Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - sys

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 1218
I'm a bit confused by this because it's equating a 30+ year old memory of something with a 30+ year old non-memory of something.  Of course Kav could not remember details from that long ago because he was drunk.  He also may just not have retained that information for any number of reasons.  But if you're acting like that is an argument against his credibility, I don't get it.  No matter what his reason for not remembering (drunk, head trauma, or the event never actually occurred), the denial would still be credible absent evidence to the contrary.  That's why anyone who actually cares about discerning the truth here is going to be focused on the account of the person who alleges the event occurred.

the probability of a person's 30 year old memory being roughly accurate, while far from 100%, is much greater than the probability that any specific event from 30 years ago would be retained in memory.  therefore, assuming neither party is lying, the person asserting the memory is more likely to be rendering an accurate recounting than the person asserting that because they do not recall the event, it didn't occur.

I never said anything about the high legal burden to prove perjury.  I said if it takes a complicated explanation to explain how someone was lying, you've got a weak case for it.

even odder then, since the explanation for multiple cases is that he said x and x isn't true.

no, I don't think there is anything unjust about it.

i don't think this requires anything more.

i wonder how he decided which one is a lying slut and which one has her silly little head all mixed up.

I did not realize how much republicans liked rapists before this kavanaugh business

about three more weeks of them calling college white women lying whores would be ideal.

lol ok

I’ve posted yours, you post mine.

i don't know what i've mine you've posted.

if you're asking why i don't believe that you are impartial it's because as soon as a woman discusses her memories of kav, you're all "actually, false memories are surprisingly common, ..."  but you've not mentioned so much as a caveat as to the likelihood that a perpetually drunk man would recall any of his specific drunken escapades 30 years later and what that suggests regarding the credibility of kav's denials.  and because when anyone mentions his frequent lies, you jump in with "actually, it's surprisingly difficult to convict of perjury, ..."  and most of all because you argue that it is appropriate to prevent investigation of the women's allegations by nonpartisan, professional investigators.

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Trump owns Russia
« on: September 24, 2018, 10:52:40 AM »
oh, the veterans guy.  that's who it was.

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Trump owns Russia
« on: September 24, 2018, 10:51:49 AM »
sounds like the wh is trying to get out front with a resignation story, hoping to at least muddy the waters.  didn't they do the exact same thing once before?  i can't recall the name, though.

Yes of course, I will grant that if there is any reason to deny a republican nominee other than "blood for blood" you are going to go with that.

you're not even pretending to impartiality anymore.  why are you so hung up this rapist?

That's not what you said last time with Gorsuch :dunno:

yep, i thought they should have taken a righteous position on gorsuch to highlight the garland travesty.  it's possible i was wrong about that, but it was my thought at the time.

you'll notice i didn't post anything about fighting kavanaugh until he was already a sinking ship. 

And you will support Democrats doing everything they can to obstruct confirmation of that nominee.

i support them fighting kavanaugh because it advantages democrats in the midterms.  that's a win.  fighting a more popular nominee would be a loss.

The court is what Republicans value the most tho (I think cause activist judges hate abortion). Short term sacrifice for long term no babykillin'.

they're not going to nominate some libtard when they pull kavanaugh.  the replacement will rule the same way on every case.

this dude is mumped.  if the admin is too stupid to figure it out, mcconnell will force the issue.  he's not going to risk his majority for this fuckface.

keep in mind that sys was fantasizing about some Mormon CIA agent winning a state or two in 2016.

hmm, tagteaming with 'ophe to demonstrate the problems with relying on memory?

Kansas State Basketball / Re: 2019 Recruiting Thread
« on: September 23, 2018, 12:06:59 AM »
cal is THE university of california at berkeley, you idiots.

Kansas State Football / Re: Week 4 games thread of the week
« on: September 22, 2018, 10:48:57 PM »
I'm enjoying the Stanford-Oregon game

eff ya, i, cal, am.

Kansas State Football / Re: Well...
« on: September 22, 2018, 09:50:00 PM »
We need to get a new coaching staff and start recruiting.

except sean, obviously.

turn out is very hard to model, true.

It’s kind of amazing you still don’t realize how important SCOTUS justices are to Republicans. Even lady college ones.

you can take 30% for granted, but 30% also doesn't get you crap.

They sign with a smile on their face, believing in the bottom of the their heart that it will some other women, bad women who probably deserve it.

i do not think she will sign.  but regardless, a competent admin would not have put it in chance.

Kansas State Football / Re: Week 4 games thread of the week
« on: September 22, 2018, 08:58:01 PM »
Don't look now but la tech is making this interesting

jokes on you, chingon, i will be looking as soon as ou-army permits.

You can't possibly think she's going to win or even come within single digits of winning.

i have money down on beto losing and davids winning.

They'll reliably vote pub when the time comes.

think of it good old college white male about to close the deal with college white female - "we are your sons, husbands and fathers, all that we have, we will share with you, cherished rib of our own body."  and right as college white female is about to sign the dotted line... "but, we get to rape you."

Which demographic are you talking about?

college white women.

a lesbian indian is polling ahead of an incumbent pub named after a town in central kansas in ks-3 and you dudes are skipping down memory lane whistling maga.

neither of you have the faintest idea of what you're talking about, so i forgive you.

Kansas State Football / Re: Week 4 games thread of the week
« on: September 22, 2018, 08:23:46 PM »
this ou-army game has grabbed my attention.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 1218