Author Topic: gdp  (Read 3490 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85326
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
gdp
« on: August 13, 2014, 12:59:29 PM »
the left is lucky



(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: gdp
« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2014, 01:14:30 PM »
I bet a lot of ugly people are sharing this on Facebook today.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36668
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #2 on: August 13, 2014, 01:43:08 PM »
If I am reading this correctly, the GDP under Obama's first term, as the country entered it's second worst economic down turn ever, is just slightly under what the 'Pub avg is?

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #3 on: August 13, 2014, 01:48:13 PM »
That's a cute chart.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37093
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #4 on: August 13, 2014, 01:53:36 PM »
Looks like the 3 worst presidents since WW2 have been Bush, Bush, and Obama.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30397
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #5 on: August 13, 2014, 02:00:04 PM »
Looks like Truman dropped the bomb more than once...heeeyyooo
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7634
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #6 on: August 13, 2014, 02:09:32 PM »
Is it worth noting that the GDP includes government spending? Or, that the national debt has increased by $7 trillion since 2008?

Date           US Real GDP
Jun 30, 2014    15.99 trillion
Dec 31, 2013    15.92 trillion
Dec 31, 2012    15.43 trillion
Dec 31, 2011    15.19 trillion
Dec 31, 2010    14.94 trillion
Dec 31, 2009    14.54 trillion
Dec 31, 2008    14.58 trillion

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: gdp
« Reply #7 on: August 13, 2014, 02:23:51 PM »
"Average Annualized GDP Growth by Presidential Term"

Average Annualized?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16749
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #8 on: August 13, 2014, 02:34:28 PM »
man, what if Reagan had been able to just keep doing his thing

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #9 on: August 13, 2014, 02:48:05 PM »
Is it worth noting that the GDP includes government spending? Or, that the national debt has increased by $7 trillion since 2008?

Yeah, that probably is worth noting. Of course, it's probably also worth noting that government spending is more a product of Congress - not the Presidency, and that spending is a product of programs implemented over a number of years and cannot be directly tied to any one particular Congress. So.... this chart appears to be worthless. :facepalm:
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85326
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #10 on: August 13, 2014, 03:07:55 PM »
swing and a miss

Quote
Table 6
Shocks and the DR-Gap
Shock Sample Period
R2
DR - Gap
Total Explained
1 Oil Shocks (Hamilton) 1949:Q2-2013:Q1 0.13 1.80 (0.64) 0.50 (0.10)
2 Oil Shocks (Killian) 1972:Q3 - 2004:Q3 0.05 0.82 (0.76) 0.21 (0.19)
3 TFP Utilization Adj (Fernald) 1949:Q2 - 2013:Q1 0.26 1.80 (0.64) 0.42 (0.11)
4 TFP Utilization Adj (Annual 1949 – 2012 0.14 1.79 (0.58) 0.46 (0.13)
5 Labor Productivity (SVAR, Gali) 1950:Q3 – 2013:Q1 0.09 1.73 (0.61) 0.21 (0.07)
6 Defense Spending (Ramey) 1949:Q2 - 2012.Q3 0.03 1.87 (0.64) 0.20 (0.05)
7 Defense Spending (Fisher-Peters) 1949:Q2 - 2008:Q4 0.00 2.13 (0.65) 0.02 (0.06)
8 International (GDP Growth Europe) 1962:Q4 – 2012:Q3 0.16 1.33 (0.63) 0.19 (0.05)
9 Taxes (Romer and Romer) 1949:Q2 - 2007:Q4 0.00 1.97 (0.64) 0.01 (0.06)
10 Taxes (Mertens and Ravn) 1951:Q3 - 2006:Q4 -0.05 1.68 (0.61) ?0.03 (0.11)
11 Government Spending (SVAR) 1952:Q3 - 2006:Q4 0.04 1.72 (0.63) 0.06 (0.02)
12 Monetary Policy (Romer and Romer) 1970:Q3 - 1996:Q4 0.20 0.47 (0.95) ?0.09 (0.17)
13 Monetary Policy SVAR (Sims and Zha) 1961:Q4 - 2003:Q1 0.16 1.50 (0.70) 0.05 (0.13)
14 Monetary Policy SVAR (Cholesky) 1957:Q2 - 2008.Q4 0.06 1.78 (0.64) ?0.23 (0.12)
15 Baa-Aaa Spread 1949:Q4 – 2013:Q1 0.06 1.85 (0.65) 0.21 (0.13)
16 EBP Spread (Gilchrist-Zakrajšek) 1975:Q3 – 2012:Q4 0.04 0.66 (0.69) 0.33 (026)
17 Ted Spread 1973:Q3 – 2013:Q1 0.22 0.93 (0.69) ?0.02 (0.03)
18 FRB SLOOS 1972:Q3 – 2013:Q1 0.20 0.77 (0.67) ?0.24 (0.10)
19 Index of Consumer Sent. Current (ICC) 1962:Q3 – 2013:Q1 0.10 1.26 (0.63) 0.03 (0.04)
20 Index of Consumer Expectations (ICE) 1962:Q3 – 2013:Q1 0.13 1.26 (0.63) 0.33 (0.09)
21 Uncertainty Index (BBD) 1949:Q4 - 2012:Q4 0.04 1.88 (0.65) ?0.18 (0.06)
Notes: The “Total” DR-gap is the difference in the average growth rate or real GDP under Democratic and
Republicans presidents for the sample period shown. The “Explained” gap is computed from (2) using the shock
shown and k =1. The R2 is the marginal R2 for the current

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85326
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #11 on: August 13, 2014, 03:10:14 PM »
here's the entire paper if you want to read it. they don't seem to be "libtards" but knowing this group they may be called that anyway. and their conclusion actually does chalk up a lot of the returns on luck and various shocks (though a lot of them could be attributable to foreign policy).

http://www.princeton.edu/~mwatson/papers/Presidents_Blinder_Watson_July2014.pdf

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: gdp
« Reply #12 on: August 13, 2014, 03:46:47 PM »
The important takeaway is Averaged Annualized.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53241
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #13 on: August 13, 2014, 03:54:57 PM »
This is great, I also enjoy the discussion on "balanced budgets" but the national debt still managed to increase and the misunderstood reality the intra-governmental debt is still . . . debt.   Which until further notice, has to be paid back at some point down the line..




Offline Ghost of Stan Parrish

  • I found my password
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1815
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #14 on: August 13, 2014, 06:31:37 PM »
This is great, I also enjoy the discussion on "balanced budgets" but the national debt still managed to increase and the misunderstood reality the intra-governmental debt is still . . . debt.   Which until further notice, has to be paid back at some point down the line..

You and I and Al Gore all understand this.

https://screen.yahoo.com/gore-bush-first-debate-000000075.html?query=bush+gore+snl
"I'm thankful our MHK forefathers had the foresight to lynch white dudes so that we might be able to throw up the mob with a clear conscience."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40513
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #15 on: August 13, 2014, 08:09:31 PM »
debt doesn't have to be paid back.  don't you conservatards want govt to be run like a business?
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: gdp
« Reply #16 on: August 13, 2014, 09:14:38 PM »
debt doesn't have to be paid back.  don't you conservatards want govt to be run like a business?

From the champion of fiat money.  What a rough ridin' moron.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: gdp
« Reply #17 on: August 13, 2014, 09:22:33 PM »
Sidenote: the conservatards are acting especially conservatarded in this thread
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #18 on: August 14, 2014, 11:46:50 AM »
Never heard the world conservetard used before.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: gdp
« Reply #19 on: August 14, 2014, 12:23:54 PM »
Never heard the world conservetard used before.

I made it up. It's not very clever.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6268
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #20 on: August 14, 2014, 12:53:31 PM »
Is it worth noting that the GDP includes government spending? Or, that the national debt has increased by $7 trillion since 2008?

Yeah, that probably is worth noting. Of course, it's probably also worth noting that government spending is more a product of Congress - not the Presidency, and that spending is a product of programs implemented over a number of years and cannot be directly tied to any one particular Congress. So.... this chart appears to be worthless. :facepalm:

He said the left got lucky. WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6060
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53241
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #22 on: January 27, 2022, 11:24:03 AM »
 :lol: :lol:

The same political movement that lead to charge to get as many things as possible shut down is now bragging about GDP growth.   :lol:


Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19745
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #23 on: January 27, 2022, 11:35:24 AM »
OPEN THE COUNTRY FOR BUSINESS

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51482
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: gdp
« Reply #24 on: January 27, 2022, 12:30:33 PM »
goddam