Hacked accounts

[ednksu]

there was supposed to be another drop.  reddit and 4chan actively modding things. 

[The Big Train]

yeah i have no idea what you were trying to do there

[Cartierfor3]

If this means the Tigers lose more often, then I am ok with it

[The Big Train]

If this means the Tigers lose more often, then I am ok with it

started last year http://deadspin.com/justin-verlander-and-his-hacked-photos-a-partial-timel-1629246666

[Cartierfor3]

I just want to party and watch the Royals win a division. It would be so much awesome. If a few celebs get in the crossfire that's their problem.

[ednksu]

25k for more leaks supposedly

['taterblast]

stick to snaps, i guess

[SdK]

If anyone really wants to work that hard to see me naked, I'd be flattered.

[cfbandyman]

If this means the Tigers lose more often, then I am ok with it

 

If anyone really wants to work that hard to see me naked, I'd be flattered.

I'd feel the same way, and I personally wouldn't mind that much. That being said what was done is criminal and isn't arguable but one needs to be cognizant that taking nude photos of yourself and sending/storing them online poses the risk that you will have them exposed at some point. If you're going to do it at least blur or don't show your face or katpak your head, and boom, much harder to prove that is you.   

[SdK]

My tattoos impede anonymity. :(

[Benja]

Here's the thing; in this day and age you should assume your crap won't be private. But, the people hacking and leaking this stuff are kinda dorks and definitely assholes. I don't understand why you would want to do that with your time.

[Asteriskhead]

Here's the thing; in this day and age you should assume your crap won't be private. But, the people hacking and leaking this stuff are kinda dorks and definitely assholes. I don't understand why you would want to do that with your time.

b can be a v. v. scary place, my friend.

[8manpick]

Here's the thing; in this day and age you should assume your crap won't be private. But, the people hacking and leaking this stuff are kinda dorks and definitely assholes. I don't understand why you would want to do that with your time.

Also definitely criminals

[chum1]

Neither being a gigantic bad person nor embarassing someone really, really, REEEALLY bad are crimes. I guess that something like unauthorized access to computer systems is illegal, but we'd be kidding ourselves if we thought that's what people find so obviously condemnable in this case.

[Asteriskhead]

Neither being a gigantic bad person nor embarassing someone really, really, REEEALLY bad are crimes. I guess that something like unauthorized access to computer systems is illegal, but we'd be kidding ourselves if we thought that's what people find so obviously condemnable in this case.

What is the general public actually horrified by then, chum?

[Spracne]

Neither being a gigantic bad person nor embarassing someone really, really, REEEALLY bad are crimes. I guess that something like unauthorized access to computer systems is illegal, but we'd be kidding ourselves if we thought that's what people find so obviously condemnable in this case.

What is the general public actually horrified by then, chum?

Justin Verlander's scrotum.

[chum1]

Neither being a gigantic bad person nor embarassing someone really, really, REEEALLY bad are crimes. I guess that something like unauthorized access to computer systems is illegal, but we'd be kidding ourselves if we thought that's what people find so obviously condemnable in this case.

What is the general public actually horrified by then, chum?

I'm just wondering if it's a case where the law and morality actually diverge.

[Asteriskhead]

Neither being a gigantic bad person nor embarassing someone really, really, REEEALLY bad are crimes. I guess that something like unauthorized access to computer systems is illegal, but we'd be kidding ourselves if we thought that's what people find so obviously condemnable in this case.

What is the general public actually horrified by then, chum?

I'm just wondering if it's a case where the law and morality actually diverge.

I still don't know what you're trying to articulate.

[Kat Kid]

Titillation overrides morality for lots of people lots of the time, so I don't see this as a particularly interesting debate about the law vs. morality. 

This is much more about the likelihood of primal urges & our social norms regarding celebrity to provide strong motivation to seek flimsy moral reasoning when our actual laws and an obvious moral case for the usefulness of a categorical imperative against invasions of privacy are very obvious.

[star seed 7]

Chum1 still doesn't think the hacker(s) did anything illegal? How weird

[IPA4Me]

Certainly illegal server access. Not a sex crime as some internet drama queens are saying.

[chum1]

Chum1 still doesn't think the hacker(s) did anything illegal? How weird

I don't know much about the law.

[Benja]

I think people are also so pumped about this because it confirms what most people already thought; that celebrities just sit around all day banging eachother

[Saulbadguy]

 

[ednksu]

Hide yo MHz if you've downloaded Malroney pics.