Author Topic: Brokered convention (Read 18781 times)

CNS · « **Reply #125 on:** April 12, 2016, 09:08:35 PM »

I just hope trump references his penis in a conceal carry joke.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #126 on:** April 12, 2016, 09:36:56 PM »

Quote from: memphis on April 12, 2016, 08:12:51 PM

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on April 12, 2016, 07:52:54 PM
They have to allow guns, or risk looking ridiculous

Why? The Secret Service doesn't just roll around America(although haven't they been involved in some dipshit headlines recently).

Uh what?

star seed 7 · « **Reply #127 on:** April 12, 2016, 10:44:30 PM »

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #128 on:** April 12, 2016, 11:12:18 PM »

The libs are really trying to make something of this. There just isn't much to work with.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #129 on:** April 13, 2016, 08:17:03 AM »

Quote from: memphis on April 12, 2016, 10:03:32 PM

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on April 12, 2016, 09:36:56 PM
Quote from: memphis on April 12, 2016, 08:12:51 PM
Quote from: Dugout DickStone on April 12, 2016, 07:52:54 PM
They have to allow guns, or risk looking ridiculous

Why? The Secret Service doesn't just roll around America(although haven't they been involved in some dipshit headlines recently).

Uh what?

I don't find it to be inconsistent to say gun free zones are unsafe, whether I believe it true or not, and say an area where Presidential candidates may be with their secret service detail in tow is fundamentally different due to the presence of the secret service.

It is, though.

chum1 · « **Reply #130 on:** April 13, 2016, 08:48:27 AM »

Whether or not there are actual contradictions here doesn't even matter. The mere appearance of contradiction is itself a bad look.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #131 on:** April 13, 2016, 08:55:57 AM »

Quote from: memphis on April 13, 2016, 08:53:52 AM

Quote from: chum1 on April 13, 2016, 08:48:27 AM
Whether or not there are actual contradictions here doesn't even matter. The mere appearance of contradiction is itself a bad look.

I mean if you want to protect against confirmation bias.

These candidates have publicly stated that there should be no gun-free zones. They make you a target.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #132 on:** April 13, 2016, 08:58:29 AM »

Quote from: memphis on April 12, 2016, 10:03:32 PM

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on April 12, 2016, 09:36:56 PM
Quote from: memphis on April 12, 2016, 08:12:51 PM
Quote from: Dugout DickStone on April 12, 2016, 07:52:54 PM
They have to allow guns, or risk looking ridiculous

Why? The Secret Service doesn't just roll around America(although haven't they been involved in some dipshit headlines recently).

Uh what?

I don't find it to be inconsistent to say gun free zones are unsafe, whether I believe it true or not, and say an area where Presidential candidates may be with their secret service detail in tow is fundamentally different due to the presence of the secret service.

To say armed citizens are a defense against violent crime and also a protected constitutional right....except for certain instances when we decide it isn't.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #133 on:** April 13, 2016, 08:59:55 AM »

There should be no gun free zones, unless I'm going to be there, then I'd rather there not be any guns if the secret service thinks it might be safer.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #134 on:** April 13, 2016, 09:20:42 AM »

Quote from: memphis on April 13, 2016, 09:18:10 AM

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on April 13, 2016, 08:58:29 AM
Quote from: memphis on April 12, 2016, 10:03:32 PM
Quote from: Dugout DickStone on April 12, 2016, 09:36:56 PM
Quote from: memphis on April 12, 2016, 08:12:51 PM
Quote from: Dugout DickStone on April 12, 2016, 07:52:54 PM
They have to allow guns, or risk looking ridiculous

Why? The Secret Service doesn't just roll around America(although haven't they been involved in some dipshit headlines recently).

Uh what?

I don't find it to be inconsistent to say gun free zones are unsafe, whether I believe it true or not, and say an area where Presidential candidates may be with their secret service detail in tow is fundamentally different due to the presence of the secret service.

To say armed citizens are a defense against violent crime and also a protected constitutional right....except for certain instances when we decide it isn't.

If they are hardlining ABSOLUTELY NO infringement of 2nd amendment rights(which I don't think exists anyways due to gun laws) then there is a contradiction.

To me the whole protection from carrying citizens derives from saying you cannot control bad actors with guns, therefore it's better to allow "good ones" to also be present. The whole point of the Secret Service being there IS to control that environment and I'm guessing those trained good actors will also be packing. Again I don't agree that more good guys with guns is actually protecting anybody, I mean I guess if we were at war .

They advocate for schools to allow guns, even if there is an armed officer present.

CNS · « **Reply #135 on:** April 13, 2016, 09:24:39 AM »

Gun free conventions will the the ground zero of the government putting the boot to the ppl. Without guns, there will be no chance to resist.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #136 on:** April 13, 2016, 09:26:12 AM »

I just hope ISIS doesn't decide to take them out. Talk about a bullseye.

CNS · « **Reply #137 on:** April 13, 2016, 09:28:01 AM »

Take out gun owners at the one spot where you know they won't have guns, then just roll over the bleeding hearts and libs at your leisure afterword, knowing they don't even have guns.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #138 on:** April 13, 2016, 10:11:47 AM »

The first thing Hitler did was disarm the jews.

Enough said

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #139 on:** April 13, 2016, 11:31:01 AM »

Quote from: CNS on April 13, 2016, 09:24:39 AM

Gun free conventions will the the ground zero of the government putting the boot to the ppl. Without guns, there will be no chance to resist.

It is pretty aggressive government intervention to prevent properly licensed citizens from protecting themselves.

steve dave · « **Reply #140 on:** April 13, 2016, 11:56:28 AM »

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #141 on:** April 13, 2016, 12:01:32 PM »

CNS · « **Reply #142 on:** April 13, 2016, 12:05:25 PM »

Obama is going to get Greg's ass at the RNC.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #143 on:** April 13, 2016, 01:09:02 PM »

"COME AND TAKE IT" means "just come on by and I'll gladly hand over my guns for my own protection." Who knew?

steve dave · « **Reply #144 on:** April 13, 2016, 01:12:16 PM »

only the bad guys will have guns at the RNC

CNS · « **Reply #145 on:** April 13, 2016, 01:17:43 PM »

Politicians should be required to train with, and carry, a firearm.

steve dave · « **Reply #146 on:** April 13, 2016, 01:20:29 PM »

you know who domestic or foreign terrorists won't ambush with guns? an entire convention filled with open carry gun owners armed with guns.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #147 on:** April 13, 2016, 01:37:16 PM »

steve dave · « **Reply #148 on:** April 13, 2016, 01:46:57 PM »

steve dave · « **Reply #149 on:** April 13, 2016, 01:47:24 PM »