he did nothing wrong.
54
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Trump owns Russia
« on: June 06, 2017, 09:20:36 PM »Quote
The nation’s top intelligence official told associates in March that President Trump asked him if he could intervene with then-FBI Director James B. Comey to get the bureau to back off its focus on former national security adviser Michael Flynn in its Russia probe, according to officials.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/top-intelligence-official-told-associates-trump-asked-him-if-he-could-intervene-with-comey-to-get-fbi-to-back-off-flynn/2017/06/06/cc879f14-4ace-11e7-9669-250d0b15f83b_story.html
55
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency
« on: June 06, 2017, 07:28:14 PM »MORE: Sources say Trump lashed out repeatedly at Sessions in private meetings, blaming his recusal for expansion of Russian investigation.
— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) June 6, 2017
56
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency
« on: June 06, 2017, 07:26:57 PM »JUST IN: Attorney General Jeff Sessions suggested he could resign amid rising tension with President Trump https://t.co/m6GCP8Eupu pic.twitter.com/BTI9WkehzM
— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) June 6, 2017
57
character arcs of the jungle book and other stuff / Re: Official Better Call Saul thread
« on: June 05, 2017, 11:00:20 PM »
Nacho swapping Hector's pills. 
58
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency
« on: June 05, 2017, 06:19:09 PM »The acting US ambassador to China resigned over Trump's decision to withdraw from Paris agreement, sources tell CNN https://t.co/CTsI6W2Ukv pic.twitter.com/TWhbAL3X4g
— CNN (@CNN) June 5, 2017
59
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Trump and Russia
« on: June 05, 2017, 04:04:57 PM »Man if only Trump would just pull an Obama and cite Executive Privilege.
Are you trying to argue that Trump is dumber than Obama?
60
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: LOL TRUMP
« on: June 05, 2017, 03:18:51 PM »President Trump just held a signing. He had nothing to sign https://t.co/7KWJX8oDDK
— TIME (@TIME) June 5, 2017
61
Womens Collegiate Soccer And Royals Only / Re: Official NBA Thread
« on: June 04, 2017, 09:12:55 PM »
When I see the people in courtside seats at these Golden State games, I always think of how absurdly wealthy they must be.
62
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency
« on: June 04, 2017, 08:59:17 PM »My god. @POTUS has no idea that the goal of terrorists is to instill a level of fear in the public disproportionate to the actual threat. https://t.co/IgDA4iaEvP
— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) June 4, 2017
At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and Mayor of London says there is "no reason to be alarmed!"
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 4, 2017
63
Kstate cat football: There is Nothing Better on the Earth / Re: Corey Sutton
« on: June 04, 2017, 02:31:58 PM »
crap! That was the only one I could think of.
64
Kstate cat football: There is Nothing Better on the Earth / Re: Corey Sutton
« on: June 04, 2017, 02:21:07 PM »
Allan Evridge!
65
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency
« on: June 04, 2017, 08:29:57 AM »1/ This tweet -from the official White House account- is false. 1)It is not a slush fund. 2)The fund was not created by the Paris Agreement. https://t.co/fHLiEOm2Hr
— ProPublica (@ProPublica) June 3, 2017
The Paris Accord created a U.N. slush fund: https://t.co/e4eLHA1Di8 pic.twitter.com/gs7NizPhEC
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 3, 2017
66
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« on: June 03, 2017, 08:59:48 PM »Does anyone think that staying committed to the agreement was bad? Why? What's the rationale for leaving?
If people want to buy certain kinds of products over others, for whatever reason, why should amyone care? That's their business.
What's so special about today's climate? What if tomorrow's is better?
So, we should reverse course on previous decisions on the basis that we might like the alternative better? Wouldn't it follow that we should continually be reversing ourselves? Because there are continually alternatives we might like better? I don't think this is a very practical suggestion.
Or..... we could stop pretending we can really control the thermostat if only we spend enough money and raise the price of energy enough. I know this is difficult to grasp - but one alternative is to just live our lives.
So, it makes you feel good not to pursue what you believe to be a fruitless endeavor. It makes other people feel good to pursue what they believe is not a fruitless endeavor. What is the reason to exit the agreement?
So now we're down to acknowledging this is nothing more than liberal butthurt feelings. Progress!!!
I'd put it this way. You say that all there is on the other side is liberal butthurt. Show me that you've got more than conservative butthurt on your side.
67
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« on: June 03, 2017, 08:37:35 PM »Does anyone think that staying committed to the agreement was bad? Why? What's the rationale for leaving?
If people want to buy certain kinds of products over others, for whatever reason, why should amyone care? That's their business.
What's so special about today's climate? What if tomorrow's is better?
So, we should reverse course on previous decisions on the basis that we might like the alternative better? Wouldn't it follow that we should continually be reversing ourselves? Because there are continually alternatives we might like better? I don't think this is a very practical suggestion.
Or..... we could stop pretending we can really control the thermostat if only we spend enough money and raise the price of energy enough. I know this is difficult to grasp - but one alternative is to just live our lives.
So, it makes you feel good not to pursue what you believe to be a fruitless endeavor. It makes other people feel good to pursue what they believe is not a fruitless endeavor. What is the reason to exit the agreement?
The juice isn't worth the squeeze.
You think staying in vs. exiting can be quantified? I don't.
Then how can we make any judgements for or against?
Is there value in being a part of the team rather than pissing off everyone else on the team? What sorts of values are there in exiting the agreement?
68
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« on: June 03, 2017, 07:19:51 PM »Does anyone think that staying committed to the agreement was bad? Why? What's the rationale for leaving?
If people want to buy certain kinds of products over others, for whatever reason, why should amyone care? That's their business.
What's so special about today's climate? What if tomorrow's is better?
So, we should reverse course on previous decisions on the basis that we might like the alternative better? Wouldn't it follow that we should continually be reversing ourselves? Because there are continually alternatives we might like better? I don't think this is a very practical suggestion.
Or..... we could stop pretending we can really control the thermostat if only we spend enough money and raise the price of energy enough. I know this is difficult to grasp - but one alternative is to just live our lives.
So, it makes you feel good not to pursue what you believe to be a fruitless endeavor. It makes other people feel good to pursue what they believe is not a fruitless endeavor. What is the reason to exit the agreement?
The juice isn't worth the squeeze.
You think staying in vs. exiting can be quantified? I don't.
69
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« on: June 03, 2017, 04:29:37 PM »Does anyone think that staying committed to the agreement was bad? Why? What's the rationale for leaving?
If people want to buy certain kinds of products over others, for whatever reason, why should amyone care? That's their business.
What's so special about today's climate? What if tomorrow's is better?
So, we should reverse course on previous decisions on the basis that we might like the alternative better? Wouldn't it follow that we should continually be reversing ourselves? Because there are continually alternatives we might like better? I don't think this is a very practical suggestion.
Or..... we could stop pretending we can really control the thermostat if only we spend enough money and raise the price of energy enough. I know this is difficult to grasp - but one alternative is to just live our lives.
So, it makes you feel good not to pursue what you believe to be a fruitless endeavor. It makes other people feel good to pursue what they believe is not a fruitless endeavor. What is the reason to exit the agreement?
70
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« on: June 03, 2017, 02:59:23 PM »Does anyone think that staying committed to the agreement was bad? Why? What's the rationale for leaving?
If people want to buy certain kinds of products over others, for whatever reason, why should amyone care? That's their business.
What's so special about today's climate? What if tomorrow's is better?
So, we should reverse course on previous decisions on the basis that we might like the alternative better? Wouldn't it follow that we should continually be reversing ourselves? Because there are continually alternatives we might like better? I don't think this is a very practical suggestion.
71
character arcs of the jungle book and other stuff / Re: Dogs
« on: June 03, 2017, 12:40:06 PM »
Oh, man. Haha.
72
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« on: June 03, 2017, 10:09:13 AM »
Does anyone think that staying committed to the agreement was bad? Why? What's the rationale for leaving?
If people want to buy certain kinds of products over others, for whatever reason, why should amyone care? That's their business.
If people want to buy certain kinds of products over others, for whatever reason, why should amyone care? That's their business.
73
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: LOL TRUMP
« on: June 02, 2017, 07:07:02 PM »Quote
President Donald Trump is still looking for a new FBI director more than three weeks after he fired James Comey
...
While the department has compiled a long list of candidates for the White House, there has been no “clear framework or logic for who was interviewed and why,” said one of the sources.
Another of the three sources described the process as chaotic and said that in one interview, Trump spoke mostly about himself and seemed distracted.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSKBN18T2S8
74
character arcs of the jungle book and other stuff / Re: Joint Checking Accounts
« on: June 02, 2017, 06:13:25 PM »
I wonder what she spent that much money on.
75
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Trump and Russia
« on: June 02, 2017, 03:50:49 PM »🔥WOW🔥
— Dr. Dena Grayson (@DrDenaGrayson) June 2, 2017
Kush has $1.2billion due in 2yrs on NYC tower w/o enough rent $$👉🏼met Gorkov #Russia🇷🇺bank under sanctions‼️https://t.co/oQNLKptPVw